Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 01:17 PM Apr 2014

Warriors planning to skip out on Oracle Arena bill

As an Alameda County resident, I want to personally thank the front office of the Golden State Warriors for the lovely parting gift they plan to bestow on their East Bay fans, supporters and landlords.

They are truly a classy organization.

When the Warriors gloriously announced their purchase of a 12-acre plot in San Francisco for a new arena last week, they also delivered a less-than-celebratory message to Oakland and Alameda County.

The team informed the Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum Authority that when it leaves in 2017, it will stop paying the public bonds issued in the mid-1990s to make seating, scoreboard and other upgrades at the Oracle Arena. Those 30-year municipal bonds generated $140 million in improvements and won't be paid off until 2027.

But the Warriors won't be sticking around to pay their share.

That's right, folks. The reward to the public for more than four decades of fan support, through good and bad times, is an unpaid bill for more than $60 million.

"Our rent, debt and other payment obligations expire after the 2017 season," Raymond Ridder, a Warriors spokesman, told The Chronicle last week. "We have the option to extend the lease, but not the obligation."

http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/johnson/article/Warriors-planning-to-skip-out-on-Oracle-Arena-bill-5436777.php

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Warriors planning to skip out on Oracle Arena bill (Original Post) Jesus Malverde Apr 2014 OP
The public are suckers upaloopa Apr 2014 #1
Seriously agree... 2naSalit Apr 2014 #2

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
1. The public are suckers
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 01:24 PM
Apr 2014

I think the public would rather pay for sports than for schools.
I am not a sports fan but I lived in LA and San Diego and paid taxes to support the teams there. Teams whose players make millions and whose owners make billions yet the sucker fans vote for tax breaks and to build new stadiums while they get no return loyalty from the team.

2naSalit

(86,646 posts)
2. Seriously agree...
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 03:06 PM
Apr 2014

if high end sports want to have a place to play, they can pay for it themselves... the nonprofit status has to go for them. they do this and leave taxpayers holding the bill... Heads Up sportsfans!!!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Warriors planning to skip...