Do you agree with Elizabeth Warren that destroying ISIS should be our number one priority?

[DemocratSinceBirth]

7 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited
	Yes
	2 (29%)
	No
	5 (71%)
	1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

[Mike Nelson]

1. No, and...

...it sounds like she's considering running for President - this is something she would say if she was running...

[leftyohiolib]

2. no the supreme court is

[BlueCaliDem]

3. Not number one priority, but it's up there in the top five.

At least, that's what I believe.

[BillZBubb]

4. Not even in the top ten. nt.

[Scuba]

12. Not even in the top 50.

[BillZBubb]

17. Probably not, but I'm not going to make a list that long to find out!

[Autumn]

5. Not necessarily, I think we need to encourage the middle east nations to work

together and take them out. The threat by ISIS is to them.

[Erich Bloodaxe BSN]

6. +1.

We should provide some support to nations in the region fighting them, but not be the 'lead'. Encourage our 'allies' in the region to take greater leadership roles in their own neighbourhood.

[Autumn]

11. Maybe if those people over there like Israel, Iran and Saudi Arabia had a EDITED

common goal they might just be forced to get along. They live there, let them clean their own house.

Don't the guys in that picture look like they are all made up for a B movie?

[cascadiance]

14. This is exactly what she said, if you read the Hill article...

http://thehill.com/policy/international/216559-warren-destroying-isis-should-be-our-no-1-priority

"We can't get pulled into another war in the Middle East," she said. "We need to be working with others to close ISIS down."

Also, this is a typical trick to pull something out of context.

A number one priority RELATIVE TO WHAT? If it is a question about priorities in the middle east, or with even foreign policy issues, then it still doesn't necessarily deflect from a belief of hers that higher priorities overall should be to get Wall Street and corporate accountability and rebuilding the middle class. But media wouldn't leave that part out now would it? The corporate media? Huh?

Voting a pass here as I don't think we have enough information here, and that smells as something intentional on someone's part.

[oberliner]

16. They have killed two Americans recently in a pretty brutal fashion

They are definitely a threat to any American who ventures to that part of the world.

Especially those who try to report on what they are doing.

[asjr]

7. If Elizabeth can tell us what the plan is I am all for it.

We have so many " must dos" hanging around our necks it will take someone as smart as E. I also wish we could find a way to sue our Congress for the reckless play they have been giving us on D.C. If this was another country I believe they would have been run out of town. Between now and election all Democrats should be getting the message out. VOTE for Democrats!

[GeorgeGist]

8. No. That's blatant idiocracy.

[Iggo]

9. Nope.

I'd still vote for her over Clinton, though.

[edhopper]

10. ISUS

will never do the damage that the 1% with the cooperation of the Government has done to the middle class.
That should be our #1 priority.

[Fred Sanders]

13. Warren seems to not be the high intellect I once thought she was. Her speciality is attacking

WallStreet, vital enough, but her other credentials?.....

A President has to be a generalist, Warren appears to be an outstanding specialist.

[moondust]

15. Maybe not #1 but still pretty high on the list.

It's usually best to excise a cancer early, before it grows and becomes incurable.

[Initech]

18. Hell no!!

We have tons of problems here before we start throwing another couple trillion we don't have at the military industrial complex who will most likely just waste it.