Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riqster

(13,986 posts)
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 10:16 AM Sep 2014

It’s 9/11. Remember who attacked us. And who let it happen. And who made money from the attacks.

http://bluntandcranky.wordpress.com/2014/09/11/its-911-remember-who-attacked-us-and-who-let-it-happen-and-who-made-money-from-the-attacks/

Source info at the link? Yup.

Today is September 11th, and in order to truly honor the memory of those who died at the hands of those terrorist goat-f***ers in Al-Quaida, this writer will forego the usual platitudes, and instead point a big finger at the “Republicans” who sat back and let it happen; and then used those thousands of deaths to further their political ends whilst padding their offshore bank accounts. Think that is inappropriate, nasty, partisan, or lese-majeste? Gentle Reader, you ain’t heard nothing yet.

The 9/11 Commission report said that the Bushistas ignored the threat until after the attacks had occurred. And then, of course, they used the deaths of our fellow citizens to launch a phony war in Iraq and make themselves multi- millionaires. It’s all public record, click the links if you don’t believe it.

In stark contrast to the incompetence, malfeasance, and obfuscation of the “Republicans” stands President Obama. People told him about an imminent terrorist threat, and he quickly got started kicking their mass-murdering asses. And he told the country exactly what he was gonna do: bomb, shoot, and generally kill all of the Shaitan-worshipping thugs in ISIS. That, friends, is how you respond to an attack. Openly, firmly, and honestly.

There are still fools around the world who think the Prexy is weak, indecisive, or naive. To those idiots, we present four words:
Osama
Bin
Laden’s
Dead.
He died because Obama had the smarts and the testicular fortitude to pursue the mutt and kill his ass. The Bushies didn’t care enough to catch the motherf***er, which helped Al-Quaida grow stronger and prosper by showing the world that America would not punish those who attack us. But the Dems in the White House DID care, justice WAS rendered, and today Al-Quaida is a shattered remnant of the jihadi collossus it once was. Punishing criminals works a lot better than rewarding them.

We can best honor the victims of crimes by rendering justice on the criminals, and preventing future crimes. To the first point, not all of the criminals of 9/11 have been brought to justice yet, but Obama has made a good start. And to the second, he is doing things differently than his predecessor, thus helping to prevent a recurrence of 9/11.

Not to say that Obama’s actions are without risk. They carry enormous potential for blowback and unintended consequences. But doing nothing failed in 2001, and failed earlier this year as well. Terrorists will commit acts of terror whether men of good will do nothing, or do something. It’s what terrorists do. At least killing them, taking their money, and destroying their assets slows them down. (Again, see what has happened to Al-Quaida since PBO took office.)

