Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
115 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
OMG!! A witness was actually watching the struggle as the shot went off and turns out it was GZ on (Original Post) Ecumenist Mar 2012 OP
I'm not following. Please clarify. hlthe2b Mar 2012 #1
The witness SAW THE STRUGGLE THAT ENDED IN TRAYVON'S DEATH! Ecumenist Mar 2012 #6
Another female witnessed mentioned that Zimmerman had his hands up as well. Lilyeye Mar 2012 #98
Mary Cutcher and her roomie. She's the one that was insistent that the screams she heard weren't Ecumenist Mar 2012 #100
It's a previously unknown, (TO THE PUBLIC) witness. Ecumenist Mar 2012 #13
if you listen to all the 911 calls, there is agirl who called 911, whose brothe was outside watching robinlynne Mar 2012 #109
ok, E CatWoman Mar 2012 #2
I had to read it a few times also qanda Mar 2012 #4
That certainly explains why GZ had no grass stains on him. Cali_Democrat Mar 2012 #7
Has anyone check ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2012 #16
The incompetent (corrupt?) Sanford police should have taken pictures Cali_Democrat Mar 2012 #25
No question mark needed. nt awoke_in_2003 Mar 2012 #27
It's absolutely impossible for any law enforcement officer to be that incompetent. TrollBuster9090 Mar 2012 #57
Well said. n/t Cali_Democrat Mar 2012 #58
"What Zimmerman did was bad enough, A Simple Game Mar 2012 #62
I think you miss the big picture. Zimmerman committed a hate crime. But the police and DA robinlynne Mar 2012 #77
You know what, if there were no Zimmermans, there would be A Simple Game Mar 2012 #85
If police and state attorneys didn't cover up hate crimes against young black men, then people MADem Mar 2012 #115
When justice is derailed Aerows Mar 2012 #89
No we will never know how many people died because of poor police and attorneys. A Simple Game Mar 2012 #110
I disagree with this statement Aerows Mar 2012 #111
I don't disagree with your statement. A Simple Game Mar 2012 #112
Once again Aerows Mar 2012 #113
More people die WeekendWarrior Mar 2012 #105
I think your version is probably the most correct Canuckistanian Mar 2012 #64
I read there were no photos of the crime scene. robinlynne Mar 2012 #76
That part I don't know. I suspect that will be presented once the autopsy Ecumenist Mar 2012 #26
My, my! Stop making sense, now! You'll upset the status quo! MADem Mar 2012 #114
YES!!!!!! Ecumenist Mar 2012 #8
Yes! Ecumenist Mar 2012 #47
Okay. Anderson Cooper interviewed this particular witness who SAW THE ENTIRE FINAL STRUGGLE! Ecumenist Mar 2012 #12
wonder what Joe Oliver has to say about this??? CatWoman Mar 2012 #21
I wonder what he has to say about this myself. I have a feeling that we might just be Ecumenist Mar 2012 #24
His 15 minutes of fame have to end sooner or later politicasista Mar 2012 #36
Haven't seen much of Joe since the police station video was released Amerigo Vespucci Mar 2012 #68
that's cause he's trying to cash that check before the stop payment is issued CatWoman Mar 2012 #72
I'll bet these witnesses told the police what they saw on that day. robinlynne Mar 2012 #78
Wow! qanda Mar 2012 #3
amen Cali_Democrat Mar 2012 #5
I knew it, I knew it. Ecumenist Mar 2012 #10
who is this witness? grasswire Mar 2012 #9
He's anonymous for now. They even changed his voice for his protection but he's given his Ecumenist Mar 2012 #11
Thank heavens... I just hope there is no way for his credibility to be put in question... hlthe2b Mar 2012 #14
He's going to go into a more in depth interview on his show tonight. Ecumenist Mar 2012 #15
Actually, it makes the video make sense now. That's why there's no blood on his clothes. Ecumenist Mar 2012 #17
I'm only guessing but I think it might be the other guy on the 911 phone call TrollBuster9090 Mar 2012 #59
Yeah it did, take place close to their home. You're probably correct. It's the person Ecumenist Mar 2012 #61
Yes, I heard that while listening to the tapes. He also Blue_Roses Mar 2012 #90
That was a different tape than the one with the Fawke Em Mar 2012 #93
Isn't it disgustingly obvious what this "man" meant to do AND did? Ecumenist Mar 2012 #95
there were 8 911 calls. there are probably several witnesses who at least heard everything. robinlynne Mar 2012 #79
Why is this witness just coming forward? It has been over a month. n/t RebelOne Mar 2012 #18
Apparently, he's not just come forward. We're just finding out about him. Ecumenist Mar 2012 #19
so how did his head get bashed on cement? grasswire Mar 2012 #20
EXACTLY...IT DIDN'T!! Explains why it doesn't appear to look as if that happened Ecumenist Mar 2012 #22
I wonder if he said that because he had a heads up about this witness telling his story Ecumenist Mar 2012 #23
