Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKrugman on Geithner: He was “…all for bailing out banks but against bailing out families…”
Springtime for Bankers
Paul Krugman
New York Times
MAY 19, 2014
By any normal standard, economic policy since the onset of the financial crisis has been a dismal failure. Its true that we avoided a full replay of the Great Depression. But employment has taken more than six years to claw its way back to pre-crisis levels years when we should have been adding millions of jobs just to keep up with a rising population. Long-term unemployment is still almost three times as high as it was in 2007; young people, often burdened by college debt, face a highly uncertain future.
Now Timothy Geithner, who was Treasury secretary for four of those six years, has published a book, Stress Test, about his experiences. And basically, he thinks he did a heckuva job
where is the rebound in the real economy? Where are the jobs? Saving Wall Street, it seems, wasnt nearly enough. Why?
fiscal austerity wasnt the only reason recovery has been so disappointing. Many analysts believe that the burden of high household debt, a legacy of the housing bubble, has been a big drag on the economy. And there was, arguably, a lot the Obama administration could have done to reduce debt burdens without Congressional approval. But it didnt; it didnt even spend funds specifically allocated for that purpose. Why? According to many accounts, the biggest roadblock was Mr. Geithners consistent opposition to mortgage debt relief he was, if you like, all for bailing out banks but against bailing out families
In the end, the story of economic policy since 2008 has been that of a remarkable double standard. Bad loans always involve mistakes on both sides if borrowers were irresponsible, so were the people who lent them money. But when crisis came, bankers were held harmless for their errors while families paid full price.
And refusing to help families in debt, it turns out, wasnt just unfair; it was bad economics. Wall Street is back, but America isnt, and the double standard is the main reason.
Paul Krugman
New York Times
MAY 19, 2014
By any normal standard, economic policy since the onset of the financial crisis has been a dismal failure. Its true that we avoided a full replay of the Great Depression. But employment has taken more than six years to claw its way back to pre-crisis levels years when we should have been adding millions of jobs just to keep up with a rising population. Long-term unemployment is still almost three times as high as it was in 2007; young people, often burdened by college debt, face a highly uncertain future.
Now Timothy Geithner, who was Treasury secretary for four of those six years, has published a book, Stress Test, about his experiences. And basically, he thinks he did a heckuva job
where is the rebound in the real economy? Where are the jobs? Saving Wall Street, it seems, wasnt nearly enough. Why?
fiscal austerity wasnt the only reason recovery has been so disappointing. Many analysts believe that the burden of high household debt, a legacy of the housing bubble, has been a big drag on the economy. And there was, arguably, a lot the Obama administration could have done to reduce debt burdens without Congressional approval. But it didnt; it didnt even spend funds specifically allocated for that purpose. Why? According to many accounts, the biggest roadblock was Mr. Geithners consistent opposition to mortgage debt relief he was, if you like, all for bailing out banks but against bailing out families
In the end, the story of economic policy since 2008 has been that of a remarkable double standard. Bad loans always involve mistakes on both sides if borrowers were irresponsible, so were the people who lent them money. But when crisis came, bankers were held harmless for their errors while families paid full price.
And refusing to help families in debt, it turns out, wasnt just unfair; it was bad economics. Wall Street is back, but America isnt, and the double standard is the main reason.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/19/opinion/krugman-springtime-for-bankers.html?hpw&rref=opinion&_r=0
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/05/19/1300352/-Krugman-on-Geithner-He-was-all-for-bailing-out-banks-but-against-bailing-out-families
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 807 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (23)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Krugman on Geithner: He was “…all for bailing out banks but against bailing out families…” (Original Post)
kpete
May 2014
OP
... which would explain why banks are flourishing while people are still drowning. n/t
winter is coming
May 2014
#4
pansypoo53219
(20,981 posts)1. he had to save his 'species'.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)2. He thinks he did a heckuva job. But he actually fucked right straight up.
Thanks, kpete.
Well said, Mr. Krugman.
Fuck you, Geithner.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)3. Geithner, Pritzker, Monsanto....
Hope and Change!
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)4. ... which would explain why banks are flourishing while people are still drowning. n/t