Who needs that troublesome Bill of Rights anyway?
The following is from Dr. Bob Altemeyer's book , freely available online at
http://members.shaw.ca/jeanaltemeyer/drbob/TheAuthoritarians.pdf
I encourage everyone to read it; it's written in a very engaging and informal style.
In fact, who even needs the whole Bill of Rights? Here is a (fake) letter-to-the- editor I asked some San Francisco State University students to respond to in 1990.
If a person stops to think about it, most of the problems we are having can be traced to the Bill of Rights--or more precisely, to the way it has been interpreted by the Supreme Court. Freedom of speech has been twisted to mean that pornographers can sell their filth, and that anybody can say whatever he wants, whether its good for society or not. And freedom of religion has been twisted to mean children cant pray in public schools any more. And the right to happiness has been twisted to mean women can have abortion after abortion if theyre unhappy being pregnant. And think how many drug pushers and criminals have gotten off scot-free because their rights were supposedly violated after they had robbed or killed somebody.
A lot of people hoped the new Supreme Court, rid of the Liberal Majority which had made all these terrible rulings, would overturn them. But its clear now that they wont. No Supreme Court can reverse the ruling of an earlier Supreme Court, so we are stuck with these interpretations as long as there is a Bill of Rights. And we will soon be destroyed as a nation because of them. So the only thing we can do, to make America the free, pure, safe Christian nation that the founding fathers intended it to be, is to repeal the Bill of Rights.
If you like, you can count up how many ignorant, inaccurate, misleading and just plain stupid things there are in this letter. I knew it was ridiculous when I composed it. But I got the material from various people Ive heard speak on the subject. If you havent heard them, tune in to talk radio some night.
I asked the students how sensible they thought the letter was, and whether they thought the Bill of Rights should be repealed. High RWAs found the letter pretty sensible, dont you know, and they favored repealing the Bill of Rights more than anyone else did. Which sprinkles a dash of irony into this stew. The founding fathers added the Bill of Rights to the Constitution to prevent tyranny by the government. I wonder if they realized that democracy could be undermined from below as well as crushed by tyranny from above by people who didnt want the freedoms?