General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEvident differences between CO2 and Nuclear waste
Cesium comes from nuclear fission which occurs in nuclear power plants.
The most talked about product of nuclear fission is Radioactive Cesium.
The most talked about air emission from other power plants is CO2.
The same companies that emit Radioactive Cesium, also emit CO2 without fear, without much capture or control of that CO2. But when it comes to the Cesium, companies spend billions on control and containment.
CO2 is a natural molecule that much of life can't live without. Radioactive Cesium is known to be deadly to nearly all life and is not a naturally occurring atom.
The US government has regulated nuclear wastes, and companies have spent billions following those regulations. Not so with CO2.
So is CO2 as bad as nuclear wastes? The government thinks not. The government has known for 50 years that nuclear wastes need to be kept out of the environment. And the corporations agreed.
But CO2 still flies out from tailpipes and smokestacks freely.
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)A transuranic is plutonium. I had mixed up cesium with the transuranic plutoinium, which has also been released from Fukushima.
I read a lot about nuclear stuff a year or so ago. Came across transuranics then. Never needed to know about it until Fukushima blew up and really don't care to, but the people here that know don't even want to admit that it is worse than anything else man has released. So i made a stab at it and improperly used the word transuranic.
Not like i released plutonium upon the public. No big deal.
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)As I read in your post. Transuranic elements are not necessarily man-made, as you suggested.
Brother Buzz
(36,447 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Was reading a year ago about plutonium which is transuranic and in the meantime had a notion that cesium was too.
Hope yall had fun, i finally made a mistake and admit it.
Frankly tho, the real criminals are the ones who lied about nuclear power being safe. It would be nice to just once see some of you climb their asses. Just once. Why some never do is quite confounding.
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)FBaggins
(26,749 posts)It's that he finally made a mistake and admitted it.
He makes lots of mistakes.
longship
(40,416 posts)It is mined for it's many uses.
Some other facts:
Cesium is very pyrophoric, it ignites in air and explosively, like sodium, in water.
I do not think it would be soluble in water -- it is an alkali metal -- but as it oxidizes instantly, one would likely have to consider the characteristics of the oxide product, which are typically soluble.
Cesium is natural and forms about 3 parts per million of the earth's crust, 45th most abundant element and 36th most abundant metal, that's more abundant than antimony, cadmium, tin, and tungsten and two orders of magnitude more abundant than mercury and silver.
So, again, you have not fact checked.
Sorry.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Is not natural. It only comes from nuclear fission. So says wiki.
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)The many isotopes of Caesium are produced in stellar nucleosynthesis. A natural process.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Caesium-137 (137
55Cs, Cs-137), cesium-137, or radiocaesium, is a radioactive isotope of caesium which is formed as one of the more common fission products by the nuclear fission of uranium-235 and other fissionable isotopes in nuclear reactors and nuclear weapons. It is among the most problematic of the short-to-medium-lifetime fission products because it easily moves and spreads in nature due to the high water solubility of caesium's most common chemical compounds, which are salts.
SNIP
Caesium-137 in the environment is anthropogenic (human-made). Unlike most other radioisotopes, caesium-137 is not produced from the same element's nonradioactive isotopes but as a byproduct of the nuclear fission of much heavier elements,[10] meaning that until the building of the first artificial nuclear reactor, the Chicago Pile-1, in late 1942, it had not occurred on Earth for billions of years.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cesium_137
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)And other forms of nucleosynthesis take place in unimaginable quantities outside of the realm of Earth.
Stellar nucleosynthesis is the process of producing various elements and their isotopes within the active core of stars. Supernova and novae nucleosynthesis takes place under the immense heat and pressure of stellar death. And, in fact, the original form of nucleosynthesis took place right after the formation of the Universe when the most abundant elements were produced in mass.
Caesium 137 was and continues to be produced in nucleosynthesis beyond our world. It is as natural as any other material in the Universe. What makes it dangerous is its ability to distribute quickly and effectively throughout the human body, lowering the threshold for negative effects of ionizing radiation.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Are you a scienctician?
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)Then again, I don't read ENE so I guess that disqualifies me.
Honestly, I read these threads and I'm just like...
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)The nuke industry is polluting the world and you in all your educated glory feel not one bit of need to go after them. Instead your venom is reserved for an anonymous internet poster. That's f'n weird as can be. You need to check yourself.
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)Wonder if this one will be self-deleted.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)It has to be.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)I have been reminded what transuranics are. I will probably forget again, so stay tuned and you can get your jollies again!!
Meanwhile the nuke polluters just got another huge government subsidy. And the WIPP plant (where they store nuclear waste) is still closed down as it is smoldering. The excuse they give for the smoldering is not that the plutonium stored there got hot, but that the kitty litter it is packed in did not do what they expected. "Damn kitty litter".
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)The point is that cesium is regulated, and co2 is not.
What does that tell you?
Radioactive Cesium has had millions spent on containment. And virtually nothing spent on containing co2.
longship
(40,416 posts)I think you'd be preaching to the choir on that issue here.
Most here would agree that CO2 emissions should be curtailed. The question is how. That's the sticky wicket. Getting that through congress won't be easy.
We will do it eventually however, come Hell or high water. The latter, literally.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)has ruled public energy policy for decades and the blind idiotic terror has put the far more real danger of climate change on the back burner for more than a generation. And anti-nuclear protesters are largely responsible for that, and for the effects of the coal plants used instead. Transuranic that.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)But blaming people who are against nuke power for the general public's ignoring of GW is quite a stretch. In fact is a dumb idea.
Given that corporations have spent millions controlling transuranics and other fission products while spending next to nothing on co2 emissions is a real clue as to which is the more deadly.
Problem is, even after all that money spent on controlling transuranics there is still more needed to be spent.... for oh, say another 1,000 years.
seveneyes
(4,631 posts)From their first, to their last breath.