Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 12:19 PM Sep 2014

No troops on the ground? US Troops Could Fight ISIS in Iraq, General Tells Senate

It's beyond naive to think that new war or escalation or whatever you want to call it, won't lead to "boots on the ground".

The nation's top military officer opened the door slightly today to the possibility of American troops accompanying Iraqi forces on the battlefield against ISIS if needed.

The latest deployment of 475 American forces to Iraq includes 150 advisers who will be working closely with Iraqi brigades at the headquarters level to coordinate the Iraqi military's offensive operations against ISIS.

Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the Senate Armed Services Committee that the advisers "will help the Iraqis conduct campaign planning, arrange for enabler and logistics support, and coordinate coalition contributions."

"To be clear, if we reach the point where I believe our advisers should accompany Iraqi troops on attacks against specific ISIL targets, I will recommend that to the president," said Dempsey, using one of several acronyms for the militant Islamic group that has taken over a large swath of Syria and Iraq. The group calls itself the Islamic State.

<snip>
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-troops-fight-isis-iraq-general-tells-senate/story?id=25537584

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No troops on the ground? US Troops Could Fight ISIS in Iraq, General Tells Senate (Original Post) cali Sep 2014 OP
This will not happen philosslayer Sep 2014 #1
Uh huh atreides1 Sep 2014 #4
that just strikes me as painfully naive. cali Sep 2014 #5
LOL. We weren't going to escalate, either. grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #8
Advisors... atreides1 Sep 2014 #2
they are "on the ground" now . . . c'mon DrDan Sep 2014 #3
Is it safe to assume that the "advisers" are wearing comfortable walking shoes rather than boots? Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2014 #6
There is a powerful H2O Man Sep 2014 #7
Our troops aren't running around in 500 pairs of sneakers over there. In_The_Wind Sep 2014 #9
There are only two place ISIS can be in Iraq. That is, out in the open or inside the local ladjf Sep 2014 #10
 

philosslayer

(3,076 posts)
1. This will not happen
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 12:21 PM
Sep 2014

At least while President Obama is in office. He said no "boots on the ground". Period.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
5. that just strikes me as painfully naive.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 12:24 PM
Sep 2014

He may have said no boots on the ground, but it sure the hell isn't written in stone.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
6. Is it safe to assume that the "advisers" are wearing comfortable walking shoes rather than boots?
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 12:25 PM
Sep 2014

And, whatever arms they're toting are merely fashion statement accessories?

H2O Man

(73,556 posts)
7. There is a powerful
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 12:26 PM
Sep 2014

tide of pressure trying to push this onto the American public. I hope that there is a good anti-war candidate in the 2016 democratic primaries.

Recommended.

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
10. There are only two place ISIS can be in Iraq. That is, out in the open or inside the local
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 01:09 PM
Sep 2014

homes and small buildings. A few dozen UAV's could loiter of most of the main locations. When they come out of the buildings, we attack. Remember, Iraq is no Viet Nam, no jungles or tunnels in which to hide. Iraq is a populated desert, no where to hide.

Our military should be able to solve this and come up with some offensive strategies that would stop ISIS in their tracks. Those rats would "leave the ship". But, then we'll have to chase them into their next "hole".

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No troops on the ground? ...