Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
64 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why aren't the bodies of MH17 being picked up and preserved??? (Original Post) MoonRiver Jul 2014 OP
thyey are in a war zone, I don't know how easy it is to get to them. hollysmom Jul 2014 #1
Well, countries where the victims came from need to demand safe access. MoonRiver Jul 2014 #3
And their demand will be backed up .... oldhippie Jul 2014 #28
life sucks in a war zone Niceguy1 Jul 2014 #47
I've seen reference to the investigators being fired upon--so I'm guessing the combatants hlthe2b Jul 2014 #2
The Russian separatists are in control Jenoch Jul 2014 #4
They may want to loot but they are not trying to destroy evidence. former9thward Jul 2014 #9
WTF kind of statement is that? Trajan Jul 2014 #11
What exactly would be the "evidence" they would be destroying? former9thward Jul 2014 #14
What a giant load ... Trajan Jul 2014 #17
You did not answer the question. former9thward Jul 2014 #40
They could be picking up missile fragments, for one thing. HooptieWagon Jul 2014 #22
They know the missile from radar and satellite. former9thward Jul 2014 #39
Fragments may identify a particular type of age of the missile system muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #45
The Ukrainians got their systems from Russia. former9thward Jul 2014 #49
Yes, but the type *or* age (as I should have typed above) may indicate muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #53
Fragments would reveal WHOSE missile. HooptieWagon Jul 2014 #48
Perhaps, but what does it matter who gave it to them? former9thward Jul 2014 #50
One of the stories on RT is that the bodies were actually from the Malaysian crash pnwmom Jul 2014 #25
I doubt anybody would take that claim seriously. HooptieWagon Jul 2014 #35
Those who need to believe that their cause is just and Igel Jul 2014 #41
Evidence of a missile strike, IronGate Jul 2014 #56
Ahhhh former9thward Jul 2014 #58
I know that, IronGate Jul 2014 #61
The kind of evidence that traces a SAM to recent Russian manufacturer and ownership. that kind. EX500rider Jul 2014 #62
That is not really the issue. former9thward Jul 2014 #63
It may be no issue to you whether or not the Russians handed over.. EX500rider Jul 2014 #64
If the debris on the ground does not give more Jenoch Jul 2014 #13
Most aircraft accidents are not shoot downs. former9thward Jul 2014 #15
Are you for real? Jenoch Jul 2014 #18
The Russians are not claiming that. former9thward Jul 2014 #20
There was also a claim that a top rebel commander said many of the bodies were days old. pnwmom Jul 2014 #26
Thank you. Jenoch Jul 2014 #29
I also read somewhere else that Russian television pnwmom Jul 2014 #30
Russia Today is pretty much the Pravda of the 21st Century. Jenoch Jul 2014 #34
No it is not. former9thward Jul 2014 #38
You can read anything on the internet. former9thward Jul 2014 #36
Two fails on you. Jenoch Jul 2014 #44
LOL former9thward Jul 2014 #51
How would you determine that? Jenoch Jul 2014 #55
Oh so you post stuff without a source former9thward Jul 2014 #57
You apparently did not read all of my posts. Jenoch Jul 2014 #59
The debris on the ground could include a black box, which certainly is evidence. n/t pnwmom Jul 2014 #24
No, its not. former9thward Jul 2014 #37
They need to prove the exact direction the missile was shot from pnwmom Jul 2014 #43
The black box does not know anything about the missile. former9thward Jul 2014 #52
We need to be able to prove it to the world's satisfaction, not just ours. pnwmom Jul 2014 #54
Because armed warlords aren't letting anyone near the site... Blue_Tires Jul 2014 #5
lol CatWoman Jul 2014 #10
Because the Russian terrorists won't let them be picked up. eom MohRokTah Jul 2014 #6
Because the heroic, anti-fascist freedom fighters won't allow it? n/t Crunchy Frog Jul 2014 #7
I noticed the man that owns the vegetable patch was kind enough to cover the body that fell. So sad monmouth3 Jul 2014 #8
All of the above, plus it's a crime scene. Brickbat Jul 2014 #12
Some of the bodies fell through Jenoch Jul 2014 #16
Uh, war zone? Hekate Jul 2014 #19
I'm sorry but bodies are routinely picked up in war zones. MoonRiver Jul 2014 #21
I doubt the guilty party is worried about bio-hazard to civilian population. HooptieWagon Jul 2014 #23
Yep, agree flamingdem Jul 2014 #32
That place was fucked up before there was a war. AngryAmish Jul 2014 #27
Rachel just said the separatists ordered volunteers to leave and that OSCE flamingdem Jul 2014 #31
Probably because the evidence will prove damning to Putin. Throd Jul 2014 #33
The initial reason was "it wasn't possible." Igel Jul 2014 #42
Because their bodies are in a war zone SoCalDem Jul 2014 #46
Russian tea party people in control randr Jul 2014 #60

