General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGillibrand To Male Colleague Who Called Her 'Porky': 'Thanks A--hole'
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/gillibrand-male-colleagues-called-porkyShe does not give names, but this clarifies why no gender equality bill can be passed in the US Senate (and I am sure some of this guys are "on our side".
In promoting her new book, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) has come forward with several stories of being called "chubby," "fat," and "porky" by her male colleagues in Congress.
In one incident from her early days in the Senate, Gillibrand describes an older senator who approached her from behind and squeezed her waist. "Dont lose too much weight now," she recalls him saying. "I like my girls chubby.
When I first met you in 2006 you were beautiful, a breath of fresh air. To win, you need to be beautiful again," he said.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Who would ever believe they could have an approval rating lower than lice?
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)The lice are way up there next to airline food and Fran Drescher's rendition of the national anthem
leftstreet
(36,109 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)ask any woman....the subtle dog whistle style misogyny happens all the frikken time. There are men that cannot even look women in the eyes....but that isn't overt sexism or harassment so you are forced to tolerate it...its little signs of disrespect...like being the new person on the job then soon after watching a male get hired in your same position and watching how they fawn all over them to make sure THEY have everything they need.....they rolled out the red carpet for my male counterpart....whom I helped hand select by the way....
Stupid otherwise
dilby
(2,273 posts)Sorry but she needs to call people out on the carpet when this shit happens, not cover it up to keep her party happy.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)Journeyman
(15,036 posts)She's too kind. I'm 60, and no one I know older than I am (or even younger), would ever believe statements such as these were acceptable to say to anyone, female or male, not even a relative or exceptionally close friend. But then, I guess I hang around with a classier group of people.
Gillibrand quote from, of all places, People Magazine (http://www.people.com/article/kirsten-gillibrand-hillary-clinton-president). i just did a search and its what came up.
BronxBoy
(2,286 posts)that these same men are making policy decisions affecting women in this country. If they were making those comments at the country club bar with no power to affect the lives of women, that's one thing. Making those comments and helping to make decisions on the laws of the land, quite another.
Journeyman
(15,036 posts)I'm far more disturbed by her cavalier attitude than I am the rudeness and misogyny of her despicable compatriots -- I expect, and can see ways around their assholery; Gillibrand's, not so much.
JI7
(89,252 posts)or give explanations . but while it may be true it still doesn't make it ok.
Johonny
(20,854 posts)I guess some people don't get sarcasm
"They had no clue that those are inappropriate things to say to a pregnant woman or a woman who just had a baby or to women in general."
I personally love the slow dig.
Journeyman
(15,036 posts)"It was all statements that were being made by men who were well into their 60s, 70s or 80s," she said.
If it were intended as sarcasm, she'd have said, "It was all statements made by men who have no clue those are inappropriate things to say to a pregnant woman or a woman who just had a baby or to women in general."
But people hear what they want to hear.
Johonny
(20,854 posts)In the House gym, she recalled, another of her male colleagues advised her to work out to avoid getting "porky."
"Thanks, ahole, she quipped in her book.
You do know smart people do insult people making statements that begin with caveats and end with... insults. It is a form of comedic statement that is older than you or me. She only said by the end of that excerpt that these men don't understand how to communicate with half the human race but you know you hear something different. That's why she tosses out the occasional Thanks, a-hole. For people that don't like people being subtle. I do you give you that she seems to go easy on Harry Reid in the book excerpts... but thanks asshole seems pretty harsh to me. But what do I know. Maybe it is a form of greeting where you are from.
VanGoghRocks
(621 posts)insinuating that Anita Hill had lied.
BTW, Joe Biden was then-Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee that voted out Thomas' nomination.
VAWA aside, I'll never forgive Biden for that.
karynnj
(59,504 posts)It would be interesting to have some idea which of her colleagues said this, however, it would be completely impolitical for her to identify any. What surprises me is that most pre baby boom people, while there was far more sexism, there was a far stricter (though chauvinistic) set of manners.
