Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

boomer55

(592 posts)
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 01:16 AM Oct 2014

The scariest thing about the Ebola in Dallas? The infected person had symptoms for 4 days before

being admitted to the hospital and at one time was waiting for awhile in the emergency room.

The person became sick Sept. 24, and he sought care two days later. He was sent home but returned to a hospital and was admitted Sept. 28.

How many people did he come in contact with? How many people did the now quarantined ambulance crew come in contact with?

http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/health/Case-of-Ebola-Confirmed-in-the-US-CDC-277648611.html?_osource=SocialFlowTwt_DFWBrand



161 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The scariest thing about the Ebola in Dallas? The infected person had symptoms for 4 days before (Original Post) boomer55 Oct 2014 OP
So what is being asked is how many people rubbed their nose Control-Z Oct 2014 #1
If he sneezed into the air Generic Other Oct 2014 #2
If I skinned my knee and he rubbed his sweaty body on the abrasion, that might work. uppityperson Oct 2014 #3
CDC says otherwise. boomer55 Oct 2014 #6
As I said, sneezed jucily in my face. nt uppityperson Oct 2014 #18
Hence, bodily fluid exchange. Control-Z Oct 2014 #19
At a school? Sneezes spread germs constantly Generic Other Oct 2014 #73
Also... pipi_k Oct 2014 #74
This thread makes me queasy Generic Other Oct 2014 #75
After might be better, Jamastiene Oct 2014 #133
That's exactly how it happens. Easy peasy. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #154
If he used the restroom... liberalmuse Oct 2014 #57
Which leads me to research how long the virus can live outside the body with answers.... uppityperson Oct 2014 #59
Ebola is not spread by aerosols (coughing, sneezing) LeftyMom Oct 2014 #5
See above for cdc info on sneezing n coughing boomer55 Oct 2014 #8
You're misreading that. LeftyMom Oct 2014 #13
How could he be misreading it when he quoted it directly from cdc? LisaL Oct 2014 #14
You need real information from credible sources like the WHO boomer55 Oct 2014 #15
Direct physical contact. Not sneezing. It's not aerosol transmissible and its's not in lung tissue. LeftyMom Oct 2014 #16
Are you being obtuse on purpose? boomer55 Oct 2014 #17
i think you should volunteer to be sent to liberia, immediately. You know how to beat that virus! librechik Oct 2014 #38
You seem unfamiliar with the concept of fomites, which can transmit ebola if contaminated by kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #78
seriously? this is true? boomer55 Oct 2014 #115
Kestrel's a vet Aerows Oct 2014 #118
damn..... boomer55 Oct 2014 #121
Fomite Aerows Oct 2014 #129
Google: fomite(s)..................... kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #150
Thanks for being an incredible source of knowledge Aerows Oct 2014 #125
Thank you. I'm just trying to correct as much misinformation as possible. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #151
I am reading it quite plainly Kelvin Mace Oct 2014 #28
I concur. grahamhgreen Oct 2014 #53
I still am hoping they will get a handle on this thing in Africa. So many people have died. Mojorabbit Oct 2014 #136
Ebola is spread by ALL bodily fluids: kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #77
It's more than theoretically possible. Step 1, someone forcefully sneezes pnwmom Oct 2014 #132
The scariest part is no one at the hospital followed procedure. He was supposed to have been asked pnwmom Oct 2014 #23
He was asked and he said he came from west Africa. morningfog Oct 2014 #51
How many people came into contact with his fluids in the ambulance pnwmom Oct 2014 #131
Pretty sure sneezing transmits it and it lives for awhile outside the host boomer55 Oct 2014 #4
Which is why he is on 2 types of isolation rainbow4321 Oct 2014 #11
But he was sent home with symptoms because no one asked him if he'd been traveling. pnwmom Oct 2014 #24
They asked, he told, they proceeded to ignore him. Yup, best medical system in the world. Uh huh. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #79
sneezing video in slow motion.... boomer55 Oct 2014 #22
Even if he managed to transmit it to people he was in contact with Duer 157099 Oct 2014 #7
He was sent home WITH SYMPTOMS, so he had at least two days of possibly transmitting it pnwmom Oct 2014 #25
I understand that Duer 157099 Oct 2014 #30
Now they're saying he may have infected 12 - 18 people -- because the stupid hospital screwed up. pnwmom Oct 2014 #32
Wow. I haven't seen that 12-18 figure deutsey Oct 2014 #58
It's in most of the articles by now, but here: pnwmom Oct 2014 #61
Thanks. The only number I had heard was for the children deutsey Oct 2014 #62
They aren't confirmed infected since are in incubation period and testing won't show anything. uppityperson Oct 2014 #64
Correct. They were exposed -- so only possibly infected. Hopefully no one was. n/t pnwmom Oct 2014 #140
Cdc on tv said transmission was Sancho Oct 2014 #139
If none of the kids have symptoms, they would not have exposed anyone else yet. Only after showing uppityperson Oct 2014 #141
Yea...on CNN they tried to pin the doctor from CDC down on exactly WHEN you could pass it on... Sancho Oct 2014 #147
Speaking as a veterinarian with a microbiology degree, out of an abundance of caution, kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #156
I don't think our for profit health care gives a sht. grahamhgreen Oct 2014 #60
I think that's the weakest link in our system, right there deutsey Oct 2014 #63
He had FOUR days to spread it - Sep 24-28. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #80
I heard an intake nurse did not relay to the drs. the fact there was recent travel to Liberia though lunasun Oct 2014 #109
And the irony is the hospital had just had a training session about Ebola. Apparently it didn't work pnwmom Oct 2014 #111
Oh that I did not know. Only takes one brain dead ER employee to set unaware Ebola out lunasun Oct 2014 #114
Also the cdc says the virus has a long shelf life outside the host boomer55 Oct 2014 #9
OH SHIT. I was wondering about that and that is very bad news. Do you have the link? SHIT. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #81
And people that get well from it Aerows Oct 2014 #91
Well fuckety fuck. I had heard THREE MONTHS for the sperm but I didn't hear about the vaginal fluids kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #92
The thing is Aerows Oct 2014 #93
I cringe when I hear the head of the CDC saying it can't happen here. LIKE HELL IT CAN'T. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #95
I know. Aerows Oct 2014 #98
Yep. Absolutely horrifying. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #105
It really couldn't happen here, not without shitloads of bad luck and incompetence, anyway..... AverageJoe90 Oct 2014 #106
Unfortunately n/t Aerows Oct 2014 #116
The good news is, it does seem that the CDC's trying to keep on top of things. AverageJoe90 Oct 2014 #117
AJ90, I have a rather bad feeling about the way Aerows Oct 2014 #119
"but it seems as though everyone is looking at this at the wrong end of the telescope." Could you... AverageJoe90 Oct 2014 #120
Viewing things from a telescope Aerows Oct 2014 #122
