Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Miigwech

(3,741 posts)
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 10:08 PM Aug 2014

Fire ex-military from police force

Not only has the American police force been getting ex-military equipment but has also been getting ex-soldiers from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Police departments actively recruit veterans - "Green to Blue" programs. Many of these police forces are made up of entirely of ex-military who are using the same tactics that they used in war zones - the hair trigger, shoot first gang. They are not retrained well enough to work on our streets, resorting to their war training. The police violate the constitutional rights of our fellow citizens more everyday, especially the citizens should have dark skin .... combat flashbacks? with a side order of racism for some? It is time to take away the military hardware and eliminate the war mentality from the police. The only way to do this is either retrain the
ex-military police of fire them, clean house. I bet that the officer who shot Michael Brown served in war. Enough is enough, why should I be more worried about getting abused or killed by the police then the criminals, even in our homes?

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fire ex-military from police force (Original Post) Miigwech Aug 2014 OP
Is there evidence former military are disproportionately invovled in these incidents? BainsBane Aug 2014 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author GP6971 Aug 2014 #5
I have been saying this all along.....our police forces are desert trained for 10 yrs worth VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #2
The surplus equipment SHOULD be going to the National Guard Amories..... VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #3
Broad Brush Smear The River Aug 2014 #4
I think it's a legitimate concern, especially since the evidence in these cases repeatedly Maedhros Aug 2014 #26
It's basically a shot in the dark. delta17 Aug 2014 #28
No, but what he said about poor police training on top of prior military training Maedhros Aug 2014 #29
That poor training would apply to all officers, right? delta17 Aug 2014 #30
"Serve and Protect" devolves into "Search and Destroy". . . DinahMoeHum Aug 2014 #6
You got some guns there... no, I mean the arms required to swing that brush. n/t X_Digger Aug 2014 #7
Keep the National Guard at home and let them be used in exceptional cases aint_no_life_nowhere Aug 2014 #8
Almost all the reserve Combat Arms units are Guard mwrguy Aug 2014 #12
Don't think all or most x-military are a problem, but I've definitely heard SOME gunners talk as Hoyt Aug 2014 #9
Perhaps you could be bothered to provide even the slightest bit of evidence mythology Aug 2014 #10
The COPS are overly militarized. Calista241 Aug 2014 #11
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71YvIOqNYws Here's the military/police connections. L0oniX Aug 2014 #13
We should have seen this coming. Baitball Blogger Aug 2014 #14
ridiculous Skittles Aug 2014 #15
Ask the Police in your city how many ex-military are currently on the force Miigwech Aug 2014 #16
I am ex-military Skittles Aug 2014 #18
not what I said Miigwech Aug 2014 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author bluesbassman Dec 2014 #34
"I don't have all the facts.." - You should have stopped right there hack89 Aug 2014 #19
"I don't have all the facts" tammywammy Aug 2014 #20
Not smearing anyone - read this report Miigwech Aug 2014 #23
Read your uncited "report"? tammywammy Aug 2014 #24
report from U.S. Dept. of Justice Miigwech Aug 2014 #31
Police killing civilians - asking why? Miigwech Aug 2014 #17
Ugh. NuclearDem Aug 2014 #21
Worst OP on DU ever. Shameful! yeoman6987 Aug 2014 #22
Unrec. The modern version of spitting on the troops? FSogol Aug 2014 #25
I am inclined to believe that many are ex-military police who have police training rustydog Aug 2014 #27
Disagree...Are most of the individual members of police force...military? RyanWill570 Dec 2014 #33

BainsBane

(53,056 posts)
1. Is there evidence former military are disproportionately invovled in these incidents?
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 10:11 PM
Aug 2014

It's possible their higher level of training might make them less likely to overreact. What do you know about the backgrounds of some of these officers involved in high-profile incidents of murder and abuse?

Response to BainsBane (Reply #1)

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
2. I have been saying this all along.....our police forces are desert trained for 10 yrs worth
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 10:13 PM
Aug 2014

and they think their safety is above all of ours...because WE are the enemy.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
3. The surplus equipment SHOULD be going to the National Guard Amories.....
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 10:14 PM
Aug 2014

that is the proper place for them....not to the active police force.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
26. I think it's a legitimate concern, especially since the evidence in these cases repeatedly
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 06:00 PM
Aug 2014

calls into question the quality of police training.

