General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsthe average IQ in the U.S. is 98
Of course IQ scores aren't the be all and end all, and the differences between nations are slight- Switzerland has the highest average IQ at 101.
But it explains a lot. I'd wager just about anything that the average IQ on DU is much higher than 98. And I think as a group, we tend to forget that our perspectives, even as we differ, our vastly different because we're, well, smarter than the average The less able an individual is at grappling with information, the easier it is to persuade that individual.
I'm always a bit surprised by how low the average IQ is.
So, I'm curious. What is your IQ? (and yes I know that self-reporting will lend this to skewing higher than it may be)
39 votes, 2 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
between 95 and 105 | |
1 (3%) |
|
between 105 and 115 | |
0 (0%) |
|
between 115 and 125 | |
4 (10%) |
|
between 125 and 135 | |
16 (41%) |
|
I'm a freakin' genius with an IQ over 135 | |
18 (46%) |
|
2 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Back then it was either 134 or 138, don't remember which. But IQ tests only really test a limited window of how you use your brain, so I don't put a lot of stock in them. A lot of people with 'lower IQs' have done and will do far more with their lives than I ever will.
zazen
(2,978 posts)And it inherently inflates high scores when you're much younger (I forget why). And of course is still pretty socially constructed.
I didn't look into the methodology behind this report but it would have to have a limitations section longer than the results section. Just the cross-cultural issues alone, let alone intra-cultural issues, would make me wonder how they compare anything.
Despite their validity issues, my experience with them (at 8, 12, 14?) was that they were "reliable," but only in the sense that different tests (and test dates) consistently showed the same verbal-ish/mathematical score differences, whether both were lower or higher. I wonder if others have had that experience.
gordianot
(15,238 posts)Due to test variance new tests are normed about every 5 years by publishers. Test scores (which is what an IQ really represents) are merely a snapshot of how you compare taking a test to the original normative group in time. A normative group is not the same thing as a group in Switzerland compared to a group in the United States. Even non verbal IQ tests such as the Leiter scales with international normative groups are revised over time. In the old days bull shit threads such as this were locked on DU. As a Psychological Examiner I find the sort of premise in the original post to be not only ignorant but sickening.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)how much does the mean shift?
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)upward shifting of IQ tests.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)All the attacks against teachers in America and all the screaming about how stupid our kids are, yet IQ scores and literacy rates have increased over time.
People have that fantasy of the mythological golden age that never was. People should really consider literacy rates and actual overall knowledge over the past 75 years or so and perhaps reconsider this "chicken little" knee jerk complaining about our education system.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)The only thing that's gotten worse in public education is school boards, which are staffed by insane people in many states. People who hate math and science.
gordianot
(15,238 posts)They almost give me hope.
gordianot
(15,238 posts)I once attended a rare lecture by David Wechsler. It was in the early 1990's. He authored the Wechsler Scale spoke with nostalgia for many test questions those retained and discarded as well as the statistical methods. A really fascinating man with a lot of insight into people. Each edition is different some of the questions are retained because they are popular and give insight into people. The statistical methods also vary testing questions across a wide variety of American populations. In an effort to be culture free what you end up is an aggregate multi group score the examiner has some latitude selecting various norms. There has been some interest reviving old test for comparison with modern groups I do have specifics but understand that eye, hand, motor planning among children today has greatly increased. There are some who attribute this to technology. Generally test publishers note a 3 point improvement from a standard mean every 4 years in Industrial countries. Plans for test revisions are on going.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I wonder what's going on? Technology, as you say, may explain the eye/hand/motor increases. Maybe TV explains the intellectual component? I kinda hate to think that, but...
gordianot
(15,238 posts)Many live in a self imposed ignorance, many more demand facts what they do not know they absorb. This cuts across socio-economic, cultural, and educational barriers. I know poor urban 10 year old kids who would give a Harvard graduate a run for knowledge. Just give them access to technology show them sites like Kahn Academy. Issac Asimov predicted this in his old Sci Fi stories. I used to pride myself as tech savvy my 23 year old daughter who is finishing up a masters degree operates on a level I could not imagine. She interacts with more people than I have experienced in my 62 years. Our kids are evolving into something that is difficult for me to grasp and it happens very early. Koch Brothers will never be able to buy that, excluding and lying to this generation is a huge mistake.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)I don't want to get ridiculed for being stupid or snickered at because people think I'm lying about it.
So you can just fucking well guess what it is. And I mean that in a nice way. But I will say it's higher than 98.
moriah
(8,311 posts)He also narrowly missed a diagnosis of autism as a child, because he didn't start talking to people until he was five. They knew he could talk when they heard him repeating conversations he heard around him at night. (Now, that's known as a classic symptom in verbal autistics -- echolalia. But back then, verbal kids were *rarely* diagnosed as being on the spectrum.)
He said he remembers his grandfather saying "We know you can talk, so stop pretending." He said to him it wasn't that he was pretending he couldn't talk -- just that no one was interesting enough to talk to, so he didn't bother. But he spoke his first words to an actual human being that day -- when he responded with "Yes, sir" to the gramps.
But yeah, when I asked him what his was, he didn't want to tell me. He was afraid I'd think he was lying or bragging. I'd already seen him breathing in books on quantum physics that blew my mind (I barely was able to wrap my head around "The Dancing Wu-Li Masters", which he recommended when I wanted to know about the books *he* was reading but the math made me cringe), though, so it was believable.
---------
Still didn't mean the man could find his way out of a wet paper bag, though. Went to help a friend with her car that had a dead battery, and when asked if he'd brought jumper cables, said "What for?" -- seriously. Could get lost in a town of 5000 people. Killed the Civic I let him keep within 3 months of us splitting up, despite me warning him it had an oil leak and if the oil light stayed on for more than a second when he started it to check and add oil, and to check the oil once a week anyway.
