Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Real simple question: what would it take to change the age for Medicare? (Original Post) Stinky The Clown Mar 2012 OP
It would take Congress. Isn't there already a proposal by Ryan to sinkingfeeling Mar 2012 #1
A 50 page bill CAPHAVOC Mar 2012 #2
Who would fund campaigns and write laws then? One_Life_To_Give Mar 2012 #10
Maybe the way it CAPHAVOC Mar 2012 #12
The insurance companies wouldn't mindit if the Medicare eligibility age was dropped to 55 or 60. bornskeptic Mar 2012 #13
Universal Healthcare for all could happen so easily Horse with no Name Mar 2012 #3
OMG, the Catholics would go crazy. Women's care tsuki Mar 2012 #4
Then they could opt out for religious reasons Horse with no Name Mar 2012 #8
Strategically zipplewrath Mar 2012 #5
X1000 libtodeath Mar 2012 #7
Easily? You have the Republican House voting for this and 60 Senators? karynnj Mar 2012 #14
That little shit Ryan wants to RAISE it to 70! SammyWinstonJack Mar 2012 #6
And then he would have had to face a lot of pissed-off people between the ages of Lydia Leftcoast Mar 2012 #9
Stop being sensible! Stinky The Clown Mar 2012 #16
Sorry, I know that's not allowed Lydia Leftcoast Mar 2012 #17
just a little confused... belcffub Mar 2012 #18
Seniors pay premiums in addition to the paycheck withholding Lydia Leftcoast Mar 2012 #19
I think that the way they wanted it to work was a buy in at less than 65. tsuki Mar 2012 #20
ok... that makes more sense... belcffub Mar 2012 #21
They were within one vote of lowering it to 55 SOS Mar 2012 #11
And Act of congress and a lot of money. n/t hughee99 Mar 2012 #15
 

CAPHAVOC

(1,138 posts)
2. A 50 page bill
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 10:37 AM
Mar 2012

Expanding Medicare to all citizens and throwing the Mega-Insurance companies on the ash heap of history. And it is Constitutional. We can't have that can we?

One_Life_To_Give

(6,036 posts)
10. Who would fund campaigns and write laws then?
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 11:26 AM
Mar 2012

How is our democracy going to function without big insurance to fund our campaigns and their lobbyists to write out laws?

bornskeptic

(1,330 posts)
13. The insurance companies wouldn't mindit if the Medicare eligibility age was dropped to 55 or 60.
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 11:51 AM
Mar 2012

We people in that age bracket are too expensive to cover. They'd be able to drop their premiums to attract more young healthy people into the market. Under the ACA they are only allowed to charge three times as much for a 64-year-old as for a healthy 25 -year-old, compared with the 10:1 ratios which sometimes occur now.

Horse with no Name

(33,956 posts)
3. Universal Healthcare for all could happen so easily
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 10:38 AM
Mar 2012

1. Drop the age requirement for Medicare to 18.
2. Drop the income requirements for CHIPS for those under 18.




tsuki

(11,994 posts)
4. OMG, the Catholics would go crazy. Women's care
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 10:55 AM
Mar 2012

would be paid for including birth control. Never happen.

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
5. Strategically
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 10:56 AM
Mar 2012

They should have handled the "kids on parents policy" by offering that parents could buy medicare for them for a few years. The kds would have gotten used to it and wanted to buy additional years. Pretty soon, you'd have a population of people that just expected to be able to get their health insurace "from the government".

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
14. Easily? You have the Republican House voting for this and 60 Senators?
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 12:06 PM
Mar 2012

I think this could not have passed back in 2009. In addition, an enormous amount of revenue would have to be found to pay for this.

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
9. And then he would have had to face a lot of pissed-off people between the ages of
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 11:25 AM
Mar 2012

65 and 69.

Not to mention the fact that 70-year-olds usually have more ailments than younger people, so it would actually worsen the system's financing.

Given all the people 50-65 who are having trouble paying for insurance, I'd think that a gradual lowering of the age (by 5 years every year) would be popular. By 2016, everyone over 45 would be eligible.

Filling the ranks with younger, healthier people would help balance the system's finances.

belcffub

(595 posts)
18. just a little confused...
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 01:16 PM
Mar 2012

how would it be cheaper if more people are on medicare...

doesn't mater how healthy people are... medicare is financed from paycheck withholdings (a dedicated tax really)... that amount won't change if you add additional people... seems like it would cost more if you add more people

can you explain how it would be cheaper...

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
19. Seniors pay premiums in addition to the paycheck withholding
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 01:37 PM
Mar 2012

If younger, healthier people were paying premiums but not using as many services (less likely to have cancer, heart attacks, strokes than the 65+ crowd and far less likely to need nursing home care, even for the 30 days allowed after hospitalization), that would help the finances.

SOS

(7,048 posts)
11. They were within one vote of lowering it to 55
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 11:31 AM
Mar 2012

But our friend Joe Lieberman voted no leaving us one vote short.

His insurance pals in Hartford must have paid off handsomely for that.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Real simple question: wha...