Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

underpants

(182,843 posts)
Fri May 23, 2014, 01:03 PM May 2014

Congress Reluctant To Cut Funding For Tank That Just Spins Around And Self-Destructs (The Onion)

http://www.theonion.com/articles/congress-reluctant-to-cut-funding-for-tank-that-ju,36099/

WASHINGTON—Escalating recent budgetary disputes with the White House over military spending, members of Congress signaled their hesitance Thursday to curtail funding for the M114 Armored Combat Vehicle, a midsize tank whose sole capability is spinning 360 degrees in place and then exploding.

The 70-ton tactical battle tank commonly known as the Dervish, which reportedly has a price tag of $95 million per vehicle and is said to begin emitting volatile, combustible fumes and sending off a dangerous fountain of sparks immediately after it is started, has been called a vital asset to national security by top congressmen on both sides of the aisle. While detractors have attempted to defund the project over the years due to its ballooning cost and the loss of every vehicle so far deployed, advocates have been able to preserve the program from cuts, hailing the tank’s rightward-only movement and propensity to ignite in a towering fireball as the centerpiece of America’s war effort.

“At a time when protecting United States interests at home and abroad has never been more important, we simply cannot afford to compromise our military’s ability to drive a tank repeatedly in a circle as gigantic flames shoot out of every opening on its surface,” said House Armed Services Committee Chair Rep. Howard “Buck” McKeon (R-CA), an outspoken proponent for continued funding of the program, which has consumed over 81 billion taxpayer dollars since its inception. “Cutting production of the Dervish merely because it is able to do nothing more than leave circular treadmarks and a smoking crater where it once stood would not only be irresponsible, it would leave the nation unequipped for the armed conflicts of tomorrow and put every citizen of this country at risk.”

“Frankly, it’s indicative of the diminished role in international leadership the White House sees for America that they are even willing to consider sacrificing such a critical piece of defense technology,” McKeon continued. “Do we really want the 1,800 U.S. servicemen who have so far died while using this piece of technology to have given their lives in vain? That seems to be what the president wants.”
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Congress Reluctant To Cut Funding For Tank That Just Spins Around And Self-Destructs (The Onion) (Original Post) underpants May 2014 OP
Who needs the Onion when we have a republican congress that would do this? liberal N proud May 2014 #1
Excellent F-in-35-g satire. n/t wandy May 2014 #2
I thought they might be refering to Combat for the Atari 2600 mindwalker_i May 2014 #3
The picture in the link is a Bradley Fighting Vehicle underpants May 2014 #4
They probably don't spin around for a second after being hit mindwalker_i May 2014 #7
I dig it. But your posts are just not the same without the floating underwear looking Guy Whitey Corngood May 2014 #5
Screen doors for the submarines are still a go, though. NuclearDem May 2014 #6
Right, to keep the fish out underpants May 2014 #8

liberal N proud

(60,338 posts)
1. Who needs the Onion when we have a republican congress that would do this?
Fri May 23, 2014, 01:20 PM
May 2014

Really, they would do this while they were cutting aid to veterans and food stamps.

mindwalker_i

(4,407 posts)
3. I thought they might be refering to Combat for the Atari 2600
Fri May 23, 2014, 01:41 PM
May 2014

I sort of remember tanks spinning around when they were hit.

underpants

(182,843 posts)
4. The picture in the link is a Bradley Fighting Vehicle
Fri May 23, 2014, 02:14 PM
May 2014

I spent 3 years on one. They don't explode but there is a movie with Kelsey Grammer and Cary Ewles about the development of the Bradley and it isn't too far off from this Onion story.

mindwalker_i

(4,407 posts)
7. They probably don't spin around for a second after being hit
Fri May 23, 2014, 02:22 PM
May 2014

then reappear somewhere else on the playing field. And they're not limited to the Atari 2600's resolution.

underpants

(182,843 posts)
8. Right, to keep the fish out
Fri May 23, 2014, 04:12 PM
May 2014

Unfortunately there a "cost over run" and the screen doors are coming in WAY over budget. Just like the "stunt fish" did.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Congress Reluctant To Cut...