IQ doesn't mean all that much, except when it comes to actually being able to understand what the heck Stephen Hawking is talking about.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)Although I can remember deliberately screwing up some placement test in the 9th grade because my sister told me that if I got in the smart class I'd have 3 hours of homework every night. Apparently I wasn't convincing enough and they found me out and put me in there anyway. But I had the last laugh, I didn't have 3 hours of homework. They may have assigned it but I didn't do it. My only role in that class was to lower the grading curve for the rest of the class for the next 4 years. I wound up an underachieving "C" student in a family where both my siblings were class valedictorians.
I'm pretty certain my IQ is higher than average but in all honesty, I've never been curious about what it actually is.
Response to tularetom (Reply #2)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,368 posts)CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)Minus five hundred.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,368 posts)Off the scale to the right, minus 500 makes you almost as smart as me!
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)I've looped round to the extreme left!
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)I've just figured out your joke!
Math was never my strong point.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,368 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Whatever circumstances need to arise to bring it about never did.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Send me a PM when you add an "under 95" response?
I'd like to participate, too.
Thanks.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Need to study up to be allowed on DU!
Logical
(22,457 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Because I don't know the numbers that come after that.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)So, I more than met the 125 required for ASA.
Does that really say anything about 'being smart' or mentally balanced?
Just how smart was I or for that matter all my fellow lightning fast chickens (our shoulder patch was interpreted by many as the leg of a chicken running fast enough to catch lightening) who avoided being drafted into 2 years of active Vietnam era service by volunteering for 4 years active service?
cali
(114,904 posts)It does not say anything about mental balance.
As I said in the OP, IQ isn't the be all and end all, but it's not totally meaningless either. And being smart isn't the be all and end all either, but I do think that that we're collectively not all that smart, has a connection to such things as how easily we're (collectively) persuaded to support wars, for example.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)What is SMART about?
When I have pondered this I have considered that smart has to do with the capacity to quickly make some correct or otherwise valuable choice. The sort of thing that wins Jeopardy!, and the sort of thing that glues your mouth shut when you want to scream at the boss.
I do ok with knowing the critical 'fact' in jeopardy but I never remember state it as a question. And after I had my PhD, I lived in 17 places in 19 years.
One of my defining characteristics is to be incapable of providing myself a stable home.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)We all have biases and prejudices which give us blind spots.
It takes curiosity to look into those blind spots and it takes bravery to keep digging deeper.
cali
(114,904 posts)I believe it's the most fundamental element.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)and I'm not sure IQ tests measure all of them.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)you are correct. the iq wont carry a person. i suggest sometimes the higher iq hinders a person.
pipi_k
(21,020 posts)there are different types of intelligence.
In terms of curiosity, I'm probably up there with Mensa people.
If we're talking about mathematical ability, I'm dumber than dumb.
Which is why taking a standard IQ test is so depressing for me. All the good gets dragged down into the mud by my overwhelming incompetence with numbers.
So in the end, I don't really know what my overall score would be. Maybe it would average out at 105 or something.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)I work daily with people with developmental disabilities. In general, they are preferable company to elitists and snobs.
I see zero difference between people bragging about their IQ's or education and people bragging about their net worth or ability to lift heavy things.
BTW, we should rename this place Lake Woebegone: it turns out that 43% of DU'ers are the top 1.5% of the IQ distribution.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)as actual application, day to day living, genetics, ect...
the significance and lack of significance both in the testing and experiencing.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)my brother hits 189. everything about the iq for him has helped to lead to such a desolate life. having a high iq does not mean a peaceful, successful or even good life. i feel his iq led him to a life of alcoholism for self medication and continuous self destruction.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Your score, that is.
It has to be above 170 or 175, at least.
Do you know how I know that?
Well, 2 years ago I volunteered to be a host for the now defunct Meta forum.
I wanted to see if there had been actual, honest discussion taking place in the hosts' forum to see if they were genuinely, and honestly discussing how to manage the new DU forum.
So, I went clear back to the very beginnings of the hosts' forum to read many of the threads made by other forum hosts, and what I found in the hosts' forum shocked me.
Not only was there honest, genuine discussion taking place between hosts, some of those discussions lasted several days, and created many pages of posts discussing a single topic.
But, the one thing that stood out to me the most, were your comments.
The comments that you made in that forum -- the one that was created for all of the forum hosts -- were comments that were made in private, or at least at some level of semi-privacy, and they were not able to be read by the entire membership of the DU forum.
And I only have 1 thing I want to say about that ---
Your comments were the most brilliant, passionate, thoughtful, clear, intelligent, logical comments I had ever read here at the DU forum.
And when straight-up logic wasn't appearing to work for you, you even employed all of the tools of rhetoric at your disposal to get other hosts to agree with your point of view, including appeals to the emotion, appeals to the majority, etc. etc.
You are a freakin' bona fide genius, young lady.
There is no doubt about that.
And a damned good writer.
Whoever told you that your IQ was only 143 was way the hell off.
Women like you, ones that are as passionate and as intelligent as you, should consider running for public office, at some level.
Because the world needs women like you to make the important decisions affecting other people's lives.
