Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,674 posts)
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 07:02 PM Apr 2014

"Elizabeth Warren Simplifies Thomas Piketty: 'Trickle Down Doesn't Work. Never Did'"

Elizabeth Warren Simplifies Thomas Piketty: 'Trickle Down Doesn't Work. Never Did'

by Ryan Grim at the Huffington Post

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/elizabeth-warren-thomas-piketty_n_5213690.html

"SNIP.......................

The No. 2 author on Amazon's best-seller list, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, weighed in Thursday night on the No. 1 book, identifying overlapping themes.

At a reading at the Harvard Book Store, the Massachusetts Democrat, author of A Fighting Chance, was asked about Thomas Piketty's new book, Capital in the Twenty-First Century, and specifically about its contention that trickle-down economics "definitively do not work."

Warren cut in. "Can we say that part again? 'Definitely do not work,'" she repeated. "Not as in that's somebody else's opinion or this comes out of a long-held political opinion. The data don't lie on this. He's got good historical data, and boy, what it shows is trickle down doesn't work. Never did, doesn't work. Just so we're all clear on the baseline. I just saved you 1,100 pages of reading." (The book is shorter than that; Warren may have assumed the audience would also read the online technical index.)

Warren, whose own book was going to be titled Rigged but ultimately went out with a more hopeful title, said that while Piketty's book could elicit despair, she found a hopeful note in it, too.


.....................SNIP"
71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Elizabeth Warren Simplifies Thomas Piketty: 'Trickle Down Doesn't Work. Never Did'" (Original Post) applegrove Apr 2014 OP
Neither do rich men. They let their money work for them Warpy Apr 2014 #1
+1 - the rich are too busy in their counting rooms to _work_ erronis Apr 2014 #29
+1000! nt adirondacker Apr 2014 #47
The tax cut fairy does not exist Gothmog Apr 2014 #2
Republicans don't believe that at all mindwalker_i Apr 2014 #4
It doesn't really help the 1%, either. A prosperous economy would enrich them a lot more. tclambert Apr 2014 #9
You nailed it with grabbing a bigger share.... Theyletmeeatcake2 Apr 2014 #30
That's a large part of it Nevernose Apr 2014 #33
Maybe it is true that they would prosper more Curmudgeoness Apr 2014 #38
None for you Diremoon Apr 2014 #65
Think pirates - take what everyone else has, any means possible csziggy Apr 2014 #68
Greed only grows stronger and more voracious the more you indulge it deutsey Apr 2014 #66
I hate to disagree with her, but for those that introduced it, Trickle Down works rhett o rick Apr 2014 #3
Agreed, it works really well. temporary311 Apr 2014 #5
George H W Bush called quarbis Apr 2014 #10
Right, and David Stockman dis-owned it thesquanderer Apr 2014 #14
+1 gulliver Apr 2014 #6
A Dobie Gillis reference! mac56 Apr 2014 #16
I have some pretty crazy stuff stuck in my brain (and a lot of good stuff forgotten) but rhett o rick Apr 2014 #18
One of the episodes had Maynard testifying in court. mac56 Apr 2014 #19
Ah yes, thank you for that. I do remember. I loved Maynard. I think that rhett o rick Apr 2014 #23
Never forget Zelda, ie Sheila Kuehl, current candidate for LA County Board of Bluenorthwest Apr 2014 #31
Very cool. Isnt Amy on Big Bang similar to Zelda's character? nm rhett o rick Apr 2014 #34
Where's Milton Armitage The Wizard Apr 2014 #43
Warren Beatty? maddiemom Apr 2014 #48
yes The Wizard Apr 2014 #59
I had forgotten him. I do remember Ms. Weld tho. She was my second true love. rhett o rick Apr 2014 #60
Thalia Menninger The Wizard Apr 2014 #61
I could so associate with Dobie. nm rhett o rick Apr 2014 #62
"...a buck private with a good conduct medal..." or how was it? u maddiemom Apr 2014 #46
It's the rationale we're fighting, not the facts. DirkGently Apr 2014 #24
Yessir. Ed Suspicious Apr 2014 #58
No, it doesn't even work for them. See the sub-thread above this one csziggy Apr 2014 #67
Agree! alfredo Apr 2014 #69
Not when the Republicans do it, bvar22 Apr 2014 #7
+1 mmonk Apr 2014 #28
free trade was an FDR priority Progressive dog Apr 2014 #35
NOT the way it has been implemented over the last 30 years. bvar22 Apr 2014 #39
Data shows that the 1% own Progressive dog Apr 2014 #49
"Data shows that the 1% own approximately the percentage of everything that they did in bvar22 Apr 2014 #50
Huffington post interview with Progressive dog Apr 2014 #51
"The 'trickle-down' theory: the principle that the poor, who must subsist on table scraps ... " baldguy Apr 2014 #8
For most Republicans that's the way it should be.. they totally don't understand the real problem. DCBob Apr 2014 #25
The horse and sparrow theory alfredo Apr 2014 #70
Truth Telling you won't hear from the TheTruth©, Inc. Thanks, Elizabeth Warren! freshwest Apr 2014 #11
K&R! This post should have hundreds of recommendations! Enthusiast Apr 2014 #12
Oh, it works. Just not like how Raygun told you it would ... Scuba Apr 2014 #13
The hopeful note in Pikkety's book lovemydog Apr 2014 #15
Part of the blame goes to my generation, the Baby Boomers. rhett o rick Apr 2014 #21
Then some whackos lovemydog Apr 2014 #26
Now as our people in poverty & middle class slip well below!, other '1st world' Nations' one would Sunlei Apr 2014 #17
The Rethugs just hate the attention this book is getting. DCBob Apr 2014 #20
The problem with "Trickle down does/doesn't work" is defining "works". Thor_MN Apr 2014 #22
What's their dodge? toby jo Apr 2014 #27
Trickle down has always worked for the short term for a few up until the the start of wide spread geretogo Apr 2014 #32
I have both Warren's book and Piketty's BlueEye Apr 2014 #36
Trickle up, no more trickle down NBachers Apr 2014 #37
it's surprising how few politicians are willing to say this. nt TheFrenchRazor Apr 2014 #40
Obama has said it 500 times, at least frazzled Apr 2014 #41
Thank you Ms Warren as trickle down has always been synonymous with azurnoir Apr 2014 #42
Trickle down The Wizard Apr 2014 #44
You only find dispair if you are invested to the concept of never ending growth.... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2014 #45
What a concise summation Populist_Prole Apr 2014 #52
Right, to them, there is no "excess".... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2014 #53
Is that Rush Limpball's bathroom? Populist_Prole Apr 2014 #55
Mine is, "Those who rail the loudest about the work ethic,... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2014 #57
This message was self-deleted by its author Populist_Prole Apr 2014 #54
That, and the up-trickled moneyed elite is largely hereditary BelgianMadCow Apr 2014 #56
What a godless, un-American commie! Doesn't this Liberal harpie know that giving money Nanjing to Seoul Apr 2014 #63
Changing naritive HenryWallace Apr 2014 #64
Just 4 words intaglio Apr 2014 #71