The Bushies have the blood of innocents on their hands and in their wallets. Never forget, Gentle Reader. Because if we forget, it’ll happen again. Good luck to President Obama and all the brave people who fight for us every day. And bad cess to those who attack us, abandon us, and use tragedy to manipulate us.
58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It’s 9/11. Remember who attacked us. And who let it happen. And who made money from the attacks. (Original Post) riqster Sep 2014 OP
If Democrats had been in charge... kentuck Sep 2014 #1
Shrug. There would have been no Iraq war, and a lot of other things would have been different. riqster Sep 2014 #2
Well, both parties agreed that Saddam was horrible YoungDemCA Sep 2014 #4
Huh, all the people who died may still be alive. Iliyah Sep 2014 #33
Agreed. A less unstable ME, no crash in the USA, no Patriot Act... riqster Sep 2014 #38
I don't know if that's necessarily true, kentuck. With a president Gore who BlueCaliDem Sep 2014 #6
True. kentuck Sep 2014 #7
And put them on trial. riqster Sep 2014 #9
Gore and Clinton were well on top of terrorism. 9 11 would not have happened Autumn Sep 2014 #17
Dingdingding! We have a winner! riqster Sep 2014 #21
Ditto Iliyah Sep 2014 #34
If Democrats had been in charge... zentrum Sep 2014 #41
Good analysis. riqster Sep 2014 #44
As long as America is strong due to it's wealth, weapons and exploitive control of other nations librechik Sep 2014 #3
I will never cease to be amazed that after 9/11 JNelson6563 Sep 2014 #5
An illegitimate man at 1600 PA Ave doing incompetent things. riqster Sep 2014 #15
Osama bin laden succeeded beyond his wildest dreams cali Sep 2014 #8
I Got Sucked Into Watching MSNBC Re-Playing Of The Events Of The Day....... global1 Sep 2014 #10
9/11 was a crime perpetrated by Dick Cheney & The Neocons. nt ChisolmTrailDem Sep 2014 #11
I'd say they aided and abetted. riqster Sep 2014 #13
Oh, they aided and abetted alright. They made it possible, along with their buddy ChisolmTrailDem Sep 2014 #16
So are you saying Bush and Dick collaborated with King Abdullah zappaman Sep 2014 #55
The most disgusting ignored element is how deeply the Saudis were involved bullwinkle428 Sep 2014 #12
Bush held hands with them. riqster Sep 2014 #14
even more incredible detail nationalize the fed Sep 2014 #37
K&R Zorra Sep 2014 #18
A few pertinent pics pauldp Sep 2014 #19
It's surprising to me that the commission said anything about the Bushies. riqster Sep 2014 #23
They could only whitewash the report so much. Rex Sep 2014 #28
Yep. Shit still stinks, no matter how much polish you put on a turd. riqster Sep 2014 #50
While New York burned, Bush read "My Pet Goat" to school children. Initech Sep 2014 #20
And kept going. riqster Sep 2014 #22
I really wonder if we had elected Al Gore if the Twin Towers would still be standing. Initech Sep 2014 #24
Number A: we did. Never mind the unconstitutional act of the Supremes. riqster Sep 2014 #25
Who made money on 911? Try the push and call options right before 911 Ichingcarpenter Sep 2014 #26
Interesting. Thanks for the links. riqster Sep 2014 #36
Saving. Kicking. Reccing. BlancheSplanchnik Sep 2014 #27
Thanking. riqster Sep 2014 #30
:) BlancheSplanchnik Sep 2014 #32
Thanks again. riqster Sep 2014 #35
Let's also not forget... freebrew Sep 2014 #29
Yep. And idiots across the country still vote for them. riqster Sep 2014 #31
Patriot Act - NSA Iliyah Sep 2014 #39
No doubt. And other scams ad infinitum. riqster Sep 2014 #40
presumably OBL died so we could *take over* AQ (and then it ran away from us...again) MisterP Sep 2014 #42
War is Peace! This is the second thread attempting this ludicrous talking point. woo me with science Sep 2014 #43
Bollocks. I am saying that inaction served us badly in the past. riqster Sep 2014 #45
Which inaction was that? The invasion of Iraq? SomethingFishy Sep 2014 #54
Say not so, O fishy one. riqster Sep 2014 #58
The Real Truth colsohlibgal Sep 2014 #46
Oh yeah. There was a lot hidden. riqster Sep 2014 #47
Yes, it must have been a conspiracy cuz "the shockingly low passenger numbers on these planes" zappaman Sep 2014 #56
yes, let's remember ... napkinz Sep 2014 #48
Very good collection! riqster Sep 2014 #49
and Republicans want an apology ... talk about chutzpah napkinz Sep 2014 #51
Well, yes. Obama is making them look even worse. riqster Sep 2014 #52
more ... napkinz Sep 2014 #53
... napkinz Sep 2014 #57

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
1. If Democrats had been in charge...
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 10:23 AM
Sep 2014

...we would still hear about how weak the Democrats are on national defense. Republicans would have destroyed the Democratic Party. There would not have been a President Obama.