What also surprises me is that in the 50s and 60s, though it was extremely offensive, some men did differentiate between the "girls they could take home to mom" and those who they wouldn't. Here, you would expect they would be polite to their peer - a US Senator - even if their behavior towards staff was atrocious. (Please note - this behavior is unacceptable towards any woman.)
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)You know shithead McCain is one of them.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)A shock to my system, indeed:
steve2470
(37,457 posts)they could be sisters.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)I see "cool," "confident," and "worldly-wise," but not "porky."
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Harsh, very harsh.
And this "they were old" excuse doesn't jive with me. I can't recall my grandparents ever walking up to someone and calling them fat to their faces. Has there ever been a time when calling someone fat wasn't considered rude?
caraher
(6,278 posts)but she did have substantial post-pregnancy weight that she shed prior to the Vogue piece the photo KansDem posted. Probably somewhere during that transition is where she was getting all the unsolicited advice and attention concerning her weight. From Wikipedia
She's far too generous to these jerks in what she wrote. Who asked any of these guys for their opinions? Who gave that one guy license to paw at her waist?
That this is a discussion we're even having speaks volumes about how sick the culture is in the corridors of government.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)There may not have always been ill intent, but still, not a good thing to do to someone who doesn't appreciate it. Kudos to Sen. Gillibrand for standing up for herself.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)yes he would
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)of the number of times Strom Thurmond "accidentally" brushed his hand against her breasts. (His nickname among the female staffers was "Sperm" Thurmond.) If I could, I would like to exhume him, hold him upright, and get you to KICK HIS ASS!
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)Skittles
(153,169 posts)I don't fault other gals because I know growing up with a slew of brothers made me a bit, er assertive
alp227
(32,034 posts)Sheesh what is WRONG with people in modern America?
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Those male Senators are lucky they were not all cursed out. Even back in the day, those remarks were rude, by anyone. Who gives a **** about her weight except her and her doctor ?
progressoid
(49,991 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)up his ass. Whatever happened to common courtesy and basic professionalism?
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)Even from his wheelchair he was a lecher. My sister saw him in Washington once and said he looked like Frankenstein's Monster because of the hair implants all in a row where his hair was falling out.
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)I read all the way down to your post. You are absolutely correct about Thurmond.
Shemp Howard
(889 posts)So let's see, some of Sen. Gillibrand's colleagues called her names. I don't doubt that.
But without naming names, all of her colleagues are now under a bit of suspicion. "I'll bet it was Senator A. But it could have been Senators B and C as well."
Would naming names have caused trouble for Sen. Gillibrand? Almost certainly. But that's what heroism is all about.
As it is, her statements do have some up-side as it brings attention to a problem. But without naming names, many people can reasonably assume that she is just making things up to sell a book.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)For instance, if some of those comments came from Dems in tight races this fall. I don't think the decision is necessarily an easy one, but she put herself in a bad spot by telling the story and NOT naming the names.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Consider that we're hearing the opinion of a Three Stooges member.
wheniwasincongress
(1,307 posts)It hurts when powerful women (actresses come to mind in these situations) speak about what happened but decline to name names.
(My actresses comment refers to them speaking about "a director" asking them sexual favors for a role, casting couch, etc.)
jmowreader
(50,560 posts)I understand it's been a while since she was on the cover of the Babes of the Senate Swimsuit Calendar, but last I checked Kirsten Gillibrand is the thinnest person in the Senate.
Now ya want to talk porky? Yertle the Turtle will do nicely, at least until November when he gets stomped.
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)keep their mouths shut.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)lunasun
(21,646 posts)Not everyone can be in super shape like them all the time and they should lay off the inappropriate very bad manners
Wella
(1,827 posts)These males are guys who secretly worry about their lack of control in any given situation--and about their penis size.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Gillibrand should have simply punched the guy in the face. That to me is a clear example of sexual harassment.
The second one it's harder to judge what is happening without hearing more of what the situation was. Was this the one where she was called porky? I don't know.