Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

J_J_

(1,213 posts)
Mon Sep 29, 2014, 12:05 PM Sep 2014

Just because Obama won 2 elections, it doesn't mean our voting systems have been improved


In fact, nothing has changed at all.

Even in states with paper ballots, they are still counted only on diebold accuvote machines.

It should be clear by now, that Obama is a part of the whole homeland world domination plan.

Perhaps they let Obama win so that they could blame everything on him, and use him as an excuse to spend even more money on military.


While everyone keeps talking about getting out the vote, Republicans are manufacturing consent that they will win.

Republicans own the polling, they own the media, they no longer do exit polls which was the canary in the coal mine.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just because Obama won 2 elections, it doesn't mean our voting systems have been improved (Original Post) J_J_ Sep 2014 OP
Turnout is why we won. Most hacks need a narrow margin to work. riqster Sep 2014 #1
Let's not forget the effects of gerrymandering Takket Sep 2014 #2
Obama won because of the wide margin rustydog Sep 2014 #3
No Diebold 'accuvote' tally mechanisms are used in Oregon, and no one provider provides Bluenorthwest Sep 2014 #4

Takket

(21,578 posts)
2. Let's not forget the effects of gerrymandering
Mon Sep 29, 2014, 12:35 PM
Sep 2014

I'm really surprised gerrymandering is not an issue the people of the US are not up in arms over. Maybe the average person is just too disengaged to notice.

that fact that Democrats drew a 48.8% to 47.6% advantage in house voting in 2012, but still own only 46.2% of the seats to the GOP's 53.8% means the unfair practice of using lines on a map to essentially disenfranchise voters is undermining the will of the people.

rustydog

(9,186 posts)
3. Obama won because of the wide margin
Mon Sep 29, 2014, 01:13 PM
Sep 2014

It is the closer races where the cheating works. It is where they remove ballot boxes and make voters (Mostly minorities) wait for hours upon hours to do what is a constitutional guaranteed right.

If the vote is close in some states, diebold machines can make up the difference and the loser wins!

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
4. No Diebold 'accuvote' tally mechanisms are used in Oregon, and no one provider provides
Mon Sep 29, 2014, 02:01 PM
Sep 2014

the tally systems used by each county. Each election there are randomly selected races in each county subjected to hand count. Yes we do tally the votes using machines as the primary method. It works just fine, thanks.
Here is a list of the tally mechanisms employed in each of our counties. Got one for your State it would be interesting to see.
http://voteoregon.org/files/pdf/EMOregonCountyVoteTallyEquipment.pdf

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just because Obama won 2 ...