Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEconomists’ long-held beliefs make income inequality worse
http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2014/10/11/income-inequality-made-worse-economists-long-held-beliefs/P9hHPQ9L4kU0HNOAKxgdlK/story.htmlThough many economists today are sounding the alarm over rising income inequality, one culprit somehow has been overlooked: their own wage theory.
Wage theory one of the sacred truths of modern economics suggests that competitive labor markets are self-regulating. Each worker is paid his or her productive worth. Unions, minimum wages, or any other interference all just cause unemployment. Nearly all contemporary public policy is dictated by some version of this theory, but it simply no longer holds up.
Adam Smith, often called the father of classical economics, told a very different story. Smith believed that each society sets a living wage to cover whatever the custom of the country renders it indecent for creditable people, even of the lowest order, to be without. His successor David Ricardo similarly saw the habits and customs of the people as determining how to divide income between profits and wages. Marxs class struggle was just a more confrontational version of the idea.
Around the turn of the 20th century, economists grew dissatisfied with this squishy sociologists answer, and some found it morally problematic. The indictment that hangs over society is that of exploiting labor, conceded John Bates Clark, a founder of the American Economic Association. He set out to disprove it.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 812 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Economists’ long-held beliefs make income inequality worse (Original Post)
Sherman A1
Oct 2014
OP
I have wondered about the abilities of economists since Texas A&M economics professor Phil Gramm
Thinkingabout
Oct 2014
#1
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)1. I have wondered about the abilities of economists since Texas A&M economics professor Phil Gramm
Declared if we would just deregulate the banks, etc "Everything will just be fine". They voted to repeal Glass-Stegall and replaced it with Gramm's bill and guess what, it wasn't fine, they had to have tax payer help to get out of the ditch. Now when I hear "economists" talking I start running for cover.
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)4. Did you stop listening to doctors when tobacco companies paid some of them to say smoking was safe?
Why would you stop listening to economists after some of them were paid to support lies?
daleo
(21,317 posts)2. Good article
Worth reading.
Marr
(20,317 posts)3. Adam Smith is to economists as Jesus is to evangelical Christians.
They like to mention him a lot, but they don't actually read his stuff.