I think I see what you're getting at. AverageJoe90 Oct 2014 #124
Oh, no doubt Aerows Oct 2014 #126
"The road to hell is paved with good intentions." As they say. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #157
Not necessarily. AverageJoe90 Oct 2014 #158
Here's how it happens: scared exposed people like Duncan lying to airport screeners in Liberia to kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #153
I *did* mention hospital incompetence, though, didn't I? AverageJoe90 Oct 2014 #155
+1 exactly From the hedging Ebola would burn it self out at the beginning of it spreading lunasun Oct 2014 #113
To be fair, I recall the CDC saying an outbreak like is occurring in WAfrica can't happen here, not uppityperson Oct 2014 #142
dang didnt know that. boomer55 Oct 2014 #102
We are screwn then. Jamastiene Oct 2014 #135
here is one boomer55 Oct 2014 #101
Thanks. And this response there is scary: kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #107
Did the patient tell the medics on the 26th he was just in the hot zone? seveneyes Oct 2014 #10
We don't know. LisaL Oct 2014 #12
They didn't ask and he didn't tell. The hospital made a grave mistake. n/t pnwmom Oct 2014 #33
Worse. They asked, he told, they ignored the significance. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #82
I've been told it can be transmitted with sweat... Even a sweaty high five. grahamhgreen Oct 2014 #20
Told by who? Kelvin Mace Oct 2014 #29
Probable, actually BlindTiresias Oct 2014 #36
Again, avoid close contact with sweaty sick people Kelvin Mace Oct 2014 #39
I understand that BlindTiresias Oct 2014 #40
Getting ebola from a sweaty high five Kelvin Mace Oct 2014 #42
Contact with sweat BlindTiresias Oct 2014 #49
True. In the event it is an epidemic locally, avoid bodily contact like high fives and handshakes... grahamhgreen Oct 2014 #52
Handshakes are bad news Kelvin Mace Oct 2014 #56
I surely hope you are being sarcastic. n/t Avalux Oct 2014 #65
The very second I hear of a contact being present in SoCal, let alone a confirmed case, kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #85
West Africans know otherwise. Really, this dangerous disinformation you are spreading must stop. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #84
I give up Kelvin Mace Oct 2014 #145
People who don't know a damned thing about virology and epidemiology but who go around giving kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #159
"Handshaking is no longer practiced". Hugging and kissing is practiced as the cultural norm uppityperson Oct 2014 #148
No, it isn't Aerows Oct 2014 #94
Again Kelvin Mace Oct 2014 #144
Microscopic breaks in the skin are sufficient for transmission of all microbial diseases I know of kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #160
A producer for medical TV news who was investigating it. Note: it is believed that grahamhgreen Oct 2014 #47
Not trying to rag on you Kelvin Mace Oct 2014 #54
Fever is s symptom. It's the first, and can start out looking like any other garden variety bug. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #86
We'll find out in a few weeks how many people, if any, this guy infected.... grahamhgreen Oct 2014 #137
He lied to the Liberian screeners at the airport there. Then his family kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #152
CDC. Virus is found in all bodily fluids including sweat. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #83
the most disturbing aspect of this story to me, is that he was sent home cali Oct 2014 #21
^^this^^^ logosoco Oct 2014 #27
He didn't lie. The hospital acknowledged they didn't ask. n/t pnwmom Oct 2014 #34
Wow. It seems like that would be kind of standard. logosoco Oct 2014 #43
It's even worse. His sister says he told them he was visiting from Liberia when they asked for pnwmom Oct 2014 #44
They did ask. he told. And then they ignored what he said. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #87
we know how he got it TorchTheWitch Oct 2014 #143
Yes, then was in contact with the general population for 4 days, grahamhgreen Oct 2014 #55
The thing is, Control-Z Oct 2014 #76
I don't know, but I think he should release his name and GPS log. grahamhgreen Oct 2014 #138
So you really think banning flight from those countries yeoman6987 Oct 2014 #26
Context Kelvin Mace Oct 2014 #37
None of those are increasing exponentially. Ebola is. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #88
It's increasing, but not exponentially. Let's try to stay realistic here..... AverageJoe90 Oct 2014 #108
Well then, by all means Kelvin Mace Oct 2014 #146
OMG OMG OMG OMGOMGOMGOGOMGOMGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111111111111111111111111 uppityperson Oct 2014 #149
the ambulance crew will not have infected anybody magical thyme Oct 2014 #31
His children were exposed and presumably they were going to school. pnwmom Oct 2014 #35
highly unlikely. the worst case incubation period would end on the 26th. magical thyme Oct 2014 #41
You're assuming he went to the hospital on the first day he had symptoms. I'm not. pnwmom Oct 2014 #45
no I am not. His 1st day of symptoms was the 24th according to all reports magical thyme Oct 2014 #50
His first day of symptoms was the 23rd according to this report: pnwmom Oct 2014 #68
he left Liberia on he 19th. He arrived in Dallas on the 20th. magical thyme Oct 2014 #69
How do we know they weren't in school on the 29th? B2G Oct 2014 #66
we don't know it for a fact. But Ebola was suspected on the 28th magical thyme Oct 2014 #67
You're assuming they had been identified as having contact B2G Oct 2014 #70
an announcement earlier today did make it sound like someone else probably has it magical thyme Oct 2014 #71
Please remain calm until we are all dead, thank you. Rex Oct 2014 #46
Yep. I swear they WANT people to underestimate it and then die. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #89
Vegas odds compel me to reserve much more concern about being hit while on my bicycle commute... LanternWaste Oct 2014 #48
Sad that we can look at the poor state of medicine in Africa as a cause of the spread bhikkhu Oct 2014 #72
Even the second time he went to the hospital, his friend had to call CDC and tell them LisaL Oct 2014 #97
He was uninsured Warpy Oct 2014 #90
He is still infectious whether he has insurance or not. LisaL Oct 2014 #96
I suppose they didn't see beyond the word "uninsured." Warpy Oct 2014 #100
Another problem Aerows Oct 2014 #99
Now possible in Honolulu boomer55 Oct 2014 #103
At least they are being proactive and educating the staff and precautions being taken lunasun Oct 2014 #110
I was listening to a story on NPR from Africa about the people who remove the bodies of mucifer Oct 2014 #104
What's dangerous about this politically customerserviceguy Oct 2014 #112
It's a political disaster all right - for Perry. HIS state's doctors and nurses apparently kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #161
and now they're scrambling to reach passengers on the plane he was on. boomer55 Oct 2014 #123
Combatting the biological, contaminated waste Aerows Oct 2014 #127
Guess this gives new meaning to the tired over used cliche "Don't mess with Texas". gordianot Oct 2014 #128
it's how people with no insurance are "treated" Skittles Oct 2014 #130
Pretty much. Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #134

