Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

McCamy Taylor

(19,240 posts) Sat Jul 19, 2014, 02:32 PM Jul 2014

Let's Have a Toast for the Tea Party "Tin Ear"

You gotta love the Tea Party. First they are against...

Care!

Then they were against....

Marriage!

Now they are against....

Children!

What will they be against next?

Motherhood?

Baseball?

Apple Pie?

The Tea Party, your anti-care/marriage/children party. Thank Karl Rove and the Koch brothers they chose to ally themselves with the GOP, because with public relations guys like that, there is only one way they are going...

Toast.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Let's Have a Toast for the Tea Party "Tin Ear" (Original Post) McCamy Taylor Jul 2014 OP

Well played!! Cooley Hurd Jul 2014 #1

Theocrats are only interested in the iron-fist of male authoritarianism, cloaked in far rightwing blkmusclmachine Jul 2014 #2

This is what you attract when your party has a long list of things they're against.... Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2014 #3

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)

1. Well played!!

Reply to McCamy Taylor (Original post)

Sat Jul 19, 2014, 03:44 PM

Jul 2014

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)

2. Theocrats are only interested in the iron-fist of male authoritarianism, cloaked in far rightwing

Reply to McCamy Taylor (Original post)

Sat Jul 19, 2014, 04:50 PM

Jul 2014

religion.

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)

3. This is what you attract when your party has a long list of things they're against....

Reply to McCamy Taylor (Original post)

Sat Jul 19, 2014, 04:54 PM

Jul 2014

And the list they can all agree on over what they're for consists of "less for you and more for us".

Reply to this discussion