The woman who thinks reducing the male population by 90% will solve everything.
The Femitheist is a 22-year-old criminology student with a three-year-old. One angry day in 2012 she took to the Internet to outline the brutal concept of International Castration Day. After posting it on YouTube she stepped out for a coffee. Returning home a few hours later, she found that all gnashing male hell had broken loose.
While she now derides International Castration day as silly, the internet had met The Femitheist. Two years later she is an emergent cult leader, a ball-stepping villainess, or clear-thinking realist—depending who you ask. Today she continues to support the reduction of the male population and generally courts outrage and devotion through her website and YouTube channel. She’s also 200 pages into what she’s hoping will be her 700 page manifesto outlining the philosophy of Femitheism. It’s tentatively titled The Ratio.
VICE: I assume The Ratio refers to your belief the male population should be reduced to between by 90 percent.
The Femitheist: I believe that conventional equality, with a 50/50 female-to-male ratio, is an inferior system. Essentially my ideas lead to men being made a special class—a far more valued class—having choice of a myriad of women due to the difference in sex ratio. That is my intention. Men would be made more valuable, and their quality of life would be dramatically improved. They would have a subsidised existence if you will, akin to going on an all-expenses paid vacation that lasts from birth to death.
Assuming people are down for that, how could you reduce the male population by that much? Are you talking culling or selective breeding over years?
Obviously men comprise a substantial portion of the victims of violent crime and participate heavily in war, so there will always be deaths there—but certainly not culling. I don't advocate selective slaughter or brutal processes.
Sic....
What about the ambitions of the individual? Some men may aspire to more than luxury breeding pens.:
Some would argue it would be a dystopian world because it wouldn't be free in the present conventional sense. However that is misguided. It will be utopian because it will be a world almost without conflict where people cooperate and are treated properly within a well-engineered and long-forged system. If everything is great for almost everyone the point is null. Survival and socio-organic wellbeing are the most important elements in life. Diversity of principles and standards is only necessary in a world of multiple nations, cultures, societies, and religions due to fear of oppression. So, how is this world any better? Because some people have potential opportunities to do certain things?
http://www.vice.com/read/is-reducing-the-male-population-by-90-percent-the-solution-to-all-our-problems
And before anyone says anything, no one is claiming this woman is representative of all feminists, she doesn't even claim to be feminist but her own "special" kind of thing.
That said, I find it especially disturbing how she seems to be able to openly call for what amounts to a genocide of gay men. They obviously wouldn't have any place in her "utopia" where men are literally just breeding stock. So I find her claims she isn't calling for a genocide highly dubious.
Her being a criminology major disturbs me, would you really trust her to give any man a fair shake in a legal situation?
This has to be my "favorite" quote
"Vice: Like slaves?
Not as slaves, simply as workers performing a duty, in the same way workers today do. Only without the need for monetary reimbursement as they would have no need for such a thing. This would be highly monitored and regulated."
So... slaves.
= new reply since forum marked as read
She hasn't slaughtered a bunch of men, yet! But she thinks it's a good idea...
As evidenced by the fact that you asked, apparently in all seriousness, if I was ok with forced castration. 
I'm not even ok with infant circumcision FFS.
Yeah, you've got me alllll figured out. Excellent work, detective. 
I don't get it.
I can change the oil in my car, and in the school bus we used as a camper in college. 
Fuck her
that your motives were anything than "lilly pure"....
Posting about street harassment as in Redqueen's example up top is to shed light on a widespread problem and might even educate a few on something they rarely consider--and from the viewpoint of the "harassed"..
Posting these rantings that you know are extremist to the degree of infinity and represent no significant group think in the real world--as though they represent a position or a problem that needs to be addressed--is quite something else...
I wonder why?
Question anything but those.
You could at least give it the good ol' college try. 
the worst Star Trek episode ever made. Do her plans involve pain belts and Spock's Brain?
I pleaded with her to allow me to stay, as Macho Island's ambassador. 
Or the Divine Miss M?
Maybe they could tour.
But seriously...your fantasy is pretty disturbing.
To put it mildly and politely. 
Some people will do anything for money.
I think she'd have been better off if she'd have just done the whole thing up as a nice Sci-Fi fiction.
"Special" indeed.
How.. interesting.
