Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 01:55 PM Sep 2014

(Oops) Police Abusing Military Gear Could Be Forced to Pay Back Millions in Grants

http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/345-justice/25798-police-abusing-military-gear-could-be-forced-to-pay-back-millions-in-grants

Police Abusing Military Gear Could Be Forced to Pay Back Millions in Grants
By Dan Roberts, Guardian UK
10 September 14



US police forces that use military equipment earmarked for counter-terrorism to handle public order disturbances instead could be forced to repay millions of dollars in grants, under a review revealed during the first congressional hearings into this summer’s riots in Ferguson, Missouri.

The Department of Justice and the White House were already investigating whether to limit federal programs that have showered local law enforcement agencies with armoured vehicles and military-style equipment in recent years.

But the Department of Homeland Security, one of three US agencies primarily responsible for providing the equipment, said it was now considering whether to demand that its grants be repaid if police are found to have broken a little-known rule prohibiting its use in riot suppression.

“We have a range of remedies should [the DOJ] find non-compliance, including recoupment of funds,” Brian Kamoie of the Federal Emergency Management Agency told Kentucky senator Rand Paul during a hearing of the Senate homeland security committee.
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
(Oops) Police Abusing Military Gear Could Be Forced to Pay Back Millions in Grants (Original Post) Jackpine Radical Sep 2014 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author hlthe2b Sep 2014 #1
Did you change your entire OP? My response (since self-deleted) was obviously geared toward another hlthe2b Sep 2014 #2
I didn't change anything. Jackpine Radical Sep 2014 #21
I must have had two DU windows open.. 'Sorry! hlthe2b Sep 2014 #22
Make the police (not the populace) pay for it Taitertots Sep 2014 #3
Right, so then we will have paid *twice over* to equip our police into a military force... eomer Sep 2014 #4
No, the police would pay out of pocket. Not using tax dollars Taitertots Sep 2014 #6
Yes, sorry, faulty wording on my part. eomer Sep 2014 #7
Where do you think the dollars that go INTO the police pockets comes from? dixiegrrrrl Sep 2014 #12
Not the PD's money, right out of the police officer's bank account Taitertots Sep 2014 #13
And the police money in their bank accounts.....where did that come from? dixiegrrrrl Sep 2014 #15
Who cares where it comes from. Personal spending isn't government spending Taitertots Sep 2014 #16
As Spock would say whistler162 Sep 2014 #18
Making people who break the law pays fine is not illogical Taitertots Sep 2014 #20
If DHS wants the equipment available for fighting terrorism postulater Sep 2014 #5
Constitution says the Gov. cannot use military on US citizens, essentially. dixiegrrrrl Sep 2014 #14
Ouch! I hadn't thought of that. I would like to think that MY government is not that asshole-ish, postulater Sep 2014 #17
I am not understanding why HSA would write that in there. AllyCat Sep 2014 #8
It's CYA BrotherIvan Sep 2014 #9
sure it is NJCher Sep 2014 #11
Guess that is what I was thinking too Cher. AllyCat Sep 2014 #23
the hearing Garion_55 Sep 2014 #10
Uh Oh Tsiyu Sep 2014 #19

Response to Jackpine Radical (Original post)

hlthe2b

(102,304 posts)
2. Did you change your entire OP? My response (since self-deleted) was obviously geared toward another
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 02:06 PM
Sep 2014

issue...

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
21. I didn't change anything.
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 07:25 PM
Sep 2014

Note absence of edits on OP (but not on this response, which was edited to add this text).

eomer

(3,845 posts)
4. Right, so then we will have paid *twice over* to equip our police into a military force...
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 02:24 PM
Sep 2014

and the police will still have been turned into a military force?

What a deal (for the MIC 1%ers)!

eomer

(3,845 posts)
7. Yes, sorry, faulty wording on my part.
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 02:42 PM
Sep 2014

What I was trying say was that otherwise (if the police themselves don't pay for it), then we will have paid for it twice over - once through our federal taxes and then again through our local taxes. But in your solution then we will have paid for it just the once that we already have (which is obviously better).

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
12. Where do you think the dollars that go INTO the police pockets comes from?
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 04:23 PM
Sep 2014

Our Federal tax dollars get turned into war machines.
Our community ( city, county, state) tax dollars ( plus a lot of Federal tax dollars as a match) get turned into ANYTHING
the police/sheriff/Highway Patrol wants to buy
OR
has to pay out in lawsuits.

Our tax dollars pay the high premiums for the insurance that city/county/state offices has to buy, including liability insurance.

WE are buying the tools THEY use to oppress us.

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
13. Not the PD's money, right out of the police officer's bank account
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 04:28 PM
Sep 2014

When officers willfully violate the law, they should be personally responsible for it.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
15. And the police money in their bank accounts.....where did that come from?
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 04:41 PM
Sep 2014

Re-edit, to try again.

The money that police get comes from our taxes.
The police deposit their money, from our taxes, into a bank.
They then spend it, just like anyone else with a job does.
Just because it is in their bank account does not make the $$$ suddenly NOT coming from taxes we pay.

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
16. Who cares where it comes from. Personal spending isn't government spending
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 05:03 PM
Sep 2014

If YOU get a fine is it the same thing as fining your employer? The money comes out of your pocket, not your employers.

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
20. Making people who break the law pays fine is not illogical
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 06:27 PM
Sep 2014

Why should we hold police to a lower standard than everyone else?

I break the law, i pay the fine. Cops break the law, we pay the fine.

postulater

(5,075 posts)
5. If DHS wants the equipment available for fighting terrorism
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 02:34 PM
Sep 2014

it would seem more sensible to allocate it to the National Guard rather than the local police.

The National Guard is already trained on stuff like that and would have better supervision.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
14. Constitution says the Gov. cannot use military on US citizens, essentially.
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 04:34 PM
Sep 2014

National Guard is military.

Nothing says you cannot turn civilian police into a military looking/acting force, so that is what they are doing.

Worse yet, some states are using PRIVATE contractors to act as police.

postulater

(5,075 posts)
17. Ouch! I hadn't thought of that. I would like to think that MY government is not that asshole-ish,
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 05:50 PM
Sep 2014

but wrong again.

This crap never ends.

Somedays it seems like Cheney never left office.

NJCher

(35,689 posts)
11. sure it is
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 04:01 PM
Sep 2014

And that's de facto proof right there that they knew what could happen.

And can you believe this? College and university campus security is getting this type of equipment if they have an affiliation with the local police department in which the campus is located.

As a university teacher, I was tailed by an unmarked police car in a highly aggressive fashion. This car had tinted windows and six (count 'em!) six antennas on top of the car!

Later, at a teacher's meeting, I found out the campus was getting equipment through the police department (it had come through the Defense Department).

They are probably salivating for another Kent State. Then they can mow the students and faculty down with greater efficiency than what they were able to do in 1970. Bayonets! Assault rifles! Armored vehicles!! Just imagine the possibilities!


Cher

AllyCat

(16,195 posts)
23. Guess that is what I was thinking too Cher.
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 10:44 PM
Sep 2014

Still, why would the NSA care if cops opened fire on protesters? Keeps us all in line.

Tsiyu

(18,186 posts)
19. Uh Oh
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 06:19 PM
Sep 2014


Methinks a lotta no-neck Bubba deputies and porn-stashed captains might be sweatin' under the collar when they realize this.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»(Oops) Police Abusing Mil...