Control-Z

(15,682 posts)
1. So what is being asked is how many people rubbed their nose
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 01:37 AM
Oct 2014

up against his runny nose, kissed him or had sex with him while waiting in the ER but don't remember? Or exactly who and how many swaped bodily fluids with him in any other imaginable way?

That really is scary.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
2. If he sneezed into the air
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 01:42 AM
Oct 2014

fluid could be passed. Or if he sweat. Seems like there are lots of ways for this to spread. I'm just glad they have him in quarantine. Ebola is a horrific sounding illness.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
3. If I skinned my knee and he rubbed his sweaty body on the abrasion, that might work.
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 01:49 AM
Oct 2014

Or if he sneezed juicily right into my face, but I don't recall the last time that has ever happened. And no, no one rubbed their sweaty body over my freshly abraded bloody knee.

This is a good reminder for me to get my annual flu shot.

 

boomer55

(592 posts)
6. CDC says otherwise.
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:04 AM
Oct 2014
http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/transmission/qas.html?mobile=nocontent



ptoms of Ebola disease. Although coughing and sneezing are not common symptoms of Ebola, if a symptomatic patient with Ebola coughs or sneezes on someone, and saliva or mucus come into contact with that person’s eyes, nose or mouth, these fluids may transmit the disease.

Control-Z

(15,682 posts)
19. Hence, bodily fluid exchange.
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:40 AM
Oct 2014

Completely different from airborn viruses. It would be the direct fluids on your face, nose, mouth, or the unfortunate open, gaping wound you might have on your brow that might infect you. When was the last time a stranger sneezed his mucus directly into your mouth or noise? Oh, never? That's what I thought. The only people to have ever done that to me were my children when they were very young. That is why families are the most at risk.

Please tell me you understand these differences?

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
73. At a school? Sneezes spread germs constantly
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 05:03 PM
Oct 2014

Sneezes are said to be rather forceful and the germs travel up to 15 feet or so as anyone in an enclosed area who has been sneezed on can attest.

I am not expecting to catch ebola from a wayward sneeze, but yes I have seen what happens when sneezes go airborne. Yuck.

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
74. Also...
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 05:14 PM
Oct 2014

Person coughs or sneezes into his hand, then touches doorknob or other surface, someone else comes along immediately and touches doorknob or surface, then gets an itchy nose or eye, and touches eye or nose with finger that has virus on it.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
75. This thread makes me queasy
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 05:38 PM
Oct 2014

like I should bathe in Purell before going in public. Let's face it, we all have varying degrees of knowledge about protecting ourselves and others. If it weren't so, we would have far fewer cases of flu or colds. Some people use caution; others just infect.

liberalmuse

(18,672 posts)
57. If he used the restroom...
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 03:12 PM
Oct 2014

and did not thoroughly wash his hands (at the very least, 1 minute soaping up and rinsing with hot water - how many people do this?), and someone with a cut came in contact with the faucet handles or door handle, then I imagine they could get infected. Our bodily fluids are in more places than we'd like to think. He could have rubbed his eye or wiped his mouth with his hand and touched a chair handle or magazine. Some people are overreacting, but others are just as bad by suggesting you'd have to roll around in a bucket of an infected person's mucus before getting infected, when obviously this isn't true. Even doctors who have taken precautions have become infected, so it's not really out of line to worry that he may have infected others.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
59. Which leads me to research how long the virus can live outside the body with answers....
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 03:22 PM
Oct 2014
http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/lab-bio/res/psds-ftss/ebola-eng.php
(big clip)
SURVIVAL OUTSIDE HOST: Filoviruses have been reported capable to survive for weeks in blood and can also survive on contaminated surfaces, particularly at low temperatures (4°C) Footnote 52 Footnote 61. One study could not recover any Ebolavirus from experimentally contaminated surfaces (plastic, metal or glass) at room temperature Footnote 61. In another study, Ebolavirus dried onto glass, polymeric silicone rubber, or painted aluminum alloy is able to survive in the dark for several hours under ambient conditions (between 20 and 250C and 30–40% relative humidity) (amount of virus reduced to 37% after 15.4 hours), but is less stable than some other viral hemorrhagic fevers (Lassa) Footnote 53. When dried in tissue culture media onto glass and stored at 4 °C, Zaire ebolavirus survived for over 50 days Footnote 61. This information is based on experimental findings only and not based on observations in nature. This information is intended to be used to support local risk assessments in a laboratory setting.

A study on transmission of ebolavirus from fomites in an isolation ward concludes that the risk of transmission is low when recommended infection control guidelines for viral hemorrhagic fevers are followed Footnote 64. Infection control protocols included decontamination of floors with 0.5% bleach daily and decontamination of visibly contaminated surfaces with 0.05% bleach as necessary.
(clip)

SOURCES/SPECIMENS: Blood, serum, urine, respiratory and throat secretions, semen, and organs or their homogenates from human or animal hosts Footnote 1 Footnote 2 Footnote 53. Human or animal hosts, including non-human primates, may represent a further source of infection Footnote 54.



An interesting article that covers a lot, including that Canadian study which turns out may have had problems
http://www.npr.org/blogs/goatsandsoda/2014/09/12/346114454/how-do-you-catch-ebola-by-air-sweat-or-water
(clip)
Note: A study in 2012 showed infected pigs passed on the Ebola to monkeys without touching them. Besides the fact that people aren't pigs or monkeys, the lead author has pointed out it's possible the monkeys caught the virus when droplets from the pigs splashed into their cage during cleaning.
(clip)
The virus is most abundant in blood and diarrhea. In fact, a milliliter of blood typically carries about a million infectious particles. And in a controlled lab, just a small drop of blood from an infected monkey can be strong enough to kill a million of its companions, Schmaljohn says.