Maybe that doesn't fit in to your world right now, but at least think about it down the road sometime in the future.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)i read your post this morning. it has taken me in so many directions, lol.
i was ready to walk again. what is du giving me? i could not find much. i was angry yesterday at both misogyny and racism.
yet, last night i had a man ask me a question about my son, that is close to my heart. i thought about that question until moments ago, when i finally replied. such awesome exploration.
i read your post this morning. and the same.
and on a particular thread, at least three posters which such thoughtful, and insightful posts, that too had me thinking.
your post. i have had a lot of people say nice things about me. yours is about on the top.
in real life, a lot of changes are coming. i have considerations to make. because of the time you put into your post, giving me your thoughts, it will affect my real life.
kinda nifty, huh?
lol
that is why i stay, or one of the many reasons. growth being the highlight.
thanks hogwash. i love you and always love hearing your voice.
the trip a couple years ago, in all the battles and sitting on mirt with people that i KNOW was in battle with me. yet.... we kept it professional. i was proud of that, us.
MineralMan
(146,316 posts)They're irrelevant to who a person is and how a person behaves, frankly.
cali
(114,904 posts)and maybe I shouldn't have put up the poll as it's irrelevant to the point I was making.
MineralMan
(146,316 posts)If I don't want to answer, I don't put up the poll. Think about it.
cali
(114,904 posts)I don't think it's inherently dishonest not to answer in a poll one puts up. I gather that's your belief.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)I have no fricken clue what it is.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)They clock me at about 140. I seriously doubt that is true. If it is then I have been hiding my intelligence quite well.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)I've had mine tested IRL and online tests always show me as 30-40 points above my IRL test done. AS if.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)But, genius probably not. They got close to the same results a tech higher though cuz math.
edhopper
(33,580 posts)show how well you do on IQ tests, that's it. The rest is just extrapolation and far from precise.
The tests have cultural, language and gender biases. They are general tools for a large population, but have little accuracy for individuals.
And the US and Swiss difference would be within a standard deviation. Because the score is based on the statistical results, the average IQ is always 100.
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)Positive correllations with health, wealth, educational attainment and other things.
Negative correllation with number of children. Idiocracy was a documentary.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)unblock
(52,241 posts)Taitertots
(7,745 posts)It is self-selection bias.
unblock
(52,241 posts)so the o.p. already presumes no one would self-report below that.
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)fredamae
(4,458 posts)good old fashioned Common Sense-my grandfather always said-it doesn't matter how high your IQ is. I agree.
pipi_k
(21,020 posts)I know plenty of "intelligent" people who are pretty damned stupid as far as common sense goes.
bhikkhu
(10,718 posts)and uses it as a basis for their positions on most things. I've heard it so often on hate radio I've developed a deep mistrust of the term.
On the other hand, kindness is much more valuable, I think, than intelligence. My grandmother was one of the kindest (and most sensible) people I ever knew. She lived to 95, and had a wonderful life, and inspired the majority of her family toward kind and well-lived lives. On the intellectual side, I don't know how far she got with schooling or how curious she was about how the world worked. She raised many kids, loved to work in the garden and cook and putter around the house, sang old songs as she worked, knitted and made things in the evenings, and read romance novels to relax from a busy day. In old age she had visitors and guests, from morning to night most days, and was hardly ever seen without a welcoming smile.
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)Something stupid people repeat ad nauseum to try and make themselves feel superior to people smarter then them.
fredamae
(4,458 posts)mean to touch a nerve.
It's justa fact.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)intentionally reply to others with a tone that makes them look like self centered douchbags or is that just for a chosen few?
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)I vaguely remember 136, but I think I elevated one. It was told to me to be 135 in grade school...when I took my civil service test and a couple of other employment tests. always got the highest score. Did me no good.....no support or encouragement, and I never thought (religion) the way that some of the rest of my family (mother) did....but I thought at the time it was normal....
A sense of humor has more value than IQ....helps one to survive.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)Hopefully I make up for it in accumulated wisdom.
(OK... you can laugh now.)
Paper Roses
(7,473 posts)Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)Without a common base, the scores from any IQ test I've heard of cannot be conclusive proof of innate intelligence.
All other factors have to be normalized; training, environment, diet, and social grouping (to name a few).
Chathamization
(1,638 posts)A $10 incentive can apparently raise IQ scores by up to 20 points according to one study, taking the test multiple times can increase scores, training can improve IQ scores, and the hefty rise in IQ scores over the years means that people 80 years ago were either mentally handicapped or we currently live in a society of innate geniuses (if you think the test measures innate intelligence).
It measures how well you took that particular IQ test at that particular time. Its not that theres no correlation between that and other mental abilities (innate or learned), but the connection gets real fuzzy real fast. Also keep in mind that our current models for the brain show it to be much more plastic than it was believed to be 20 years ago.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)excellent. i love it. and says a whole lot about being motivated which speaks little toward high iq. which is what i saw, and why iq was never a factor with the boys. i did not allow tests. motivation takes one a long way.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)It is probably much lower now than when I took it.
Any how, perhaps it is best if you post a free standardized IQ test here, and then we can tell you what we got.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)pscot
(21,024 posts)who aren't able to read the writing on the wall.
gordianot
(15,238 posts)An intelligence quotient is just that a number that reflects a statistical comparison to other human beings who took the same set of test questions. A score of 100 is just that a number that is often used to represent an average score. As scores are described on a bell curve the score of 100 or also known as the 50th percentile are distributed in standard deviations. You cannot compare a normative group in Switzerland with a normative group in the United States. You were not born with a set number on an IQ test. To my knowledge the test makers have never accounted for variance as to political party on a test. Honestly this entire thread is an embarrassment to the Democratic underground. Those who defend themselves with an IQ do not understand what they are really describing.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Of course it was biased and the IQs he assigned to Democratic and Republican presidents weren't substantiated, at least to the satisfaction of anyone who wasn't already convinced.
