Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brentspeak

(18,290 posts)
Wed Apr 30, 2014, 08:23 PM Apr 2014

Obama formally approves yet another nickel-and-diming of the 99%

Right on the heels of his handpicked FCC cable lobbyist stooge opening the door to higher fees for tiered internet access.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trafficandcommuting/white-house-opens-door-to-tolls-on-interstate-highways-removing-long-standing-prohibition/2014/04/29/5d2b9f30-cfac-11e3-b812-0c92213941f4_story.html

White House opens door to tolls on interstate highways, removing long-standing prohibition

By Ashley Halsey III, Published: April 29

With pressure mounting to avert a transportation funding crisis this summer, the Obama administration Tuesday opened the door for states to collect tolls on interstate highways to raise revenue for roadway repairs.

The proposal, contained in a four-year, $302 billion White House transportation bill, would reverse a long-standing federal prohibition on most interstate tolling.

While providing tolling as an option to states, the White House proposal relies on funding from a series of corporate tax reforms, most of them one-time revenue streams that would provide a four-year bridge to close the trust-fund deficit and permit $150 billion more in spending than the gas tax will bring in.

snip

The corporate tax reform proposal has gotten a lukewarm reception even from Democrats in Congress, and Foxx emphasized that the administration is open to any counterproposal that wins bipartisan support.


The last sentence means: Obama was publicly claiming to want to close corporate tax loopholes instead of taxing the little guy, but never really meant it.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
3. Oh come on. These tolls are nothing to the 1%. They will hit the lower classes the hardest. But
Thu May 1, 2014, 12:48 AM
May 2014

the conservatives among us have no empathy and think the lower classes dont deserve to drive anywayz.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
12. In the same kind of way they aren't exempted from laws against sleeping under bridges or begging
Sun May 4, 2014, 10:52 AM
May 2014

for bread in the streets.

Please think about where the weight of this burden rests.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
4. Not just nickel and diming. Limiting movement and increasing surveillance and control,
Thu May 1, 2014, 12:49 AM
May 2014

while lining the pockets of billionaires.
 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
7. Yet another tightening of the grip around the neck while the nation looks at flickering screens,
Thu May 1, 2014, 12:57 AM
May 2014

oblivious like a frog in a pan of water.

 

Ned Flanders

(233 posts)
13. spot on!
Tue May 27, 2014, 03:00 PM
May 2014

Of course the new toll booths will require cameras, with associated automatic recording of license plates.

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
6. "We don't want the rif-raff whose jobs we've shipped abroad to drive their
Thu May 1, 2014, 12:55 AM
May 2014

hoopties on our commerce corridors anymore. Put up some toll gates." - The Oligarchy

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
8. Since the President is proposing all these "good" things just imagine
Thu May 1, 2014, 01:31 PM
May 2014

how it will boost enthusiasm for the 2014 midterm election.

Sort of reminds me of the good things leading up to the 2010 election.

I predicted this would happen.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
10. On the way to a breakfast hubby and I were talking about it
Thu May 1, 2014, 04:31 PM
May 2014

and I will take your conclusion a step further. They do not want a cynical public involved at all. PERIOD.

So these things are designed to do that.

Hey they VOTED right? The few who benefit from this policies that is.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama formally approves y...