A CDC study in 2007 found that Ebola is shed through other bodily fluids during the illness, such as saliva, breast milk and semen. In most cases, these fluids were not visibly contaminated by blood, but they still contained the virus. That study didn't look at sweat, but another one suggested that Ebola could be passed on through sweat. Researchers suspect the amount of Ebola in these other fluids, like saliva and sweat, to be much lower.

(clip)
A drop of blood can remain contagious outside the body. And virus particles can survive for days or weeks, depending on the environment. Ultraviolet light, heat and exposure to oxygen gradually deactivate the virus, while cooler temperatures and humidity help keep it active.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
5. Ebola is not spread by aerosols (coughing, sneezing)
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:04 AM
Oct 2014

Direct contact with bodily fluids only. Which is why transmission is usually to family members, health care workers and burial crews.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
13. You're misreading that.
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:14 AM
Oct 2014

If somebody sneezes three seats over from you on the bus you're fine. If they sneeze directly in your face AND the sneeze somehow has blood or vomit in it AND it comes in contact with your mucus membranes, theoretically you could be infected.

Would you be? Almost certainly not. But it's theoretically possible.

Ebola is a viral disease that is not transmitted like the flu. Flu viruses infect the lungs of ill people, while Ebola infects tissues that line the intestines and blood vessels that underlie the skin.

Flu spreads when flu viruses leave lung cells and enter fluids in the respiratory tract, and can be expelled through coughs and sneezes. Those infectious particles can then be inhaled or swallowed and so transmit the flu to others.

Since Ebola viruses do not enter lung tissues, they cannot be transmitted through sneezing and coughing, but instead enter fluids that exit the body out of the intestines or, less so, through the skin, in sweat.


http://today.uconn.edu/blog/2014/08/west-africas-ebola-outbreak-a-look-at-the-facts/

Long story short: if you're not living with, caring for or burying sick people, you're almost certainly fine.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
14. How could he be misreading it when he quoted it directly from cdc?
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:16 AM
Oct 2014

I don't know who wrote this blog you are quoting, but methinks cdc is more credible.

 

boomer55

(592 posts)
15. You need real information from credible sources like the WHO
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:21 AM
Oct 2014

People can be exposed to Ebola virus from direct physical contact with body fluids like blood, saliva, stool, urine, sweat etc. of an infected person and soiled linen used by a patient.


http://www.afro.who.int/en/clusters-a-programmes/dpc/epidemic-a-pandemic-alert-and-response/epr-highlights/3648-frequently-asked-questions-on-ebola-hemorrhagic-fever.html

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
16. Direct physical contact. Not sneezing. It's not aerosol transmissible and its's not in lung tissue.
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:23 AM
Oct 2014

Your very own quote contradicts what you're saying.

 

boomer55

(592 posts)
17. Are you being obtuse on purpose?
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:29 AM
Oct 2014

Patient sneezes. Saliva from sneeze hits another person in the nose, eyes or mouth That person can contact Ebola. The cdc says it and the WHO says it.

librechik

(30,674 posts)
38. i think you should volunteer to be sent to liberia, immediately. You know how to beat that virus!
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 01:56 PM
Oct 2014

n/t

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
78. You seem unfamiliar with the concept of fomites, which can transmit ebola if contaminated by
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 06:55 PM
Oct 2014

infected bodily fluids.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
118. Kestrel's a vet
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 12:56 AM
Oct 2014

I have no doubt she is informed about disease and the way they spread. She doesn't bullshit like I suspect many in the CDC and WHO are doing to prevent panic.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
129. Fomite
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 01:18 AM
Oct 2014

A fomes (pronounced /ˈfoʊmiːz/) or fomite (/ˈfoʊmaɪt/) is any object or substance capable of carrying infectious organisms, such as germs or parasites, and hence transferring them from one individual to another. Skin cells, hair, clothing, and bedding are common hospital sources of contamination.

*My addition. I'm not certain how the transmission is occurring, though many attempt to say it hasn't gone airborne. I can believe that, but I think it is more highly transmissible than stated.

Just my .02

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
150. Google: fomite(s).....................
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 05:03 PM
Oct 2014

we learned all about fomites and their role in infectious diseases waaaaaaaayyyy back when I was an undergrad studying MICROBIOLOGY. In 1976.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
125. Thanks for being an incredible source of knowledge
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 01:09 AM
Oct 2014

I truly think this could become a health care problem.

I try to keep everyone updated as well as I can, but you have far more medical knowledge and credentials that me.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
151. Thank you. I'm just trying to correct as much misinformation as possible.
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 05:05 PM
Oct 2014

Though it's a Herculean task.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
28. I am reading it quite plainly
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 01:39 PM
Oct 2014
Although coughing and sneezing are not common symptoms of Ebola, if a symptomatic patient with Ebola coughs or sneezes on someone, and saliva or mucus come into contact with that person’s eyes, nose or mouth, these fluids may transmit the disease.

Seems pretty straightforward to me. Transmission of the disease is possible by coughing and sneezing if "saliva or mucus come into contact with that person’s eyes, nose or mouth, these fluids may transmit the disease."
 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
77. Ebola is spread by ALL bodily fluids:
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 06:54 PM
Oct 2014

The usual suspects - blood, urine, and feces.

But also - semen, saliva, tears, snot, and SWEAT.

Which is probably why Mr. Duncan caught it from that woman by picking her up and carrying her to the hospital. Pretty much endless possibilities for disaster.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
132. It's more than theoretically possible. Step 1, someone forcefully sneezes
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 01:35 AM
Oct 2014

Step 2, infected droplets land on hand of nearby person. Step 3, that person rubs his nose or eyes.