Warpy

(111,267 posts)
1. Neither do rich men. They let their money work for them
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 07:11 PM
Apr 2014

Last edited Sat Apr 26, 2014, 02:50 PM - Edit history (1)

and in any sort of capitalism worth the name, their money works harder than people do, the laws make sure of that.

Piketty got that point across, too.

Advice to Sen. Warren: go with your gut. "Rigged" would have sold better.

ETA: The tax cut fairy does exist but only for the top 5% or so. Everyone else ended up paying more in regressive taxes so the rich could pay less income tax.

Gothmog

(145,289 posts)
2. The tax cut fairy does not exist
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 07:12 PM
Apr 2014

Republicans believe in the tax cut fairy (a mythical creature who causes tax cuts to pay for themselves). Tax cuts do not pay for themselves and trickle down economics have never worked. I am looking forward to reading both Senator Warren's book and Prof. Piketty's book

mindwalker_i

(4,407 posts)
4. Republicans don't believe that at all
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 07:55 PM
Apr 2014

They know perfectly well that trickle-down doesn't work, that it doesn't help the economy, and that it hurts middle and lower classes. A fuck, they do not give. It helps the people who pay for their reelections.

Trickle-down also hurts America in that fewer people are able to rise and do great things. We end up with fewer inventors, fewer scientists, fewer people solving problems. But again, a fuck, they do not give.

tclambert

(11,087 posts)
9. It doesn't really help the 1%, either. A prosperous economy would enrich them a lot more.
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 08:55 PM
Apr 2014

It's as if they don't care about creating more wealth, just grabbing a bigger share of the current amount of treasure.

