General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsClimate scientists: It’s basically too late to stop warming
If you like cool weather and not having to club your neighbors as you battle for scarce resources, nows the time to move to Canada, because the story of the 21st century is almost written, reports Reuters. Global warming is close to being irreversible, and in some cases that ship has already sailed.
Scientists have been saying for a while that we have until between 2015 and 2020 to start radically reducing our carbon emissions, and what do you know: That deadlines almost past! Crazy how these things sneak up on you while youre squabbling about whether global warming is a religion. Also, our science got better in the meantime, so now we know that no matter what we do, we can say adios to the planets ice caps.
Heres what happens next: Natural climate feedbacks will take over and, on top of our prodigious human-caused carbon emissions, send us over an irreversible tipping point. By 2100, the planet will be hotter than its been since the time of the dinosaurs, and everyone who lives in red states will pretty much get the apocalypse theyve been hoping for. The subtropics will expand northward, the bottom half of the U.S. will turn into an inhospitable desert, and everyone who lives there will be drinking recycled pee and struggling to salvage something from an economy wrecked by the destruction of agriculture, industry, and electrical power production.
more
http://grist.org/list/climate-scientists-its-basically-too-late-to-stop-warming/?postpost=v2
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Canuckistanian
(42,290 posts)We don't want hoards of survivalists crawling across the border, looking for caves.
Those caves have already been earmarked for members of Harper's Conservative cabinet.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)... are based on an article out of Scientific American, which provokes much argument.
That doesn't mean we should stop curtailing what we do an industrialized nations, that simply means that what nations do (awful or not) TO curtail this... that history has not been forecast with certainty.
And, meanwhile... I'm not going to put a loaded barrel of a gun to my face as I kiss my ass "G-Bye"!
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)And we're going to be using more than ever until who knows when.
The equation is simple. What we're using, and how many are using it. Technology can only solve part of that equation. The other part is personal responsiblity to help decrease world population. It's simply going to have to be a personal effort. No one is going to force anyone to do anything. The sooner we understand this the sooner we can begin the process of altering course.
Creideiki
(2,567 posts)I know we have all the built-in warming coming. National solutions don't look to be forthcoming (and we'll spike any international solution) so it's time to start pushing things toward the state and local levels.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)of pulling the CO2 out of the atmosphere? It seems like such a workable compromise. We all could go on polluting the atmosphere as long as we could pull it back out to keep the planet in balance.
provis99
(13,062 posts)They have been having an alarming number of draughts in the prairie provinces the past few decades, and it's getting worse.
shimonitanegi
(114 posts)when GWB stole the election...
Gore would have taken any humanly possible steps to deal with GWC
Gore wouldn't have wasted 800 billion dollars in the totally unnecessary war.
Gore would have paid off the national debt instead of massive tax cut for the super-rich.
Uncle Joe
(58,363 posts)Thanks for the thread, n2doc.
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)We had a pretty good run. Too bad we couldn't overcome our superstitions and other limitations in time.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)- with no sarcasm. On the other hand, I have talked with people who admit that it is happening but dispute the cause. I have wondered if there are enough of them that we could come together and focus on adaptation as opposed to trying to stop it?
From an evolutionary perspective, maybe sucking it up and meeting halfway so that a significant number of reasonable people survive wouldn't be a terrible alternative.
It may be the only one we have left at some point. Best to use as much planning time as possible.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Smilo
(1,944 posts).......... but food shortages - which are already happening and will only get worse.
FredStembottom
(2,928 posts)Putting some type of light blocking contaminant in jet fuels and let every flight spread an upper atmosphere "shade" around the planet.
Are there any ideas like that out there?
(of course, Yellowstone blowing up would do the trick, too...)
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Seems to me that I recall some hippie scientists talking about this like, 40 years ago. But then Ronnie told us that it would all be fine and that sounded a lot better.
"You can't fix stupid."
JCMach1
(27,559 posts)chnoutte
(36 posts)as another excuse to do nothing.