General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAre you okay with the right wing calling Hillary Clinton a bitch?
23 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes | |
4 (17%) |
|
No | |
19 (83%) |
|
1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
Hofbrau
(53 posts)... And outside of government I prefer more speech than less...
So sure...
I reserve the right to call them an asshole though..
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)While the guarantee of the 1st amendment is essentially universal, outside of direct threats and incitements, it is meant to insure where law cannot infringe, not explicate how language should be used.
It is up to ourselves, both as individuals and as a social group, to use language responsibly and not simply in stupid abundance.
So, when the OP asks if it is "okay" for conservatives to call Hillary a name, they are not asking if it should be legal or illegal but instead whether or not you find it ethically objectionable.
We need to enter these discussions with an implicit understanding associated with 1st amendment guarantees and then move on to the subject at hand.
Hofbrau
(53 posts)I prefer more speech to less and reserve the right to curse out anyone I deem worthy and expect the same from others.
So ethically I'm still fine...
If you had asked if it was rude perhaps...
moriah
(8,311 posts)The "fighting words" exception comes to mind, for example, if you really did decide to bless someone out who didn't agree that you had the right to do that to them, particularly if you did it to their face.
Hofbrau
(53 posts)But...
If I were to call Clinton a bitch to her face in polite conversation I would rightfully expect some negative consequences.
Same for Palin, Cheney or that woman down the street who can't keep her dogs under control.
Consequences... Amazing stuff...
moriah
(8,311 posts)... just because you wouldn't mind them doing the same to you, you're going to be in for a rude wake-up call someday.
Have we really gone so far that it must be explicitly stated that there will be consequences to actions?
Really?
moriah
(8,311 posts)For instance, if the person you cuss out fears that you're about to hit them while you're doing it because you're up in their face, or you're big and scary... that's misdemeanor assault in my state.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)H2O Man
(73,537 posts)at high risk of having Dick Cheney viciously attack you -- physically, mind you -- if you express your opinion.
Response to H2O Man (Reply #39)
Name removed Message auto-removed
H2O Man
(73,537 posts)being brutalized by Cheney would be a negative consequence. And I do believe you brought the topic of physical attack up.
Response to H2O Man (Reply #43)
Name removed Message auto-removed
H2O Man
(73,537 posts)I'm in agreement with you. I'm making jokes about the other person's position. But I'm not very funny on a good day, and so it isn't coming across as I intended.
Response to H2O Man (Reply #46)
Name removed Message auto-removed
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Warpy
(111,261 posts)and I'd rather wince at a few words here and there than see sites that supposedly cater to adults censored in a manner to make them safe for impressionable kiddies who wouldn't read them, anyway.
In fact, every time they call her that, I take it as a great compliment to her. The source of such comments should always be considered.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)And yes. I think the right wing calling a woman a bitch is on the same level as calling Obama a n****r.
And yes, I understand the bizarre implications that I can type out the word bitch and not the word n****r.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)"How like a monkey is man? The higher he climbs, the more you see of his ass." (An astute observation on the nature of public displays, fame, audience size and how actions often reflect on the actor rather than the subject. Also, proof that not all Catholic saints are goody-goodies; St. B. was quite the witticist and social critic.)
I wouldn't go so far as to call any of these a complement, except in so far as some people's hatred of you is something to be proud of.
If people are stupid enough to publicly call the President a n****r, i think it harms them more than it harms him...it's not the first time he's heard that word, I doubt it shocks him to learn that's what they think of him--on some level I think he may even revel in their hatred of him, it reflects so very badly on the speaker. It reflects badly on the causes, positions and affiliations of the speaker.
The same are all probably true of Sec. Clinton; politics at that level requires thick skin.
What does someone calling Hillary Clinton a b***h tell you about Hillary Clinton? Nothing
What does someone calling Hillary Clinton a b***h tell you about that person? Everything
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Throd
(7,208 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)It's quite consistent with the first amendment to think calling any woman a bitch is sexist and very wrong.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)it's expected they'll be nasty, and probably the best thing is not to engage them on their terms.
AuntPatsy
(9,904 posts)I know its a fantasy that all humanity, Americans in particular will find a way to ensure tranquility among us all...something we were once promised would be in our futures, but I do honestly believe that the truth lies in ensuring the truth be spoken, if not, the truth will never be heard...at least not by all that needs to hear it, even if they choose to ignore it, at least you know you've tried....
Words matter, it cannot be said enough...
msongs
(67,406 posts)betsuni
(25,525 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)which I've seen her called here at DU, and the post allowed to remain. Same with Nancy Pelosi.