 

YoungDemCA

(5,714 posts)
4. Well, both parties agreed that Saddam was horrible
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 10:30 AM
Sep 2014

But I can't see President Gore invading Iraq on such blatantly false pretenses, lying about his administration's motives, handling the aftermath of the invasion so incompetently and corruptly, and not even bothering to get approval and help from the international community (other than the "Coalition of the Willing." )

riqster

(13,986 posts)
38. Agreed. A less unstable ME, no crash in the USA, no Patriot Act...
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 01:18 PM
Sep 2014

Had Gore been allowed to serve in the office he earned, almost everything would be different today.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
6. I don't know if that's necessarily true, kentuck. With a president Gore who
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 10:32 AM
Sep 2014

would carry on President Clinton's anti-terrorism policy, I don't know if 9/11 would have happened. I'm certain that he'd keep the people in place in order to smoothly continue with President Clinton's anti-terrorism work and we wouldn't have the warmongering chickenhawks in positions of power who wanted to invade Iraq from the get-go ... however, Lieberman would have been VP and god only knows what he would have pushed for.

That said, I would rather not have a President Obama if it meant not having 9/11/2001 happen, thousands of Americans dead, 100's of thousands of Iraqis dead, a terrorized American electorate, ISIS, a $16 trillion dollar Federal deficit because of Bush tax cuts to the rich, 10% unemployment (in October 2009 before the stimulus kicked in), and the housing bubble. We could still have a Senator Barack Obama who can then run after a President Al Gore's two terms, right? If only, if only, if only...

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
7. True.
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 10:55 AM
Sep 2014

But if it had happened during a Democratic Administration, the Repubs would have cut no slack. I think the Democrats should put the blame on Bush and Cheney for letting 9/11 happen. They escaped any and all responsibility.

Autumn

(45,120 posts)
17. Gore and Clinton were well on top of terrorism. 9 11 would not have happened
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 11:42 AM
Sep 2014

had Gore been in the White House.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
41. If Democrats had been in charge...
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 01:25 PM
Sep 2014

There would not have been a 9/11. Because Gore with his different team would have read the August memo and prevented the attack. Also, Richard Wright would have had his ear from day one and prevention would have been in place long before August.

No attack, no phony war, no Bush, no Rumsfield, no Cheney, no Condi Rice "selling the product", no red terror alerts.
And Obama very likely could still have been elected.

Even with your analysis, one Obama is not worth the Iraq war and this aftermath which will never go away.

librechik

(30,676 posts)
3. As long as America is strong due to it's wealth, weapons and exploitive control of other nations
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 10:28 AM
Sep 2014

rather than its global citizenship and enlightened, humanistic policies, we will always be plagued by heroes trying to stop us strangling society with empire. .

JNelson6563

(28,151 posts)
5. I will never cease to be amazed that after 9/11
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 10:31 AM
Sep 2014

Condi Rice, the greatest failure of a national security advisor in the history of mankind, was promotedto SOS.
WTF.

Julie

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
8. Osama bin laden succeeded beyond his wildest dreams
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 10:57 AM
Sep 2014

he goaded us into spending trillions and completely destabilizing the region, not to mention our abridgement of rights.

global1

(25,270 posts)
10. I Got Sucked Into Watching MSNBC Re-Playing Of The Events Of The Day.......
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 11:04 AM
Sep 2014

Compelling!!! But I didn't believe it then and I still don't believe it now as I re-watch it. Too many coincidences that seem innocuous at first but when put together have always made me suspicious of the events of that day. Many resources that should have been around were out of place - conveniently. The time span between the first plane hitting the towers and the second plane. The plane hitting the Pentagon a long time after the planes hit the towers - yet they didn't seem prepared to take any action. The shuttling out of the country of Saudi's tied to Bin Laden when all other flights were grounded. The aftermath - with the passing of the Patriot Act - that seemed to be poised and ready to pass through a Congress that most in Congress didn't even read. The quick judgement by the Administration to go after Saddam Hussain and Iraq. And look where this has all brought us to today.