And these viruses linger for hours, making step 3 definitely possible.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
23. The scariest part is no one at the hospital followed procedure. He was supposed to have been asked
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 01:25 PM
Oct 2014

whether he had been traveling. And he wasn't.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025607692

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
51. He was asked and he said he came from west Africa.
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:18 PM
Oct 2014

The nurse didn't pass it on or follow protocol.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
131. How many people came into contact with his fluids in the ambulance
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 01:33 AM
Oct 2014

in the 2 days AFTER he was finally admitted to the hospital on the 28th -- until they finally took the ambulance out of service to clean it, and put the crew under observation?

rainbow4321

(9,974 posts)
11. Which is why he is on 2 types of isolation
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:11 AM
Oct 2014

Both contact AND droplet. Droplet includes mask and usually goggles. Protects against cough, sneezes, etc from spreading the germs

Press conference today said he was on both.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
79. They asked, he told, they proceeded to ignore him. Yup, best medical system in the world. Uh huh.
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 06:57 PM
Oct 2014

Duer 157099

(17,742 posts)
7. Even if he managed to transmit it to people he was in contact with
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:04 AM
Oct 2014

it's highly unlikely that it was further passed on since it can only transmit when the person has symptoms, which presumably takes some days to exhibit. So, the ambulance workers may have been exposed, but they could not transmit it until they themselves started to show symptoms.

I suspect it will be a rather small group involved and everyone will be ok.

Duer 157099

(17,742 posts)
30. I understand that
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 01:44 PM
Oct 2014

What I was trying to say was that the people he may have exposed and infected--that THEY would not be able to transmit it until THEY showed symptoms.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
32. Now they're saying he may have infected 12 - 18 people -- because the stupid hospital screwed up.
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 01:50 PM
Oct 2014

And this was a large Dallas hospital. Hopefully we'll only need one wake-up call.

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
58. Wow. I haven't seen that 12-18 figure
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 03:21 PM
Oct 2014

I'm not challenging you, but I'm just curious to learn more: do you have a linK, please?

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
61. It's in most of the articles by now, but here:
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 04:15 PM
Oct 2014
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/02/us/after-ebola-case-in-dallas-health-officials-seek-those-who-had-contact-with-patient.html?_r=0

Health officials in Dallas said Wednesday that they believed Mr. Duncan came in contact with at least 12 to 18 people when he was experiencing symptoms. So far, none has been confirmed infected.

SNIP

The five children who had contact with Mr. Duncan are being kept home from school, according to David Daigle, a spokesman for the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention team that is working with local health officials to trace the contacts. Adults without symptoms do not have to stay home or be quarantined, but will be visited once a day for 21 days by health teams to have their temperatures taken and be checked for signs of illness. The first round of visits to contacts took place on Wednesday afternoon, Mr. Daigle said.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
64. They aren't confirmed infected since are in incubation period and testing won't show anything.
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 04:23 PM
Oct 2014

It is good they are following up on monitoring all those people, best wishes to Mr Duncan in his recovery.

Sancho

(9,070 posts)
139. Cdc on tv said transmission was
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 04:07 AM
Oct 2014

2 to 20 days after infection. In theory, he could have infected kids and others who could have passed it on and it has not showed up yet. For example, a kid was contracted it the day before he went to the hospital might have been infected a couple days before he was diagnosed. That child had time in school for incubation to occur (2 days) and spread it.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
141. If none of the kids have symptoms, they would not have exposed anyone else yet. Only after showing
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 11:53 AM
Oct 2014

symptoms do you become contagious. And as far as I have read, none of the kids have shown symptoms.

In theory you are right, it COULD have happened, which is why that hospital emergency department needs to have their butts dragged over the coals.

Sancho

(9,070 posts)
147. Yea...on CNN they tried to pin the doctor from CDC down on exactly WHEN you could pass it on...
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 02:25 PM
Oct 2014

some people start with milder symptoms (at least for a few hours), but are contagious. He said even someone in the "early stage" of development could have enough virus to transmit it. He said an infected person had been documented anytime between 2 and 20 days! Apparently, the onset of symptoms varies widely from person to person.

I was thinking of all the years my wife and I caught things from school children.

I heard on the radio they were looking for about 80 people he had contact with from the time he was first discharged. Apparently, his kids also had visitors in the home! I'm sure the EMT's etc. are going to spend three weeks isolated.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
156. Speaking as a veterinarian with a microbiology degree, out of an abundance of caution,
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 05:33 PM
Oct 2014

personally i would consider any exposed person with the slightest elevated temperature to be shedding ebola virus like there's no tomorrow.

But that's just me. And my extreme caution saved me and 21 other people from rabies once.

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
63. I think that's the weakest link in our system, right there
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 04:21 PM
Oct 2014

Everyone's heads are so far up their bottom lines, I'm concerned they won't notice a real crisis until it's too late.

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
109. I heard an intake nurse did not relay to the drs. the fact there was recent travel to Liberia though
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 11:58 PM
Oct 2014

told.
Clearly the hospital workers were not educated re Ebola and recent travel was not discussed with the full team diagnosing him.
American hospitals are not in a heads up mode about this but it really has happened here as we see....

http://www.boston.com/health/2014/10/01/ebola-case-stokes-concerns-for-liberians-dallas/WNPf889Gx9riLBD6K5DaAL/story.html
"But the diagnosis, and the hospital’s slip-up, highlighted the wider threat of Ebola, even in places far from West Africa.

‘‘The scrutiny just needs to be higher now,’’ said Dr. Rade Vukmir, a spokesman for the American College of Emergency Physicians."
..................

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
111. And the irony is the hospital had just had a training session about Ebola. Apparently it didn't work
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 12:08 AM
Oct 2014

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
114. Oh that I did not know. Only takes one brain dead ER employee to set unaware Ebola out
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 12:27 AM
Oct 2014

on the street in a major city I guess.

 

boomer55

(592 posts)
9. Also the cdc says the virus has a long shelf life outside the host
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:07 AM
Oct 2014

Ebola on dried on surfaces such as doorknobs and countertops can survive for several hours; however, virus in body fluids (such as blood) can survive up to several days at room temperature.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
91. And people that get well from it
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 07:24 PM
Oct 2014

remain contagious for up to seven weeks.

People are infectious as long as their blood and secretions contain the virus. For this reason, infected patients receive close monitoring from medical professionals and receive laboratory tests to ensure the virus is no longer circulating in their systems before they return home. When the medical professionals determine it is okay for the patient to return home, they are no longer infectious and cannot infect anyone else in their communities. Men who have recovered from the illness can still spread the virus to their partner through their semen for up to 7 weeks after recovery. For this reason, it is important for men to avoid sexual intercourse for at least 7 weeks after recovery or to wear condoms if having sexual intercourse during 7 weeks after recovery.

http://www.who.int/csr/disease/ebola/faq-ebola/en/

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
92. Well fuckety fuck. I had heard THREE MONTHS for the sperm but I didn't hear about the vaginal fluids
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 07:25 PM
Oct 2014

Good. Just great. People survive to become Typhoid Marys.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
93. The thing is
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 07:29 PM
Oct 2014

that it seems the health care associations are trying to downplay the contagion of the virus to prevent panic. I understand that, and that a mass panic could end up worse than what they are trying to prevent. On the other hand, downplaying the virulency leads to people not realizing how infectious it is and can give people a false sense of security.