Of course there were excuses, causes so righteous that it was ok to use that word. In Hillary's case it was that she was running against Obama, and in Pelosi's case it was because she didn't impeach Bush.
delrem
(9,688 posts)It doesn't make much sense, if they weren't.
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)I'd be happy to know the usernames so I could be instructed on their interactions with me in the future.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)my interest is in the acceptance by everyone else. Sometimes there were protests about the word, that's for sure.
And one thing I didn't mention is the use of the word toward Republican women, e.g. Condi Rice. Again, sometimes there were protests, but not nearly enough of them for us to feel 100% superior on this issue.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Liberal or anything false like that. Proto-Fascist maybe. An architect and supporter of the TPP definitely. I can think of lots of accurate terms for her. But not what the RW calls her.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)I'm more concerned with misogyny on the putative left, honestly, than on the right--plenty of which has been directed at Hillary Clinton, but also at other women, including many I personally have ideological disagreements with; I'm not really okay with people on the "left" calling, say, Ann Coulter "bitch", "cunt" and "Mann Coulter" (which manages to be both misogynist and transphobic). Is she a vile human being? Yes, but that's because of the opinions she chooses to express, and her gender has no relevance to that whatever.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,823 posts)But they will anyways.
Newtie opened the door to that years ago. I think it was when he was married to (I forget which number wife) and messing around with his current wife.
Oh fiddle dee - some man who sleeps around outside of his "sacred hetero marriage" calls a liberal woman . . . I don't really respect those people and hold a very low opinion of them due to the rampant hypocrisy they display - so its hard to take one of them seriously.
Now if it came from someone under our big tent - I would flip a shit.
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)a deliberately misogynistic slur against ANY woman. Each carries a ton of baggage and is intended to "put" a woman "in her place" and literally chill speech or assertive behavior by women generally.
Free speech or not. It is simply not acceptable.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Thank you.
CountAllVotes
(20,870 posts)Well said! Excellent post!
steve2470
(37,457 posts)JoDog
(1,353 posts)but I'm willing to turn it around and use it against them.
TINA FEY: Maybe what bothers me the most is that people say that Hillary is a bitch. Let me say something about that: Yeah, she is. So am I and so is this one. [Points to Amy Poehler]
AMY POEHLER: Yeah, deal with it.
TINA FEY: You know what, bitches get stuff done. Thats why Catholic schools use nuns as teachers and not priests. Those nuns are mean old clams and they sleep on cots and theyre allowed to hit you. And at the end of the school year you hated those bitches but you knew the capital of Vermont. So, Im saying its not too late Texas and Ohio, bitch is the new black!
http://www.salon.com/2008/02/25/fey/
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)does not help the common woman who is called the word for being tough or not smiling or just the general fuck of it by some asswipe.
Hestia
(3,818 posts)to get here and with older women I will sometimes use the word in admiration, especially if she has done something devious; and in rancor admittedly. Why are y'all so scared of words? Especially Title Words for Women. Rubber? Glue?
It is a title of the Great Mother Goddess, as with all multi-breasted animals, providing humankind with Her nourishing enrichment of love, food, home, and succor.
I find it funny whether men say it is or it is not okay for a woman to be called a bitch.
Y'all keep getting all distracted by the bull that the GOP throws, quibbling about words in a dictionary, while we adults sit here on the sidelines working. IOW - who gives a shit? This is what the other side does - getting their knickers in a knot, parsing each and every word, "outraged" at something said, trying to blind people from the real message.
Grow up!
Response to Hestia (Reply #50)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)asked her to.
And you are proud that a woman does something devious? Any woman or man should be ashamed to do something devious. And that you would proudly ascribe the word bitch to a deviousness is um, kind of making my point.
And adults who sit on the sidelines aren't working in fact this is one of the most incomprehensible thing I have ever read on DU...
"Y'all keep getting all distracted by the bull that the GOP throws, quibbling about words in a dictionary, while we adults sit here on the sidelines working. IOW - who gives a shit? This is what the other side does - getting their knickers in a knot, parsing each and every word, "outraged" at something said, trying to blind people from the real message."
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)Say it!
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Use it about yourself if you want. Use it about your friends if they like it. I doubt many care.
What we do care about is when these anti woman slurs are used to label women who haven't signed on with the "I love hate speech about women because I'm reclaiming it!" parade.
Do whatever you want but don't pretend that means anyone else should tolerate misogynist hate speech.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)TBF
(32,060 posts)Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)not even other women.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)directed toward anyone. Including all those DUers love to do so to.
I'm fine with legitimate criticisms based on evidence. For example, I have no trouble calling HRC a neo-liberal, and that is definitely not a compliment. It's also not middle-school bullying.
RKP5637
(67,108 posts)Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
lostincalifornia This message was self-deleted by its author.
