Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJoseph Stiglitz: No, Spiraling Inequality Isn't Inevitable
http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/24830-joseph-stiglitz-no-spiraling-inequality-isnt-inevitable***SNIP
Last week, Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph E. Stiglitz took to the opinion pages of The New York Times to argue that theres no such thing as natural market forces markets, and their outcomes, are determined by public policies by the rules established by governments.
Stiglitz wrote that inequality is anything but inevitable:
We dont need to have this much inequality in America.
Our current brand of capitalism is an ersatz capitalism. For proof of this go back to our response to the Great Recession, where we socialized losses, even as we privatized gains. Perfect competition should drive profits to zero, at least theoretically, but we have monopolies and oligopolies making persistently high profits. C.E.O.s enjoy incomes that are on average 295 times that of the typical worker, a much higher ratio than in the past, without any evidence of a proportionate increase in productivity.
If it is not the inexorable laws of economics that have led to Americas great divide, what is it? The straightforward answer: our policies and our politics. People get tired of hearing about Scandinavian success stories, but the fact of the matter is that Sweden, Finland and Norway have all succeeded in having about as much or faster growth in per capita incomes than the United States and with far greater equality.
Inequality Is Not Inevitable
By JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/06/27/inequality-is-not-inevitable/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=1&
AN insidious trend has developed over this past third of a century. A country that experienced shared growth after World War II began to tear apart, so much so that when the Great Recession hit in late 2007, one could no longer ignore the fissures that had come to define the American economic landscape. How did this shining city on a hill become the advanced country with the greatest level of inequality?
One stream of the extraordinary discussion set in motion by Thomas Pikettys timely, important book, Capital in the Twenty-First Century, has settled on the idea that violent extremes of wealth and income are inherent to capitalism. In this scheme, we should view the decades after World War II a period of rapidly falling inequality as an aberration.
This is actually a superficial reading of Mr. Pikettys work, which provides an institutional context for understanding the deepening of inequality over time. Unfortunately, that part of his analysis received somewhat less attention than the more fatalistic-seeming aspects.
Over the past year and a half, The Great Divide, a series in The New York Times for which I have served as moderator, has also presented a wide range of examples that undermine the notion that there are any truly fundamental laws of capitalism. The dynamics of the imperial capitalism of the 19th century neednt apply in the democracies of the 21st. We dont need to have this much inequality in America.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 675 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Joseph Stiglitz: No, Spiraling Inequality Isn't Inevitable (Original Post)
xchrom
Jul 2014
OP
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)1. Kicked and recommended a whole bunch!
WillyT
(72,631 posts)2. K & R !!!
Octafish
(55,745 posts)3. Stiglitz would make an excellent president.
Brilliant Mind. Check.
Nobel Prize winner. Check.
Man of Integrity. Check.
The complete package.
todmorden
(1 post)4. no Marx for Liberal thinking
Stiglitz writes,in the concluding section of "The Price of Inequality" (p.359 Penguine edition.) -
"The political and economic reform agenda in this chapter assumes that while market forces play some role in the creation of our current levels of inequality, MARKET FORCES ARE ULTIMATELY SHAPED BY POLITICS."
Duuuhhh........... He obviously doesn't know the first thing about Marx's analysis, or the concept of the "ruling ideology" as outlined by Marx.
MONEY is what makes the world go round - not well-meaning politicians (or their worthy ideas come to that.) Back to school Stiglitz.
niyad
(113,315 posts)5. welcome to du--does your screen name refer to that lovely "edible todmorden"?