Doesn't this make it seem like Judge Daddy is lying to cover up K8-EEE Mar 2012 #28
Yep, it does. Considering that this makes 3 witnesses who say that GZ was ON TOP Ecumenist Mar 2012 #31
It's possible. USArmyParatrooper Mar 2012 #33
Considering the EXTREMELY SHORT period of time between the shot and when mary Cutcher Ecumenist Mar 2012 #35
I'm not sure what that has to do with it. USArmyParatrooper Mar 2012 #39
The reason I ask the question is because according to at least 3 witnesses, Trayvon was face down Ecumenist Mar 2012 #42
If true (and I'm not doubting it) USArmyParatrooper Mar 2012 #44
That's what I'm saying. I don;t understand how he could have shot him in the chest Ecumenist Mar 2012 #46
And after flipping over a body with a gaping chest wound Aerows Mar 2012 #91
BAM! Aerows, this is what I was saying from the beginning. How could he not have Ecumenist Mar 2012 #96
I don't see a way Aerows Mar 2012 #102
There are several witnesses who say they heard 2 gunshots. Now, if what you propose is true, Ecumenist Mar 2012 #103
I don't know Aerows Mar 2012 #107
Why would the charge be manslaughter, and not murder? robinlynne Mar 2012 #80
Intent leftynyc Mar 2012 #87
Could this witness tell if Trayvon was facing upward or lying face down? MagickMuffin Mar 2012 #40
Yes, he saw GZ on top of trayvon and when Gz got up after shooting trayvon, Ecumenist Mar 2012 #43
Well it sure appears that GZ "wasn't going to let him get away" and that GZ went a hunting MagickMuffin Mar 2012 #52
Honey, that' quite alright, you're not doing anything but telling the truth. Ecumenist Mar 2012 #53
The funeral director could answer that pronto. EmeraldCityGrl Mar 2012 #48
an article I read today said that the funeral director couldn't Bluerthanblue Mar 2012 #56
more than a possibility. witness says he was shot in the back magical thyme Mar 2012 #49
WOA....ARE YOU SERIOUS? I KNEW it, I KNEW It, I KNEW IT! Ecumenist Mar 2012 #50
yes, I'm serious. link below magical thyme Mar 2012 #55
I don't think GZ shot him while he was on the kid's back. intheflow Mar 2012 #75
At this point Aerows Mar 2012 #92
Not necessarily - the father had no first hand independent information karynnj Mar 2012 #38
and what about prior arrests when he got his son off? magical thyme Mar 2012 #51
I'm not saying the denial is logical or reasonable karynnj Mar 2012 #74
oh I agree, I'm sure it is difficult magical thyme Mar 2012 #84
is this the video? warrior1 Mar 2012 #29
Is what in what video? Ecumenist Mar 2012 #30
Whoever that was says that Zimmerman didn't appear hurt after the shot. Glimmer of Hope Mar 2012 #34
No, it's was a heretofore unknown(to the public) witness that saw the final struggle. Ecumenist Mar 2012 #37
Should be interesting. I hope this is streaming somewhere. Glimmer of Hope Mar 2012 #41
If you can, tune into AndersonCooper and it will probably stream after the show if you Ecumenist Mar 2012 #45
the video of the witness interview warrior1 Mar 2012 #32
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Mar 2012 #54
Arrest the murderer malaise Mar 2012 #60
story has so many twists and turns Liberal_in_LA Mar 2012 #63
Tomorrow there will be some kind of surprise revelation that ponts to Zimmerman's innocence slackmaster Mar 2012 #65
Only because the liars tried to make sure that only what they wanted to say Ecumenist Mar 2012 #67
exactly! robinlynne Mar 2012 #81
Why is ANYONE giving fucking interviews?? randome Mar 2012 #66
BOTH sides are doing it but I'm sure that there's alot that isn't coming out Ecumenist Mar 2012 #69
Respectfully, it doesn't matter who started it. randome Mar 2012 #70
This isn't the first time this has happened. To a certain extent, it began with Rodney King Ecumenist Mar 2012 #71
i only see Trayvon's fmaily asking for justice. I ahve not heard them amking up stories about what robinlynne Mar 2012 #83
I'd ordinarily agree with that stranger81 Mar 2012 #73
That may be exactly why they're doing it. robinlynne Mar 2012 #82
Zimmerman still hasn't been arrested. This is a way to foment public pressure for morningfog Mar 2012 #86
The Sanford Police Department Aerows Mar 2012 #88
LOL!! that's so true. After all, the cookie jar is responsible for making the cookies available Ecumenist Mar 2012 #94
Surely it must be true if Anderson Cooper and Nancy Grace say it is, LOL. just1voice Mar 2012 #97
Of course. You do know that we can always tell by what you say right away. Ecumenist Mar 2012 #101
Unless someone actually saw what PRECEDED the shooting, it's still not proof of anything. the moon is fake Mar 2012 #99
live it up, troll n/t grasswire Mar 2012 #104
Only thing to do is laugh. ceile Mar 2012 #106
oh how sweet--you learned our smileys already librechik Mar 2012 #108

