General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFire ex-military from police force
Not only has the American police force been getting ex-military equipment but has also been getting ex-soldiers from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Police departments actively recruit veterans - "Green to Blue" programs. Many of these police forces are made up of entirely of ex-military who are using the same tactics that they used in war zones - the hair trigger, shoot first gang. They are not retrained well enough to work on our streets, resorting to their war training. The police violate the constitutional rights of our fellow citizens more everyday, especially the citizens should have dark skin .... combat flashbacks? with a side order of racism for some? It is time to take away the military hardware and eliminate the war mentality from the police. The only way to do this is either retrain the
ex-military police of fire them, clean house. I bet that the officer who shot Michael Brown served in war. Enough is enough, why should I be more worried about getting abused or killed by the police then the criminals, even in our homes?
BainsBane
(53,056 posts)It's possible their higher level of training might make them less likely to overreact. What do you know about the backgrounds of some of these officers involved in high-profile incidents of murder and abuse?
Response to BainsBane (Reply #1)
GP6971 This message was self-deleted by its author.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and they think their safety is above all of ours...because WE are the enemy.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)that is the proper place for them....not to the active police force.
The River
(2,615 posts)You should delete it.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)calls into question the quality of police training.
I agree that it's a speculative post, and we can't assume that these incidents are a result of combat veterans serving in police forces, but I don't think it falls into the category of a smear.
delta17
(283 posts)There is no evidence that veterans are worse officers than non-vets.
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/11/retiring-the-vietnam-vet-stereotype/281321/
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)has some traction. IMO, the problems we're seeing nationwide with police officers is a result of poor training from the ground up.
delta17
(283 posts)By the way, military training isn't "Shoot anything that moves." I would think a combat veteran would be less likely to draw on a kid walking in the street.
Again, the stereotype of the violent, crazy war vet is wrong. They aren't ticking time bombs. Rambo was a movie, not reality.
DinahMoeHum
(21,806 posts). . ."shooting anything that moves". . .
. . .when this stuff happens.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)Almost no National Guard members were called up during Vietnam when we had a draft. We should use the National Guard inside the nation, only as a last resort if, God forbid, an uprising occurs (along with the guard's service during natural disasters and the like). The local police should tone it down and start relating to the community they police in, instead of acting like a foreign army of occupation.
mwrguy
(3,245 posts)Army Reserve has the support units.
I wonder why that is.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)as if we live in a war zone. I think evaluations should be required (and I suspect many police departments do them to some extent) to ensure the prospective policeperson internalizes that we are not living in a war zone.
My former FIL was retired military and a policeman. I think he was pretty decent. But then, he wasn't a gung ho type like many today (including police/military wannabes with their tough guy, gun toting mentality).
mythology
(9,527 posts)Or is this just a slam against military members?
Calista241
(5,586 posts)I can sorta be convinced that a swat team needs an armored vehicle. But not every cop needs an AR, combat fatigues and flash bangs.
Equipping the cops this way just forms a barrier between them and the people they're supposed to protect.
This whole episode is a tragedy.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Yep it's RT.
Baitball Blogger
(46,756 posts)Especially in Florida, our world has been turned upside down because ex-military officers take jobs or positions in the community and expect to make decisions without anyone questioning them. It creates crazy scenarios around here that can't be defended.
Skittles
(153,182 posts)Miigwech
(3,741 posts)...... I don't have all the facts by any means. But, to call my post ridiculous is closing the door to part of the problem, it is not just the military hardware that makes the police so aggressive.
https://www.aclu.org/war-comes-home-excessive-militarization-american-policing
Skittles
(153,182 posts)I don't stereotype ex-military folk
a discussion regarding the militarization of the police force is fine; saying "fire all ex-military" is ridiculous
Miigwech
(3,741 posts)I said fire or retrain. Military tactics are wrong for a civil police force. The police don't seem to have a problem using them. Why? I believe it has to do with the high number of ex-military with little or no transitional training into the civilian work force. I have posted several links discussing this problem. It is not disrespecting the veterans to discuss this.
