Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Fri Aug 22, 2014, 02:33 PM Aug 2014

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Weighs In On Ferguson, Skewers The Conservative Roberts Court


Ruth Bader Ginsburg Skewers High Court For Forsaking Fight Against 'Real Racial Problem'
By Shadee Ashtari


Although the U.S. Supreme Court was "once a leader in the world" in the battle for racial equality, recent decisions by the high court undermine its role in solving a "real racial problem" in America, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg explained in an interview with The National Law Journal on Wednesday.

Citing recent events in Ferguson, Missouri, and racially biased stop-and-frisk policies, Ginsburg reflected on the perpetuation of racial segregation in America, comparing the challenges with those of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community.

<...>

instead of upholding the court's history as a powerful stalwart against racial discrimination, the Roberts court's recent decisions upholding affirmative action bans and restricting voting rights have not "helped" the country advance, Ginsburg explained.

"What's amazing is how things have changed," Ginsburg said, recalling a landmark 1971 decision in Griggs v. Duke Power Co., in which the Supreme Court unanimously embraced its legal powers to outlaw arbitrary employment discrimination against minorities. "It was a very influential decision and it was picked up in England. That's where the court was heading in the '70s."

Singling out the Voting Rights Act as the most powerful law "in terms of making people count in a democracy," Ginsburg reiterated her opposition to the court's majority 2013 decision in Shelby County v. Holder, which struck down a key provision of the law that safeguarded against racial discrimination in certain voting laws.

Chief Justice John Roberts Jr., who delivered the majority decision, justified the ruling by arguing that "things have changed dramatically" in the South since the landmark civil rights law was signed in 1965 and that the provision, while once effective, is no longer needed.


Read more:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/22/ruth-bader-ginsburg-racial-discrimination_n_5699275.html
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ruth Bader Ginsburg Weighs In On Ferguson, Skewers The Conservative Roberts Court (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Aug 2014 OP
A critically important piece. Thanks for the OP. nt stevenleser Aug 2014 #1
May this wise woman have a LONG tenure on the Court. hifiguy Aug 2014 #2
especially if a rethug is elected president. Sam1 Aug 2014 #9
Thank you for being a lonely voice for us at the top! TheNutcracker Aug 2014 #3
Yep. One of the few unfortunately. nt Cali_Democrat Aug 2014 #13
Big K/R. moondust Aug 2014 #4
I love this fearless woman malaise Aug 2014 #5
Yes. Cali_Democrat Aug 2014 #15
What an intelligent and strong woman. And honest. Ginsburg for President. JaydenD Aug 2014 #6
She is our most kickass jurist. nt msanthrope Aug 2014 #7
thank you thank you so much...EXCELLENT article. BlancheSplanchnik Aug 2014 #8
loved reading this. thanks for posting! secondwind Aug 2014 #10
She is amazing! ybbor Aug 2014 #11
K&R ReRe Aug 2014 #12
KnR! sheshe2 Aug 2014 #14
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Aug 2014 #16
Maybe in Roberts' white bread world "things have changed dramatically..." But, he seems to Cha Aug 2014 #17
Kicked and recommended! Enthusiast Aug 2014 #18
A national treasure, that lady! lastlib Aug 2014 #19
The Notorius Ruth Bader Ginsburg... Stellar Aug 2014 #20
Justice Ginsburg is a wave saidsimplesimon Aug 2014 #21
She's one of the great ladies of our era. I hope the history books note that. eom Cleita Aug 2014 #22
why georgee was annointed. to keep the court conservative. pansypoo53219 Aug 2014 #23
I'm afraid I find this unsettling. It looks as though she's talking about ethics, not legality. Donald Ian Rankin Aug 2014 #24
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
15. Yes.
Fri Aug 22, 2014, 08:47 PM
Aug 2014

She speaks her mind. I still remember the Hobby Lobby case where she tore into the Supreme Court fascists.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
8. thank you thank you so much...EXCELLENT article.
Fri Aug 22, 2014, 04:09 PM
Aug 2014

It must be hard for her to stomach, having to work with the majority CONservative court.

ybbor

(1,554 posts)
11. She is amazing!
Fri Aug 22, 2014, 04:54 PM
Aug 2014

And when she decides to retire she must be replaced with a person as strong as she is on our side. We must control the senate and WH when she does step down, but I hope she serves as long as she can.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
12. K&R
Fri Aug 22, 2014, 05:17 PM
Aug 2014

... throwing out that part of the voting rights act was

".... like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you're not getting wet."

That's right, she's naming names and using analogies to make her views completely understood.

Cha

(297,318 posts)
17. Maybe in Roberts' white bread world "things have changed dramatically..." But, he seems to
Fri Aug 22, 2014, 09:33 PM
Aug 2014

have his head up his own conservative a$$.. so how would he know what's going on the real world?

Thank you, Ruth Bader Ginsburg!

Mahalo Cali

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
18. Kicked and recommended!
Sat Aug 23, 2014, 05:53 AM
Aug 2014

The racist Robert's court struck down key provisions of the Voting Rights Act.

They suggested America was post racial! Can you say out of touch?

Bigoted Fascists!

pansypoo53219

(20,981 posts)
23. why georgee was annointed. to keep the court conservative.
Sat Aug 23, 2014, 01:39 PM
Aug 2014

gore NEVER had a chance. it had NOTHING to do w/ law.

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
24. I'm afraid I find this unsettling. It looks as though she's talking about ethics, not legality.
Sat Aug 23, 2014, 01:59 PM
Aug 2014

Ginsburg appears to be justifying her positions on grounds of the social consequences.

I don't think that that is what a judge should be doing. Thinking about the consequences of laws should be left to elected politicians; a judge should focus on correctly interpreting the law, even if the correct interpretation will have consequences that are bad.

Even though I agree with most of her views, I do not want Ginsburg substituting her own conscience for the collective conscience of the electorate.

When a judge talks about "helping the country advance", that sets off very loud warning bells for me. A judge should be completely impartial about the consequences of their rulings and the direction the country should be going in; all they should care about is the correct interpretation of the law.

Yes, she's "on our side". No, I don't think that makes this OK.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ruth Bader Ginsburg Weigh...