hlthe2b

(102,283 posts)
1. I'm not following. Please clarify.
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 06:21 PM
Mar 2012

What did the witness see?

On edit, I see you added "on top." That is news. Who is this witness? A new one or just one who hadn't been on tv previously?

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
6. The witness SAW THE STRUGGLE THAT ENDED IN TRAYVON'S DEATH!
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 06:24 PM
Mar 2012

He didn't see the flash but he was watching and heard the shot. He said that GZ just got up and walked away, appearing nervous and putting his hands on his forehead.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
100. Mary Cutcher and her roomie. She's the one that was insistent that the screams she heard weren't
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 11:34 AM
Mar 2012

those of a grown man but a young boy.

robinlynne

(15,481 posts)
109. if you listen to all the 911 calls, there is agirl who called 911, whose brothe was outside watching
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 01:44 PM
Mar 2012

the struggle. he ran inside when the shot was fired.

they can be found on the sanford city page.

qanda

(10,422 posts)
4. I had to read it a few times also
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 06:23 PM
Mar 2012

They were saying it turns out GZ was on top of Trayvon and the struggle was in the grass and not on the sidewalk as Zimmerman has previously stated.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
16. Has anyone check ...
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 06:35 PM
Mar 2012

MARTIN'S clothes for grass stains on the back? That would answer the "who was on top" question.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
25. The incompetent (corrupt?) Sanford police should have taken pictures
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 06:50 PM
Mar 2012

as evidence.

But knowing them, they probably botched that as well.

TrollBuster9090

(5,954 posts)
57. It's absolutely impossible for any law enforcement officer to be that incompetent.
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 08:35 PM
Mar 2012

The investigation wasn't 'botched.' They didn't do an investigation, they just took Zimmerman's word for it because they didn't care, and didn't want the hassle. They wrote down his side of the story, assumed it was probably true, then rushed Trayvon's body off to be drug tested hoping to find drugs in his system. If there were drugs in his system, that would have been the end of it as far as they were concerned. Open and shut case of a drugged up black teenaged boy getting in to a gated community looking for stuff to steal.

The sad fact is that African American teenaged boys get gunned down every day, and most of the police "investigations" are about as detailed as this. This is just business as usual in most police departments.