It's a mess.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
95. I cringe when I hear the head of the CDC saying it can't happen here. LIKE HELL IT CAN'T.
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 08:27 PM
Oct 2014

That sort of magical thinking and hubris can be deadly.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
98. I know.
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 08:59 PM
Oct 2014

It's here. There are likely other cases that will spring up. It is irresponsible to pretend this isn't a public health nightmare. Hell, handling the toxic waste from treating patients with it is a logistical nightmare.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/09/24/health-ebola-usa-hospitals-idUSL2N0RP00E20140924

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
106. It really couldn't happen here, not without shitloads of bad luck and incompetence, anyway.....
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 11:52 PM
Oct 2014

Unfortunately, I think many of us know that incompetence is a serious problem in our healthcare system.....which is why this happened.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
117. The good news is, it does seem that the CDC's trying to keep on top of things.
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 12:55 AM
Oct 2014

Thank goodness for that.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
119. AJ90, I have a rather bad feeling about the way
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 12:59 AM
Oct 2014

they have handled this. I know they are one of the foremost healthcare consultancies in the world, but consultants have a tendency to fail in execution (which is why they aren't fully practicing physicians to begin with, and are instead medical consultants).

They are indeed doctors, but it seems as though everyone is looking at this at the wrong end of the telescope.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
120. "but it seems as though everyone is looking at this at the wrong end of the telescope." Could you...
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 01:01 AM
Oct 2014

try to explain this for me?

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
122. Viewing things from a telescope
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 01:04 AM
Oct 2014

as though they couldn't happen here, instead of the up close of a microscope.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
124. I think I see what you're getting at.
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 01:08 AM
Oct 2014

Well, TBH, I did say that a significant Ebola problem in the U.S. is extremely unlikely, and this is, so far, an opinion that is shared by most experts working on this as well.

It's just that with all the problems our private healthcare system has, that is one of the few things that makes it so it's not impossible. (And unfortunately, it IS a major problem.) Which is why I've personally advocated for the government to step up their involvement; the CDC does a good job, yes, but it just wouldn't hurt to go that extra mile; an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, as the old saying goes.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
126. Oh, no doubt
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 01:11 AM
Oct 2014

and thank you for a well-reasoned comment. Our problem is our health care system. Are we prepared to deal with a multitude of patients infected with a disease that generates TONs of waste?

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/09/24/health-ebola-usa-hospitals-idUSL2N0RP00E20140924

Many studies and assessments conclude we aren't.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
158. Not necessarily.
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 05:37 PM
Oct 2014

In this case, the "road to hell" would be paved, not by good intentions, but by poor preparation.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
153. Here's how it happens: scared exposed people like Duncan lying to airport screeners in Liberia to
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 05:27 PM
Oct 2014

onto plane; incompetent hospital staff violating every federal guideline they can think of; exposed contacts immediately ignoring advice and leaving their voluntary home isolation, forcing the health department to lower the boom by getting a court order for them to stay fucking put and posting a cop outside their door.

Lather, rinse, repeat. Instant godawful mess.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
155. I *did* mention hospital incompetence, though, didn't I?
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 05:31 PM
Oct 2014

I'm still not convinced that an Ebola epidemic is all that likely in the States, though. Even Nigeria and Senegal have managed to get their problems under control.

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
113. +1 exactly From the hedging Ebola would burn it self out at the beginning of it spreading
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 12:15 AM
Oct 2014

To the can't happen here or near where I live attitude now is all scary thinking

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
142. To be fair, I recall the CDC saying an outbreak like is occurring in WAfrica can't happen here, not
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 11:57 AM
Oct 2014

that there will not be ebola in the USA.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
107. Thanks. And this response there is scary:
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 11:52 PM
Oct 2014

".....No wonder it spreads so quickly. Just to clarify, if someone in the early stages of ebola decides to get on a bus to get to the hospital, and they sneeze and touch a pole on the bus, the ebola virus is now on that pole and can be passed to anyone who touches it and then wipes their face for several days unless disinfected?....."

Hand >>>> eyes/nose/mouth is so very easy to do and extremely common.

This is why, if it comes to SoCal, I will CEASE using mass transit. It will be bike or walk or carpool with known healthy folks or don't go (I no longer have a car).

 

seveneyes

(4,631 posts)
10. Did the patient tell the medics on the 26th he was just in the hot zone?
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:09 AM
Oct 2014

Somebody on the 26th was stupid, ignorant or negligent. Or worse.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
12. We don't know.
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:11 AM
Oct 2014

Hospital says they are investigating why he was sent home.
I agree somebody screwed up badly by sending Ebola patient home. Why he was send home, that is the question.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
29. Told by who?
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 01:43 PM
Oct 2014

Possible? Yes, in the same way it is possible I could be the next president. Probable? No.

Avoid high fiving sweaty people who don't feel well.

BlindTiresias

(1,563 posts)
36. Probable, actually
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 01:53 PM
Oct 2014

It does no service to downplay this just as it does no service to become hysterical.

Ebola is in -all bodily fluids-

Ebola requires -a very low amount of virions to induce infection-

Touching an infected person's sweat is a huge risk. Touching an infected person's sweat that ends up in a microtear in the skin or a mucous membrane will infect you.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
39. Again, avoid close contact with sweaty sick people
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 01:59 PM
Oct 2014

You are FAR more likely to die of a heart attack, a stroke, being run down in the street, being shot or slipping in the bathroom than you are to die of Ebola.

Context.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
42. Getting ebola from a sweaty high five
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:07 PM
Oct 2014

is WAY down the list on the ways you get infected. So, possible? Yes. Probable? No.

BlindTiresias

(1,563 posts)
49. Contact with sweat
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:15 PM
Oct 2014

Is not an improbable route of transmission as the first stages of the disease make people sweaty but still able to function. Arguably it is the first stages of infection that are more likely to allow people to infect others as when the really serious symptoms begin most people are down for the count and their ability to infect people other than caretakers or people within their close vicinity decreases.

