Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
1. Here in the UK that would possibly make him and his lawyer both liable for charges
Thu Aug 21, 2014, 10:09 PM
Aug 2014

"conspiracy to pervert the course of justice", it's called. And probably also misconduct in public office.

napi21

(45,806 posts)
2. Unfortunately here in the US, it appears to be ok.
Thu Aug 21, 2014, 10:11 PM
Aug 2014

Im still listening to the show and an attorney on there is saying that it doesnt surprise her.

ncjustice80

(948 posts)
4. I wish the 5th amendment was waived for public officials
Thu Aug 21, 2014, 10:19 PM
Aug 2014

In the US like it is in the UK. Doea the UK even have something like our 5th amendment????

CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)
3. He may be a murderer but he knows the first rule of interacting with the police
Thu Aug 21, 2014, 10:17 PM
Aug 2014

Never say anything to the police without your attorney's approval and that would include making an official report. If he tells the truth and it is bad for him he is fucked and if he lies on a police report he is fucked so the first rule of dealing with the police is say nothing until you talk to your attorney.

Funny how the cops know this but the general public does not.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
5. I suppose he has a right to refuse, but that ought to be enough to fire his ass along
Thu Aug 21, 2014, 10:23 PM
Aug 2014

with the rest of bunch.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
6. He might have a right to not file a report, but the police investigating
Thu Aug 21, 2014, 10:26 PM
Aug 2014

the incident should be required to turn in a report that is a public record. It appears that no on the PD was compelled to write any type of official report.

procon

(15,805 posts)
7. Yeah, don't write stuff that might be used against you
Thu Aug 21, 2014, 10:39 PM
Aug 2014

So, he must have contacted a lawyer first because he knew from the start that he had done something illegal. Then he was advised not to make an official report which could be used as evidence to convict him.

 

VanGoghRocks

(621 posts)
12. I'm as anti-Wilson as the next person (and probably a lot more than some), but here I must
Fri Aug 22, 2014, 12:05 AM
Aug 2014

put my foot down to insist on a fundamental principle: the act of consulting an attorney is not evidence of anything, nor should any inference be drawn from it, other than that one consulted an attorney. Thus, Wilson might have wondered whether writing an incident report might expose him to liability in a civil trial, been advised not to file by an attorney, without knowing or even thinking that he had broken any law.

I would, however, like to see under what statutory authority Ferguson Chief Jackson was allowed to place Wilson on 'paid' administrative leave. Seems to me Wilson has a right not to write the incident report but the Department has an equal right to insist that its employees adhere to policy, i.e., write incident reports, or face suspension or termination without pay.

madville

(7,412 posts)
8. Ferguson PD isn't the investigating agency
Thu Aug 21, 2014, 10:41 PM
Aug 2014

The brought in St. Louis PD if I recall correctly, so the official investigation/report should be issued from that third party agency at some point.

Solomon

(12,310 posts)
9. and since the people writing the report were not at the scene
Thu Aug 21, 2014, 10:49 PM
Aug 2014

then they have no choice but to rely on the eyewitnesses when making the report. Since Wilson won't tell his side of the story, then they are left with the 4 or 5 witnesses, all of whom say Wilson killed Brown when Brown had his hands up trying to surrender. Based on that, he should be charged and arrested. So your excuse is out the window.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
13. They wouldn't interview the witnesses.
Fri Aug 22, 2014, 12:56 AM
Aug 2014

Thats why they went on TV. So, if they weren't interested in witnesses, and Wilson was clamming up, just what the hell could be in a report?

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
11. Yet the "strong armed robbery" incident report references a shooting incident report
Thu Aug 21, 2014, 11:55 PM
Aug 2014


Are they lying now when they say there is no shooting incident report or were they lying in the report on the so-called "robbery" when they referenced a shooting incident report?

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
15. And that's his 'time sheet.' He was paid for what he did, wasn't he?
Fri Aug 22, 2014, 03:12 PM
Aug 2014

Ferguson, vote out ALL the people who allowed this corruption. You can have better lives than you've been living, you deserve better than this!

Lex

(34,108 posts)
14. So Wilson already knew he fucked up
Fri Aug 22, 2014, 12:58 AM
Aug 2014

is exactly was "he didn't write a report on advice of lawyers" sounds like.

Slice it any way you want, but it sounds like he was covering up from the get-go.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Officer Wilson didn't WRI...