Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Becka2515

(58 posts)
3. Its not what we think he did
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 06:20 AM
Apr 2012

but what the state can prove and with that whacky SYG law it might very well be hard to prove 2nd degree murder (unless the have a witness to prove it)

If he plea's to a lesser charge and doesnt serve a long sentence will people accept that?

Bucky

(54,068 posts)
9. Interesting: "It's not what *WE* think he did"
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 07:32 AM
Apr 2012

Expectations of groupthink won't be well sustained on DU. 'Tis a place of diverse viewpoints.

Just a few thoughts. First, Florida law is different from New Jersey law or Virginia law or Louisiana law. Each state sets its own standards for what's Murder 1 or 2 or various degrees of Manslaughter. So an out of state layman's view of what's the proper charge won't tend to be very precise. For that matter, neither would an out of state attorney's.

Second thought is, as is probably discussed downthread, one quirk in Florida law is that prosecutors can bring Murder 2 charges directly to a judge & jury while Murder 1 could only be brought by an empaneled grand jury--it's one of those protections of individual liberty in the American system of law, ironically enough. But in this case, going for First Degree would have dragged out the process. I suspect swift action by the state may have been an unspoken motive in this case.

Third, Murder 1 is pretty high standard. It's not what the me part of "we" thinks happened. I just don't see that Zimmerman thought to himself beforehand, "I'm gonna go kill that kid" when he got in his car to track down Trayvon Martin, nor even when he got out of the car to interdict him on the street a few minutes later.

What Zimmerman did certainly does seem to involve premeditation--he chose his course of action every step of the way leading up to the confrontation--so Murder rather than Manslaughter seems to be the proper charge. But he was a powerdrunk fool overreacting to local crime rather than a villain setting out to kill. Murder 2 is a serious charge and carries a heavy punishment. In my opinion, it's the right call on the prosecutor's part. I just hope the process doesn't get all Floridified.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
2. I think they desperately want a plea bargain
Thu Apr 12, 2012, 06:14 PM
Apr 2012

a not guilty verdict at a trial would be a disaster. It is not a open and shut case like many here think - there is considerable risk of a not guilty verdict.

 

Becka2515

(58 posts)
4. I agree
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 06:21 AM
Apr 2012

its not a slam dunk. I think they shouldve went with manslaughter in the first place if they are not intrested in a plea deal.

shimonitanegi

(114 posts)
5. Zimmerman killed a kid who was screaming for help and begging for his life
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 06:35 AM
Apr 2012

in a cold blooded manner. I think it is an appropriate charge.

 

Becka2515

(58 posts)
8. There is nothing to get over.
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 07:13 AM
Apr 2012

Why do you believe I have to get over it? Can you show me proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed 2nd degree murder? Nearly every reasonable lawyer not involved with the case says they are going to have a hard time proving 2nd degree and this is just a ploy to get him to cop to a lesser charge. I know a lot of people want him to swing from the gallows but they shouldve charged him with the crime that best suits the facts: Manslaughter.

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
10. you know better than the prosecution team
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 07:42 AM
Apr 2012

who actually know what the facts are having been the ones to investigate quite a bit beyond internet website articles and have years and years of experience?

Call me crazy, but I'll go with what the prosecution team believes is the best charge seeing as they're the ones with the job experience and ACTUAL knowledge of the facts of the case.

Did these brilliant lawyer talking heads on tv seem to forget that the Murder 2 charge includes the lesser charge of Manslaughter that the jury has as an option if they don't feel that they can convict on Murder 2?


Solomon

(12,319 posts)
13. You and all the other whiners around here are obviously
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 09:15 AM
Apr 2012

having a problem with the charge. There's a freaking "mountain of evidence" in this case but some people act as though it doesn't exist. Any grandstanding defense lawyer telling you otherwise is just trying to get in on the case. It means a lot of fame and notoriety.

 

Becka2515

(58 posts)
15. I told you already
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 02:07 PM
Apr 2012

I could be way off but I doubt with the wacky law that is SYG they are going to have a hard time proving 2nd degree, maybe manslaughter but all he has to say is that he felt that his life was in danger. I dont know all the evidence collected so I really dont know how this is going to turn out.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do you think?