Discrimination is an “inalienable” right: The 5 juiciest revelations in The New Yorker’s Rand Paul p
Discrimination is an inalienable right: The 5 juiciest revelations in The New Yorkers Rand Paul profile
From tensions with Ron Paul to his support for legalized discrimination, a new profile sheds an unflattering light
LUKE BRINKER
The forthcoming issue of The New Yorker features an engrossing 12,000-word deep dive into Sen. Rand Pauls bid to take his libertarian conservative message mainstream ahead of a potential 2016 run for the White House.
The profile, by the magazines Ryan Lizza, rehashes familiar territory Ron Pauls racist newsletters, the notorious
Aqua Buddha incident, and Pauls train wreck of an interview with Rachel Maddow on the Civil Rights Act of 1964. But Lizza also unearths fascinating tidbits about Pauls past and what may lie in store for the senator.
From political tensions between Paul and his father to his long track record of support for legalized discrimination, here are five key takeaways from the piece.
Paul vs. Paul?
While nobody ever thought Ron Paul stood a serious chance of winning the GOP nod in either 2008 or 2012, Rand Paul would be a real contender if he entered the field. Thats largely because while Ron Paul fancies himself an anti-politician with a penchant for rhetoric that infuriated large segments of his own party his son is less keen to alienate GOP factions he would need to win in a general election, including more hawkish members of the party.
more
http://www.salon.com/2014/09/29/discrimination_is_an_inalienable_right_the_5_juiciest_revelations_in_the_new_yorker%E2%80%99s_rand_paul_profile/