General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUugghh! Louisiana cop fatally shoots 14-year-old ‘four or five times in the back’
Oh and surprise, surprise ...this 14-year-old boy just "happened" to be black.
Louisiana deputy fatally shot 14-year-old four or five times in the back: family
DAVID EDWARDS * 24 SEP 2014 * RAW STORY
Louisiana State Police were investigating on Wednesday after a Terrebonne Parish Sheriffs deputy fatally shot a 14-year-old boy.
Louisiana State Police Trooper Evan Harrell said that deputies responded at around 6 p.m. on Tuesday to a 911 call alleging that armed individuals were seen running into an abandoned home in Houmas Village East neighborhood, The Time-Pacayune reported.
The first deputy to enter the home reportedly shot the boy. Harrell said that a weapon was found in close proximity to the dead body. The family of the boy, who was identified him as 14-year-old as Cameron Tillman, said that he was shot four or five times in the back, according to WWLTV.
Tillmans brother, Andre, said that his brother heard a knock at the door of the abandoned home and opened it because he thought it was a joke. My little brother thought somebody was just clowning, because somebody is always clowning by the door, Andre Tillman recalled. He opened [it] and the man just shot him. He didnt have nothing in his hand.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/09/louisiana-deputy-fatally-shot-14-year-old-four-or-five-times-in-the-back-family/
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Or if Cameron gets Trayvoned. I will be shocked I tell ya.
I am not saying the police did plant a weapon. But, seriously if he opened the door was he really a threat?
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Opening The Door While Black <-- apparently this a crime in Louisiana
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)When I think about all the hijinxs me and my siblings pulled as children and teenagers around that age I guess we were lucky we didn't get shot. I know someone is going to make an issue of their presumed behavior, but really it looks more like regular kids being kids to me rather than something they were doing that was a danger to the community.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Poor kid and family
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)This makes me physically ill.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)They all do.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)lpbk2713
(42,757 posts)And I fear it will get worse before it gets better simply
because there is little or no accountability.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)It's such a sad and tawdry irony that police "unions" are just about the ONLY unions that have not been hounded out of existence or marginalized. AND that they wield enormous power at the local level, often seeming to be the ones calling the shots, running the city, etc. when the chips are down, especially regarding any possible accountability for police murdering citizens in cold blood.
eggplant
(3,911 posts)It is the corrupt and out-of-control departments that coddle bad cops, not the union. Unions do not protect terrible members. They ensure due process.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)The union is there to represent the member, not to assume guilt or innocence, because I have to say some of the grievances were absurd to say the least - was home sick but got a sunburn by sitting next to a closed window? Or a a obscenity loaded grievance complaining that they were fired shouting obscenities at everyone. uh, yeah. The union rep would just present the grievance and then a mediation board would decide. So basically, I was told not to judge anyone, not my job.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)Unions do not run internal affairs departments or management. They do not decide if disciplinary action will or will not be brought against a member. They do not make decisions regarding policy. They do insure that their labor contract is honored and that their members receive due process.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)The Blue Code of Silence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Code_of_Silence
I'm genuinely happy for you if your local police union is turning in the bad cops on a regular basis. Our experience in Portland Oregon is exactly the opposite of that, so your blanket approval of ALL police unions is a wee bit misplaced, in my experience.
eggplant
(3,911 posts)And I also believe it exists, and can be a problem.
But it's got zero to do with unionization. Unions have *nothing* to do with the day-to-day operation of a police force. Nothing.
I would really like to hear you explain the relationship between police unions and the protection of bad cops. Go ahead. I'm all ears.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)http://pdxintelligencer.com/portland-police-union-president-tearfully-defends-police-brutality-amidst-federal-investigation/
Portland police union president: 'Why do we expose ourselves to the scrutiny of those who have never walked in our shoes?'
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2014/02/portland_police_union_presiden_7.html
Portland police union president slams city's independent inquiries into alleged officer misconduct
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2014/06/portland_police_union_presiden_8.html
Police Union Has "Many Concerns" About Talk of Outfitting Cops with Body Cameras
http://www.portlandmercury.com/BlogtownPDX/archives/2014/09/18/police-union-has-many-concerns-about-talk-of-outfitting-cops-with-body-cameras
Portland Police Association Contract: What Did Portland Buy for $5 Million?
http://www.portlandcopwatch.org/PPR53/ppa_contract53.html
eggplant
(3,911 posts)The first one is satire.
The second one talks of how the union dropped its opposition to the DOJ settlement. That's how negotiation works.
The third one says that the independent arbitrator agreed that the officer was at fault, but that the punishment (demotion) wasn't appropriate. That's how arbitration works.
The fourth one lists the issues that need to be addressed before body cameras can be legally implemented. Most of these sound completely legitimate.
The fifth one is from three years ago from a heavily biased source. It basically says that the city council hired crappy lawyers when they negotiated their contract with the union. Blame the council if you don't like what they agreed to.
