General Discussion

matmar

(593 posts) Fri Mar 30, 2012, 04:18 PM Mar 2012

A moment of silence please for Justice Scalia......

...in his questioning of Obamacare he opined of the length of the bill and the amount of reading he might have to do in order to make a decision.

Poor baby. It must be a bitch to be a Supreme Court Justice.

He also criticized a part of Obamacare, a sweetheart deal known as the "Cornhusker Kickback". Except that there is no "Cornhusker Kickback" in the bill.

Who needs research when all you need is rightwing ideology to guide you?

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A moment of silence please for Justice Scalia...... (Original Post) matmar Mar 2012 OP

My moment of silence will be pregnant with meaning lunatica Mar 2012 #1

I would hope that his "moment of silence" would last for the rest of his life. calimary Mar 2012 #2

Darn. I read your headline and I was hoping... Chorophyll Mar 2012 #3

+1 Richard D Mar 2012 #6

+1... tosh Mar 2012 #8

Honestly, Chorophyll Mar 2012 #10

Why O' why was his nomination to SCOTUS ever approved by any of the non-repugs in the Senate? left on green only Mar 2012 #4

If only they could find people from the top of their classes at Ivy League law schools DefenseLawyer Mar 2012 #5

If it is too much work for the man cojoel Mar 2012 #7

Maybe he was unable to read it with Clarence Thomas's head up his ass?? JoePhilly Mar 2012 #9

he's gives liberals the finger every chance he gets. he's unworthy of the position. spanone Mar 2012 #11

lunatica

(53,410 posts)

1. My moment of silence will be pregnant with meaning

Reply to matmar (Original post)

Fri Mar 30, 2012, 04:20 PM

Mar 2012

and it will have this dripping all over it -->

calimary

(81,267 posts)

2. I would hope that his "moment of silence" would last for the rest of his life.

Reply to matmar (Original post)

Fri Mar 30, 2012, 04:22 PM

Mar 2012

What an asshole. Arrogant putz.

Chorophyll

(5,179 posts)

3. Darn. I read your headline and I was hoping...

Reply to matmar (Original post)

Fri Mar 30, 2012, 04:29 PM

Mar 2012

...but no. I don't wish ill on him. I only wish that he would recuse himself... from pretty much everything.

Richard D

(8,754 posts)

6. +1

Reply to Chorophyll (Reply #3)

Fri Mar 30, 2012, 04:46 PM

Mar 2012

But I'm not quite as nice as you.

tosh

(4,423 posts)

8. +1...

Reply to Richard D (Reply #6)

Fri Mar 30, 2012, 06:24 PM

Mar 2012

on both counts.

Chorophyll

(5,179 posts)

10. Honestly,

Reply to Richard D (Reply #6)

Fri Mar 30, 2012, 08:28 PM

Mar 2012

I'm not as nice as me either. I was kind of hoping he'd walked under a falling anvil.

left on green only

(1,484 posts)

4. Why O' why was his nomination to SCOTUS ever approved by any of the non-repugs in the Senate?

Reply to matmar (Original post)

Fri Mar 30, 2012, 04:30 PM

Mar 2012

I saw through the lies behind that one right from the start, and my immediate outrage has remained with me ever since. Over time, since his appointment, I have only seen his arrogance grow.

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)

5. If only they could find people from the top of their classes at Ivy League law schools

Reply to matmar (Original post)

Fri Mar 30, 2012, 04:33 PM

Mar 2012

to come work for them on the Supreme Court. It would make things a lot easier for Tony.

cojoel

(957 posts)

7. If it is too much work for the man

Reply to matmar (Original post)

Fri Mar 30, 2012, 06:23 PM

Mar 2012

then it is probably time for him to step down from the bench. If a justice is not willing to understand the laws affecting cases on which they rule, then they really aren't doing their job.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)

9. Maybe he was unable to read it with Clarence Thomas's head up his ass??

Reply to matmar (Original post)

Fri Mar 30, 2012, 06:24 PM

Mar 2012

spanone

(135,833 posts)

11. he's gives liberals the finger every chance he gets. he's unworthy of the position.

Reply to matmar (Original post)

Fri Mar 30, 2012, 08:29 PM

Mar 2012

Reply to this discussion