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
3. Well, countries where the victims came from need to demand safe access.
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 08:18 PM
Jul 2014

Plus there is a health hazard for the local populace if all those bodies are allowed to keep decomposing. How about somebody displaying some common sense and human decency?

hlthe2b

(102,298 posts)
2. I've seen reference to the investigators being fired upon--so I'm guessing the combatants
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 08:16 PM
Jul 2014

in the area are not cooperating with removal of the dead.

A very sad sitution..

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
4. The Russian separatists are in control
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 08:23 PM
Jul 2014

and they won't let anyone in until hey can crqp all over the evidnce that will help to explain exactly what happened.

former9thward

(32,028 posts)
9. They may want to loot but they are not trying to destroy evidence.
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 08:30 PM
Jul 2014

Everyone with satellites over the area knows exactly what happened. The debris on the ground does not give more information. The only question is whether the shoot down was an intentional attack on a civilian aircraft or an accidental shoot down of what they thought was a military aircraft. Debris on the ground will not answer that question.

 

Trajan

(19,089 posts)
11. WTF kind of statement is that?
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 08:34 PM
Jul 2014

Sheesh ... you know for a fact that Ukrainian Separatists are not trying to destroy evidence?

How do you know that? ...

former9thward

(32,028 posts)
14. What exactly would be the "evidence" they would be destroying?
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 08:43 PM
Jul 2014

Please be specific. There is only one question to be answered. There is nothing on the ground that will answer it. Experts have already said the black boxes will tell nothing. So again what "evidence" are they destroying? That is the WTF kind of statement.

 

Trajan

(19,089 posts)
17. What a giant load ...
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 08:49 PM
Jul 2014

WHAT evidence? ...

The entire crash area is a crime scene ...

Material evidence is spread over a wide area ... just as every single aircraft accident that occurs in the modern world is investigated, piece by piece; so should this event ...

I cannot believe the level of cynical obfuscation that sullies this website lately ... completely and utterly dishonest ...

I've read your other posts over time ... This one takes the fucking cake ... ridiculous ...

former9thward

(32,028 posts)
40. You did not answer the question.
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 01:10 AM
Jul 2014

No surprise there. If you don't like my posts use the ignore button. The admins put it there for a reason.

former9thward

(32,028 posts)
39. They know the missile from radar and satellite.
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 01:09 AM
Jul 2014

No mystery there. Why the missile was fired is the question.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,322 posts)
45. Fragments may identify a particular type of age of the missile system
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 05:20 AM
Jul 2014

which may identify if it was a system taken from the Ukrainians (a claim which has been both made and denied) or one that only the Russians had. This goes to the question of whether the Russian government was supplying the missiles or not.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,322 posts)
53. Yes, but the type *or* age (as I should have typed above) may indicate
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 10:01 AM
Jul 2014

if it was a missile in the Ukrainian stock, or the Russian one.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
48. Fragments would reveal WHOSE missile.
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 08:34 AM
Jul 2014

Was it captured from Ukr forces, or given to them by Russians? Clues to the model#, the seriel#, would reveal that. Perhaps they don't want that revealed.

former9thward

(32,028 posts)
50. Perhaps, but what does it matter who gave it to them?
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 09:26 AM
Jul 2014

The rebels fired it. Unless you think Putin gave an order to shoot down a civilian aircraft unrelated in any way to Ukraine. No, I don't think he gave an order like that. There would be no point to it. And the U.S. with intercepts would know that anyway.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
25. One of the stories on RT is that the bodies were actually from the Malaysian crash
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 09:21 PM
Jul 2014

of three months ago.

Examining the bodies now would disprove that theory.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
35. I doubt anybody would take that claim seriously.
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 09:57 PM
Jul 2014

The passengers were certainly alive when they walked on board. And the airline and Dutch govt have a passenger list.

