General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOn defending Hillary :/
Last edited Mon Jun 16, 2014, 08:34 PM - Edit history (1)
So... I'm a 9/11 skeptic, or as some of you prefer, the pejorative, Truther. I find it pretty fucking ironic that despite there being legitimate questions about that day, this site condones and encourages vilifying "crazies" like me, while Hillary is defended for her steadfast belief in what Joss Weadon termed "The Sky Bully". Alas, it's the kind of hypocrisy and relativism I've come to expect from democrats who swing with anything to win.
cali
(114,904 posts)I was not criticizing her for her beliefs and also I find the phrase "sky bully" to be utter facile bullshit.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)but why? It seems to be appropriate for the wrathful god depicted in the bible.
cali
(114,904 posts)also, I admire too many people who have been devout: MLK, Thomas Merton, for example.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Does admiring them legitimize their beliefs for you? If it does, you just illustrated the hypocrisy I'm talking about.
cali
(114,904 posts)that's not hypocrisy, hon. Methinks, you don't know the meaning of that word. And of course, you're still wrong about the bible only portraying god as vengeful.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Not entirely believing the government account of an event = crazy
Believing in God = sane
Would this be the likely DU consensus?
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
bigtree This message was self-deleted by its author.