Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baitball Blogger

(46,758 posts)
Sat Aug 16, 2014, 09:23 PM Aug 2014

Rich holds true to principles — dooming her chances

TALLAHASSEE — Maybe Nan Rich should engineer her own political metamorphosis. She could hold a news conference, tear up her Democratic voter-registration card, go independent and demand to be let into the gubernatorial general-election debates.

That might be the only way people would finally pay some attention to the Broward Democrat who stubbornly refuses to play the game and shift every core position to find the sweet spot between what progressive groups will tolerate and a majority of voters will embrace.

Or course, Rich would never switch parties. She is who she is, a South Florida liberal, unabashed advocate of abortion rights and expanding the state government's footprint in health care. She sponsored bills mandating background checks for gun buyers.

She was Charlie Crist before Crist was Crist, way back five years ago when he "blindly supported irresponsible gun legislation pushed by the NRA." She was sponsoring bills to allow same-sex couples to adopt children when Crist was backing Florida's gay-marriage constitutional ban.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/politics/os-capview-deslatte-081714-20140815,0,5655531.column

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rich holds true to principles — dooming her chances (Original Post) Baitball Blogger Aug 2014 OP
There is no constitutional God given right to be included in a debate bluestateguy Aug 2014 #1
Nan Rich's chances are slim to none because she is almost totally unknown. 1monster Aug 2014 #2

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
1. There is no constitutional God given right to be included in a debate
Sat Aug 16, 2014, 09:45 PM
Aug 2014

Nor does any politician "owe" the voters, or his/her opponent, a debate.

The media usually screws up debates anyway with stupid questions, opinionated cant and impressionistic bibble-babble.

1monster

(11,012 posts)
2. Nan Rich's chances are slim to none because she is almost totally unknown.
Sat Aug 16, 2014, 09:47 PM
Aug 2014

I don't think she can change that positively in the week or so before primary elections.

I wish liberal/progressive Dems would get their names and reputations out there a year or so BEFORE election day so that voters know at least as much about them as their opponets.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rich holds true to princi...