Look, I don't live there. The complaints sound accurate. Police brutality is unacceptable. But the *union* doesn't cause it. The only thing the union can do is force the city to follow the contract they signed. If you don't like the terms of the contract, complain to the council, or elect people who will stand up for you.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)This article is from the Guardian 4 days ago, and the Police Union was in lockstep with the perps & bad apples every step of the way.
Portland police's problem with race: 'This city is not as liberal as it thinks it is'
Chris McGreal * The Guardian * 9.20.2014
In early 2010, Portland police officers were dispatched to check on the welfare of a young African American man whose brother had died earlier that day. Aaron Campbell was at his girlfriends flat and was said to be distraught over the death of his brother, whom he had nursed before he succumbed to heart disease and kidney failure. A family member called the police, fearing Campbell might be suicidal, and officers arrived to check that he was not going to harm himself or anyone else.
The police quickly established that Campbell was heartbroken, not dangerous, and even exchanged a jokey text message with him that helped put the officers at ease. But then a second police unit arrived, armed with tactical weapons.
It had limited communication with the officers talking to Campbell. It did not know that they had concluded he was fine and they were prepared to leave. Within minutes the unarmed Campbell was dead, following a sequence of events that an incredulous grand jury later said was all the more outrageous because what happened was legal under police regulations in a city that regards itself as one of the most progressive in the US.
The civil rights leader Jesse Jackson called Campbells killing an execution. It prompted a US Department of Justice investigation into a decade of the use of excessive force by the Portland police, from the beating to death in custody of a musician to an officer holding a gun to the head of an unarmed woman before she was shot.
The probe led to a court agreement in August between the city and federal authorities on reforms to police training, use of force and accountability. The Justice Department described what it called a groundbreaking deal as introducing innovative new mechanisms to ensure community participation in oversight of the reforms with the inclusion of civil rights groups as a party to the agreement. The deal also requires the appointment of an official to monitor changes and the election of a community advisory board on policing.
The federal judge who approved the agreement, Michael Simon, took the unusual step, over the objections of the citys leadership and the police union, of ordering that its implementation should be reviewed by the court each year to ensure it was being fulfilled.
Civil rights leaders have described the deal as a potential model for co-operation in other cities, such as Ferguson, Missouri, which was rocked by protests over the killing of Michael Brown by a white police officer last month.
The Albina Ministerial Alliance Coalition for Justice and Police Reform, an association of Portland civil rights groups that is a party to the deal, welcomed it as a major step to creating a true community policing culture. It said the agreement was important to prevent a Ferguson upheaval in Portland.
But the AMA Coalition chair, Reverend LeRoy Haynes, like others pressing for police reform, is also critical of the agreement because he says the Justice Department sidestepped the real issue race.
Six percent of this city is black, but about a third of those shot by the police are African American, he said. There certainly is a racial issue in this city with police shootings.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/20/portland-police-race-reform-crime
eggplant
(3,911 posts)Sounds like both the council and the union were opposed. And they were both overruled.
Like I said, I have no doubt that all sorts of bad shit is happening there. But the union does not dictate policy. The council, the mayor and the chief of police do. Are you suggesting that they all *want* to deal with these very real problems, and are somehow being held hostage by the *union*? That the union is the bad actor here?
Why aren't you placing blame at anyone else's feet?
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)but am struck by how weird it is for any union to take up the cause of hired bullies with guns who murder citizens in cold blood, that's all.
eggplant
(3,911 posts)The union represents the cop, for better or for worse. If they didn't, they wouldn't be a union. It doesn't matter what the guy was accused of doing, whether there are a zillion witnesses and video of the guy planning, acting, and then bragging about it later. They have to suck it up and represent them.
(The two self-deletes were me trying to have this show up as a response to 99th_Monkey and failing for some reason.)
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)That's saying that unions should place themselves above the law, to deliberately obstruct justice, when they know damn well they are protecting cold-blooded murderers.
Unlike legal representation by an attorney, or say a priest, there is NO constitutional hook to hang unions on, that gives them special rights to obstruct justice and protect murderers.
ON EDIT: plus, you started out saying that "pollce unions call-out the bad apple cops", and now you are saying they have a "duty" to do the exact opposite. Just sayin'
eggplant
(3,911 posts)I believe that my comments have been pretty consistent. Unions protect the due process rights of their members, and negotiate and defend the contract that was agreed upon with the city. A union acts in the interests of its collective members. Unions don't have any direct control over management. Firing someone requires action by management, and previously agreed upon rules have to be followed.
Even if there is a clear case where the cop is in the wrong, the union is still obligated to provide them with counsel as part of any arbitration related to their job (firing, demotion, etc). It is *because* the union doesn't evaluate the alleged event, but instead provides support to their member on their way towards mediation, that makes them a union.
If the DA decides a crime has been committed, they proceed with it. If not, it isn't the union that prevents it.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Is what you said, which was what I was referencing.
