Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Sat May 17, 2014, 12:48 PM May 2014

Bankrolled by broadband donors, house democrat/republican lobby FCC against net neutrality










Bankrolled by broadband donors, lawmakers lobby FCC on net neutrality
Watchdog decries politicians' claims that they "are acting in the public interest."

by David Kravets - May 16 2014, 10:20pm CEST
BROADBAND GOVERNMENT WEB CULTURE
110

Andrew Magill/Flickr
The 28 House members who lobbied the Federal Communications Commission to drop net neutrality this week have received more than twice the amount in campaign contributions from the broadband sector than the average for all House members.

These lawmakers, including the top House leadership, warned the FCC that regulating broadband like a public utility "harms" providers, would be "fatal to the Internet," and could "limit economic freedom."​

According to research provided Friday by Maplight, the 28 House members received, on average, $26,832 from the "cable & satellite TV production & distribution" sector over a two-year period ending in December. According to the data, that's 2.3 times more than the House average of $11,651.

What's more, one of the lawmakers who told the FCC that he had "grave concern" (PDF) about the proposed regulation took more money from that sector than any other member of the House. Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR) was the top sector recipient, netting more than $109,000 over the two-year period, the Maplight data shows.

Dan Newman, cofounder and president of Maplight, the California research group that reveals money in politics, said the figures show that "it's hard to take seriously politicians' claims that they are acting in the public interest when their campaigns are funded by companies seeking huge financial benefits for themselves."

Signing a letter to the FCC along with Walden, who chairs the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, were three other key members of the same committee: Reps. Fred Upton (R-MI), Robert Latta (R-OH), and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN). Over the two-year period, Upton took in $65,000, Latta took $51,000, and Blackburn took $32,500.

In a letter (PDF) those representatives sent to the FCC two days before Thursday's raucous FCC net neutrality hearing, the four wrote that they had "grave concern" over the FCC's consideration of "reclassifying Internet broadband service as an old-fashioned 'Title II common carrier service.'"

The letter added that a switchover "harms broadband providers, the American economy, and ultimately broadband consumers, actually doing so would be fatal to the Internet as we know it."

Not every one of the 28 members who publicly lobbied the FCC against net neutrality in advance of Thursday's FCC public hearing received campaign financing from the industry. One representative took no money: Rep. Nick Rahall (D-WV).











Greg Walden Republican (Elected 1998), OR House district 2 $109,250

Eric Cantor Republican (Elected 2000), VA House district 7 $80,800

John A. Boehner Republican (Elected 1990), OH House district 8 $75,450

Fred Upton Republican (Elected 1986), MI House district 6 $65,000

John Barrow Democrat (Elected 2005), GA House district 12 $60,500

Bob Latta Republican (Elected 2007), OH House district 5 $51,000


George "G.K." Butterfield Democrat (Elected 2004), NC House district 1
$34,500


Kevin McCarthy Republican (Elected 2007), CA House district 23 $33,000

Marsha Blackburn Republican (Elected 2002), TN House district 7 $32,500

Cathy McMorris Rodgers Republican (Elected 2005), WA House district 5
$31,500

Raymond "Gene" Green Democrat (Elected 1992), TX House district 29 $27,000

Scott Peters Democrat (Elected 2013), CA House district 52 $21,800

Joaquin Castro Democrat (Elected 2013), TX House district 20 $18,250

Kurt Schrader Democrat (Elected 2009), OR House district 5 $16,000

Bill Owens Democrat (Elected 2009), NY House district 21 $15,500

Bobby Rush Democrat (Elected 1992), IL House district 1 $15,000

Loretta Sanchez Democrat (Elected 1996), CA House district 46 $12,000

Albio Sires Democrat (Elected 2006), NJ House district 8 $9,000

Alcee Hastings Democrat (Elected 1992), FL House district 20 $7,000

Marc Veasey Democrat (Elected 2013), TX House district 33 $6,750

Bennie Thompson Democrat (Elected 1992), MS House district 2 $6,500

Sanford Bishop Democrat (Elected 1992), GA House district 2 $6,000

Henry Cuellar Democrat (Elected 2005), TX House district 28 $5,000

David Scott Democrat (Elected 2002), GA House district 13 $3,500

Gregory Meeks Democrat (Elected 1996), NY House district 5 $3,500

Corrine Brown Democrat (Elected 1992), FL House district 5 $3,000

William Lacy Clay Democrat (Elected 2000), MO House district 1 $2,000

Nick Rahall Democrat (Elected 1976), WV House district 3 $0



http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/05/bankrolled-by-broadband-donors-lawmakers-lobby-fcc-on-net-neutrality/


asshole democrats.....turncoat bastards.


8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bankrolled by broadband donors, house democrat/republican lobby FCC against net neutrality (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter May 2014 OP
Is it no longer chic to deliver the bribes in brown paper bags? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #1
There was a good sign on solidarity however Ichingcarpenter May 2014 #4
"limit economic freedom" = business should be free to make money with no oversight? NightWatcher May 2014 #2
Jesus Christ. I'll write a letter to octoberlib May 2014 #3
about half the Congressional Black Caucus is on that list Enrique May 2014 #5
And Harry Reid's chief of staff was once a Senior VP at Comcast... PoliticAverse May 2014 #6
K&R! octoberlib May 2014 #7
The Third Way is a malignant, infiltrating cancer in our party. woo me with science May 2014 #8

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
2. "limit economic freedom" = business should be free to make money with no oversight?
Sat May 17, 2014, 12:58 PM
May 2014

So now regulations are bad because they may "limit economic freedom". Heavens forbid that a corporation not be FREE to do whatever they can to make money, even if that means establishing monopolies, buying influence, and corrupting those who pass the regulations.

Nice.

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
3. Jesus Christ. I'll write a letter to
Sat May 17, 2014, 01:06 PM
May 2014

Butterfield even though he's not in my district. There's nothing like pay to play!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bankrolled by broadband d...