General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)malthaussen
(17,204 posts)It may, however, be construed as a derivitave right if society so chooses.
Most of our rights are derivative. And almost any of our rights may be withheld at pleasure. We tend these days, however, to dignify as "rights" things we consider to be so terribly important that they need some distinction to elevate them over other issues.
-- Mal
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)into the medical professions, that is as doctors and other care givers, scientists and discoverers of cures, suppliers of medical equipment, administrators and investors of capital, there is no health care.
Rather than a right or a privilege it is a service or commodity made available by people that all should have access to.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)I'm not sure it's an absolute right, since it's a service provided by others at some cost. However, an informed society will recognize the value of and responsibility for providing health care to its members. We all will require it, rich and poor alike, so an enlightened society should provide it to every member.
But, what do we do for those who are not members of our society? If it were a genuine right, it should be universally available. I doubt that will ever occur. In an ideal world where it was a universal right, we'd be flying every ebola victim to a location where they could receive the same care the two American healthcare workers received, or creating facilities where the disease is endemic to provide that level of care. I don't see that happening, so it will have to be a responsibility of each society.
Matrosov
(1,098 posts)For a long time, my stance on the matter leaned toward healthcare being a privilege, exactly because "it's a service provided by others at some cost." How can we demand that others help take care of us, at least in helping to finance our healthcare?
What helped me decide that healthcare was an absolutely right was to think of children. Don't children have an absolute right to be taken care of, not just in the way of healthcare but in terms of food, shelter, clothing, and so forth, despite this having to be provided by others at some cost?
A counter-argument would be, "But children do not have mental, physical, and financial means to care for themselves!" Well, the same could be said for many seniors and for those who have mental or physical disabilities.
Furthermore, very few people in general would be able to visit a doctor and pay for everything in cash without any other payers involved. In other words, most people would not be able to afford healthcare without the financial help of others. That's why we pool our money in government healthcare programs and private insurances, where those who do not need healthcare at the moment nevertheless help provide healthcare to others by continuing to pay into these "pools."
deathrind
(1,786 posts)cornball 24
(1,478 posts)City Lights
(25,171 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)the good Senator is 100% correct.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Here it's a commodity. Similarly with education and a pension
ProfessorGAC
(65,076 posts)But we can't use that co-opted word anymore because it now means something different than what it is supposed to mean.
But, certainly people are ENTITLED to receive the medical care they need to live healthy lives.
Cosmocat
(14,566 posts)nm
Lochloosa
(16,066 posts)TampaAnimusVortex
(785 posts)Last edited Fri Aug 22, 2014, 04:34 PM - Edit history (1)
A right should be a right if your in a country of 350 million, or a city of 5 million, or a small town of 1000, or a commune of 50, or an island of 2 or 1.
Figure out what your rights are on if you were the sole inhabitant of an island, and you can extrapolate your rights in the countless throngs.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)for food, shelter, or healthcare if there was no other society. But, I see your point.
TampaAnimusVortex
(785 posts)Granted, he didnt have the right (or ability) to make anyone else provide it to him. He certainly had every right to work towards that himself.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)in a civilized society.
riseabove
(70 posts)Their time at the hospital cost money, as they too need to earn money for a living.
So why should people be entitled to free healthcare?
I like the Norwegian system. I believe they tax everyone for universal healthcare, but you also have to pay a $2000 deductible before any healthcare kicks in.
Make that deductible $3000-4000 in America and call it a deal!
Edit: And the post above me has it spot on as well. I can't argue that people in America should be entitled to free healthcare if they aren't going to take care of themselves either. We have a disgusting obesity rate, fast food diets, the smoking. You know how much it cost to keep someone in ICU?? Like 10k a day. We have shootings, stabbings, skateboarders breaking bones, x-games, smoking... IMHO there is no way America's lifestyle could sustain us having a true universal healthcare system without taxes going through the roof..
If America wants universal healthcare, or think it should be a privilege, our lifestyles would have to change as well!
antigop
(12,778 posts)Last edited Fri Aug 22, 2014, 05:25 PM - Edit history (1)
http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/(1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
(2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.
antigop
(12,778 posts)Article 31 reads:
"First: Every citizen has the right to health care. The State shall maintain public health and provide the means of prevention and treatment by building different types of hospitals and health institutions.
Second: Individuals and entities have the right to build hospitals, clinics,or private health care centers under the supervision of the State, and this shall be regulated by law."
There are other health care guarantees, including special provisions for children, the elderly, and the handicapped elsewhere in the 43-page document.
antigop
(12,778 posts)not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.
The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the
fundamental rights of every human being without distinction of race,
religion, political belief, economic or social condition.
antigop
(12,778 posts)You have the right to receive NHS
services free of charge, apart from
certain limited exceptions sanctioned
by Parliament.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)I don't understand that.
What if no one wanted to become a doctor?
What happens to a person's right to healthcare in that case?
raven mad
(4,940 posts)Not all of them are in it for the money and prestige. If the education were provided at a reasonable cost, we would have a LOT more doctors/PA's/nurses/EMTS than we do now. Instead, they have to scramble for years and years to pay off loans just to attend med school. Education should also be a RIGHT.
treestar
(82,383 posts)The medicine man took care of everyone. When it became a paid proposition, it started to get derailed.
BaggersRDumb
(186 posts)If you are asking someone like David Koch he would assure you it is a privilege, a privilege he can afford the best of and that you might not be able to afford any of...
If you are asking a non sociopath, they will say it is a right.
surrealAmerican
(11,362 posts)... so we ought to treat it more like a right than a privilege, even though it is neither.
PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)Currently, it's a privilege.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)See replies numbered 17, 23.
Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)Unfortunately