OK I'll give you that "protecting due process" is one tiny step away from outright protecting terrible cops, but it is quite a fine distinction.
I think we've both had our say, and still do not agree completely, yet I appreciate you taking the time to explain what you meant.
I wish my experience DID align more with yours, but sadly it doesn't.
Thanks for playing
Response to 99th_Monkey (Reply #59)
eggplant This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to 99th_Monkey (Reply #59)
eggplant This message was self-deleted by its author.
eggplant
(3,911 posts)Nope, not even once.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)and as you can read down-string, I still stand by my concerns with Portland's Police "Union"
Logical
(22,457 posts)eggplant
(3,911 posts)My sister is an attorney for a number of police unions. The union has no control over firings -- they represent the cop at neutral arbitration. Bad cops get canned ONLY when their management WANTS them gone and they have a VALID reason. If management doesn't want to can them, you can't blame the union for it.
Well, you can, but you'd be wrong.
Logical
(22,457 posts)eggplant
(3,911 posts)Since I don't live there and I might have missed a story, would you be willing to list some of the issues with the FOP in Philly? I'd like to learn more about them, so I can have a reasonable discussion with you.
Louisiana1976
(3,962 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Stellar
(5,644 posts)the babies.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)My gf has a 14 y.o. daughter so this hits close to home for me.
It's just too much sometimes to read about this stuff, but I must
not shrink from this, but try to do my part to shed light of day
on this horrific evil that is springing up in our midst in form of
militarized sadists who literally have a "license to kill at will",
no questions asked, nothing to see here.
Words fail.
Stellar
(5,644 posts)It still hurts.
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Boom Sound 416 This message was self-deleted by its author.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)in addition to being the PIO. I'm not sure how big this place is, but I don't think it would be that unusual for a town (parrish) with only 20 or so police officers.
madville
(7,410 posts)The POI state trooper is just making the public statement.
The Deputy that shot the teen was reported to be a field training office, also on the SWAT team and also Black as well.
Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)why would you do that in response to a pretty clear cut, obvious video?
Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)My question to you is an observation based on your posts on the topic and ones like it, combined with your PM to me accusing me of posting anti-cop messages on DU, which I haven't done as my posting history shows.
Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)A lot of black cops are more blue than they are black
Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)Institutional racism against a minority group can be carried out by minority group members against other minority group members.
madville
(7,410 posts)Says that the deputy that shot him is also Black and that the 911 caller (presumably a neighbor) reported that the intruders were armed. Also says that neighbors reported three shots and the sheriffs spokesman reports that the teen was armed when he was shot.
Whatever the real details are, still a tragedy.
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)Well, with that bit of news, I'm going to say that I hope justice is served, because right now, we don't know enough to hope for anything else.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Every single story that we have heard lately has been a nosey body who is calling 911 and clearly over reacting to the situation.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)P.S. Bad Raw Story. The NOLA cat box liner is the Times-Picayune, not the "Time-Pacayune".
edit: And no, I did not post that because his shirt has the Patriots instead of the Saints.
Bonx
(2,053 posts)with questionable content designed to agitate their readers.
But they usually do.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Abandoned home? Are they just playing around in a house that is not theirs? Much more information needed on this story.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)and then the "real story" emerges i.e. that he "stole cigars" etc. or in this case, that he was playing where he shouldn't have been, or whatever. and people seem all too eager to go "oh well then he deserved it".
Really people?
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)She mentioned weapons. If there were none, I think she needs to be charged as well.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)alp227
(32,026 posts)Could the neighbor have witnessed behavior that signaled home invasion/robbery? Did the neighbor know the house was vacant?
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)There have been countless books and movies about kids going into spooky old homes.
It was a right of passage in my small town. If the cops caught us we got lectured and our parents called. We didn't get shot and killed.
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)they weren't making crack. Well....we weren't cooking up a batch in that old house at the end of the sugar cane field. Now, every abandoned house is seen by cops as a potential crack making factory (or worse) and they act accordingly.
Yep, every black kid is a potential criminal and every abandoned house a potential crime scene.
Feron
(2,063 posts)When I was a kid, my friends and I would play in the new, but unoccupied and open, houses in my neighborhood. But I guess that was fine because we all had white skin.
There does need to be more information however.
madville
(7,410 posts)The other accomplices in the alleged break-in could potentially be charged with the 14 year old's murder in many states. Wouldn't put it past some DAs to do that in order for the police to have some leverage regarding the other teenagers' statements of the shooting.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)Honestly, there's no reason for this cop to have shot a kid simply because he was playing around in an abandoned home.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)The shit I got away with when I was a teen makes this look tame,
but still some are jumping on that as if to say "oh well, then he
deserves it' somehow.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Add one more murder to what appears to be a daily routine here in this democracy of ours.
RIP to yet another victim of the violence of our 'civilian' police.