I wasn't a big fan of the policies of presidents such as Herbert Hoover, Richard Nixon, and Dwight Eisenhower but I don't think they were dull men.
Crabby Appleton
(5,231 posts)Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)I'd extend that to all humanity.
This place is known for its endless need for bewildering self-congratulation but I think we have now reached a new high... or is that low?
Hekate
(90,697 posts)Judge them on behavior, such as how they treat others.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)based upon the number of times that other DUers call me stupid.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)After all, I am not smart enough to be able to get a car that is loaded in Walled Lake, MI and going to Novi, MI over to a poor little screaming rich twit in Bloomfield Hills within 10 minutes or less.
BTW, if anyone else is curious as to why I believe that is impossible: http://goo.gl/maps/agJJt
stage left
(2,962 posts)Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)Will the results of this poll be added to the tracker along with the results of your "how much do you make?" poll?
Response to cali (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)I scored in the top 1% on my ASVAB. I completed my GED without any prep, scoring a combined 326 (225 was passing). In one sitting. And I passed my CNE (Certified Netware Engineer) exams with flying colors, with perfect scores on two of the tests. So I rock at test taking.
But I don't worship socialism. I believe, as socialism has been described here, would make life worse instead of better for most people. To me, I see it as "Let's drain the bank accounts of everyone doing better than me and start making up shit as we go along. In the name of the people". So I suppose that knocks off 20 points.
I support taking kinetic action against the suicidal "I'm going to Disneyland ooops I mean Paradise" terrorists who have a record of atrocities and, if left unchecked, could potentially ignite a stepped up nuclear arms race, and potentially, nuclear war. So that's gotta knock off another 20 points or so.
I took some time to research the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department, instead of joining in the chorus of "those evil bastards are trying to give the city cholera". How many IQ points deducted are for that?
I even support a rich white DINO mayor in a predominately African American city (as did 55% of the voters of said city). Damn, I'm not even smart enough to hit the floor with my feet.
Response to FrodosPet (Reply #54)
linuxman This message was self-deleted by its author.
Logical
(22,457 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Translating that skill into practical purposes, maybe not so much.
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)or si that a random essay generator?
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)I wrote a random essay generator that is my life.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)N.T.
chrisa
(4,524 posts)Who cares? Judging worth by a test is pretty dumb anyways. All voters need is common sense.
I'd rather spend my time with fun "low IQ" people than pretentious jerks who talk the whole time about how smart they are and how much better they are than everyone else. To answer your question, IQ doesn't prove a thing.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)Know why? Because it's probably true. You have exactly zero basis to claim that DUers are much smarter than
average because (a) you're biased to think it's true by your own design, and (b) if you ran across someone
or someones who are objectively of high IQ, any lack of kinship you feel with them would probably cause you to dismiss their intelligence. Any diversion on their part from any of your closely held feelings or beliefs would likely cause you to call them an 'idiot,' 'moron,' and so forth.
Moreover, political conviction, activism, and earnestness does not imply nor is implied by supra-normal intelligence.
"I believe in science rather than in faith," for example, is not an indication of intelligence. It's an indication of
belief and preference. "I think Sarah Palin is an idiot" is not a magical incantation that confers intelligence, nor does
it display much.
Furthermore, on what basis could you possibly be surprised by "how low the average IQ" is? IQ isn't an absolute
measure, nor are there any basic human functions that require a minimum IQ to perform. Also, I can make an affine, order-preserving transformation to the IQ scale so that a score of 98 is indicative of historic genius or complete idiocy. Choose which you'd like, and I'll get to work.
I'm sure there are geniuses on DU. There may be many of them. I'm sorry to report, however, that there are almost certainly some with sub-98 IQs as well, and I would bet a lot of money that the DU mean IQ is around average.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)but it is far from "politically correct."
The fact is, the so called "fundamentalist" religions, be they Dixie Baptist, pro Ben-Ladin Islam, Hard-line Catholic or sadly any and all variants of Religion, all encourage numbers, regardless of the parent's ability to actually raise a child, or the lack thereof. This suits the churches, as they can take over a lot of the role, and they do NOT need nor WANT a bunch of intellectual children questioning them. They do not want the children for their heads, they need them for their hands, so that the churches can hand them farm tools and weapons, and so that they can grow up to hand the fruits of their work to the church.
Want an example?
http://www.thedailybeast.com/witw/articles/2013/04/11/homeschooled-kids-now-grown-blog-against-the-past.html
Here, these kids were raised out of school so that they could be good religious types. Now, I know some people have their reasons to homeschool, but the reason it is embraced by religion is because it keeps their kids away from things that will question the faith, which is a very nice way of saying they want to keep the kids as stupid as their parents. After all, if you train these kids to THINK, than they might not be what the church wants.
It is true that many times the process of deliberately "religious education" backfires: Madonna, Rosie O' Donell, and Fidel Castro are all famous example of Catholic Education However, that does not change the intent of Religious education, which is to keep the faith, even at the expense of one's mental development.
So, how does this rant tie back to American IQ scores? Because, even in Public education, there is an intense amount of pressure Religious Institutions can place. It is no accident that many Charter Schools end up being run by Religious educators of all stripes. In Florida, there was a scandal because the Scientologists were found to have been influencing the Charter schools, in particular making textbooks based on their ideas of learning, which in their case, were PART OF RELIGOUS DOCTRINE.
http://www.tampabay.com/opinion/editorials/charter-school-dangers-on-display-in-scientology-case/1218150
I picked this example because, while it is easy to pick on the more established "God of Abraham" faiths, it is indeed true that newcomers like the Scientologists can use the flaws of our education system to their advantage; our education system gave them a back door, and in the case of Charter schools, a front door, to make children led to their door. Of course, while the Scientologists brought about scrutiny on themselves, most people missed the point. They were only doing what the established religions were already doing, just that they were newcomers to the game.
Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)First off, I really have no idea of why I wasn't told: whether it was so low they didn't want me to get discouraged or so high they didn't want me to get a swelled head, I'll never know.
I'd take a wild-ass guess and say slightly above average. I find myself able to "connect the dots" more quickly than more people then I find needing help connecting the dots with those people who are quicker than me.
Here's one case I've always thought about. A friend of mine has an IQ of 160 ( or so he says ) and sometimes he can be an insufferable braggart about it. He's just that way and others note it too. He is also quite resourceful in solving certain issues; possessing a great deal of "know-how". Very good at doing math in his head and brain teaser type games. Despite this, I also find him to have an amazing lack of insight. Much of it via stubborn ignorance. I've seen him take stances that are/were categorically illogical. Irrational even.
Either he's lying about his IQ or IQ just isn't a good metric to measure someone.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Response to cali (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)Although the OP is actually being kind, because they really mean to say that
they value and appreciate the content on DU.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I developed my own test. And yes, I accounted for confirmation bias--it started at 967.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)Also, zip your fly.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)also, I was posting from the bathroom, so it was supposed to be unzipped.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)I'm quite confident we have plenty of people who are not of above-average intellect. And that's just fine; politics has more to do with empathy, experiences, and circumstances than intelligence or reasoning.
I know plenty of dumbass liberals and at least a few wicked-smart conservatives. Their political views have fuck-all to do with their score on a test.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)than Democrats. The smart Republicans tend to be sociopaths and know exactly what they are doing and that it's for personal gain.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I do have enough common sense to giggle at the poll results.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)My IQ is the same as my shoe size... and I have small feet. Ten and a half sounds about right for me all the way around.
linuxman
(2,337 posts)The number has little to no relevance in my life today.
I find people who flaunt/talk about their IQs to be intensely boorish. Not sure if there is a causal relationship there.
reddread
(6,896 posts)the ramifications of intelligence distribution and more importantly the psychological behavior of fellow voters is an important topic.
Touches on some basic social realities that we should focus on instead of the latest lies on TV.
I came up at 152 Stanford Binet courtesy of some psychologists who administered it in the boonies so many years ago.
Its good to know, eventually, where you stand, when the other ducks are heading cliffward, and you need some reassurance.
on the other hand, ignorance has its merits in this country, and Ive heard bliss is there, too.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)people were unable and therefore unwilling to tackle complex ideas and subjects. This is why they are so easily fed propaganda. Since we do live in a complicated world, we need the teachers who can explain complicated issues in an easily digested format. Elizabeth Warren and Bill Clinton are very good at this as are some media people like Bill Moyers and Thom Hartmann.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)until I realized I was too smart to hang out with those morons.
(I actually was a MENSA member, so I suppose that puts me in the 98th or 99th percentile, whatever their metric is.)
murielm99
(30,741 posts)of a social organization, any social organization. That is what Mensa is, a social organization.
Whenever there are threads here about Mensa, I taste a lot or sour grapes.
Why join any organization? Have you never belonged to a school, arts, sports, social, political or other interest related organization? Is it so hard to understand why others would want to do so?
People join Mensa for many reasons. Some of it is for social compatibility, because first and foremost, Mensa is a social organization.
Some people join to communicate with others. Some like new experiences and challenges. People on the high end of the curve sometimes have as much trouble socializing and communicating as people in the middle or on the low end.
Many people in the top two percent do not belong to Mensa. That is their choice. So if Mensa has the others, the odd people whom you might dismiss as morons or nerds, what do you care if we have our own club? If belonging to a group of unpopular nerds is not your goal in life, why announce it? Do you need to make fun of people you consider morons or nerds? Anyway, I have seen a lot of threads here lately celebrating neediness. Which is it? You can't have it both ways.
As far as bragging goes, I have never heard anyone do that at a Mensa meeting in all the years I have been a member. We already know what the membership qualifications are. Why bother to brag about it?
I don't think Mensans see themselves as better than others, only different. Sometimes we lack knowledge, or behave inappropriately, just like anyone else. We have the same problems as everyone else, but sometimes we have extra problems with communication and social interactions. There are, in my experience, many Mensans with learning disorders. In the past, I have mentioned here that I respect the way Mensans accept and treat people with Asperberger's Syndrome.
I often see comments like, "If they are so smart, why aren't all Mensans rich and famous?" Why should they be? Only people who lack imagination think that everyone should have the same goals in life. Why should everyone spend a lifetime struggling to get ahead in corporate or government culture? Some Mensans are cab drivers. Some live a marginal existence. Some are interested in everything and refuse to settle for one thing. Some can't seem to focus on anything at all. And I have never, never seen anyone treated as a lesser being at one of our gatherings, based on his or her employment, education or perceived social status.
I have always felt that people who insult and make jokes about Mensa are motivated by jealousy or feelings of inadequacy. Intelligence is something we are born with. So is singing ability, leadership ability, left-handedness. I am not ashamed of my IQ or my Mensa membership. Usually, I don't mention my membership unless I am talking to other members, or to someone I think might qualify and enjoy the benefits of membership.
I know this will come up here again. And when it does, I will again be surprised by the jokes and the smug anti-intellectualism displayed in the discussions about Mensa. I expect better from a Democratic discussion group. I expect all of you to be, well, brighter.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)I certainly didn't mean to offend.
