General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Elizabeth Warren Simplifies Thomas Piketty: 'Trickle Down Doesn't Work. Never Did'"
Elizabeth Warren Simplifies Thomas Piketty: 'Trickle Down Doesn't Work. Never Did'by Ryan Grim at the Huffington Post
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/elizabeth-warren-thomas-piketty_n_5213690.html
"SNIP.......................
The No. 2 author on Amazon's best-seller list, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, weighed in Thursday night on the No. 1 book, identifying overlapping themes.
At a reading at the Harvard Book Store, the Massachusetts Democrat, author of A Fighting Chance, was asked about Thomas Piketty's new book, Capital in the Twenty-First Century, and specifically about its contention that trickle-down economics "definitively do not work."
Warren cut in. "Can we say that part again? 'Definitely do not work,'" she repeated. "Not as in that's somebody else's opinion or this comes out of a long-held political opinion. The data don't lie on this. He's got good historical data, and boy, what it shows is trickle down doesn't work. Never did, doesn't work. Just so we're all clear on the baseline. I just saved you 1,100 pages of reading." (The book is shorter than that; Warren may have assumed the audience would also read the online technical index.)
Warren, whose own book was going to be titled Rigged but ultimately went out with a more hopeful title, said that while Piketty's book could elicit despair, she found a hopeful note in it, too.
.....................SNIP"
Warpy
(111,267 posts)Last edited Sat Apr 26, 2014, 02:50 PM - Edit history (1)
and in any sort of capitalism worth the name, their money works harder than people do, the laws make sure of that.
Piketty got that point across, too.
Advice to Sen. Warren: go with your gut. "Rigged" would have sold better.
ETA: The tax cut fairy does exist but only for the top 5% or so. Everyone else ended up paying more in regressive taxes so the rich could pay less income tax.
erronis
(15,286 posts)adirondacker
(2,921 posts)Gothmog
(145,289 posts)Republicans believe in the tax cut fairy (a mythical creature who causes tax cuts to pay for themselves). Tax cuts do not pay for themselves and trickle down economics have never worked. I am looking forward to reading both Senator Warren's book and Prof. Piketty's book
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)They know perfectly well that trickle-down doesn't work, that it doesn't help the economy, and that it hurts middle and lower classes. A fuck, they do not give. It helps the people who pay for their reelections.
Trickle-down also hurts America in that fewer people are able to rise and do great things. We end up with fewer inventors, fewer scientists, fewer people solving problems. But again, a fuck, they do not give.
tclambert
(11,087 posts)It's as if they don't care about creating more wealth, just grabbing a bigger share of the current amount of treasure.
Theyletmeeatcake2
(348 posts)These people are just money grubbing maggots that truly don't give a fuck about anyone except themselves... Eg Walmart the welfare corporation sucking at the gubment teat... Immoral and despicable
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)I think an equally large part of it short-sightedness. These people seem to be unable to think beyond next weekend, or at the very best a couple of years.
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)with a good economy, but remember that these predators are not only interested in the market here in the USA. They have their hands in markets all over the world. And I believe that they are betting on the Chinese to have enough money for consumer goods and that is a population they can sink their teeth into.
Diremoon
(86 posts)It isn't just that they want more for themselves, they don't want anyone else to have anything. It was never about "lifting all ships". It is about ramming and sinking everyone else's dinghy. Their war is, and always has been malevolent to the poor. Think Feudal system, and you will have their endgame pretty clear.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)To continue your ramming and sinking analogy! I liked your comment enough to quote it below.
Welcome to DU!
deutsey
(20,166 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)perfectly.
For about 30 years, after the end of WW II (the big one*) the middle class grew and everyone prospered. But although wealth can be created, it takes work even if you are exploiting. Stealing wealth is much easier. Via the Great Lewis Powell conspiracy, the uber wealthy changed the laws to allow them to steal from the middle class. How long do we let this go on?
*source: Herbert T. Gillis
temporary311
(955 posts)It's just that when people say "it doesn't work," they're not looking at it from the POV of those who its supposed to benefit. Hint: If you aren't rich, it's not supposed to benefit you.
quarbis
(314 posts)"Voodoo" Economics in 1980.
thesquanderer
(11,989 posts)This is not news. But no matter the facts, some people will even believe their horoscopes.
Hard to find a more effective ploy. Now about "job creators...."
mac56
(17,569 posts)I bow to you.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)every time I see WW II, I can hear Herbert T. Gillis.
I also remember that Maynard G. Krebs' favorite past time was watching the sheep getting dipped. Of course it was unsaid that he probably was high on MaryJane.
mac56
(17,569 posts)Judge: State your name.
Maynard: Maynard G. Krebs.
Judge: What does the G stand for?
Maynard: Walter.
I was five years old and thought that was the funniest line I'd ever heard.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)should have been the warning sign. And we cant forget Zelda.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Supervisors Third District, and former Democratic member of both of California's House and Senate.
