Poll about Limited War.

[Ken Burch]

This poll is about measuring the level of trust people feel here regarding the concept of "limited war".

3 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited
	I believe it's certain that "limited wars" will stay limited.
	0 (0%)
	I believe it's likely, but not certain, that "limited wars" will stay limited.
	1 (33%)
	I believe it's unlikely, but not certain, that "limited wars" will stay limited.
	1 (33%)
	I believe it's certain that"limited wars" will not stay limited.
	1 (33%)
	1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

[Kaleva]

1. We haven't experienced total war since WWII

[Ken Burch]

2. We have experienced long, pointlessly drawn-out regional conflicts.

Would you say THOSE were still "limited"?

Is a war "limited" if it isn't a world war?

What, to you, is the dividing line?

[Kaleva]

5. Total war doesn't have to be world wide

The Civil War can be considered to be a total war and also the numerous Indian Wars. The North and South Koreans would probably think of the Korean War as a total war but from the viewpoint of the US and other involved nations, it wasn't.

[Xipe Totec]

3. I believe in limited war the way I believe in limited pregnancy. nt

[Maedhros]

4. One thing that is undoubtedly true:

the reasons the Pentagon gives for why a war is "necessary" are always false.

[el_bryanto]

6. I'd probably vote halfway in the middle - we have seen some that stayed limited and others that

expanded.

Bryant