THEN they found out he had no drugs in his system, he was actually STAYING in that neighborhood at the time (NOT just sneaking in to steal stuff while high on drugs), didn't show any signs of a struggle, had TWO PARENTS who both CARED enough about him to not just let this be swept under the carpet...then it went viral in the social media....and then they had their "OH..SHIT" moment.

That's when all the "leaking" and "smearing" started. That entire police department is obviously shitting their pants right now. What Zimmerman did was bad enough, but the actions of the police and the state attourney are far worse, and there are a lot more laws that come in to play for them than for Zimmerman.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
62. "What Zimmerman did was bad enough,
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 09:04 PM
Mar 2012

but the actions of the police and the state attourney are far worse"? I'm not defending their actions, but how many people died because of the actions of the police and state attorney?

robinlynne

(15,481 posts)
77. I think you miss the big picture. Zimmerman committed a hate crime. But the police and DA
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 10:26 PM
Mar 2012

by covering it up, and treating the hate crime as not important create the condiyions whereby hate crimes happen all over the country every day. In other words times 1000 what Zimmerman did.
Zimmerman felt he would not be in trouble for killing a black boy, and he WAS NOT arrested. because of that 10 more Zimmermans will do the same thing.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
85. You know what, if there were no Zimmermans, there would be
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 07:36 AM
Mar 2012

less need for police and state attorneys.

If there were no corrupt police and state attorneys, would there still be Zimmermans?

Zimmerman probably killed Trayvon in cold blood, the others did not.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
115. If police and state attorneys didn't cover up hate crimes against young black men, then people
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 10:58 AM
Mar 2012

wouldn't be so comfortable shooting them like it's open season on teens of color.

If you know the cops have your back, you're going to be a bit more comfortable pulling that kind of shit.

Remember Emmett Till? The people that killed him KNEW they could get away with it, before they even grabbed that kid. And the did get away with it, didn't they?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmett_Till

On September 23 the jury acquitted both defendants after a 67-minute deliberation; one juror said, "If we hadn't stopped to drink pop, it wouldn't have taken that long."[69]

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
89. When justice is derailed
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 09:57 AM
Mar 2012

Everyone suffers. How many people have died because of the actions of the police and state attorney? We'll never know, because we'll never know how many times they have done something similar prior to this incident.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
110. No we will never know how many people died because of poor police and attorneys.
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 06:27 PM
Mar 2012

Could be a lot, could be none. The truth is I don't know and you admit you don't and never will know. To equate someone that maybe, just maybe abetted a crime before or after the fact to the person that pulled the trigger is something I can't do.

I know what you are trying to point out, but it is not worse, it is not even equal. The problem to me is not so much with the condoning of a crime by authorities as it is with the parenting and peers that put the idea in their heads to start with.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
111. I disagree with this statement
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 07:20 PM
Mar 2012
The problem to me is not so much with the condoning of a crime by authorities as it is with the parenting and peers that put the idea in their heads to start with.


If you are granted power beyond that of ordinary citizens, such as these people are, you have a responsibility to not use such power for personal gain or for cronyism.

It IS abetting a crime if you knowingly cover one up, or if you usurp the justice system. We must all do our duties as discerning and just members of society.

If you disagree with that idea, then honestly, I think you have an agenda that precludes you from seeking truth, and instead marks you as a person that has an agenda of personal gain, rather than keeping the integrity of the justice department in good standing.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
112. I don't disagree with your statement.
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 08:23 PM
Mar 2012

But if you think a corrupt cop or attorney will cause a well raised morally good child to go out and shoot another person once they become an adult, so be it, I doubt I could change your mind.

And if you think covering up for a crime is equal to pulling the trigger, so be it, I doubt I could change your mind about that either. But I know who I am blaming for Trayvon's death, and it isn't the cops.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
113. Once again
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 08:55 PM
Mar 2012

I think you miss my point.

" if you think a corrupt cop or attorney will cause a well raised morally good child to go out and shoot another person once they become an adult"

A corrupt cop or attorney that has powers that exceed that of normal citizens can not only cover up the murder, rape or other violence against another person, adult or otherwise, they can also cause innocents to be executed for crimes they didn't commit simply because they manipulate evidence.