She was very great as Zelda. Very great.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)The Wizard
(12,545 posts)when you need him?
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)The Wizard
(12,545 posts)very young
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Annette, of course, was my first. I am dating myself.
The Wizard
(12,545 posts)Tuesday Weld
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)maddiemom
(5,106 posts)DirkGently
(12,151 posts)Which may be the scariest part. A large segment of the population has embraced the idea that it doesn't even matter if your argument has anything to do with what works or what helps the country.
It only matters that you can SAY it. It's the sportsfan metaphor that permeates public discussion now. You just keep screaming for the home team, no matter what. There's a catchphrase or a stock argument for everything. Wealth creators. Welfare queens. Sharia law. Liberal bias.
A lot of people aren't even interested in thinking things through.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)csziggy
(34,136 posts)A strong economy that spreads the wealth is more prosperous and is better for everyone, not just a very few. I think this new DUer has it right:
65. None for you
It isn't just that they want more for themselves, they don't want anyone else to have anything. It was never about "lifting all ships". It is about ramming and sinking everyone else's dinghy. Their war is, and always has been malevolent to the poor. Think Feudal system, and you will have their endgame pretty clear.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4880684
alfredo
(60,074 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)and not when the 3rd Way (DLC) Democrats do it.
We KNOW what works.
The traditional Democratic Party Vlaues of FDR (New Deal) and LBJ(Great Society) built the largest, wealthiest, and most upwardly mobile Working/Middle Class the WORLD had ever seen.
Lets try THAT again!
I believe the Top Marginal Rate was 91%,
and "Free Trade", "Free Markets", and "Market Based Solutions" hadn't been invented yet.
Progressive dog
(6,904 posts)From the Roosevelt Institute.
Encouraging free trade was one part of the Roosevelt administration's broader effort to revive the global economy and create good jobs for all Americans.
Free trade is also the focus of "The Wealth of Nations" by Adam Smith.
Let's try that again Free trade and free markets had been invented well before FDR. FDR believed in free trade.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)FDR would not have destroyed our Working/Middle Class to enrich Wall Street and the 1%,
the way "Free Trade" and "Free Markets" are used today.
Progressive dog
(6,904 posts)approximately the percentage of everything that they did in 1933. FDR decreased tariffs and worked to increase trade. The percentage of wealth held by the 1% shrank. Free trade payed a minor part in the wealth of the 1%.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)....the percentage of everything that they did in 1933."
And THAT is after 20+ years of de-regulated International Trade.
Do you have stats for 1975?
THAT would be the most interesting point of comparison.
Progressive dog
(6,904 posts)Thomas Piketty has a graph (1% & 10%) going back to early 1900's.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)" ... dropped by the rich, can best be served by giving the rich bigger meals." - William Blum
DCBob
(24,689 posts)That being the deck is stacked in the favor of the rich and connected. We want more than table scraps.. and to get that we need fundamental changes in the way our economy and society functions.
alfredo
(60,074 posts)"If you feed the horse enough oats there is more chance that some will pass through to the road for the sparrows.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)is that "it's not like an act of nature. It's not like gravity and you can't fix it," Warren said. "Piketty's book makes the point that how much equality there is ... is a matter of the policies you choose to follow and that, for example, progressive taxation and investment in everyone's education helps to level the playing field."
Warren pointed to the period from the Great Depression up through the deregulatory era that began in the 1980s as reason for hope -- a period that she noted Piketty found to be an aberration in many ways.
"It is a time when we made those investments that built America's great middle class and we made those decisions -- not we in this room, but our parents, our grandparents, they made those decisions. They said, 'You put a cop on the beat so nobody steals your pension, you do that on Wall Street.' But they also said, 'You tax progressively and then you make those investments.' For those who made it big, God bless 'em, that's great, but they've gotta pay a piece of that forward so the next kid has a chance to make it big and the kid after that and the kid after that. That's what defines America."
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Life was good for us and we didnt heed our parents (who survived the Great Republican Depression) warnings. By 1970 my parents generation gave up trying to tell us to beware and the dismantling of the New Deal began. I personally didnt wake up until 2000 and most of the damage was done. Now it's a long road back so lets get this class war going.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)put a stupid war on a credit card. Tax the rich!
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)think Republicans would stop pretending their "Leaders" really care about all "The People".
DCBob
(24,689 posts)It counters their central core ideology regarding economics. This will be the perfect issue to focus on during the 2014 and 2016 elections. If we can convince the ignorant masses that trickle-down is bogus.. then the Republicans are finished.
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)The argument goes round in circles, because we don't define success. Republicans see supply side as being very successful because it concentrates wealth in the hands of their owners. It's been fabulously successful for them. They will never admit what their goal is, and as long as we let the discussion hover around "does/doesn't work", the middle class and poor suffer.
