Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
Tue Aug 5, 2014, 05:06 AM Aug 2014

about Hillary running

Look, I realize that we do not need to repeat the fiasco of 2000. Nader may be backing Rand Paul, but I have no illusions about the fact that the same congress and media that fights a Democratic president will fall all over themselves to obey a Republican, if not drag him further to the right themselves.

However, perhaps some of the Hillary supporters who are angry should think about why so many people are unhappy about the way the 2016 campaign is being sold to us.

One: If we simply coronate Hillary, she will have NO reason to go to the left. The moneyed interests will be there, ready to make "suggestions."

Two: By attacking those who have misgivings, many people who felt cheated are dismissed. The truth is, The democrats have been trying to exchange their base since Bill himself got elected, and that proverbial "bill" shows up at the Voting booth.

Three: The Gop still has their dirty tricks in place. It will be easy to sell the idea that Hillary lost Florida and Ohio

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
about Hillary running (Original Post) DonCoquixote Aug 2014 OP
Pffft! wyldwolf Aug 2014 #1
Hilly, Thespian2 Aug 2014 #3
Juvenile name calling. I rest my case. wyldwolf Aug 2014 #4
Here is name calling. Thespian2 Aug 2014 #14
Wait! What?? That really happened? wyldwolf Aug 2014 #15
Who cares Thespian2 Aug 2014 #16
Apparently the vast majority of Democratic voters have couldn't care less about your opinion wyldwolf Aug 2014 #17
Here is how your post played out in my mind MyNameGoesHere Aug 2014 #5
I crawled out from Thespian2 Aug 2014 #13
Hillary would govern to the political <<Right>> of Obama, I would think. And I don't want that. blkmusclmachine Aug 2014 #2
Its all about SCOTUS lobodons Aug 2014 #6
Her SCOTUS picks? Is she the only Democrat in the US? merrily Aug 2014 #9
Yeah...to hell with the other 2/3rds of the government davidn3600 Aug 2014 #11
If given the choice of a Republican or a Democrat obxhead Aug 2014 #7
Assuming DonkeyXotee is not a GOTP troll . . . OldRedneck Aug 2014 #8
Any of Hillary's challengers? Who are her Democratic primary challengers? merrily Aug 2014 #10
name calling, excellent DonCoquixote Aug 2014 #12

wyldwolf

(43,868 posts)
1. Pffft!
Tue Aug 5, 2014, 05:31 AM
Aug 2014
However, perhaps some of the Hillary supporters who are angry

Hillary supporters are angry because we constantly have to fend off lies from the left (here and here, for example) and the right.

should think about why so many people are unhappy about the way the 2016 campaign is being sold to us.

One: If we simply coronate Hillary, she will have NO reason to go to the left. The moneyed interests will be there, ready to make "suggestions."


No one has ever suggested a coronation. But those who don't support Hillary have an obvious problem with news of her success. If I could use a sports analogy like so many do when it comes to politics, it's like being told to shut up when your team shows the biggest potential to win in a coming season.

Two: By attacking those who have misgivings,

Ah yes, the old "if you would stop attacking us" bit coming from the mouths of the ones doing the attacking. Go through GD with an unbiased eye and see who starts attacking first.

Thespian2

(2,741 posts)
3. Hilly,
Tue Aug 5, 2014, 07:00 AM
Aug 2014

like Billy, is a corporate shill. Want a poorer government than you have now? Coronate Hilly. Want a better government? Choose a real progressive. Personally, I will never vote for Hilly and Billy (because you will get both if you elect Hilly).

Thespian2

(2,741 posts)
14. Here is name calling.
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 10:40 AM
Aug 2014

Who signed the law to allow Wall Street bankers too ruin the economy? Oh, yes. That was Bill Clinton, helping out Phil Gramm who authored the provision.

wyldwolf

(43,868 posts)
15. Wait! What?? That really happened?
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 12:13 PM
Aug 2014

You're not making it up?? LOL

Such an old story. Are u regurgitating it because it's new to you?

Interesting how the Clintons have such astronomical approval numbers. You must be so much smarter than the rest of us.

Thespian2

(2,741 posts)
16. Who cares
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 08:07 PM
Aug 2014

how long ago Clinton helped bankers destroy the economy? Is that no longer relevant since Warren is trying to return some of the regulations? Your last sentence proves your childishness.

 

MyNameGoesHere

(7,638 posts)
5. Here is how your post played out in my mind
Tue Aug 5, 2014, 07:25 AM
Aug 2014

Hilly, My brain just tied you to right wing when I saw that so my first reaction was to skip it. Then I caught the Billy reference and no doubt was left in my mind where you may have crawled out from.

Thespian2

(2,741 posts)
13. I crawled out from
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 10:32 AM
Aug 2014

under a pile of idiotic thinking about Hillary Clinton. Go ahead, choose to continue to lose America.

 

lobodons

(1,290 posts)
6. Its all about SCOTUS
Tue Aug 5, 2014, 07:27 AM
Aug 2014

Could care less about how close to center Hillary is. The only thing that matters is her SCOTUS picks will be be left of whoever the TPGOP candidate would pick.

 

obxhead

(8,434 posts)
7. If given the choice of a Republican or a Democrat
Tue Aug 5, 2014, 07:40 AM
Aug 2014

That will govern as a Republican would, I'll choose neither.

I'm done supporting Democrats that act as Republicans.

 

OldRedneck

(1,397 posts)
8. Assuming DonkeyXotee is not a GOTP troll . . .
Tue Aug 5, 2014, 07:44 AM
Aug 2014

Let's assume the original post to which I am replying is not a GOTP troll, flopping around trying to sow dissent among Democrats.

1. There has been no coronation. We still must go through primaries, debates, and the like.

2. One response used a sports analogy in which, during the preseason, one team looks very strong -- but we still have to play the entire season during which there are upsets, injuries, player trades . . .

3. Another reply said it's about SCOTUS. Exactly. I give a damn if the Devil himself (herself?) is the Democratic candidate in 2016 -- just so s/he hangs on for January 2017 - January 2025, long enough to fill judicial vacancies with liberals.

3. It's also about the Senate and the House. In 2016, Republicans must defend 23 Senate seats. A few months ago I read an analysis that claimed 6-7 of these are safe GOTP seats, 6-8 are probable Democratic wins, and the rest range from lean D to lean R. We need someone at the top of the ticket with long, strong coattails to take both the House and the Senate. Do any of Hillary's challengers have that capability?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
10. Any of Hillary's challengers? Who are her Democratic primary challengers?
Tue Aug 5, 2014, 07:51 AM
Aug 2014

I've been hearing since 2012 from Democrats that no one will challenge her *wink* if *wink* she decides to run.

But no, no one was trying to make that a self-fulfilling prophesy. No one at all.

Thank goodness, Democrats have been pushing back against the anointing attempts that began over four years before the 2016 Presidential both prematurely and unanimously. The flacks seem to have toned it down a bit. But, for almost two years, it was as ludicrous as it was transparent.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
12. name calling, excellent
Tue Aug 5, 2014, 01:52 PM
Aug 2014

and the years I have been here show I am NOT a GOTP troll. as far as GOTP, this campaign so far seemes to fit the Hillary is queen types, "Get out the Progressive (so we can crown Hillary.)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»about Hillary running