General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe day after Ted Cruz posed with a tiger skin rug
Yes, this is the idiocity that my fellow Texas Democrats and I have to endure. Please, when you think about bashing Texas, think about us. We are here, fighting the good fight. And we have to put up with shit like this.
Cruzs spokeswoman Catharine Frazier says he was kidding, and had no intention of bringing the tiger pelt back to Washington. He had hosted a fundraiser in his home state for Lee and they ran across it in Houston and took a picture. She could not say whether it was real.
Tigers are an endangered species. The mere act of making light of a skinned tiger set off an angry torrent of tweets and posts, with one tweeter suggesting the tiger should come alive and eat Cruz.*
Animal advocates sprung with catlike speed to condemn the senators.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)RAWR!
Not I have to go wash my brain out with Draino.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)I wish I could do it.
sarisataka
(18,659 posts)but I hoped that there would have been a graphic warning if that was the case
riversedge
(70,242 posts)janlyn
(735 posts)who expected to see some type of boudoir photograph. I shudder at the thought! I still can't get the photo of John Boehner breast feeding him out of my brain!
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)But thanks for the update on what liberals are and are not allowed to think, gravitycollapse. Great to know you're on duty as gatekeeper for the issues
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)It's repulsive--another repulsive act among many. It makes the truth (that we liberals have known forever) yet more clear to the people slower to wake up.
Rex
(65,616 posts)flvegan
(64,408 posts)pscot
(21,024 posts)flvegan
(64,408 posts)Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)Is it in poor taste? Possibly. But even then it is not flagrant. At least not to me and I'm having a hard time conceiving in what way it could possibly be flagrant or deeply offensive or constitutive of a greater issue.
That's why I'm saying it isn't worth expending energy on. Especially not with the cornucopia of issues to choose from related to Ted Cruz.
I see the fervor around this issue as a sort of "rallying of the troops" if you may.
Am I wrong?
drmeow
(5,018 posts)who care passionately about tigers. If any of them would have either not voted out of apathy or (worse) voted for Cruz by default or cause they didn't care and that person will now got out and vote against Cruz, in my opinion it is worth reacting to in order to make sure it gets in the public eye. My aunt, for example, LOVES tigers - passionately and fanatically loves tigers. I don't know if she is a liberal or not - if she followed in her mother's footprints, she is. If her views mirror what I suspect her husband's are, she's not. But a picture like this, joke or not, would motivate her. Even if we think it is mainly "rallying of the troops" there is always a possibility that one more person will switch sides or become active. For that reason, while I don't necessarily expend the energy myself, I don't think it is wasted energy. One man's "yawn" is another man's last straw.
lob1
(3,820 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)A joke is anyone defending this jerk.
Squinch
(50,954 posts)and the killing of which has no practical purpose other than some sick version of "sport."
That is a big deal to some people. I find this photo disgusting and disturbing to look at.
Also, it is a purposefully antagonistic act on his part. It needed push back, and it is good that it got it.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)My opinion is that I don't see anything funny about it whatsoever.
I find it sick, disgusting and oh so revealing.
It is infantile behavior by an infantile adolescent.
Paladin
(28,262 posts)For Cruz to pose for a picture like this shows a phenomenal arrogance and detachment; it can and should be employed against him. We use the weapons that are made available to us, and we'd be idiots to pass up this opportunity to trash a madman like Cruz.
otohara
(24,135 posts)Response to Avalux (Original post)
sarisataka This message was self-deleted by its author.
TeamPooka
(24,228 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)And I still do not like him, Sam-I-Am.
Blue Owl
(50,393 posts)n/t
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Cha
(297,275 posts)That's so nice - good to see you here! Thinking about you too!
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)shaking their heads at the idiots we have in our governor's mansion and in Congress. Even Florida has good reason to look at us crazy.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Lol
Kablooie
(18,634 posts)No reason for him to do this unless he had no idea that killing tigers is an issue.
It wasn't a joke. He thought it would be cool.
They say he's a genius. I say he's an egotistical imbecile!
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Cruz should be so proud. What a fucking idiot.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Why do so many RWrs have several nonpolitical things in common? Things which I don't even blame on rw media indoctrination. They love killing animals ( legit hunting or otherwise ) , they're racist and they don't care about others ( who are different than they are ) well being.
Maybe my perception is off. But I have met so many who exhibit those attitudes in real life and they were all hardcore RWrs.
On edit: I have yet to meet a Democrat who is racist , bigoted, ignorant, and who loves killing wild life.
Lisa0825
(14,487 posts)Carole Baskin - "I am sure they will be in our Top 5 Most Shocking Reports of animal exploitation in the May AdvoCat newsletter."