My opinion, agree that it works to increase income disparity. Agree that it works to destroy the middle class. Tie the lead weight of Supply Side economics around the Republicans neck and kick them overboard.
toby jo
(1,269 posts)They've had one for 30 years.
What I hear from righties at work is: 'chico and bubba are stealing from us'. Doesn't compare to what 'the man' stole, but that never enters the equation.
Never.
So the dodge is ignorance.
If we make this a national campaign, have everybody repeat it, billboard it, commercialize it, we can break through their defenses. Book's a bomb ( good one ) Heave fucking ho.
geretogo
(1,281 posts)violence and up rising from the proletariat , then peace and prosperity for a while and then the cycle
starts over again . So goes history .
BlueEye
(449 posts)"Capital" on my summer reading list. I understand the latter is fairly dense, at 700 pages. Should be a good time.
NBachers
(17,116 posts)TheFrenchRazor
(2,116 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)Over the years, at all the economic talks he's given around the country, he always has brought it up. Just for the record.
It always goes something like this:
"Top-down economics doesn't work," President Obama told an adoring crowd this September in Virginia Beach. "We don't need to double down on the same trickle-down policies that got us into this mess in the first place," he continued.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/12/16/obama039s_trickle-down_economics_297984.html
Trickle down economics, the conservative theory embraced by Ronald Reagan and virtually every conservative since, doesnt work, Obama declared. And even as conservatives have clung to the idea in the face of overwhelming evidence against it, it has never worked, Obama added:Now, just as there was in Teddy Roosevelts time, theres been a certain crowd in Washington for the last few decades who respond to this economic challenge with the same old tune. The market will take care of everything, they tell us. If only we cut more regulations and cut more taxes especially for the wealthy our economy will grow stronger. Sure, there will be winners and losers. But if the winners do really well, jobs and prosperity will eventually trickle down to everyone else. And even if prosperity doesnt trickle down, they argue, thats the price of liberty.
Its a simple theory one that speaks to our rugged individualism and healthy skepticism of too much government. And that theory fits well on a bumper sticker. Heres the problem: It doesnt work. It has never worked. It didnt work when it was tried in the decade before the Great Depression. Its not what led to the incredible post-war boom of the 50s and 60s. And it didnt work when we tried it during the last decade.
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/12/06/383348/trickle-down-economics-doesnt-work-obama-asserts-in-economic-speech/
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)tinkle on
The Wizard
(12,545 posts)Golden parachutes for the wealthy elites who make the laws and golden showers for the working class. No thanks.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Instead of a sustainable balance that meets the needs of life on this rock.
Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)That's why those so consumed with getting ever more and more are never happy, no matter how much they've got.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Case in point:
While you might be struggling to pay the electric bill, they are convinced their shit don't stink.
Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)Seriously though, I am constantly chided by both my money obsessed right-wing father and his friends for my desire to work just enough to live reasonably well rather than constantly hustle for more money or more status. My attitude is incomprehensible to them.
A little missive I've read that describes my feeling perfectly:
Once a fisherman was sitting near seashore, under the shadow of a tree smoking his beedi. Suddenly a rich businessman passing by approached him and enquired as to why he was sitting under a tree smoking and not working. To this the poor fisherman replied that he had caught enough fishes for the day.
Hearing this the rich man got angry and said: Why dont you catch more fishes instead of sitting in shadow wasting your time?
Fisherman asked: What would I do by catching more fishes?
Businessman: You could catch more fishes, sell them and earn more money, and buy a bigger boat.
Fisherman: What would I do then?
Businessman: You could go fishing in deep waters and catch even more fishes and earn even more money.
Fisherman: What would I do then?
Businessman: You could buy many boats and employ many people to work for you and earn even more money.
Fisherman: What would I do then?
Businessman: You could become a rich businessman like me.
Fisherman: What would I do then?
Businessman: You could then enjoy your life peacefully.
Fisherman: What do you think Im doing right now?
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)....dream of becoming rich so they'll never have to work again."
Response to applegrove (Original post)
Populist_Prole This message was self-deleted by its author.
BelgianMadCow
(5,379 posts)or so I have read in a review, because it's major league sold out here - and at Amazon. I'm ordering a copy.
Nanjing to Seoul
(2,088 posts)to the top in huge amounts always trickles down? It's like a loaf of bread with 25 slices. The upper 1% can eat 24 of them, loan the rest to the bottom 99% and tell them to be happy with the crumbs.
Seriously. . .if we started saying Republican ideas don't work, the entire American system of government would collapse.
BTW, massive sarcasm here
HenryWallace
(332 posts)The statement doesnt work isnt strong enough.
The direct implication of the book is that unrestrained capitalism naturally leads to a less free and just society.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)GET OUT THE VOTE
Start telling people now to vote their local GOP sock puppet out. Tell them to read Picketty, tell them to imagine the USA without the new healthcare ...
... and most of all start working now!