Igel

(35,320 posts)
41. Those who need to believe that their cause is just and
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 01:11 AM
Jul 2014

their leaders are righteous are buying it.

Belief is a great motivator. Think about it: It kept the USSR together, with most of the believing that things were horrible in the West for decades. We were starving, uneducated, about to revolt against our oppressors.

My Russian teacher years ago said that he arrived in the US and was given over to a host family. He didn't believe them. They took him shopping a few days after they arrived and he was convinced they were at a special store. So they took him to another. And another. This was in New Jersey. At the time there was a liquor section in grocery stores--you could pick up corn flakes in one aisle and the vodka to go with them in another.

Finally they got tired of taking him to stores and they handed him a map. "Pick a neighborhood. There's likely to be a grocery store in it." So he picked a neighborhood and they drove however many miles and found a grocery store. Randomly chosen. He went to the liquor aisle and cried. The store had lots of food, lots of meat, and he just stared at the different brands of vodka at this no-name, randomly chosen store. The fourth or fifth that he'd seen that day.

Other Russians at the time said that they realized they'd been lied to not when artists and such went to Russia, not even when common Americans visited the country, and certainly not when people defected to the West, but when Russian commoners came to the US and returned not just with stories but with stuff. Because everything Soviet was better, they'd been told. They had the highest standard of living on Earth. They had the best and most food. The best housing. The best clothing. Theirs was a triumph of freedom and prosperity. Except everybody that went to the West returned with VCRs and stereos, nice clothes and good technology--and said these things were common, cheap, and the evidence was "better." They'd sacrificed for greatness and reached mediocrity, and the underpinnings came out from under support for the ideology.

former9thward

(32,028 posts)
58. Ahhhh
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 11:00 AM
Jul 2014

Maybe you don't follow news much .... But no one anywhere is disputing the fact a missile brought it down.

former9thward

(32,028 posts)
63. That is not really the issue.
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 02:15 PM
Jul 2014

The issue is 1) did they know they were firing at a civilian airliner? and 2) was there Russian help in targeting the aircraft? No one is suggesting the missile came from Russian soil.

EX500rider

(10,849 posts)
64. It may be no issue to you whether or not the Russians handed over..
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 02:19 PM
Jul 2014

....state of the art heavy duty SAM launchers to Ukrainian rebels....but it may a issue to others.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
13. If the debris on the ground does not give more
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 08:41 PM
Jul 2014

information then why is the debris always collected and analyzed? Please tell us what your education and experience is in forensics n these kinds of situations.

former9thward

(32,028 posts)
15. Most aircraft accidents are not shoot downs.
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 08:45 PM
Jul 2014

With the ones that are, such as when the U.S. shot down the Iranian civilian aircraft, people know the cause. You don't know the cause of the plane crashing? Incredible.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
18. Are you for real?
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 08:49 PM
Jul 2014

The Russians are claiming that the bodies are of people who have been dead for weeks. There are hundreds of reasons to do a thorough investigation.

Exactly why do you believe an investigation is not needed?

former9thward

(32,028 posts)
20. The Russians are not claiming that.
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 08:51 PM
Jul 2014

It that the position of Putin? Internet crap does not represent the "Russians saying something". Nice strawman.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
26. There was also a claim that a top rebel commander said many of the bodies were days old.
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 09:22 PM
Jul 2014
http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/world/2014/07/18/rebel-leader-suggests-victims-were-dead-before-plane-took-off/MIOJNrP0sKWDQcQX2Ym8WO/story.html

MOSCOW (AP) — A top pro-Russia rebel commander in eastern Ukraine has given a bizarre version of events surrounding the Malaysian jetliner crash — suggesting many of the victims may have died days before the plane took off.