Innocent people HAVE been found after the fact to be innocent after their execution. While I admit that there is no evidence in this case of that YET, their lax standards of justice place the citizens that pay their salaries via tax dollars in peril.

When the justice system is corrupt, there is no justice and someone must be the person that says "I'm the line and it stops here." If there is no one to say it, there is no line, there is no justice, and committing crimes against people not only becomes possible, it becomes institutional.

WeekendWarrior

(1,437 posts)
105. More people die
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 12:20 PM
Mar 2012

when law enforcement gives people like Zimmerman a pass and thus condone his actions. Their refusal to do their jobs has far-reaching consequences, one of which is coming to light through all the people who seem to think it's okay to shoot a young black man because he was wearing a hoodie. All you have to do is claim self-defense.

Canuckistanian

(42,290 posts)
64. I think your version is probably the most correct
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 09:10 PM
Mar 2012

Now let's see if the justice system can even come CLOSE to this same conclusion.

I'm not holding out for this resolution.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
26. That part I don't know. I suspect that will be presented once the autopsy
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 06:55 PM
Mar 2012

and the reasons that they are charging GZ are.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
114. My, my! Stop making sense, now! You'll upset the status quo!
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 10:44 AM
Mar 2012

I'll bet that hoodie could be used in a TIDE commercial...

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
12. Okay. Anderson Cooper interviewed this particular witness who SAW THE ENTIRE FINAL STRUGGLE!
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 06:27 PM
Mar 2012

The one on the top was GZ NOT Trayvon!

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
24. I wonder what he has to say about this myself. I have a feeling that we might just be
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 06:44 PM
Mar 2012

nearing the end of his particular clown car.

politicasista

(14,128 posts)
36. His 15 minutes of fame have to end sooner or later
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 07:25 PM
Mar 2012

Roland Martin wanted to take him to the woodshed. He is an embarrassment.

Amerigo Vespucci

(30,885 posts)
68. Haven't seen much of Joe since the police station video was released
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 09:22 PM
Mar 2012

He's been all over MSNBC. Today, not so much.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
11. He's anonymous for now. They even changed his voice for his protection but he's given his
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 06:26 PM
Mar 2012

info to the appropriate authorities!

hlthe2b

(102,283 posts)
14. Thank heavens... I just hope there is no way for his credibility to be put in question...
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 06:31 PM
Mar 2012

THis sounds like what we've been waiting for.

TrollBuster9090

(5,954 posts)
59. I'm only guessing but I think it might be the other guy on the 911 phone call
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 08:43 PM
Mar 2012

Remember the woman who called 911 where you can hear Trayvon screaming in the background. Obviously the event took place very close to their house, or you wouldn't be able to hear it over the phone. Then you can hear her telling a man to "get down" and get away from the window. Then, while she's still on the phone she describes seeing men with flashlights etc.

I figure it's either the woman herself or the man she was talking to that saw most of it. And the fact that his voice is on the 911 call gives credibility to the idea that he wasn't just some random person who didn't see anything coming forward and pretending to be an eye witness. He was already KNOWN to be a witness.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
61. Yeah it did, take place close to their home. You're probably correct. It's the person
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 08:49 PM
Mar 2012

who claimed that he heard GZ asking for help. But he said that based on the way things happened, he thinks now that it was Trayvon and h described the fact that after the "larger" hispanic man got up after shooting the other person, he realised that the one lying deceased face down was a "boy", (his words).

Blue_Roses

(12,894 posts)
90. Yes, I heard that while listening to the tapes. He also
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 10:01 AM
Mar 2012

told the 911 dispatcher that he thought the guy was dead. He had to be watching it. He sounded very alarmed. I need to hear that again

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
93. That was a different tape than the one with the
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 10:15 AM
Mar 2012

woman on the phone and a man in the background.

The one you're talking about is a man only.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
95. Isn't it disgustingly obvious what this "man" meant to do AND did?
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 10:25 AM
Mar 2012

And his family has the nerve to continue to lie...SMDH

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
19. Apparently, he's not just come forward. We're just finding out about him.
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 06:40 PM
Mar 2012

Remember, there are alot of these witnesses who weren't contacted even though they called to give their information.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
20. so how did his head get bashed on cement?
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 06:41 PM
Mar 2012

if the struggle was never on the sidewalk?

