Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe End of Reefer Madness? by Katrina vanden Heuvel
People in the United States, a country in which painkillers are routinely overprescribed, now consume more than 84 percent of the entire worldwide supply of oxycodone and almost 100 percent of hydrocodone opioids.
So its more than a little odd that CADCA and the other groups leading the fight against relaxing marijuana laws, including the Partnership for Drug-Free Kids (formerly the Partnership for a Drug-Free America), derive a significant portion of their budget from opioid manufacturers and other pharmaceutical companies.
http://www.thenation.com/article/180493/anti-pot-lobbys-big-bankroll
So its more than a little odd that CADCA and the other groups leading the fight against relaxing marijuana laws, including the Partnership for Drug-Free Kids (formerly the Partnership for a Drug-Free America), derive a significant portion of their budget from opioid manufacturers and other pharmaceutical companies.
http://www.thenation.com/article/180493/anti-pot-lobbys-big-bankroll
***********************
The End of Reefer Madness?
Katrina vanden Heuvel
..........................
Last November, of course, The Nation went all-in on marijuana-law reform with our Dope and Change issue, and I wrote, If Congresswith its dismal 8 percent approval ratingwants to enjoy a popularity as high as marijuanas, it might consider revisiting pots federal prohibition. The blanket federal ban is unworkable on many levels, not least of which is the capriciousness of its enforcement: Given the crazy-quilt of state and local medicinal and decriminalization laws, the actual prohibition of marijuana in this country comes down to, as the Times puts it, the whims of whoever happens to be in the White House and chooses to enforce or not enforce the federal law. Needless to say, this type of jurisprudence is neither fair nor just; Harry Levine reported in Dope and Change that since 1997 in New York City, 87 percent of NYPDs 600,000 marijuana-possession arrests were of blacks and Latinos.
The data-driven, nuts-and-bolts reasons for legalization are legion, andto an unbiased eyeoverwhelmingly convincing. But the bias behind prohibition, born out of 1920s- and 30s-era xenophobia and racism, continues to impress itself on the minds of pundits and policymakers across the political spectrum. The problem that prohibition advocates have, writes Paul Waldman at The American Prospect, is that so much of their rhetoric hasnt changed in decades, steeped in culture war resentments and reliant on fear-mongering. A 2008 article on AlterNet illustrates that twentieth-century drug prohibition was born in places where white minorities ruled over non-white majoritiesSouth Africa and Jamaica, for examplebefore becoming a xenophobic tool of law enforcement (against Latinos in California and Texas, Middle Eastern immigrants in New York, Asians on the Pacific Coast) in places with white majorities.
An examination into the whys and wherefores of our broken cannabis policy is well overdue. After all, this story can and should be about more than just marijuana. American pot prohibition ought to be seen as a cautionary tale of what happens when we create policy based not on appropriately reasoned ideas, but rather on fear, racism and the sensational-but-unfounded caterwauling of policymakers and think-tankers who should know better.
If American drug prohibition laws were enacted, as is convincingly argued, in the service of furthering discrimination, then youd have to saybased on the arrest and incarceration numbersthat theyve been a smashing success. But as far as advancing public health goes well, theyre a disaster. This discrepancy is worth noting. At a time when governmental dysfunction is so prevalent and the demand for congressional actionany actionis high, we need to be aware of the real motives were asking our elected officials to promote (For example, how much of our homeland security policy is actually driven by xenophobia and racism? How much resistance to the Affordable Care Act?). With marijuana, bigotry-based policy has delivered a nearly 100-year-long quagmire from which were only now beginning to extricate ourselves with fact-based debate and informed dissent.
http://www.thenation.com/blog/180874/end-reefer-madness
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 504 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post