The pro-rebel website Russkaya Vesna on Friday quoted Igor Girkin as saying he was told by people at the crash site that ‘‘a significant number of the bodies weren’t fresh,’’ adding that he was told they were drained of blood and reeked of decomposition.

snip

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
30. I also read somewhere else that Russian television
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 09:45 PM
Jul 2014

was putting out three stories. And one of them was that the bodies actually came from the Malaysian crash of three months ago. But this was the first similar story I found on google.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
34. Russia Today is pretty much the Pravda of the 21st Century.
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 09:53 PM
Jul 2014

Pretty amazing that the Ukrainians (or whomever RT was intending to implicate) were able to recover intact bodies from 2,500 fathoms deep.

former9thward

(32,028 posts)
51. LOL
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 09:27 AM
Jul 2014

" I never wrote what source I used." Now, that is a true statement. Maybe because it was a worthless source.

former9thward

(32,028 posts)
57. Oh so you post stuff without a source
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 10:58 AM
Jul 2014

and then complain that no one can determine it is worthless. Classic.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
43. They need to prove the exact direction the missile was shot from
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 01:25 AM
Jul 2014

and some information from the black boxes could help in making that calculation. They won't know unless they examine it.

Yes, we know "why" the plane crashed, but we don't know all of the "how."

former9thward

(32,028 posts)
52. The black box does not know anything about the missile.
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 09:29 AM
Jul 2014

The U.S. knows exactly where the missile came from and has said so. Keep up with the news. Satellites give that information not black boxes.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
54. We need to be able to prove it to the world's satisfaction, not just ours.
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 10:10 AM
Jul 2014

And you don't know what information might be stored in those two black boxes, about what the pilots might have done or said, so you can't know that nothing in them would help in an investigation.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
5. Because armed warlords aren't letting anyone near the site...
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 08:25 PM
Jul 2014

At least until they get their "official" alibi straightened out

CatWoman

(79,302 posts)
10. lol
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 08:32 PM
Jul 2014

not funny at all, but that place is eerily similar to the Bundy Ranch.


the thought gave me a chuckle.

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
21. I'm sorry but bodies are routinely picked up in war zones.
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 09:00 PM
Jul 2014

Even if one has no empathy for the families, decomposition represents a very real biological danger.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
23. I doubt the guilty party is worried about bio-hazard to civilian population.
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 09:07 PM
Jul 2014

They are more concerned with destroying evidence.

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
27. That place was fucked up before there was a war.
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 09:25 PM
Jul 2014

Most places are fucked up. The natural human condition is fucked up.

Civilization is hard. You have to work at it. Some folks are not capable of it.

Might as well damn them for not putting on a world's fair or making a giant water slide.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
31. Rachel just said the separatists ordered volunteers to leave and that OSCE
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 09:48 PM
Jul 2014

members didn't have freedom of movement.

People can come and go and "take what they want".

This is really out there.

Throd

(7,208 posts)
33. Probably because the evidence will prove damning to Putin.
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 09:49 PM
Jul 2014

If the armed forces in control of the crash area thought otherwise, they would welcome an investigation.

I expect a few days of dithering and pissing contests in which the wreckage will have been thoroughly compromised.

Igel

(35,320 posts)
42. The initial reason was "it wasn't possible."
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 01:19 AM
Jul 2014

No power to the area. Nothing to preserve the bodies in--no refrigerator cars.

Now the lastest story is from the Donets'k official governor Taruta is that the rebels are trying to pick up the bodies and send them to Russia for "objective" analysis. Because all the Westerners are fascists and are trying to frame them. I don't know if Taruta is accurate. He's not on the ground and hardly unbiased.

There's a reason the rebels turn off all the tv stations (and more recently, radio stations) that aren't out of Russia and mostly strongly oriented to the official state version of events. Have closed newspapers and beaten up editors. Dozens of reporters have gone missing for a while-some still aren't found (and these aren't Russian reporters nabbed by the Ukrainians). They've been pressured to "tell the truth", to give "objective views of the facts". If it's not flattering to them, it's fascist lies and propaganda.

And if there's one word I refuse to translate from Russian, it's "objective." Because when that word is used in Russian its meaning is pretty much never "objective." It's a Marxist-Leninist philosophical term and was so warped that it'll never be unscrewed. As far as I can tell, the best translation for ob"ektivnyi is something like "in the view that I'm forced to have", if you're low ranking, and "in the view that I insist others adopt because they serve my purpose", f you're high ranking. Putin's told his forces to produce an "objective" analysis that casts light on what really happened. But what really happened, he'd already said, was that the Ukr government was responsible.

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
46. Because their bodies are in a war zone
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 05:48 AM
Jul 2014

and the locals are more interested in looting the luggage and personal effects than they are about pressing for a cease fire that could allow for body removal..

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why aren't the bodies of ...