Response to Miigwech (Reply #32)
bluesbassman This message was self-deleted by its author.
hack89
(39,171 posts)instead of smearing every military veteran.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)It's obvious you don't and your smearing of all veterans is disgusting.
Miigwech
(3,741 posts)Of course you think by saying that I am smearing the military veterans, that will end the discussion. I don't disrespect our military at all, I just wonder that they are not being retrained properly to do civilian police work..... Read this report, please.
[link:http://cops.usdoj.gov/Publications/e011226431.pdf
|Law Enforcement Agency Responses
One limitation of this report is that it leaves many important questions
unanswered about the nature and extent of specific problems
that returning police officers are experiencing. The study was too small
to survey police officers who have returned from combat zones, and
most of the agency representatives who were interviewed on the telephone
provided only general observations. For example, one said that
some officers had difficulty transitioning from the go-go-go mindset
of active duty to the slower pace of in-service training or routine police
duties. Another said signs of stress had been reported regarding a
few officers. Several emphasized the importance of outreach to deployed
police officers families, while others suggested that equal or
greater attention be paid to potential problems among combat veterans
who apply for police work. Similarly, psychologists who reviewed a
draft of this report expressed concerns about the adequacy of current
psychological screening instruments for identifying unresolved, combat-
related mental health issues among police recruits. Finally, several
interview participants emphasized the importance of recognizing the
benefits that military veterans can bring to policing, such as leadership
skills, teamwork experiences, and weapons training.
The study did find a wide range of police department responses to
officers returning from combat zones. In some departments, officers
simply go back to work. As one police officer and SWAT team member
explained, his return from combat to law enforcement was essentially
a matter of heres your gun back, no questions asked.Other
departments required some type of reorientation, training, and/or a
conversation about the availability of personal and family assistance.
They required, for example, firearms retraining and recertification,
and a meeting with a supervisor (but not with a professional mental
health or family services counselor). At various departments, the
supervisor brought the officer up to date on policies and procedures
that had changed and/or reminded the officer that personal and
family resources were available if needed, such as through the departments
(or a city/county) employee assistance program, psychological
or behavioral services unit, or a peer assistance team.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)Yeah, I'll get right on that.
Miigwech
(3,741 posts)I posted the link of the report:
U.S. Department of Justice
Office of Community Oriented Policing Services
Barbara Webster
Institute for Law and Justice
http://cops.usdoj.gov/Publications/e011226431.pdf
Miigwech
(3,741 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Yes, the veterans are the problem here.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)FSogol
(45,524 posts)rustydog
(9,186 posts)I could be wrong. But there is nothing wrong with ex-military being police officers. That is not the problem, It is the culture that is allowed to exist.
Start slapping-down offenders as hard as we, as a nation, pick on the poor, police departments would straighten up pretty quick and get rid of the assholes.
RyanWill570
(1 post)The rate of military wanting to join the police force (through "green to blue" programs coupled with the amount who pass the academy and are sworn in.. (its a very difficult figure to get here on the internet... but its around 10-20%) That's pretty insignificant to begin with because they are barely even hired to begin with.
With that, it is safe to say it is mostly the police with no prior military experience who do the ugly stuff we here on the news. Its also important to understand the difference between experience and training. Experience is to actually use it in the field and then have the opportunity to assess yourself along with your peers in a concrete manner.
On the subject of race. Many of the peers those encounter mind you are of different races and you don't have the freedom to live anywhere you please (side note: the demographics of US military are not equivalent to the US civilian population..40% minorities as opposed to 28%) So, good luck being racist in the military) Once again, its more likely race card cases involving police have not an Ex-military member involved.
I think you will find that most of the time these police are simply bullies who may be too racist, or scared of real combat to join and are itching for a safe yet, real world scenario to get their rocks off. (Situations that a very rarely get and the military does: more than it wants. PTSD anyone?) All in all i think it's quite the opposite from your call to fire ex-military from the police forces and quite the contrary. Police officers should BE REQUIRED military experience or (at a minimal military training sponsorship) for a significant period of time because there is way too much room for them to be zealous, scared of people and lack discipline with any weapons they carry.