General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDana Milbank thinks Elizabeth Warren is too smart to be president
Excerpt from Milbank's column in today's Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dana-milbank-elizabeth-warren-for-president/2014/07/18/a1aad8a6-0e72-11e4-8341-b8072b1e7348_story.html
Hmmm, knowledge and experience are bad traits if you want to be president? So if that's true, I guess that Sarah Palin or Louis Gohmert would make great presidents.
There is more to the column than just this statement. But most of it is just as dumb. Nonetheless, Mr. Milbank has to fill up space twice a week whether or not he has anything sensible to say.
ms liberty
(8,580 posts)kentuck
(111,103 posts)It is about raw power. Who has it and who has it absolutely?
In America today, Sarah Palin and Louis Gohmert, just like George W Bush, would make the perfect President. They are easily persuaded and are malleable to the ideas of the rich and powerful.
Cyrano
(15,041 posts)Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama were/are just aberrations. Can't let that happen again.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)they would be aberrations. We have lost control of our government. We are owned by the wealthy and the corporations and it will take more than any one person to change it. I have become too cynical even for DU...
Cyrano
(15,041 posts)it's a real possibility that Chris Christie or Mitt Romney could end up in the White House. It would be the last gasps of a dying empire.
PCIntern
(25,556 posts)for starters...
The original "Egghead".
Those RW shitbags like Milbank...
Cyrano
(15,041 posts)He's (supposedly) left of center which makes his remarks even worse. Having the Republican Party of Dumb is bad enough. We don't need a Dem leaning columnist adding fuel to the flames of ignorance.
PCIntern
(25,556 posts)wrote for New Republic and everything to acquire his bona fides. Phony...
spanone
(135,844 posts)pscot
(21,024 posts)Milbank doesn't draw any of the conclusions you attribute to him. It's just a short character study, comparing senator Warren's behavior to Obama's at a similar point in their respective careers. Dog forbid a columnist should actually speculate about the nature of political ambition.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)I don't think he's saying that's how it should be, but we sure talk about who we'd like "to have a beer with" more than "who really knows what the hell they're talking about."