Honestly, the reason I took the MENSA test was because my boss, one of Alaska's best trial lawyers back in the late '70s (he has since passed on), took the test, passed it, and thought he was pretty cool. I, as his lowly assistant, thought it would be pretty cool if I took the test, too, which I did -- and out scored him by a few points. We had a good laugh about it.
I went to a couple of meetings, which were okay -- but, in point of fact, I am NOT a joiner, never have been, and really don't care that much about socializing. I'm actually more content staying at home and reading a book (back then, since there was no internet) or, now, engaging with people online. I happen to be a loner, but not because I feel "better than," "worse than," or anything else. It's just that I prefer to be by myself.
So, again, no offense meant, and I certainly wasn't making fun of you or anyone else who is intelligent. Lighten up...
murielm99
(30,741 posts)I will lighten up.
I enjoy my Mensa membership, although I seldom mention it to anyone outside the group.
Hekate
(90,697 posts)... dropped in college, and rejoined as a divorcee in a new town where I knew no one aside from people my ex-husband worked with. It's how I met my second-and-final-husband. When I was single I supported my kids as a secretary, not a CEO. My best girlfriends are also from that group. They understand.
And I almost never tell anyone that I'm a member because it makes them uncomfortable. My neighbor kept wanting to know how I met the ladies she and I kept going to movies and plays with, and when I stopped being evasive and told her she got pretty snarky for awhile, which hurt.
No one I know ever discusses their IQ. Sure I remember what my score was all those decades ago. It doesn't make me a better person; just a person who often sees the world differently than many others.
You said it all very well, murielm.
Peacetrain
(22,877 posts)betsuni
(25,531 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)I don't think I ever had one (and I'm in my 60s). Plenty of standardized tests when I was in school, but none was an "IQ" test that provided a score. I always scored in the "99th" percentile on standardized tests, but that is not IQ-related. I'd probably flunk IQ.
I know my kids (now in late 20s early 30s) never had an official IQ test. They're not administered in public schools.
Honestly, how many people ever get their IQ tested? If you did have one, did you request it or was it administered, and under what circumstances?
dionysus
(26,467 posts)you didn't take too long on it, and didn't look up answers. I didn't put a whole lot of faith in it.
reddread
(6,896 posts)but the gifted students in the 70's at least were often placed in small groups for special "classes" which I can only presume focused on
intelligence quantifying and related psych research.
As many varieties of testing and analysis took place over the years, different schemes to align the differences were formulated.
Im pretty sure NONE of them include internet pop quizzes in their scope.
Seriously. nobody should reference a number without the type of test notated and that being administered by trained professionals.
In the end, of course, in a world so absorbed in lies and corruption, intelligence has little place unless applied towards compassion or victimization.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Both my kids were in the gifted programs at their schools. Never were IQ tests administered.
reddread
(6,896 posts)how did they get there, good grades?
im simply guessing based on my personal experience.
please tell us more about yours. when were they in school?
frazzled
(18,402 posts)The schools were always transparent about what tests were being administered, and parents were notified. I don't recall the names now (this would have been in the 1980s and early 90s when they were in elementary school), but they were achievement tests, like the "Iowa Tests of Basic Skills" that we had back in the 1950s-60s. Graded on a "percentile" basis in various areas. But never were we informed our kids would be getting a Stanford-Binet or Wechsler test. Rather, a combination of scores on those kinds of universal achievement tests mentioned, together with teacher recommendations (the teachers in Minnesota were well qualified to assess the kids), was what determined whether a kid was in the "gifted and talented" programs.
I do remember my son undergoing a qualifying exam for a program called UMTYMP (University of Minnesota Talented Youth Mathematics Program), on the recommendation of his school. He passed and entered the program at the U of Minnesota in 6th grade and completed all his high-school math (including calculus I) by 8th grade. It was at first a bummer for him when we moved to Massachusetts when he started 9th grade, because there was no such program, and he had to take calculus all over again. (We told him to suck it up, and it turned out fine.)
In high school, my daughter did the International Baccalaureate program. After we moved to MA, her brother just did mostly AP courses. Both of those are self-selecting, as long as you have a relatively good GPA. You either sink or swim in them.
But no, never an official IQ test.
reddread
(6,896 posts)which is why I qualified my statement temporally.
moriah
(8,311 posts)Technically, the average IQ is supposed to be 100, because it's standardized so that's the average. It's a pretty dramatic bell-curve, but the vast majority (nearly 70%) of the population ranges from 85 to 115.
I tested out at 155 when I was younger, but I am scared to think of what my test scores would be now -- quite a few of the medications I'm on interfere with my ability to concentrate. I bet if I was tested I'd probably be in that 70% now.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)This needs to be addressed ASAP.
bobclark86
(1,415 posts)We need at least 75 percent above the median! Damn Obama!
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)gordianot
(15,238 posts)Forget the score. Life experience, self awareness, accumulated wisdom is qualitative and is more important than any quantitative score.
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)Even knowing I'd likely score somewhat lower if I took an IQ test now, the experience, self-awareness, and facility with (written) language I've acquired since, more than offsets that.
tuhaybey
(76 posts)Interesting tidbit- the average IQ in the US actually has been steadily going up since they started recording it. The thing is, the scale is designed so that 100(or so) is average, so when the average gets above 100, they make the test harder. Apparently if a random sample of modern day Americans take an IQ test from 1960, they get an average score of around 135 where in 1960, they got an average score of around 100.
They actually do the same thing with most standardized tests- always keep making them harder so the score range stays relatively stable. Apparently increases in education, nutrition, more brain-oriented work, etc., pay off.
bobclark86
(1,415 posts)Like bias against women, minorities, the poor...
Go read up on the history of IQ tests.