Theyletmeeatcake2

(348 posts)
30. You nailed it with grabbing a bigger share....
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 12:39 PM
Apr 2014

These people are just money grubbing maggots that truly don't give a fuck about anyone except themselves... Eg Walmart the welfare corporation sucking at the gubment teat... Immoral and despicable

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
33. That's a large part of it
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 01:55 PM
Apr 2014

I think an equally large part of it short-sightedness. These people seem to be unable to think beyond next weekend, or at the very best a couple of years.

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
38. Maybe it is true that they would prosper more
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 03:48 PM
Apr 2014

with a good economy, but remember that these predators are not only interested in the market here in the USA. They have their hands in markets all over the world. And I believe that they are betting on the Chinese to have enough money for consumer goods and that is a population they can sink their teeth into.

Diremoon

(86 posts)
65. None for you
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 09:50 AM
Apr 2014

It isn't just that they want more for themselves, they don't want anyone else to have anything. It was never about "lifting all ships". It is about ramming and sinking everyone else's dinghy. Their war is, and always has been malevolent to the poor. Think Feudal system, and you will have their endgame pretty clear.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
68. Think pirates - take what everyone else has, any means possible
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 10:14 AM
Apr 2014

To continue your ramming and sinking analogy! I liked your comment enough to quote it below.

Welcome to DU!

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
3. I hate to disagree with her, but for those that introduced it, Trickle Down works
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 07:40 PM
Apr 2014

perfectly.

For about 30 years, after the end of WW II (the big one*) the middle class grew and everyone prospered. But although wealth can be created, it takes work even if you are exploiting. Stealing wealth is much easier. Via the Great Lewis Powell conspiracy, the uber wealthy changed the laws to allow them to steal from the middle class. How long do we let this go on?

*source: Herbert T. Gillis

temporary311

(955 posts)
5. Agreed, it works really well.
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 07:58 PM
Apr 2014

It's just that when people say "it doesn't work," they're not looking at it from the POV of those who its supposed to benefit. Hint: If you aren't rich, it's not supposed to benefit you.

thesquanderer

(11,989 posts)
14. Right, and David Stockman dis-owned it
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 09:11 AM
Apr 2014

This is not news. But no matter the facts, some people will even believe their horoscopes.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
18. I have some pretty crazy stuff stuck in my brain (and a lot of good stuff forgotten) but
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 09:57 AM
Apr 2014

every time I see WW II, I can hear Herbert T. Gillis.

I also remember that Maynard G. Krebs' favorite past time was watching the sheep getting dipped. Of course it was unsaid that he probably was high on MaryJane.

mac56

(17,569 posts)
19. One of the episodes had Maynard testifying in court.
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 09:59 AM
Apr 2014

Judge: State your name.
Maynard: Maynard G. Krebs.
Judge: What does the G stand for?
Maynard: Walter.

I was five years old and thought that was the funniest line I'd ever heard.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
23. Ah yes, thank you for that. I do remember. I loved Maynard. I think that
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 10:38 AM
Apr 2014

should have been the warning sign. And we cant forget Zelda.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
31. Never forget Zelda, ie Sheila Kuehl, current candidate for LA County Board of
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 12:57 PM
Apr 2014

Supervisors Third District, and former Democratic member of both of California's House and Senate.
She was very great as Zelda. Very great.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
60. I had forgotten him. I do remember Ms. Weld tho. She was my second true love.
Sun Apr 27, 2014, 05:55 PM
Apr 2014

Annette, of course, was my first. I am dating myself.

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
24. It's the rationale we're fighting, not the facts.
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 10:49 AM
Apr 2014

Which may be the scariest part. A large segment of the population has embraced the idea that it doesn't even matter if your argument has anything to do with what works or what helps the country.

It only matters that you can SAY it. It's the sportsfan metaphor that permeates public discussion now. You just keep screaming for the home team, no matter what. There's a catchphrase or a stock argument for everything. Wealth creators. Welfare queens. Sharia law. Liberal bias.