I agree that it's a speculative post, and we can't assume that these incidents are a result of combat veterans serving in police forces, but I don't think it falls into the category of a smear.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
29. No, but what he said about poor police training on top of prior military training
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 10:23 PM
Aug 2014

has some traction. IMO, the problems we're seeing nationwide with police officers is a result of poor training from the ground up.

delta17

(283 posts)
30. That poor training would apply to all officers, right?
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 10:36 PM
Aug 2014

By the way, military training isn't "Shoot anything that moves." I would think a combat veteran would be less likely to draw on a kid walking in the street.

Again, the stereotype of the violent, crazy war vet is wrong. They aren't ticking time bombs. Rambo was a movie, not reality.

DinahMoeHum

(21,806 posts)
6. "Serve and Protect" devolves into "Search and Destroy". . .
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 10:20 PM
Aug 2014

. . ."shooting anything that moves". . .

. . .when this stuff happens.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
8. Keep the National Guard at home and let them be used in exceptional cases
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 10:29 PM
Aug 2014

Almost no National Guard members were called up during Vietnam when we had a draft. We should use the National Guard inside the nation, only as a last resort if, God forbid, an uprising occurs (along with the guard's service during natural disasters and the like). The local police should tone it down and start relating to the community they police in, instead of acting like a foreign army of occupation.

mwrguy

(3,245 posts)
12. Almost all the reserve Combat Arms units are Guard
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 11:07 PM
Aug 2014

Army Reserve has the support units.

I wonder why that is.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
9. Don't think all or most x-military are a problem, but I've definitely heard SOME gunners talk as
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 10:39 PM
Aug 2014

as if we live in a war zone. I think evaluations should be required (and I suspect many police departments do them to some extent) to ensure the prospective policeperson internalizes that we are not living in a war zone.

My former FIL was retired military and a policeman. I think he was pretty decent. But then, he wasn't a gung ho type like many today (including police/military wannabes with their tough guy, gun toting mentality).

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
10. Perhaps you could be bothered to provide even the slightest bit of evidence
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 10:45 PM
Aug 2014

Or is this just a slam against military members?

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
11. The COPS are overly militarized.
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 10:48 PM
Aug 2014

I can sorta be convinced that a swat team needs an armored vehicle. But not every cop needs an AR, combat fatigues and flash bangs.

Equipping the cops this way just forms a barrier between them and the people they're supposed to protect.

This whole episode is a tragedy.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
13. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71YvIOqNYws Here's the military/police connections.
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 11:13 PM
Aug 2014


Yep it's RT.

Baitball Blogger

(46,756 posts)
14. We should have seen this coming.
Wed Aug 13, 2014, 11:19 PM
Aug 2014

Especially in Florida, our world has been turned upside down because ex-military officers take jobs or positions in the community and expect to make decisions without anyone questioning them. It creates crazy scenarios around here that can't be defended.

 

Miigwech

(3,741 posts)
16. Ask the Police in your city how many ex-military are currently on the force
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 10:25 AM
Aug 2014

...... I don't have all the facts by any means. But, to call my post ridiculous is closing the door to part of the problem, it is not just the military hardware that makes the police so aggressive.


https://www.aclu.org/war-comes-home-excessive-militarization-american-policing

Skittles

(153,182 posts)
18. I am ex-military
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 12:27 PM
Aug 2014

I don't stereotype ex-military folk

a discussion regarding the militarization of the police force is fine; saying "fire all ex-military" is ridiculous

 

Miigwech

(3,741 posts)
32. not what I said
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 11:32 PM
Aug 2014

I said fire or retrain. Military tactics are wrong for a civil police force. The police don't seem to have a problem using them. Why? I believe it has to do with the high number of ex-military with little or no transitional training into the civilian work force. I have posted several links discussing this problem. It is not disrespecting the veterans to discuss this.

Response to Miigwech (Reply #32)

hack89

(39,171 posts)
19. "I don't have all the facts.." - You should have stopped right there
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 12:40 PM
Aug 2014

instead of smearing every military veteran.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
20. "I don't have all the facts"
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 12:42 PM
Aug 2014

It's obvious you don't and your smearing of all veterans is disgusting.

