General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf the Dallas-Ebola patient knew or at least suspected he had Ebola before boarding that plane to
the United States, should there be consequences? How many people did he expose? Hundreds? Thousands? Is anyone investigating the time table of his flight into the US? Was the ticket purchased weeks in advance or at the last minute?
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)It's not like the flu, you're not contagious until you're symptomatic.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)At least there's the requirement that the patient is symptomatic with Ebola to be contagious.
As far as we know.
Viruses can mutate. Let's hope that any mutations with this one weakens its ability to be transmitted.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)The flu could mutate and kill millions too, but lay people don't freak out about that. Ebola combines a lot of things Americans are wildly irrational about: disease, bodily fluids, poverty, people of color. What it doesn't feature is a transmission mechanism that's going to do well in a first world society.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)It's happened before.
It will happen again.
It's a fact of life.
I'd rather see a mutated form of Ebola that is even more difficult to transmit, as my post you responded to expresses.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Ebola panic is irrational if you live in the developed world.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)is why I hope any mutation actually makes transmission LESS likely.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Viruses want to survive, so mutation that makes transmission less likely is not effective.
It's the other way around.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)We have a single case in the US.
It is as likely that the virus contained in a single person in the US to mutate in a form that is unviable for transmission as a mutation that makes transmission easier.
The mutation which makes transmission less likely is unlikely to survive
The mutation which makes transmission more likely is likely to survive.
In a population of a single affected individual, either mutation is as likely to occur.
Again, mutations are random. It can go in any direction, but the outcome is limited due to the population size.
Mutations are not determinate on viability, only the survivability of such mutations are determinate on viability.
MFM008
(19,810 posts)Was almost as bad as the black death in 1300s. It will happen again is a given.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Can't trust big pharma and all. But I'm sure they'd gladly accept an Ebola vaccine if it were available.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)So he wouldn't know he had it. Now, whether he knew that he was exposed to it (anyone close to him getting sick?) that is another story.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)apples and oranges
(1,451 posts)scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)I'm not the least bit fond of panicky fear-mongering.
However messed up our economic system is, the U.S. is not a third world country.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)Obviously, there's no difference at all between conditions in the U.S. and those in west Africa.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)asking for help.
WillowTree
(5,325 posts)He was asymptomatic until 4 days after he arrived here. Why would he know or even suspect that he had it?
The man is critically ill. It would be nice if a few more folks would be thinking the good thought for him instead of trying to find a way to fear and/or demonize him.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Don't want to infect your coworkers with a disease you don't yet know you have.