Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 03:18 PM Apr 2014

What Will It Take For The Populace To "Get" Global Warming - South In The Bulls Eye

It is so sad to see all the destruction and death in the South lately. Yet I see little realization in the effected regions that these continuous and repeating tornadoes almost year after year may really be the result of climate change. You keep hearing that individual events are not a sign, yet we have so many unprecedented "individual" events we must surely realize that something is wrong.

It is not just the number of tornadoes but it is the size and length of the destruction that is most notable. Yet in the conservative South "change" denying seems to be the most prevalent in the political realm. Not to say that there is not a lot of denying going on elsewhere.

If the weather patterns are supposed to get worse, how big can tornadoes and other weather events get? And we need to get rid of politicians who are determined to deny climate change and keep stopping us from doing something.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Will It Take For The Populace To "Get" Global Warming - South In The Bulls Eye (Original Post) TheMastersNemesis Apr 2014 OP
I get so tired of hearing this B2G Apr 2014 #1
I think Governor Deal might be getting it nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #2
TBH.....there's not a lot of evidence to support AGW affecting *individual* events. AverageJoe90 Apr 2014 #3
Agree. The term 'Tornado Alley' was coined in 1952. nt B2G Apr 2014 #4
 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
1. I get so tired of hearing this
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 03:23 PM
Apr 2014

We are in a typical spring pattern, which is no different than any other year. We've actually had fewer tornados this year due to a colder, later winter. The 'size and length of duration' is NOT notable.

Climate change is about trends, not a 3 day tornado outbreak.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
2. I think Governor Deal might be getting it
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 03:25 PM
Apr 2014

just from his comments today.

As to the rest, prayers are constantly asked for on the twitter feed... not explanations.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
3. TBH.....there's not a lot of evidence to support AGW affecting *individual* events.
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 03:29 PM
Apr 2014
You keep hearing that individual events are not a sign,


And to be honest, there's no real evidence that suggests otherwise, not at this juncture. And tornado outbreaks like this have been happening from time to time down there since before global climate change started roughly ~35 years ago; a lot of it has to do with the geography of the region.

To be fair, though, we do know that the science is definitely pretty much in agreement that climate change has had already had *some* effect on long-term trends. It's just that it's not so much the case for solitary weather events.
 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
4. Agree. The term 'Tornado Alley' was coined in 1952. nt
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 03:32 PM
Apr 2014

I lived most of my life in the midwest. I see no evidence tornados are increasing in strength or numbers.

A little research by the OP would bear that out.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What Will It Take For The...