Is it a coincidence that the day before the anniversary of 9/11 - we had our President address the country about basically a continuation of the results of the incompetence of BushCo. Fear back then about al quaida and fear today about ISIS/ISIL. What seemed to be timed videos of beheadings of American journalists that contributed to more fear in the minds of the American People and contributed to change their mindset about more war, destruction, loss of lives and treasure. More defense spending coming up folks. A deadlocked/obstructing Congress that is not allowing anything to help us climb out of this aftermath of the destruction that BushCo brought onto this country. The main stream corporate media that seems to be accomplices in sabotaging this President. And a critical election coming up in less than 2 months that can further decimate this nation based on control of Congress.

Scary stuff people - scary stuff.

zappaman

(20,606 posts)
55. So are you saying Bush and Dick collaborated with King Abdullah
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 07:14 PM
Sep 2014

to bring down the WTC and attack the Pentagon, then covered it up to blame it on Al Queda?

bullwinkle428

(20,630 posts)
12. The most disgusting ignored element is how deeply the Saudis were involved
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 11:20 AM
Sep 2014

in the planning and execution of it all.

"Ever since ISIS/ISIL became the Hitlers du jour, apologists for, and former employees of, the late Avignon Presidency have been loud and proud in their praise for something that C-Plus Augustus said back in 2007 as regards Iraq, and they have been comparing that unfavorably to the president's response to the current crisis, in a desperate attempt to legitimize their support for, and their participation in, the large, chewy cluster of fk that C-Plus Augustus made of everything he touched. Chief among this sad collection of human political flotsam is curiously employed torture-porn enthusiast Marc Thiessen, to whom Weigel put paid yesterday, and with a nice shout-out to the blog, too. As Weigel points out, Thiessen is criticizing the current president for living up to an agreement negotiated by Thiessen's old boss. But there's more out there, too, about how badly the late Avignon Presidency fell down on the job of protecting the country.

"There's nothing in it about national security," Walter Jones, a Republican congressman from North Carolina who has read the missing pages, contends. "It's about the Bush Administration and its relationship with the Saudis." Stephen Lynch, a Massachusetts Democrat, told me that the document is "stunning in its clarity," and that it offers direct evidence of complicity on the part of certain Saudi individuals and entities in Al Qaeda's attack on America. "Those twenty-eight pages tell a story that has been completely removed from the 9/11 Report," Lynch maintains. Another congressman who has read the document said that the evidence of Saudi government support for the 9/11 hijacking is "very disturbing," and that "the real question is whether it was sanctioned at the royal-family level or beneath that, and whether these leads were followed through." Now, in a rare example of bipartisanship, Jones and Lynch have co-sponsored a resolution requesting that the Obama Administration declassify the pages.


I have my differences with Steve Lynch on a number of issues, and Walter Jones is the freedom fries guy, and he's covered almost the entire ideological waterfront on the issues involved since those days, but there is absolutely no reason to disbelieve their reports of what those 28 pages say. And the two of them have proposed something that everyone in Congress should support. I mentioned the other day that I have grown a little impatient with the House of Saud which, it seems, considers the U.S. military to be its mall cops. Any further military aid to that repressive little theocracy now should depend on two non-negotiable demands: 1) that the Saudis use their own military primarily to protect their own interests, and 2) that anyone -- a-n-y-o-n-e -- who can be demonstrated to have been complicit in assessorial conduct involving the 9/11 attacks be handed over for prosecution to the United States Attorney for southern New York. To wit:

In 2005, the government of Saudi Arabia was dismissed from the suit on the ground of sovereign immunity, but in July the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated the Kingdom as a defendant. The plaintiffs believe that the withheld twenty-eight pages will support their allegation that the 9/11 hijackers received direct assistance from Saudi government officials in the United States.
"

http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/The_28_Pages

nationalize the fed

(2,169 posts)
37. even more incredible detail
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 01:17 PM
Sep 2014

this guy worked for years on the Saudi connection. He's not here anymore, he was found with a bullet in his head, a "suicide" -at least that's the official story. His next book is nowhere to be found. He was a professional pilot, and knew people involved in 911. RIP Phil, we'll carry on.

