Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mass

(27,315 posts)
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 06:11 PM Aug 2014

Gillibrand To Male Colleague Who Called Her 'Porky': 'Thanks A--hole'

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/gillibrand-male-colleagues-called-porky

She does not give names, but this clarifies why no gender equality bill can be passed in the US Senate (and I am sure some of this guys are "on our side".

In promoting her new book, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) has come forward with several stories of being called "chubby," "fat," and "porky" by her male colleagues in Congress.

In one incident from her early days in the Senate, Gillibrand describes an older senator who approached her from behind and squeezed her waist. "Don’t lose too much weight now," she recalls him saying. "I like my girls chubby.”



Gillibrand also recounted the time a labor leader advised her to improve her looks if she wanted to win a special election for her Senate seat in 2010.

“When I first met you in 2006 you were beautiful, a breath of fresh air. To win, you need to be beautiful again," he said.
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gillibrand To Male Colleague Who Called Her 'Porky': 'Thanks A--hole' (Original Post) Mass Aug 2014 OP
A class act, those Congresscritters. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2014 #1
In the spirit of accuracy, their approval rating is lower than TYPHUS Scootaloo Aug 2014 #4
Meh. She should name names n/t leftstreet Aug 2014 #2
yeah I agree.... VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #5
Agree cwydro Aug 2014 #24
I agree, I can't take her serious unless she does. dilby Aug 2014 #27
I suspect she's not going to because they weren't republicans. n/t hughee99 Aug 2014 #31
no surprise JI7 Aug 2014 #3
Gillibrand isn't especially offended by her coworkers' remarks. . . Journeyman Aug 2014 #6
The problem is.... BronxBoy Aug 2014 #7
Tell that to Gillibrand, who apparently doesn't have a problem with their attitude. . . Journeyman Aug 2014 #8
it doesn't say she doesn't have a problem with it but that she is trying to make excuses JI7 Aug 2014 #12
Gillibrand isn't especially offended by her coworkers' remarks Johonny Aug 2014 #15
Sarcasm rarely, in fact never, comes with caveats. . . Journeyman Aug 2014 #16
So what do you hear in this statement Johonny Aug 2014 #18
These are the same good-ole-boys who approved Clarence Thomas for SCOTUS, thereby VanGoghRocks Aug 2014 #23
I'm 64 and it never was polite to say anything like this karynnj Aug 2014 #29
Name names, please ProudToBeBlueInRhody Aug 2014 #9
I just discovered I LOVE porky women. OilemFirchen Aug 2014 #10
if I put a 1949 photo of my mom next to her.... steve2470 Aug 2014 #19
I hear ya! KansDem Aug 2014 #20
She's fat? LittleBlue Aug 2014 #33
She's not fat caraher Aug 2014 #42
Not cool, man. People shouldn't be treated that way. AverageJoe90 Aug 2014 #11
if a guy "squeezed my waist" he would lose his arm Skittles Aug 2014 #13
Before I met her, back in the '70s, my wife was an AA on the Hill. She lost count ... 11 Bravo Aug 2014 #35
"Sperm Thurmond"... SunSeeker Aug 2014 #37
see, no, he would die Skittles Aug 2014 #41
Her weight never crossed my mind a bit, until I read this article. alp227 Aug 2014 #14
same here steve2470 Aug 2014 #39
Keeping it classy on capital hill. progressoid Aug 2014 #17
What male privilege? nt geek tragedy Aug 2014 #21
Yeah, no misogyny there. bullwinkle428 Aug 2014 #22
She should have put her foot hifiguy Aug 2014 #25
Strom Thurmond was a well known creep. He would pinch women's rear ends on the elevator. Lint Head Aug 2014 #26
See post #35 upthread. I replied to Skittles before ... 11 Bravo Aug 2014 #36
Without names, her statements are next to worthless. Shemp Howard Aug 2014 #28
What if putting names out there hurts Dem chances of keeping the Senate? hughee99 Aug 2014 #38
I agree with what you say Plucketeer Aug 2014 #46
I wish she would name names. wheniwasincongress Aug 2014 #30
What woman would be "not porky" in their world? jmowreader Aug 2014 #32
She is quite attractive--those creepy male senators should WI_DEM Aug 2014 #34
And their hands to themselves. Dont call me Shirley Aug 2014 #40
They think they can say that because they are fit trim super buff guys lunasun Aug 2014 #43
Guys know that every woman worries about being fat. It's a power play, nothing more. Wella Aug 2014 #44
In the first example given by the OP davidpdx Aug 2014 #45

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
1. A class act, those Congresscritters.
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 06:12 PM
Aug 2014

Who would ever believe they could have an approval rating lower than lice?

