General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBachmann: Hillary Clinton Should Be ‘Extremely Concerned’ About Elizabeth Warren
Everyone who doesnt want a boring Democratic primary with an uncontested, pre-coronated winner is hoping someone like Elizabeth Warren runs to challenge Hillary Clinton. And on Crossfire last night, Michele Bachmann weighed into the contest by saying that if Warren runs, she would attract lots of Democrats and that should make the Clinton camp nervous.
Bachmann said theres no way Warren could pull Republican voters with some centrist populism, but did acknowledge she will be an extremely attractive candidate for the Democrat voters in 2016. And if she does, Bachmann added, if I was Mrs. Clinton, I would be extremely concerned with what I see.
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bachmann-clinton-should-be-extremely-concerned-about-elizabeth-warren/
randys1
(16,286 posts)righty pretends to like Warren and says Hillary better beware, etc.
They are hoping they can get the left to promote Warren which will somehow hurt Clinton
this came from Rove i am pretty sure
I say hell yes, let Warren run an aggressive campaign getting even more dems involved and ultimately at the polls in Nov to elect Hillary
It's a variation of the divide and conquer strategy I mentioned earlier today:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025247689
bigtree
(85,996 posts). . . and Warren will have a challenge in that effort described self-servingly by this campaign from the right in separating herself from her frequent support of Hillary. Not exactly the sharp contrast folks would expect from all of this talk.
Sanders is another story. He's solid and unwavering.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)How many right-wing dpbags went on and on about how well they got along with Obama...the ones who have their hands now on the knives in his back.
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)these two liberal women, who support each other, against one another. They'd rather us fight each other than them.
Peacetrain
(22,876 posts)to come up with this latest dredge.. Who ever we finally decide on as our canidate will be hands down 20 times anything the Republicans can dredge up..
randys1
(16,286 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)They can't win on their policies so they will employ other tactics.
Arkansas Granny
(31,516 posts)I tried to be, but it's just not there.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)[IMG][/IMG]
cali
(114,904 posts)You are amusingly obvious in your tactics. I gotta hand it to you: You really do practice transparency- even if it is unintentional.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)It's obvious you're trying to conflate liberals- a group you appear to dislike almost as much if not more than wingnut pukes... with wingnut pukes. It's an ugly thing to do.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)I'm not conflating anybody. This OP is about Michelle Bachman and another OP I created today was about Robert Costa. Both GOP ratfuckers trying to employ divide and conquer tactics.
Reading comprehension appears to be an issue here.
Being critical of people like Robert Costa and Michelle Bachman means I dislike liberals?
cali
(114,904 posts)You never lose an opportunity to do this stuff here.
You are transparent, and no one has ever accused me of a lack of acuity when it comes to reading comprehension. Look, we're a big tent, so there's room for you conservative, partisan style democrats. Socially liberal and conservative on most other issues.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Pointing out that Michele Bachman is trying to divide Dems somehow means I'm being critical of liberals?
You are a riot!!!