BTW, Do you know what the Guiness recordholder of highest IQ does? Writes for Parade magazine.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)I know I'm weird and creative, but I don't consider myself a genius.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)stage left
(2,962 posts)My thinking is that I may be slightly above the average. I got a perfect score on the verbal part of the Sat way back in '65. And half that on the math portion. Needless to say, I have never been an accountant. I write a little, though, and have had a couple of stories in a literary mag.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)filling in those little circles on the test pages.
My one legged stick heron looking at the moon got the highest score from the judges so far.
It was my masterpiece.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)I'm a moderate Democrat -- how smart can I be, really? My conservative friends and family think I'm somewhere left of Mao on the political scale. Here on DU I've been called a troll and a third-way-cut-and-paste-astroturfer. So I'm at least dumb enough to have pissed off everyone.
ProfessorGAC
(65,047 posts)No matter what one answers, it's bad.
If someone says they have a high IQ, people will think they're bragging or lying.
If someone says they're average, that will come back to haunt them in some flame fest.
Don't think this poll was a very good idea, cali.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)mak3cats
(1,573 posts)...until I heard someone at a party refer to a union between a Mensan and a non-Mensan as a "mixed marriage." Bunch of arrogant bigheads - I quit.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Hekate
(90,697 posts)You could have taken the stance I did when a member's wife told me she was not herself a member. "Come off it, Linda", I said. "Like attracts like."
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I never know what's going on and hate the spatial questions. Sometimes i'm 134. Sometimes 142. One time it was 127. I still don't get what that is supposed to mean. I'm an idiot in truth. I just am a good test taker. I pick the answer that my brain likes. ( I always feel like I cheated) I took a test for the scientologists once. The bothered me until i changed my number. Strange folks. Thought about joining mensa, but didn't want to pay them money.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)The only thing I can do is read and absorb info and regurgitate it. Other than that, pretty stupid. And weird. Everybody here knows too much shit, I can't keep up with it all. I thought i was a nerd until I met y'all.
Response to cali (Original post)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)Response to nomorenomore08 (Reply #129)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)Response to nomorenomore08 (Reply #165)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Response to Logical (Reply #153)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Response to Logical (Reply #179)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)See "normal distribution".
And "smarter" is a matter of some question anyway (see for instance the following for a persuasive case that the most significant determinant of IQ at a population level is the relative wealth of a given population):
Similarly, a large 1990 test of South African whites placed their IQ at 94, considerably below that of the Dutch or English peoples from whom they derive, and again this may be connected to their lower level of national income and technological advancement.
Perhaps the strongest evidence supporting this cultural rather than genetic hypothesis comes from the northwestern corner of Europe, namely Celtic Ireland. When the early waves of Catholic Irish immigrants reached America near the middle of the 19th century, they were widely seen as particularly ignorant and uncouth and aroused much hostility from commentators of the era, some of whom suggested that they might be innately deficient in both character and intelligence. But they advanced economically at a reasonable pace, and within less than a century had become wealthier and better educated than the average white American, including those of old stock ancestry. The evidence today is that the tested IQ of the typical Irish-Americanto the extent it can be distinguishedis somewhat above the national white American average of around 100 and also above that of most German-Americans, who arrived around the same time.
Meanwhile, Ireland itself remained largely rural and economically backward and during the 1970s and 1980s still possessed a real per capita GDP less than half that of the United States. Perhaps we should not be too surprised to discover that Lynn and Vanhanen list the Irish IQ at just 93 based on two samples taken during the 1970s, a figure far below that of their Irish-American cousins.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/race-iq-and-wealth/
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)For me, it depends on what time of day it is.
No cheating now.
http://www.free-iqtest.net/
Here's the scale
Intelligence Interval Cognitive Designation
40 - 54 Severely challenged (Less than 1% of test takers)
55 - 69 Challenged (2.3% of test takers)
70 - 84 Below average
85 - 114 Average (68% of test takers)
115 - 129 Above average
130 - 144 Gifted (2.3% of test takers)
145 - 159 Genius (Less than 1% of test takers)
160 - 175 Extraordinary genius
zazen
(2,978 posts)Fun cognitive exercise, but soooo socially constructed. Thx for the link.
panader0
(25,816 posts)It could be less now.
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)How objective are those measures, and how free from bias are they?
IQ tests have a pretty shitty history in terms of how they've been exploited, politically or socially. So that needs to be kept in mind.
Highly educated, wealthy white men create a measure of intelligence in which highly educated, wealthy white men come out on top, where whites have higher IQs than blacks and most other minorities, where the upper classes have higher IQs than the lower classes, and where men have higher IQs than women. Yep, sounds totally objective and free of any cultural bias or social prejudice!
sakabatou
(42,152 posts)IQ is more like... the potential of a person, isn't it?
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)The strange thing was there was a huge split between my verbal and non-verbal scores - 147 and 105, respectively.
Logical
(22,457 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)The only thing wrong with being genius or borderline genius though, is that it takes away from our sense of humor.
rug
(82,333 posts)MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)80% of people think they are in the upper class
80% of people think they are better than average drivers
80% of people believe they are more ethical than their co-workers
and so on and so forth.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)This basically explains my whole life. I'm too smart to know I'm stupid. Or something.
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20131125-why-the-stupid-say-theyre-smart
You're pretty smart right? Clever, and funny too. Of course you are, just like me. But wouldn't it be terrible if we were mistaken? Psychologists have shown that we are more likely to be blind to our own failings than perhaps we realise. This could explain why some incompetent people are so annoying, and also inject a healthy dose of humility into our own sense of self-regard.