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
4. In the spirit of accuracy, their approval rating is lower than TYPHUS
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 06:16 PM
Aug 2014

The lice are way up there next to airline food and Fran Drescher's rendition of the national anthem

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
5. yeah I agree....
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 06:18 PM
Aug 2014

ask any woman....the subtle dog whistle style misogyny happens all the frikken time. There are men that cannot even look women in the eyes....but that isn't overt sexism or harassment so you are forced to tolerate it...its little signs of disrespect...like being the new person on the job then soon after watching a male get hired in your same position and watching how they fawn all over them to make sure THEY have everything they need.....they rolled out the red carpet for my male counterpart....whom I helped hand select by the way....

dilby

(2,273 posts)
27. I agree, I can't take her serious unless she does.
Thu Aug 28, 2014, 01:03 PM
Aug 2014

Sorry but she needs to call people out on the carpet when this shit happens, not cover it up to keep her party happy.

Journeyman

(15,036 posts)
6. Gillibrand isn't especially offended by her coworkers' remarks. . .
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 06:26 PM
Aug 2014
Gillibrand isn't especially offended by her coworkers' remarks. "It was all statements that were being made by men who were well into their 60s, 70s or 80s," she says. "They had no clue that those are inappropriate things to say to a pregnant woman or a woman who just had a baby or to women in general."

She's too kind. I'm 60, and no one I know older than I am (or even younger), would ever believe statements such as these were acceptable to say to anyone, female or male, not even a relative or exceptionally close friend. But then, I guess I hang around with a classier group of people.


Gillibrand quote from, of all places, People Magazine (http://www.people.com/article/kirsten-gillibrand-hillary-clinton-president). i just did a search and its what came up.

BronxBoy

(2,286 posts)
7. The problem is....
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 06:34 PM
Aug 2014

that these same men are making policy decisions affecting women in this country. If they were making those comments at the country club bar with no power to affect the lives of women, that's one thing. Making those comments and helping to make decisions on the laws of the land, quite another.

Journeyman

(15,036 posts)
8. Tell that to Gillibrand, who apparently doesn't have a problem with their attitude. . .
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 06:42 PM
Aug 2014

I'm far more disturbed by her cavalier attitude than I am the rudeness and misogyny of her despicable compatriots -- I expect, and can see ways around their assholery; Gillibrand's, not so much.

JI7

(89,252 posts)
12. it doesn't say she doesn't have a problem with it but that she is trying to make excuses
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 07:07 PM
Aug 2014

or give explanations . but while it may be true it still doesn't make it ok.

Johonny

(20,854 posts)
15. Gillibrand isn't especially offended by her coworkers' remarks
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 08:02 PM
Aug 2014

I guess some people don't get sarcasm

"They had no clue that those are inappropriate things to say to a pregnant woman or a woman who just had a baby or to women in general."

I personally love the slow dig.

Journeyman

(15,036 posts)
16. Sarcasm rarely, in fact never, comes with caveats. . .
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 08:16 PM
Aug 2014

"It was all statements that were being made by men who were well into their 60s, 70s or 80s," she said.

If it were intended as sarcasm, she'd have said, "It was all statements made by men who have no clue those are inappropriate things to say to a pregnant woman or a woman who just had a baby or to women in general."

But people hear what they want to hear.

Johonny

(20,854 posts)
18. So what do you hear in this statement
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 10:58 PM
Aug 2014

In the House gym, she recalled, another of her male colleagues advised her to work out to avoid getting "porky."

"Thanks, a—hole,” she quipped in her book.


You do know smart people do insult people making statements that begin with caveats and end with... insults. It is a form of comedic statement that is older than you or me. She only said by the end of that excerpt that these men don't understand how to communicate with half the human race but you know you hear something different. That's why she tosses out the occasional Thanks, a-hole. For people that don't like people being subtle. I do you give you that she seems to go easy on Harry Reid in the book excerpts... but thanks asshole seems pretty harsh to me. But what do I know. Maybe it is a form of greeting where you are from.

 

VanGoghRocks

(621 posts)
23. These are the same good-ole-boys who approved Clarence Thomas for SCOTUS, thereby
Thu Aug 28, 2014, 11:43 AM
Aug 2014

insinuating that Anita Hill had lied.

BTW, Joe Biden was then-Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee that voted out Thomas' nomination.

VAWA aside, I'll never forgive Biden for that.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
29. I'm 64 and it never was polite to say anything like this
Thu Aug 28, 2014, 02:20 PM
Aug 2014

It would be interesting to have some idea which of her colleagues said this, however, it would be completely impolitical for her to identify any. What surprises me is that most pre baby boom people, while there was far more sexism, there was a far stricter (though chauvinistic) set of manners.

What also surprises me is that in the 50s and 60s, though it was extremely offensive, some men did differentiate between the "girls they could take home to mom" and those who they wouldn't. Here, you would expect they would be polite to their peer - a US Senator - even if their behavior towards staff was atrocious. (Please note - this behavior is unacceptable towards any woman.)

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
33. She's fat?
Thu Aug 28, 2014, 02:58 PM
Aug 2014

Harsh, very harsh.

And this "they were old" excuse doesn't jive with me. I can't recall my grandparents ever walking up to someone and calling them fat to their faces. Has there ever been a time when calling someone fat wasn't considered rude?

caraher

(6,278 posts)
42. She's not fat
Thu Aug 28, 2014, 09:30 PM
Aug 2014

but she did have substantial post-pregnancy weight that she shed prior to the Vogue piece the photo KansDem posted. Probably somewhere during that transition is where she was getting all the unsolicited advice and attention concerning her weight. From Wikipedia

The Gillibrands had their first child, Theodore, in 2003, and their second son, Henry, in 2008. Gillibrand is the sixth woman to have a child while serving as a member of Congress. She continued to work until the day of Henry's delivery, for which she received a standing ovation from her colleagues in the House the next day.