 

grahamhgreen

(15,741 posts)
52. True. In the event it is an epidemic locally, avoid bodily contact like high fives and handshakes...
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:19 PM
Oct 2014

Gyms, I imagine, would be somewhere to avoid.

I don't have stats on rate of infection from high fives. I would guess transmission is possible not probable, as you say.


 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
85. The very second I hear of a contact being present in SoCal, let alone a confirmed case,
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 07:04 PM
Oct 2014

I will be instituting some behavior changes in my own life and some policy changes in my practice, particularly where clients are concerned.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
84. West Africans know otherwise. Really, this dangerous disinformation you are spreading must stop.
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 07:02 PM
Oct 2014

Ebola can spread via sweat. The consequences are likely to be fatal.

Handshaking is no longer practiced by anyone with half a brain in West Africa because of ebola.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
159. People who don't know a damned thing about virology and epidemiology but who go around giving
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 05:38 PM
Oct 2014

terrible advice on the internet are a menace to society.

Unless you have some university level or postgraduate expertise in this subject, you need to stop. You're going to get people killed.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
148. "Handshaking is no longer practiced". Hugging and kissing is practiced as the cultural norm
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 03:46 PM
Oct 2014

Where did you get that "fact" about handshaking in W Africa?

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
94. No, it isn't
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 07:34 PM
Oct 2014

if you have ANY break in your skin (and all of us have minor breaks in our skin) it can easily get transmitted by sweat.

I realize people are trying to downplay the virulence of Ebola, but if Doctors are getting it, as much as they know about using PPE, you have to question if many of the things that are "accepted" as fact about Ebola are true in this strain.

Would you bet your life on it?

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
144. Again
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 01:13 PM
Oct 2014

The person must have Ebola, must be symptomatic, they you must have a sufficiently large break in your skin than then becomes contaminated.

Possible, yes. Probable, no.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
160. Microscopic breaks in the skin are sufficient for transmission of all microbial diseases I know of
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 05:52 PM
Oct 2014

that can infect via the skin.

Are you even aware that microbes are, um, microscopic??

It only takes between 1 and 10 Ebola virus particles to cause infection.

 

grahamhgreen

(15,741 posts)
47. A producer for medical TV news who was investigating it. Note: it is believed that
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:13 PM
Oct 2014

this is only after the person is symptomatic.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
54. Not trying to rag on you
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:25 PM
Oct 2014

but again, reading the advisories from the World Health Organization and the Center for Disease Control indicate that is a highly improbable vector.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
86. Fever is s symptom. It's the first, and can start out looking like any other garden variety bug.
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 07:05 PM
Oct 2014

Underestimate this thing at your peril.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
152. He lied to the Liberian screeners at the airport there. Then his family
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 05:07 PM
Oct 2014

apparently tried to disobey isolation instructions after about 5 minutes, so they served them with papers and now there's a cop at their door to stop such foolishness.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
83. CDC. Virus is found in all bodily fluids including sweat.
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 07:01 PM
Oct 2014

Oh, and in recovered males it is found in their semen for up to an additional THREE MONTHS.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
21. the most disturbing aspect of this story to me, is that he was sent home
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 04:07 AM
Oct 2014

what that says is the staff at the hospital wasn't well versed in protocols such as determining if this man had recently come from a part of the world where the infection is.

logosoco

(3,208 posts)
27. ^^this^^^
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 01:36 PM
Oct 2014

I guess it is possible that he could have lied (I did watch the House MD series!).

When we got back on a road trip from St. Louis to Albuquerque, NM, my husband got real sick. He had a high fever and just wanted to sleep for three days. I finally made him go to the urgent care center. I explained to them several times where we had been, they did not seem interested. They finally just gave him a dx of urinary tract infection, even though he had none of the symptoms for that. I think it was easier for them to chalk it up to that, since he is older-ish.

I would think it would be helpful for them to figure out how he got it as well, if only to learn more about how it can or cannot spread.

logosoco

(3,208 posts)
43. Wow. It seems like that would be kind of standard.
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:08 PM
Oct 2014

When I think of the kinds of questions i have been asked under medical interactions, it seems like that would be important in trying to make a dx.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
44. It's even worse. His sister says he told them he was visiting from Liberia when they asked for
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:10 PM
Oct 2014

his Social Security number.

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
143. we know how he got it
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 12:29 PM
Oct 2014

He was renting a room in the home of locals. The 19 year old pregnant daughter became ill. She was turned away from the hospital's Ebola ward because they had no more room. She was taken back home in a taxi. Mr. Duncan helped to carry her back into the house by holding onto her legs while her brother carried her from her midsection and another person from her upper body. She died in the home that night. Her brother also died soon after. Other people that also were in contact with her fell ill.

Details here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/02/world/africa/ebola-victim-texas-thomas-eric-duncan.html

 

grahamhgreen

(15,741 posts)
55. Yes, then was in contact with the general population for 4 days,
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:25 PM
Oct 2014

We will soon know how infectious this guy was.

Control-Z

(15,682 posts)
76. The thing is,
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 05:55 PM
Oct 2014

if he felt sick enough to go to the hospital the first time, what are the odds he was out in contact with the general population after that rather than home in bed? His family would be the ones likely exposed.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
26. So you really think banning flight from those countries
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 01:32 PM
Oct 2014

At least until we can get some good procedures going is a bad idea? The more I hear the truth as it drips slowly out into the news, I am not so sure anymore. It was pocked fun of yesterday, but today hopefully some seriousness comes into the discussion.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
149. OMG OMG OMG OMGOMGOMGOGOMGOMGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111111111111111111111111
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 03:47 PM
Oct 2014

It is pretty amazing.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
31. the ambulance crew will not have infected anybody
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 01:48 PM
Oct 2014

They were potentially exposed on the 28th. There is a minimum 2 day incubation period before symptoms appear. That takes you to the 30th, when the CDC confirmed the dx.

The hospital had an initial positive dx on the 27 from the Texas lab. They likely were quarantined with that initial dx, if not before. They certainly were quarantined from the 30th on.

All reports state they have not yet shown any symptoms.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
35. His children were exposed and presumably they were going to school.
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 01:52 PM
Oct 2014

Hopefully none of them have been identified as the "possible" second Ebola patient.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
41. highly unlikely. the worst case incubation period would end on the 26th.
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:06 PM
Oct 2014

If they got exposed sometime on the 24th, they would not show any symptoms before sometime on the 26th at the earliest. Then they would be home for the weekend. By Sunday, Ebola was suspected, by Monday prelim dx by Dallas lab, confirmed by CDC on Tuesday.