Last night daddy said that George tried to drag the struggle to the grass (off the sidewalk).

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
23. I wonder if he said that because he had a heads up about this witness telling his story
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 06:43 PM
Mar 2012

about what he saw...

K8-EEE

(15,667 posts)
28. Doesn't this make it seem like Judge Daddy is lying to cover up
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 07:05 PM
Mar 2012

the inconsistencies that he knew would come out in the story?

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
31. Yep, it does. Considering that this makes 3 witnesses who say that GZ was ON TOP
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 07:15 PM
Mar 2012

of Trayvon, do you think there's a chance he was shot IN THE BACK?

USArmyParatrooper

(1,827 posts)
33. It's possible.
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 07:20 PM
Mar 2012

In a fight the natural (but wrong) reaction of the person the bottom tends to be trying to roll over so they're not on their back.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
35. Considering the EXTREMELY SHORT period of time between the shot and when mary Cutcher
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 07:24 PM
Mar 2012

went out with her Roomie to see GZ straddling Trayvon's body, I am really beginning to wonder if he shot that boy in his back...

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
42. The reason I ask the question is because according to at least 3 witnesses, Trayvon was face down
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 07:31 PM
Mar 2012

and they immediately went outside to see what happened. Tray;s hands were under his body, this is according to these 3 witnesses and GZ was straddling him with his hands on his back.

USArmyParatrooper

(1,827 posts)
44. If true (and I'm not doubting it)
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 07:35 PM
Mar 2012

the eye witness accounts would dramatically increase the chance he was shot in the back. If he was, Zimmerman is screwed.

Personally I think he's screwed either way. I've been saying from the beginning that Manslaughter would be the most likely charge. I still stand by that. I don't know what the maximum penalty is for that in Florida, but it would be in the order of tens of years.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
46. That's what I'm saying. I don;t understand how he could have shot him in the chest
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 07:38 PM
Mar 2012

and then "flipped" the body over , neatly, or at least completely placing his hands under the body in the time between the shot and when Mary Cutcher and her roomie made it outside to see GZ straddling Trayvon with his hands on HIS BACK!

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
91. And after flipping over a body with a gaping chest wound
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 10:01 AM
Mar 2012

Show up at the police department 35 minutes later without an ounce of blood on him.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
96. BAM! Aerows, this is what I was saying from the beginning. How could he not have
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 10:27 AM
Mar 2012

even staining if he had either been under Trayvon or flipped the body?

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
102. I don't see a way
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 11:52 AM
Mar 2012

And frankly, considering that he had no blood on him at all, I suspect Zimmerman was standing away from him when he shot him. When people get shot, there is blood and tissue flying around. I have to believe if you shot an unarmed person in self-defense, that person was at close enough range that you are going to get some blood on you.

Unless, of course, they are fleeing FROM you, you are pursuing them on foot, and pull the trigger because you don't want them to "get away".

How close was Trayvon to his home? If he was pretty close to his home, Zimmerman could have misinterpreted it as him "breaking in", but hell, that doesn't warrant gunning somebody down, either. I didn't think even the police could shoot a suspect in the back that is fleeing.

Maybe Zimmerman accidentally pulled the trigger. In any case, it's still his fault because he had the poor judgment to chase after someone without cause - and there is no cause whatsoever if you don't see them doing something wrong - and with a gun.

The last thing we need as a society is people running around gunning people down because they "think" they might be guilty, and the last thing we need is for people to get away with that behavior.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
103. There are several witnesses who say they heard 2 gunshots. Now, if what you propose is true,
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 12:04 PM
Mar 2012

is it possible that he shot that poor boy in the bak to knock him down, Could that have been those agonising screams?

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
107. I don't know
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 12:56 PM
Mar 2012

But I DO know there are a LOT of things about this entire case, and Zimmerman's story that make absolutely no sense based on what we the public have seen, mainly the fact that he's pleading self-defense, there's no blood on him at all, and a 17 year old is dead.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
87. Intent
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 08:48 AM
Mar 2012

Prosecutors would have to prove his intention was to kill Mr. Martin and not just wound him. That's a tough charge to make stick in the best of circumstances.