In 1999, Justin Kruger and David Dunning, from Cornell University, New York, tested whether people who lack the skills or abilities for something are also more likely to lack awareness of their lack of ability. At the start of their research paper they cite a Pittsburgh bank robber called McArthur Wheeler as an example, who was arrested in 1995 shortly after robbing two banks in broad daylight without wearing a mask or any other kind of disguise. When police showed him the security camera footage, he protested "But I wore the juice". The hapless criminal believed that if you rubbed your face with lemon juice you would be invisible to security cameras.
Kruger and Dunning were interested in testing another kind of laughing matter. They asked professional comedians to rate 30 jokes for funniness. Then, 65 undergraduates were asked to rate the jokes too, and then ranked according to how well their judgements matched those of the professionals. They were also asked how well they thought they had done compared to the average person.
As you might expect, most people thought their ability to tell what was funny was above average. The results were, however, most interesting when split according to how well participants performed. Those slightly above average in their ability to rate jokes were highly accurate in their self-assessment, while those who actually did the best tended to think they were only slightly above average. Participants who were least able to judge what was funny (at least according to the professional comics) were also least able to accurately assess their own ability.
Generic Brad
(14,275 posts)Too simple to qualify for membership to Mensa but happy I am not 140. I would hate to be the dimmest person in that group.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,328 posts)dhill926
(16,339 posts)than smart .
Response to cali (Original post)
Adam051188 This message was self-deleted by its author.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I'll divulge, I have been tested 4 times in my life ... the first time in the 3rd grade (when I was being diagnosed as dyslexic ... I was figuring out math problems in my head; but couldn't do at the black-board or on "show your work" tests and multiple guess tests with bubbles were hell) ... the second time was during the admission process to a prep-school (is a result of the previous years testing) ... the third time was a week later, because the prep-school's administration didn't believe the results of the test.
The last time was when I was just out of college; but I never went to get the results.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)My parents were desperate to get me in school because I was reading books at age four. I cannot remember not being able to read. My mother read to me but I don't remember that. I did not know my scores because my parents would not tell me.
I remember they freaked out because we were going down the freeway when I was little and read a sign that said "Jones Apothecary".
My school district did not have any school psychologists who could test me so they had to take me to the city. I discovered the papers a few years ago and I scored 148 on a Stanford-Binet at age five. They were freaked out because I did well in spatial reasoning and thinking in 3-D and they thought at that time that girls were not good at thinking in 3-D. Sewing is cutting out flat pieces of material and visualizing how they would look put together on a 3-D body. And I learned how to sew when I was young.
Two standard deviations above is 130. That's the top 2% which is the requirement to join Mensa.
Three standard deviations above is 145. That's one tenth of one percent, or one out of a thousand people.
There are high IQ societies that only take 145 and above, the Prometheus Society and the Triple-9 Society are two of them.
I never joined Mensa or any other High IQ society but knew a lot of people in Mensa. Most of the people I knew were classical musicians and programmers/mathematician/engineering majors.
I was praised for being smart but never had any guidance about figuring what I was really good at and telling me to go for it.
There are 3 different modalities of learning. My daughter came home from Montessori school with information about that. There are visual, auditory and kinesthetic modes of learning. Visual people learn by seeing. Auditory people learn by hearing. Kinesthetic people learn by moving their body. I play the piano by reading the notes visually but memorize by finger memory and hearing mistakes and correcting them.
I had to go to class in college but didn't know why. Turned out that I am auditory and kinesthetic. I had to hear the teacher talk in person and take notes (physical action). I am an excellent note taker. I know when to listen to the teacher and when to write down what they are saying. I've had entire classes in law school borrow my notes and copy them when the teacher had a thick accent and nobody could understand them. I could understand some of it, not all.
People who are olfactory are perfume blenders and people who are tasters are generally chefs. They are more rare than the basic three.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)your IQ is in the top rank at DU or anywhere else.
(And I'm being entirely serious.)
People may not check on their IQ, but are often told it anyway - many schools test for it.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)would agree with you though, I do have my fans, as you do! Lol!
How do you test your IQ?
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)And any given person can score quite differently on them. My dad, for example, scored off-the-charts insanely high on one they gave him in grade school in NYC, then scored in the average range on the Army IQ test.
SAT scores convert pretty well, I'm told, to IQ. There are conversion charts on the Internet. Just make sure to pick a chart that covers your SAT test - they've rejiggered the SAT scoring a few times.
chrisa
(4,524 posts)I hear this crap all of the time.
reddread
(6,896 posts)how smart is it to put your kids into an unaffordable situation for your own status?
theres the real deal.
bragging really doesnt require statistical evidence.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)Aristus
(66,380 posts)but I'm posting to tell you that I'm pretty smart.
And drunk.
Very drunk.
Becuae a great mind has to turn off every once in a while. Don;t you agree?...
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)dionysus
(26,467 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,363 posts)Thanks for the thread, Eva.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)I have to limit my awareness somewhat because 'dah newz' does sometimes drag me down. Other days I am brilliant as I see everything clearly.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)but participation is so unrealistic in reality. I would venture there are a few who will answer truthfully but most are going to boost it for whatever reason and others will crash it as a self-flagellatetory joke. I will do neither. But I'm going to read the DU members list!
RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)no matter to what population, a disproportionate amount of responses indicate exceptional scores.
reddread
(6,896 posts)there are a lot of tangential, predictable responses. if the subject were objectively discussed, and emotional responses were less prominent, maybe we could do better. things need to improve for everyone, regardless of their social/economic/mental/emotional state.
tblue37
(65,377 posts)should not be surprised that the average is "that low." It would be like being surprised that the freezing point of water when measured in Centigrade is 0 degrees. The measuring scale is *set* that way.