Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 10:32 PM Apr 2012

On "repeal and replace" as applied to Medicare Part D (the Bush prescription drug bill)

Last edited Mon Apr 2, 2012, 11:21 PM - Edit history (1)

Had I been a member of Congress in 2003, I would have voted against the Bush Medicare prescription drug bill. It was written by Pharma lobbyists for the purposes of making their industry a lot of money. And indeed it did.

I would have preferred a cheaper plan that cut the for profit drug companies out of the loop, allowed Medicare to directly negotiate lower prices and allow for the importation of generic drugs from Canada.

But the bill passed as it was, in part because Tom DeLay and Dennis Hastert cheated by holding the House roll call vote open for over two hours past the regulation time for a roll call vote.

So Medicare part D is now the law of the land and firmly entrenched into our health care delivery system.

I seriously doubt any senior citizen getting prescription drug coverage today gives a shit about the violation of House parliamentary procedures 8 years ago.

I would like to see the Medicare Part D changed to work in the aforementioned ways I noted above, so I would favor repeal and replace . But I would stoutly oppose any proposal to simply repeal Medicare Part D and replace it with nothing. I would be against that because millions of seniors would be hurt as a result. Then it would just be about a personal grudge to repeal part of the legacy of George W. Bush, not actually trying to better people's lives.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On "repeal and replace" as applied to Medicare Part D (the Bush prescription drug bill) (Original Post) bluestateguy Apr 2012 OP
There's a problem with the "import drugs from Canada" thought jmowreader Apr 2012 #1

jmowreader

(50,561 posts)
1. There's a problem with the "import drugs from Canada" thought
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 11:05 PM
Apr 2012

Most of the drugs that get sold in Canada are made in the United States.

Can someone please give a LOGICAL explanation for why a drug that's shipped from New Jersey to Canada and back is less expensive than the exact same drug bought at a drugstore a mile from the factory?

Once you get past the illegal wars, economic disaster and dictatorship, the worst thing Bush did in his eight years of squatting in the Oval Office was to sign a bill forbidding the government to negotiate prescription prices.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»On "repeal and repla...