MagickMuffin

(15,943 posts)
40. Could this witness tell if Trayvon was facing upward or lying face down?
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 07:29 PM
Mar 2012

In one of the police reports it states Trayvon was lying face down with his hands underneath him. How could GZ feel threatened if this is how Trayvon was shot

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
43. Yes, he saw GZ on top of trayvon and when Gz got up after shooting trayvon,
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 07:33 PM
Mar 2012

Trayvon was face down in the grass.

MagickMuffin

(15,943 posts)
52. Well it sure appears that GZ "wasn't going to let him get away" and that GZ went a hunting
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 08:07 PM
Mar 2012

for a "f____ing _oo_" fill in the blanks however you feel is the appropriate "term of endearment"

Sorry for appearing insensitive, not my intention but this just seems like the mindset of these "players" in this terrible tragic event.



EmeraldCityGrl

(4,310 posts)
48. The funeral director could answer that pronto.
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 07:50 PM
Mar 2012

I'm guessing they are going to have possibly exume the body
if the current autopsy doesn't address all these questions.

Those poor parents.

Bluerthanblue

(13,669 posts)
56. an article I read today said that the funeral director couldn't
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 08:16 PM
Mar 2012

tell which was an entrance or exit wound, because of the autopsy. I'm sure the autopsy report would state this though.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
55. yes, I'm serious. link below
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 08:13 PM
Mar 2012

and the article is linked in Latest Breaking News of same title


http://www.reddingnewsreview.com/newspages/2012newspages/new_witness_confirms_trayvon_mar_12_1000044.htm

NEW WITNESS CONFIRMS TRAYVON MARTIN WAS THE VICTIM

By Staff


ATLANTA, March 29, 2012, 6:47 p.m. - CNN is set to report tonight that Trayvon Martin was topped and then shot in the back by George Zimmerman, according to emails sent to the press.


I was sure, too. I wrote earlier today I'd be willing to bet on it.

intheflow

(28,476 posts)
75. I don't think GZ shot him while he was on the kid's back.
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 10:08 PM
Mar 2012

Because surely he would have had some blood splatter on his shirt if he'd been point-blank, and there doesn't appear to be blood anywhere on him in that video of him at the police station. I'd like to see what the autopsy report says before speculating - though at this point even an autopsy might turn out to be suspicious if it somehow vindicated GZ, due to the apparent cronyism and corruption in Seminole County.

God, I hate being so cynical.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
92. At this point
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 10:06 AM
Mar 2012

How could you avoid being cynical? This whole situation has been a string of either gross incompetence or malicious corruption. There's not much room in the middle for it to be anything BUT those two situations, and is more likely to be a combination of the two.

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
38. Not necessarily - the father had no first hand independent information
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 07:25 PM
Mar 2012

He was not there. It may be that he is lying, making stuff up - or he is repeating what his son told him - and, in spite of his background as a judge, he did not question anything his son said - in spite of the obvious difficulties. This is a case where he should NOT have been given a platform - all he was was a father defending his son - maybe in denial at what a monster he was in this instance.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
51. and what about prior arrests when he got his son off?
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 07:55 PM
Mar 2012

"maybe in denial at what a monster he was in this instance."

don't forget there is a history of son getting in trouble, include assaulting a cop, and father getting him off.

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
74. I'm not saying the denial is logical or reasonable
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 10:05 PM
Mar 2012

- or that it was the first time. It has to be really hard for someone who is himself considered a responsible member of society to accept that their child is extremely troubled.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
84. oh I agree, I'm sure it is difficult
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 11:20 PM
Mar 2012

But you would think at some point he'd realize it's not the world that's wrong, it's his kid. You'd think that with his history of people accusing him of violence, that when it escalated to someone dying he might wake up. Instead of hearing hate when Obama said if he had a son, he'd look like Trayvon....

However hard it is, people do need eventually to face reality. Especially people in positions of such responsibility. Hate to think of this guy as a judge, of all things....