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)Doesn't change that I feel she is a corporatist and would rather see someone more progressive as the candidate.
This question seems pointless, somehow.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)if they do it they will be seen as the misogynistic assholes they really are and that will hurt them. I am going to abstain from this dilemma.
conservaphobe
(1,284 posts)about her pantsuits and ambition... all sexist bullshit.
Spirochete
(5,264 posts)the days of expecting anything more classy than that from them are long gone...
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)...and DU is certainly in no position to throw stones.
Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Whether the Republican right wing or the Democratic right wing (i.e. Third Way, New Democrats, DLC).
tularetom
(23,664 posts)Seriously, did you expect a little more class from them?
As far as I'm concerned, if people I seriously dislike use a bad name to describe someone I less seriously dislike, it isn't in the top ten of things I get pissed off about. They've said far worse than that about Obama and we didn't see anywhere near this level of outrage at DU then.
sarisataka
(18,655 posts)RWers are usually nekulturny
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)First Amendment comes first.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)So I don't think we should be taking a holier-than-thou attitude. She's been a public figure a long time, I'm guessing HRC has grown a thick skin inre name-calling.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)napi21
(45,806 posts)I call myself a Bitch, when I am. And in many instances when it's called for, I'm very proud to be a bitch!
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)... I might be.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)nilesobek
(1,423 posts)shocking weakness that you would have to resort to playground cursing tactics.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Call her stupid, call her morally bankrupt, etc. YMMV.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Skittles
(153,160 posts)at least they had more guts than the "neither option" folk
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Should they be arrested? Not for that.
Should they be called out, and if they wrote that word on DU they were banned? Sure.
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)even when some of the female gender have pissed me off so I'm not okay with it. Those up-thread who talk about the First Amendment are implying that because someone condemns the use of a certain word it means we want to ban it as speech. I don't interpret the op's question that way. We have free speech to say that word but also to speak out against the usage of certain words and to call the attention of the public to the lack of civility in those who use it. If the right wants to call Hillary Clinton a bitch, then they're going to bring down hell on their heads not only from women, but from husbands, sons, brothers, fathers, and male friends of women who will see it as being extremely ungentlemanly and barbaric, even if they are Republicans.
Occasionally I've found the use of the word funny if said in jest, such as in the movie Paul, where the old lady who gets reunited with the alien she saw as a child confronts Sigourney Weaver and yells "get away from her, you bitch".
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)Gothmog
(145,242 posts)Calling Sec. Clinton any name is wrong
doxydad
(1,363 posts)Doxy Sr. always told me, "Son...if they're talking about you, they're leaving some other poor sonofabitch alone. wear it with pride. " He was right, as usual.
Vinca
(50,271 posts)Screaming at my television, of course, not in public. I mean . . . really . . . who doesn't think Marsha Blackburn's a . . . never mind.
ismnotwasm
(41,980 posts)bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)nt
mindem
(1,580 posts)But being vile, thoughtless and crude is standard operating procedure for republicans now days. I can't think of the last time I saw a letter to the editor - about anything - from a republican that that wasn't caustic and insulting.
dembotoz
(16,804 posts)the right wing hate machine is already in gear and the foot is on the gas
spend a few moments in some of the comments sections on facebook
or your local paper for that matter
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Although, it's not just the RW. She's been called worse by the LW.
I'm against sexist terms being used against any woman, regardless of how I personally feel about that woman.
lame54
(35,290 posts)I hope she can be like Obama and rise above it
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)I'm amazed that anyone here could think this was okay, but I guess there are some who really want to "embrace" the term. That it was uttered by a woman makes it no less nasty.
MineralMan
(146,308 posts)It's an ugly insult, no matter how it is used to describe people.
ProfessorGAC
(65,042 posts)Of course not. I know it's a commonly used term when someone acts in a way that irritates, but that doesn't make it ok no matter who uses it and toward whom it's directed.
Since it's common parlance, it would be hard to change the usage, but that doesn't make it ok.
treestar
(82,383 posts)as they will to any female Democratic politician.
And if someone calls Republican female politicians that, they will duly whine about how wrong it is.
rock
(13,218 posts)This is of course rhetorical. So, yes, I'm OK with the shit-for-brains Blics mewling whatever they want.
AndreaCG
(2,331 posts)I've been guilty of using it. I try not to. But it's ironic in my opinion because Hillary may have her faults but her demeanor is not one of them. She is extremely civil for the most part, as befits a former Secretary of State, which is particularly remarkable because she's been dealing with the rabid right wingers irrationality about her and her husband for decades. If anyone has earned the right to be snarky with her critics she has. But more often than not she refrains from doing so.