She's far too generous to these jerks in what she wrote. Who asked any of these guys for their opinions? Who gave that one guy license to paw at her waist?

That this is a discussion we're even having speaks volumes about how sick the culture is in the corridors of government.
 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
11. Not cool, man. People shouldn't be treated that way.
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 07:02 PM
Aug 2014

There may not have always been ill intent, but still, not a good thing to do to someone who doesn't appreciate it. Kudos to Sen. Gillibrand for standing up for herself.

11 Bravo

(23,926 posts)
35. Before I met her, back in the '70s, my wife was an AA on the Hill. She lost count ...
Thu Aug 28, 2014, 04:27 PM
Aug 2014

of the number of times Strom Thurmond "accidentally" brushed his hand against her breasts. (His nickname among the female staffers was "Sperm" Thurmond.) If I could, I would like to exhume him, hold him upright, and get you to KICK HIS ASS!

Skittles

(153,169 posts)
41. see, no, he would die
Thu Aug 28, 2014, 08:30 PM
Aug 2014

I don't fault other gals because I know growing up with a slew of brothers made me a bit, er assertive

alp227

(32,034 posts)
14. Her weight never crossed my mind a bit, until I read this article.
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 07:58 PM
Aug 2014

Sheesh what is WRONG with people in modern America?

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
39. same here
Thu Aug 28, 2014, 05:53 PM
Aug 2014

Those male Senators are lucky they were not all cursed out. Even back in the day, those remarks were rude, by anyone. Who gives a **** about her weight except her and her doctor ?

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
25. She should have put her foot
Thu Aug 28, 2014, 11:53 AM
Aug 2014

up his ass. Whatever happened to common courtesy and basic professionalism?

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
26. Strom Thurmond was a well known creep. He would pinch women's rear ends on the elevator.
Thu Aug 28, 2014, 12:56 PM
Aug 2014

Even from his wheelchair he was a lecher. My sister saw him in Washington once and said he looked like Frankenstein's Monster because of the hair implants all in a row where his hair was falling out.

11 Bravo

(23,926 posts)
36. See post #35 upthread. I replied to Skittles before ...
Thu Aug 28, 2014, 04:29 PM
Aug 2014

I read all the way down to your post. You are absolutely correct about Thurmond.

Shemp Howard

(889 posts)
28. Without names, her statements are next to worthless.
Thu Aug 28, 2014, 01:48 PM
Aug 2014

So let's see, some of Sen. Gillibrand's colleagues called her names. I don't doubt that.

But without naming names, all of her colleagues are now under a bit of suspicion. "I'll bet it was Senator A. But it could have been Senators B and C as well."

Would naming names have caused trouble for Sen. Gillibrand? Almost certainly. But that's what heroism is all about.

As it is, her statements do have some up-side as it brings attention to a problem. But without naming names, many people can reasonably assume that she is just making things up to sell a book.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
38. What if putting names out there hurts Dem chances of keeping the Senate?
Thu Aug 28, 2014, 05:48 PM
Aug 2014

For instance, if some of those comments came from Dems in tight races this fall. I don't think the decision is necessarily an easy one, but she put herself in a bad spot by telling the story and NOT naming the names.

wheniwasincongress

(1,307 posts)
30. I wish she would name names.
Thu Aug 28, 2014, 02:23 PM
Aug 2014

It hurts when powerful women (actresses come to mind in these situations) speak about what happened but decline to name names.

(My actresses comment refers to them speaking about "a director" asking them sexual favors for a role, casting couch, etc.)

jmowreader

(50,560 posts)
32. What woman would be "not porky" in their world?
Thu Aug 28, 2014, 02:43 PM
Aug 2014

I understand it's been a while since she was on the cover of the Babes of the Senate Swimsuit Calendar, but last I checked Kirsten Gillibrand is the thinnest person in the Senate.

Now ya want to talk porky? Yertle the Turtle will do nicely, at least until November when he gets stomped.

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
43. They think they can say that because they are fit trim super buff guys
Thu Aug 28, 2014, 10:22 PM
Aug 2014

Not everyone can be in super shape like them all the time and they should lay off the inappropriate very bad manners

 

Wella

(1,827 posts)
44. Guys know that every woman worries about being fat. It's a power play, nothing more.
Thu Aug 28, 2014, 10:50 PM
Aug 2014

These males are guys who secretly worry about their lack of control in any given situation--and about their penis size.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
45. In the first example given by the OP
Thu Aug 28, 2014, 11:49 PM
Aug 2014

Gillibrand should have simply punched the guy in the face. That to me is a clear example of sexual harassment.

The second one it's harder to judge what is happening without hearing more of what the situation was. Was this the one where she was called porky? I don't know.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gillibrand To Male Collea...