General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums3rdwaydem
(277 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)except I know Obama will just nominate another milquetoast corporate-friendly, "lets arrest the pot growers and not the banksters" replacement.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)I wish it wasn't so, but it's what his history predicts.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)bad to mediocre which is why we have AGs going after pot growers as opposed to going after the criminal 1%. Maybe we should think about raising the bar and nominating someone mediocre to decent. We can work on good to great after that.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)Holder is his nominee and AGs carry out the president's agenda. Instead of taking up this defeatist attitude in response to Republican obstructionist policies, which will ensure the status quo remains, why not just once, just one time, at least try to raise the bar? Obama just doesn't seem to have the desire and/or stomach for a fight which means the 99% effectively have NO representation. 2016 is coming up and we need to do WAY better.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)time. If they cannot do it one way then they will find another way. This is the reason I do not blame Obama. I am old enough to have seen this before but never to the point that the institution is not working at all anymore.
As to the fight - we do not even back him here on DU. The 99% have done little to help in this fight. And no president can do it alone.
We have an enemy at home and they outright tell us what they are doing and no one sees them (Rs) as a problem ----- it is all Obama's fault.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)weren't afraid to go to the wall for nominees/issues about which they were passionate. You think a woman's right to choose was easy? The Civil Rights Act, The (now gutted) Voting Rights Act? No, they were all as a result of the Democrats taking it to the mat. The president should be LEADING the way, not following what his corporate masters tell him to do.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)floor for a vote. And the filibuster was a whole different ball of wax. And it was still hard to get those issues enacted. The best of Democratic congress persons today can usually only stand up and tell it like it is. If we do not change the makeup of Congress in 2014 we are going to be lucky if we ever get to vote again due to voter obstruction. They will find a way of stopping all of us.
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)Well put, except you left out the total lack of caring about police shooting innocent black guys and getting off the hook. So much failure on his end.
cali
(114,904 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Brother Buzz
(36,454 posts)Eric Holder To Step Down As Attorney General
by Carrie Johnson
September 25, 2014
Eric Holder Jr., the nation's first black U.S. attorney general, is preparing to announce his resignation Thursday after a tumultuous tenure marked by civil rights advances, national security threats, reforms to the criminal justice system and five and a half years of fights with Republicans in Congress.
Two sources familiar with the decision tell NPR that Holder, 63, intends to leave the Justice Department as soon as his successor is confirmed, a process that could run through 2014 and even into next year. A former U.S. government official says Holder has been increasingly "adamant" about his desire to leave soon for fear he otherwise could be locked in to stay for much of the rest of President Obama's second term.
Holder already is one of the longest serving members of the Obama cabinet and ranks as the fourth longest tenured AG in history. Hundreds of employees waited in lines, stacked three rows deep, for his return in early February 2009 to the Justice Department, where he previously worked as a young corruption prosecutor and as deputy attorney general the second in command during the Clinton administration.
But some of that early glow faded in part due to the politicized nature of the job and in part because of Holder's own rhetoric, such as a 2009 Black History Month speech where he said the country was "a nation of cowards" when it comes to discussions about racial tension.
<more>
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2014/09/25/351363171/eric-holder-to-step-down-as-attorney-general
TBF
(32,084 posts)to go. He'll go to an association or law firm and quadruple his salary (at least) so he can pay for college for all 3.
This is not new in DC - happens with personnel from every administration as they wind down.
cali
(114,904 posts)He can afford colleges for his kids just fine.
http://www.therichest.com/celebnetworth/celeb/eric-holder-net-worth/
TBF
(32,084 posts)Saw so many going from administrations back into private practice in Washington ... so just assumed that was the case with him as well. Gov't doesn't pay nearly as well as the private firms.
So what is going on? I know he was going to investigate in Ferguson? Is that pissing someone off?
Terra Alta
(5,158 posts)I wonder why. I know he was doing a lot of work trying to get clemency for non-violent drug offenders. I hope his successor keeps up the fight for clemency for these people sentenced under draconian drug laws and mandatory minimums.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)but was asked to stay on.
Actually, with the exception of Janet Reno, who served both terms of President Clinton's administration, the typical length of time modern AGs have served has been 2 or 3 years, with a few serving a full four-year term (see list at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Attorney_General ).
That Holder will have served 6 years by the time his replacement is found is unusually long. It must be an incredibly stressful job. I wonder what he will do next.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)Oh wait...
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Will the general remain in government service or will he be returning to private practice?
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.