There are two different worlds in aviation — the general single-engine airplane world with a service ceiling of 10,000 feet and a top speed of around 200 miles per hour, and the commercial swept-wing jetliner world at 40,000 feet and Mach numbers for speed calculations. Little within that first world prepares the pilot for the second, high-altitude world.
So began my search for Middle Eastern operators of Boeing airliners. Because the hijackers were mostly Saudi Arabian, the firm of Dallah Avco, a Saudi operator of multiple private Boeing airliners, soon stood out as a focal point. To my amazement, I immediately discovered that Congressional investigators had already linked Dallah Avco with the actual hijackers. Omar Bayoumi, a Dallah employee and operative within the Saudi Ministry of Aviation, had provided housing and basic support for three hijackers: Nawaf al-Hazmi, Khalid al-Mihdhar and the pilot/hijacker of American 77, Hani Hanjour.

FBI evidence of the cell would confirm that the hijacking team of American 77 had formed and operated separately with direct financial support from top-level members of the Saudi government, bitter enemies of al Qaeda. The picture was beginning to clear.

From this point in the research, the guilt needle began pointing steadily toward Saudi Arabia, in part because 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudis. With every new piece of evidence, that needle does not fluctuate. As the focus narrowed on San Diego, the footprints of a large Saudi contingent began to appear. Congressional investigators had found, within buried FBI files, evidence that United States Senators would later call “undeniable” that top Saudi officials had known that terrorists were entering the U.S. beginning in 2000 in preparation for some sort of attack. These same officials are among those who work with American oil companies and regulate the flow of crude oil to the United States, the same Saudi officials that regulate the price that has gone from $30 per barrel to over $140 post 911...

...SAUDI GOVERNMENT CONNECTION TO 9/11 HIJACKERS...

...Prince Turki and Prince Bandar have more connections to Arabic-speaking Boeing flight instructors than anyone else in the world. The means and opportunity to slip the hijackers into Pinal Airpark or other facilities for training were theirs. The motive was a world-changing event. The Saudis would benefit greatly not only from the targeting of al-Qaeda but from an American invasion of Iraq, one that they had begged for after the first Gulf War. Dick Cheney would guarantee Prince Bandar that America was going to invade Iraq months before anyone informed the United States Congress...>

http://thebigbamboozle.tumblr.com/

He's got some interviews on Youtube- search bigbamboozle

pauldp

(1,890 posts)
19. A few pertinent pics
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 12:13 PM
Sep 2014



The Executive Director of the 911 Commission and the star witness for the Bush Administration



No conflict of interest here. Move along.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
23. It's surprising to me that the commission said anything about the Bushies.
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 12:33 PM
Sep 2014

There were a number of their cronies in the commission and on its staff.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
28. They could only whitewash the report so much.
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 12:57 PM
Sep 2014

They brought in an old whitewashing pro...Lee Hamilton that made SURE nobody high up got prosecuted for 9/11 and that the report would be delayed for years and years of being finished.

9/11 has the BFEE's fingerprints all over it. Despite pro wash.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
25. Number A: we did. Never mind the unconstitutional act of the Supremes.
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 12:35 PM
Sep 2014

Letter 2: I think that had he been allowed to take office, the attacks would have been thwarted or at least their effects minimized.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
26. Who made money on 911? Try the push and call options right before 911
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 12:51 PM
Sep 2014

Financial transactions in the days before the attack suggest that certain individuals used foreknowledge of the attack to reap huge profits. 1 The evidence of insider trading includes:

Huge surges in purchases of put options on stocks of the two airlines used in the attack -- United Airlines and American Airlines

Surges in purchases of put options on stocks of reinsurance companies expected to pay out billions to cover losses from the attack -- Munich Re and the AXA Group