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
37. No, it's was a heretofore unknown(to the public) witness that saw the final struggle.
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 07:25 PM
Mar 2012

Anderson Cooper spoke to this witness. More in depth on Anderson Cooper At 5 pacific/8 eastern.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
45. If you can, tune into AndersonCooper and it will probably stream after the show if you
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 07:35 PM
Mar 2012

don't have cable.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
65. Tomorrow there will be some kind of surprise revelation that ponts to Zimmerman's innocence
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 09:15 PM
Mar 2012

The media have to do something every day to keep up the momentum.

It's a LOOOOONG time until April 10, the earliest date that the grand jury MIGHT start looking at the case.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
67. Only because the liars tried to make sure that only what they wanted to say
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 09:18 PM
Mar 2012

and wanted the world to know to try to create a cover for babyzimmy. Now that the truth is coming out and has completely contradicted their story, it seemed like twists and turns but it's just the truth clearing things up.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
66. Why is ANYONE giving fucking interviews??
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 09:16 PM
Mar 2012

Doesn't anyone think AHEAD? A good defense attorney can claim his client can't get a fair trial and a change of venue, delays and even a mistrial can result.

NO ONE should be giving public interviews no matter how well disguised their identities.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
69. BOTH sides are doing it but I'm sure that there's alot that isn't coming out
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 09:24 PM
Mar 2012

it's not the best situation but it started with zimmy's side.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
70. Respectfully, it doesn't matter who started it.
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 09:35 PM
Mar 2012

The burden of proof is on the prosecution side and if a jury or a judge can be convinced that Zimmerman can't get a fair trial, that's one more hurdle to be overcome.

There have been far too many hurdles already.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
71. This isn't the first time this has happened. To a certain extent, it began with Rodney King
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 09:38 PM
Mar 2012

and has happened with EVERY high profile case ever since.

robinlynne

(15,481 posts)
83. i only see Trayvon's fmaily asking for justice. I ahve not heard them amking up stories about what
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 10:39 PM
Mar 2012

did and did not happen. they are simply telling the truth. Our son was killed. the police need to arrest the man who did it.

stranger81

(2,345 posts)
73. I'd ordinarily agree with that
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 10:01 PM
Mar 2012

But in this case, (1) a change of venue motion is already a virtual certainty if this case is ever filed; and (2) without substantial publicity around eyewitness accounts contradicting Zimmerman's self-serving version of events, there's never going to be a prosecution or a trial.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
86. Zimmerman still hasn't been arrested. This is a way to foment public pressure for
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 07:40 AM
Mar 2012

at least an attempt at justice. If people hadn't been talking to the media, the grand jury and the feds may have never taken notice.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
88. The Sanford Police Department
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 09:55 AM
Mar 2012

Isn't competent enough to investigate the case of a kid with his hand in the cookie jar and chocolate chips smeared all over his face.

They'd probably arrest the cookie jar.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
94. LOL!! that's so true. After all, the cookie jar is responsible for making the cookies available
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 10:23 AM
Mar 2012

to tempt that poor, innocent psychopath.

 

just1voice

(1,362 posts)
97. Surely it must be true if Anderson Cooper and Nancy Grace say it is, LOL.
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 11:07 AM
Mar 2012

Of course it could actually be true despite media whores allowing it to flow from their constantly flapping lips.

 
99. Unless someone actually saw what PRECEDED the shooting, it's still not proof of anything.
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 11:14 AM
Mar 2012

Another witness saw Trayvon on top and yelled for him to quit it. He went inside to call the police but before he could, shots rang out and when he looked out the window, GZ was over Tray's body

But since you like these news stories, here's one from yesterday evening during RUSH HOUR (not middle of the night) on the South Side of Chicago. Actually, there was more than one shooting, but this one wounded five and killed one in a convenience store. The two thug shooters WORE HOODIES! Imagine that! I never heard of criminals doing so! http://www.suntimes.com/11613495-417/two-killed-11-wounded-in-thursday-shootings.html

So I am awaiting the instructions from Operation Push on where the rally will be held for these poor victims. As President Dreamboat instructed, I'm gonna put on my marching shoes...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»OMG!! A witness was actu...