General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBill Would Require CEOs Get Drug Tested If Company Gets Loans, Grants Or Tax Credits From State
Bipartisan group of representatives would mandate substance abuse testing for 'corporate welfare' recipients
Michigan Capitol Confidential
By Tom Gantert
March 29, 2012
If the likes of Ford Chief Executive Officer Alan Mulally and Hollywood Film Producer James Cameron want tax breaks for their projects in Michigan, they may have to take a drug test to get the money if a bipartisan group of State Representatives have their way.
Rep. Tom McMillin, R-Rochester Hills, introduced House Bill 5527 on Wednesday that calls for top executives in companies to be drug tested if they receive certain tax breaks from the state. The bill currently has four co-sponsors: Pat Somerville, R-New Boston, Judson Gilbert, R-Algonac, Mike Shirkey, R-Clark Lake, and Jim Ananich, D-Flint.
Rep. McMillin is against testing welfare recipients for drugs, but said if that plan goes through, then executives getting corporate welfare also should be drug tested.
The bill is tied to the Michigan Strategic Fund, which oversees the states film subsidies as well as the tax credits given to some of the states biggest corporations.
MORE
''Sorry sir, we don't have any gold embossed, diamond-
encrusted pee-cups. You'll have to make do with the plastic
ones like everyone else......''
Autumn
(45,114 posts)rec.
niyad
(113,464 posts)GopperStopper2680
(397 posts)Sounds like a plan to me! And it's Bipartisan! There may, just MAY be hope yet for this country!
RKP5637
(67,111 posts)SDjack
(1,448 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)Fuck the tit for tat, this culture is toxic.
Morning Dew
(6,539 posts)Except for some safety sensitive jobs, most employees shouldn't have to be drug tested.
Same for employers doing credit checks - in most cases, it shouldn't be allowed.
varelse
(4,062 posts)I'm impressed
cstanleytech
(26,301 posts)intended to become law at all or atleast if it does it will be written in such a way so as to be easy to be thrown out or it will have as many loopholes as the tax code does for the 1%.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)These guys will cheat. So make it random too. It was "legal" for me, it must be "legal" for them.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)See how fast the 'war on drugs' is over..
CrispyQ
(36,482 posts)Fuckin' A!
kick
saras
(6,670 posts)If Viagra, alcohol,and Adderall were legally PROHIBITED to these people, the tests might make some sense.
mopinko
(70,145 posts)think again.
saras
(6,670 posts)I thought coke was over when David Bowie said that he didn't remember 1975 but he made a good album that year. I thought the eighties were the decade of designer psychedelics - sweet stuff - whereas everyone else thought it was the decade to jump on the cocaine bandwagon a decade late.
The problem with coke is that it seems to make everyone's asshole swell to about six feet in diameter and migrate to the face. As far as I'm concerned, David Crosby lighting his freebase pipe, on a commercial airliner, in his seat, with a propane torch, says it all. I mean, even before 9/11, that took cojones so big his road crew must have moved them for him. And an equal sized dose of stupid.
It figures that GWB would be into cocaine a decade too late, at least.
got root
(425 posts)good for the goose and all.
BlueIris
(29,135 posts)Yay!
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)you really think billionaires won't know how to skirt such testing?
Initech
(100,087 posts)Drug testing is evil. We need less not more.
SATIRical
(261 posts)Hopefully it passes. Frankly, I don't think drug tests are a big deal after taking them for 20 years.