 

Miigwech

(3,741 posts)
23. Not smearing anyone - read this report
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 04:25 PM
Aug 2014

Of course you think by saying that I am smearing the military veterans, that will end the discussion. I don't disrespect our military at all, I just wonder that they are not being retrained properly to do civilian police work..... Read this report, please.

[link:http://cops.usdoj.gov/Publications/e011226431.pdf

|Law Enforcement Agency Responses
One limitation of this report is that it leaves many important questions
unanswered about the nature and extent of specific problems
that returning police officers are experiencing. The study was too small
to survey police officers who have returned from combat zones, and
most of the agency representatives who were interviewed on the telephone
provided only general observations. For example, one said that
some officers had difficulty transitioning from the “go-go-go mindset”
of active duty to the slower pace of in-service training or routine police
duties. Another said “signs of stress” had been reported regarding a
few officers. Several emphasized the importance of outreach to deployed
police officers’ families, while others suggested that equal or
greater attention be paid to potential problems among combat veterans
who apply for police work. Similarly, psychologists who reviewed a
draft of this report expressed concerns about the adequacy of current
psychological screening instruments for identifying unresolved, combat-
related mental health issues among police recruits. Finally, several
interview participants emphasized the importance of recognizing the
benefits that military veterans can bring to policing, such as leadership
skills, teamwork experiences, and weapons training.
The study did find a wide range of police department responses to
officers returning from combat zones. In some departments, officers
simply go back to work. As one police officer and SWAT team member
explained, his return from combat to law enforcement was essentially
a matter of “here’s your gun back,” no questions asked.Other
departments required some type of reorientation, training, and/or a
conversation about the availability of personal and family assistance.
They required, for example, firearms retraining and recertification,
and a meeting with a supervisor (but not with a professional mental
health or family services counselor). At various departments, the
supervisor brought the officer up to date on policies and procedures
that had changed and/or reminded the officer that personal and
family resources were available if needed, such as through the department’s
(or a city/county) employee assistance program, psychological
or behavioral services unit, or a peer assistance team.





 

Miigwech

(3,741 posts)
31. report from U.S. Dept. of Justice
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 11:22 PM
Aug 2014

I posted the link of the report:

U.S. Department of Justice
Office of Community Oriented Policing Services
Barbara Webster
Institute for Law and Justice

http://cops.usdoj.gov/Publications/e011226431.pdf

rustydog

(9,186 posts)
27. I am inclined to believe that many are ex-military police who have police training
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 09:55 PM
Aug 2014

I could be wrong. But there is nothing wrong with ex-military being police officers. That is not the problem, It is the culture that is allowed to exist.
Start slapping-down offenders as hard as we, as a nation, pick on the poor, police departments would straighten up pretty quick and get rid of the assholes.

RyanWill570

(1 post)
33. Disagree...Are most of the individual members of police force...military?
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 09:04 PM
Dec 2014

The rate of military wanting to join the police force (through "green to blue" programs coupled with the amount who pass the academy and are sworn in.. (its a very difficult figure to get here on the internet... but its around 10-20%) That's pretty insignificant to begin with because they are barely even hired to begin with.

With that, it is safe to say it is mostly the police with no prior military experience who do the ugly stuff we here on the news. Its also important to understand the difference between experience and training. Experience is to actually use it in the field and then have the opportunity to assess yourself along with your peers in a concrete manner.

On the subject of race. Many of the peers those encounter mind you are of different races and you don't have the freedom to live anywhere you please (side note: the demographics of US military are not equivalent to the US civilian population..40% minorities as opposed to 28%) So, good luck being racist in the military) Once again, its more likely race card cases involving police have not an Ex-military member involved.

I think you will find that most of the time these police are simply bullies who may be too racist, or scared of real combat to join and are itching for a safe yet, real world scenario to get their rocks off. (Situations that a very rarely get and the military does: more than it wants. PTSD anyone?) All in all i think it's quite the opposite from your call to fire ex-military from the police forces and quite the contrary. Police officers should BE REQUIRED military experience or (at a minimal military training sponsorship) for a significant period of time because there is way too much room for them to be zealous, scared of people and lack discipline with any weapons they carry.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fire ex-military from pol...