Surges in purchases of put options on stocks of financial services companies hurt by the attack -- Merrill Lynch & Co., and Morgan Stanley and Bank of America
Huge surge in purchases of call options of stock of a weapons manufacturer expected to gain from the attack -- Raytheon
Huge surges in purchases of 5-Year US Treasury Notes........ much much more;

http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/stockputs.html


SEC: Government Destroyed Documents Regarding Pre-9/11 Put Options

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/06/sec-government-destroyed-documents-regarding-pre-911-put-options.html

Anyway watch the money as always on this newest war

freebrew

(1,917 posts)
29. Let's also not forget...
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 12:57 PM
Sep 2014

which party and who it was that empowered Osama bin Laden.

They are still here, still funding the 'terrorists'.

Oh, and still profiting from it.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
43. War is Peace! This is the second thread attempting this ludicrous talking point.
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 01:29 PM
Sep 2014

2+2=5

Boy, was Orwell on the mark.


That's some jaw-droppingly audacious doublespeak there, to argue that a clear continuation of the PNAC/neocon agenda equals holding ground against the PNAC.

Trashing this thread, too, and encourage others to do the same. We need reality, not attempts to justify this wholly predictable and long-planned PNAC bombing in Syria.


.


.

______________________________________________________________

There's a reason neolibs sound so much like neocons. There's a reason it feels so familiar that they are following that familiar PNAC plan:


When the DLC connections to the Koch Bros. became well known, they just rebranded the infiltration
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4165556

When you hear "Third Way", think INVESTMENT BANKERS
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024127432

GOP Donors and K Street Fuel Third Way’s Advice for the Democratic Party
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101680116

The Rightwing Koch Brothers fund the DLC
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x498414

Same companies behind the GOP are behind the DLC
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x1481121




riqster

(13,986 posts)
45. Bollocks. I am saying that inaction served us badly in the past.
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 01:37 PM
Sep 2014

Despite the woo, ODS, and general "my pony doesn't poop sparkly butterflies" rot one encounters on the Internets, Obama is not Bush, his actions are not equivalent to Bush's, and someone in touch with reality would know that.

Don't let your irrational hatred of the Prexy blind you to the crimes of his predecessor.

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
54. Which inaction was that? The invasion of Iraq?
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 06:25 PM
Sep 2014

The invasion of Afghanistan? The drone programs in Pakistan and Syria? The decade of the War On Terror?

Who's not in touch with reality here?

riqster

(13,986 posts)
58. Say not so, O fishy one.
Fri Sep 12, 2014, 08:40 PM
Sep 2014

As stated in the OP, it was Bush's inaction that enabled 9/11.

That did not work well for us, now did it?

That, my aqueous ami, IS reality.

colsohlibgal

(5,275 posts)
46. The Real Truth
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 02:02 PM
Sep 2014

I'm not sure what really went down but I'm reasonably sure that the official narrative isn't it.

There is so much. Just one thing is the shockingly low passenger numbers on these planes. I've flown out of these places during the week and they are always packed or nearly packed. Of course there is more, like dimwits who weren't great on little Cessnas being able to successfully pilot enormous commercial planes.

Whatever, it was a present for Dubya and his minions.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
47. Oh yeah. There was a lot hidden.
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 02:11 PM
Sep 2014

Since there's no proof that Dubya and Co. pulled the trigger, I stick with the "allowed it to happen and used it for their own malevolent purposes" approach. Because that much can be proven.

But buckeye to buckeye, I agree, there's a lot of shit got swept under that rug.

zappaman

(20,606 posts)
56. Yes, it must have been a conspiracy cuz "the shockingly low passenger numbers on these planes"
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 07:19 PM
Sep 2014

Congrats!
You've broke the case!
Since the plane was not full that means...um....uh....CONSPIRACY!

Oh, and the terrorists pilots were certified to fly an airliner.
Not sure how that fits into your little scenario.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It’s 9/11. Remember who a...