Worst case, they would have developed symptoms sometime on Friday and they would already be hospitalized.

If not on Sunday when Ebola became suspected, then by Monday when Dallas lab diagnosed, they would have been quarantined.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
45. You're assuming he went to the hospital on the first day he had symptoms. I'm not.
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:11 PM
Oct 2014

Most people don't go to the hospital on the first day they feel sick.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
50. no I am not. His 1st day of symptoms was the 24th according to all reports
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:16 PM
Oct 2014

actually, either the 24th or 25th. I am assuming they were exposed on the 24th, the 1st day he was symptomatic.

His 1st visit to the hospital was the 26th. That is also by chance the 1st possible day they would have shown symptoms if infected.

The incubation period ranges from 2 to 21 days. The 1st day they could have shown symptoms with a 2-day incubation period and initial exposure on the 24th would be the 26th.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
68. His first day of symptoms was the 23rd according to this report:
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 04:40 PM
Oct 2014

He flew on the 19th. So he was contagious, and in the public, from the 23rd till the 28th. He should have been stopped at the hospital on the 26th, but instead he had two more days to infect people.

http://www.boston.com/health/2014/10/01/ebola-case-stokes-concerns-for-liberians-dallas/WNPf889Gx9riLBD6K5DaAL/story.html

‘‘Ebola doesn’t spread before someone gets sick, and he didn’t get sick until four days after he got off the airplane,’’ Frieden said.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
69. he left Liberia on he 19th. He arrived in Dallas on the 20th.
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 04:44 PM
Oct 2014

4 days from the 20th is the 24th.

"The man left Liberia on Sept. 19, arrived the next day to visit relatives and started feeling ill four or five days later, Frieden said."

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
66. How do we know they weren't in school on the 29th?
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 04:24 PM
Oct 2014

Possibly with mild fevers?

Answer: we don't. Bercause no one is saying.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
67. we don't know it for a fact. But Ebola was suspected on the 28th
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 04:32 PM
Oct 2014

and they isolated the patient on the 28th, which I would expect would cause them to tell the family to immediately home-quarantine until they got the lab results back on the 29th.

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
70. You're assuming they had been identified as having contact
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 04:47 PM
Oct 2014

on the 28th.

We really don't know who all was exposed at what points. I've read others are ill, but the story seems to change hourly.

Doesn't inspire a great deal of confidence in those in charge, IMO. Things will become clearer in about a week.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
71. an announcement earlier today did make it sound like someone else probably has it
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 04:54 PM
Oct 2014

I'm expecting an announcement probably tomorrow. The turnaround time for testing is 1 day; it was from the 28th to 29th for the state lab, sample sent to the CDC for confirmatory testing on 29th with results on 30th.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
46. Please remain calm until we are all dead, thank you.
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:12 PM
Oct 2014

I swear some of the people on this thread would ONLY care about ebola, if THEY had it. Until then, they snark at everyone and I guess that now included the CDC and the WHO.

Seriously, nobody is in full PANIC mode yet! So save your snarky crap...thanks.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
48. Vegas odds compel me to reserve much more concern about being hit while on my bicycle commute...
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 02:14 PM
Oct 2014

Vegas odds compel me to reserve much more concern about being hit while on my bicycle commute to and from the office every day.

bhikkhu

(10,716 posts)
72. Sad that we can look at the poor state of medicine in Africa as a cause of the spread
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 05:00 PM
Oct 2014

...and then find that the Texas hospital was no better, actually doing about the same thing. Duncan apparently caught the disease while helping transport a woman home who had been turned away at a hospital in Liberia.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
97. Even the second time he went to the hospital, his friend had to call CDC and tell them
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 08:29 PM
Oct 2014

that this guy likely had Ebola.
Only then this hospital did something.

Warpy

(111,261 posts)
100. I suppose they didn't see beyond the word "uninsured."
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 11:12 PM
Oct 2014

I didn't have insurance for almost three decades and the way it kept me out of the hospital was downright magical.

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
110. At least they are being proactive and educating the staff and precautions being taken
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 12:05 AM
Oct 2014

Dallas ? I dunno he told the hospital about Liberia they didn't think it was important or didn't want to hear it

mucifer

(23,542 posts)
104. I was listening to a story on NPR from Africa about the people who remove the bodies of
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 11:32 PM
Oct 2014

those who die from ebola. They wear hazmat suits and are terrified when they remove them it is an arduous process. Many of them have died from accidentally coming into contact with body fluids.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
112. What's dangerous about this politically
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 12:09 AM
Oct 2014

is that it happened in Texas, and we have a wild cowboy governor there who wants to run for President again.

It's heads I win, tails you lose here. If this thing spreads beyond the one infected person, it creates panic, and we don't need that in the final weeks before the midterm election. If it doesn't spread, it means that Rick Perry gets to claim, "Obama let this into the US, I contained it to Dallas, by being less 'politically correct' than the President was".

It's a political disaster whatever way it turns out.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
161. It's a political disaster all right - for Perry. HIS state's doctors and nurses apparently
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 05:58 PM
Oct 2014

don't cotton to following those onerous federal protocols for these supposed germs.

"We don't care wut they say up in Washington, we're gonna do things the way WE want to! Yee haw!! Hooray for states' rights and down with that big bad federal gubmint that steals out money!!"

 

boomer55

(592 posts)
123. and now they're scrambling to reach passengers on the plane he was on.
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 01:06 AM
Oct 2014
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025610473


This stinks. Its a boolean equation. Its either true or false. This is how panic starts when you say one thing with absolute certainty and then later take actions that directly contradict what was said.

The authorities said with absolute certainty over and over again that there was ZERO chance, NO chance. NONE! NADA! no chance the passengers on the plane were exposed. period end of story.



there is “zero chance” that the patient infected anyone else on the flight, said Dr. Thomas R. Frieden, director of the disease centers. Ebola is spread only by direct contact with body fluids from someone who is ill.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/01/health/airline-passenger-with-ebola-is-under-treatment-in-dallas.html?_r=0

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
134. Pretty much.
Thu Oct 2, 2014, 02:01 AM
Oct 2014

And like the deal in Nigeria, now they have a widening circle of contacts to trace, because of it.

If they had isolated him on the 25th, this would have been far less of a potential problem.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The scariest thing about ...