Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pwb

(11,287 posts)
Sun Aug 24, 2014, 04:17 PM Aug 2014

Removing those evil dictators never seems to work out very well.

Iraq, Libya, Syria, all have split into cold blooded killing factions. As soon as the dictator is removed or weakened the country turns into a cluster fuck. Maybe it is time for us to all mind our own business.

I guess I am just tired of the hate and killing. Even our police are now cold blooded haters.

Humankind is at its lowest level in my lifetime. Sad to say.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Removing those evil dictators never seems to work out very well. (Original Post) pwb Aug 2014 OP
I hear you. Laelth Aug 2014 #1
Of course, they're only "evil" when.. Matrosov Aug 2014 #2
"Business" is how they kept power in the first place arcane1 Aug 2014 #3
Violent revolutions rarely work as advertised. Warpy Aug 2014 #4
I disagree only about "humankind". Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2014 #5
No to 'regime change' and No to 'regime protection'. Dictatorships are not best and pampango Aug 2014 #6
Milosevic leaps to mind as an obvious counterexample. Donald Ian Rankin Aug 2014 #7
Who held Yugoslavia together and keep the Milosevics in control" TexasProgresive Aug 2014 #8
It worked out pretty well in Japan and Germany mythology Aug 2014 #9
Different situations... Wounded Bear Aug 2014 #10

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
1. I hear you.
Sun Aug 24, 2014, 04:22 PM
Aug 2014

But part of me believes that this is the best we have ever been. Humans have been overthrowing dictators and installing puppets for a long time. What's different, now, is the internet. We're simply more aware of what's happening in the world. That actually gives "the people" the impetus to affect politics in a way we have never been able to before.



-Laelth

 

Matrosov

(1,098 posts)
2. Of course, they're only "evil" when..
Sun Aug 24, 2014, 04:25 PM
Aug 2014

..they aren't serving US interests.

Saddam was considered a great ally when he attacked Iran, which was considered a great ally when it was led by Pahlavi rather than Khomeini.

Perhaps Al Assad would've been considered an ally as well, if he weren't so friendly with Iran and Russia.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
3. "Business" is how they kept power in the first place
Sun Aug 24, 2014, 04:26 PM
Aug 2014

and business will determine who replaces them

Warpy

(111,339 posts)
4. Violent revolutions rarely work as advertised.
Sun Aug 24, 2014, 04:29 PM
Aug 2014

It was a clusterfuck after the American Revolution under the Articles of Confederation which gave each military faction its own bailiwick. Early states were on the brink of war with each other when the Constitutional Convention was called and we got very, very lucky with that one, if only because Madison had seen what the main problems of the time were and knew how the Iroqois had managed to deal with many of them.

And take heart, humanity has been far lower than this. We haven't brought back the rack and the thumbscrew as far as I know, so the civilized veneer hasn't cracked that far.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
5. I disagree only about "humankind".
Sun Aug 24, 2014, 04:38 PM
Aug 2014

The vast majority of humans go through their lives without participating in wars, atrocities, torture, or the like. One of the great myths is that "humans are programmed for war."

If it's natural to kill, how come men have to go into training to learn how? Joan Baez

I still believe, in spite of everything, that people are truly good at heart. Anne Frank

pampango

(24,692 posts)
6. No to 'regime change' and No to 'regime protection'. Dictatorships are not best and
Sun Aug 24, 2014, 05:56 PM
Aug 2014

we should support the efforts of people to achieve more in the way of individual rights and a say in who governs them and how.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
9. It worked out pretty well in Japan and Germany
Sun Aug 24, 2014, 07:48 PM
Aug 2014

South Korea is a lot better off than if they were governed by the North Korean government. Italy is better off with Mussolini.

And supporting leaders that don't support democracy hasn't exactly worked well for us. Pinochet turned out to be an asshat as did Alfredo Stroessner. Our good friends in Saudi Arabia are also more than a bit draconian on concepts like women's rights.

I think we should do more, not necessarily militarily, to encourage democracy rather than supporting dictators. Isolationism is a poor philosophy because if we don't have an influence, somebody else will. Putin is clearly looking to expand his power and on a good day Putin is a piece of trash.

But also Syria was a civil war before we entered the picture.

Wounded Bear

(58,706 posts)
10. Different situations...
Sun Aug 24, 2014, 07:57 PM
Aug 2014

Those countries are much more unified in their demographics than many of the colonial nations we've been practicing our "regime change" skills in. Yugoslavia was patched together after WWI from the ethnic groups that we now see as the nations that replaced it. Iraq was patched together from the remnants of the Ottoman Empire and the resulting French and British colonies between the wars.

As was stated above, most of the crap we've gone through since WWII has been a modern version of colonialism, where our corporate interests trump all forms of human rights/individual freedoms.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Removing those evil dicta...