A lot of people aren't even interested in thinking things through.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
67. No, it doesn't even work for them. See the sub-thread above this one
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 10:12 AM
Apr 2014

A strong economy that spreads the wealth is more prosperous and is better for everyone, not just a very few. I think this new DUer has it right:

Diremoon
65. None for you

It isn't just that they want more for themselves, they don't want anyone else to have anything. It was never about "lifting all ships". It is about ramming and sinking everyone else's dinghy. Their war is, and always has been malevolent to the poor. Think Feudal system, and you will have their endgame pretty clear.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4880684

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
7. Not when the Republicans do it,
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 08:23 PM
Apr 2014

and not when the 3rd Way (DLC) Democrats do it.

We KNOW what works.
The traditional Democratic Party Vlaues of FDR (New Deal) and LBJ(Great Society) built the largest, wealthiest, and most upwardly mobile Working/Middle Class the WORLD had ever seen.


Lets try THAT again!
I believe the Top Marginal Rate was 91%,
and "Free Trade", "Free Markets", and "Market Based Solutions" hadn't been invented yet.

Progressive dog

(6,904 posts)
35. free trade was an FDR priority
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 02:15 PM
Apr 2014

From the Roosevelt Institute.
Encouraging free trade was one part of the Roosevelt administration's broader effort to revive the global economy and create good jobs for all Americans.
Free trade is also the focus of "The Wealth of Nations" by Adam Smith.
Let's try that again Free trade and free markets had been invented well before FDR. FDR believed in free trade.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
39. NOT the way it has been implemented over the last 30 years.
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 03:52 PM
Apr 2014

FDR would not have destroyed our Working/Middle Class to enrich Wall Street and the 1%,
the way "Free Trade" and "Free Markets" are used today.

Progressive dog

(6,904 posts)
49. Data shows that the 1% own
Sun Apr 27, 2014, 08:01 AM
Apr 2014

approximately the percentage of everything that they did in 1933. FDR decreased tariffs and worked to increase trade. The percentage of wealth held by the 1% shrank. Free trade payed a minor part in the wealth of the 1%.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
50. "Data shows that the 1% own approximately the percentage of everything that they did in
Sun Apr 27, 2014, 10:50 AM
Apr 2014

....the percentage of everything that they did in 1933."

And THAT is after 20+ years of de-regulated International Trade.

Do you have stats for 1975?
THAT would be the most interesting point of comparison.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
8. "The 'trickle-down' theory: the principle that the poor, who must subsist on table scraps ... "
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 08:42 PM
Apr 2014

" ... dropped by the rich, can best be served by giving the rich bigger meals." - William Blum

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
25. For most Republicans that's the way it should be.. they totally don't understand the real problem.
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 10:49 AM
Apr 2014

That being the deck is stacked in the favor of the rich and connected. We want more than table scraps.. and to get that we need fundamental changes in the way our economy and society functions.

alfredo

(60,074 posts)
70. The horse and sparrow theory
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 12:21 PM
Apr 2014

"If you feed the horse enough oats there is more chance that some will pass through to the road for the sparrows.”

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
15. The hopeful note in Pikkety's book
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 09:16 AM
Apr 2014

is that "it's not like an act of nature. It's not like gravity and you can't fix it," Warren said. "Piketty's book makes the point that how much equality there is ... is a matter of the policies you choose to follow and that, for example, progressive taxation and investment in everyone's education helps to level the playing field."

Warren pointed to the period from the Great Depression up through the deregulatory era that began in the 1980s as reason for hope -- a period that she noted Piketty found to be an aberration in many ways.

"It is a time when we made those investments that built America's great middle class and we made those decisions -- not we in this room, but our parents, our grandparents, they made those decisions. They said, 'You put a cop on the beat so nobody steals your pension, you do that on Wall Street.' But they also said, 'You tax progressively and then you make those investments.' For those who made it big, God bless 'em, that's great, but they've gotta pay a piece of that forward so the next kid has a chance to make it big and the kid after that and the kid after that. That's what defines America."

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
21. Part of the blame goes to my generation, the Baby Boomers.
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 10:03 AM
Apr 2014

Life was good for us and we didnt heed our parents (who survived the Great Republican Depression) warnings. By 1970 my parents generation gave up trying to tell us to beware and the dismantling of the New Deal began. I personally didnt wake up until 2000 and most of the damage was done. Now it's a long road back so lets get this class war going.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
17. Now as our people in poverty & middle class slip well below!, other '1st world' Nations' one would
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 09:54 AM
Apr 2014

think Republicans would stop pretending their "Leaders" really care about all "The People".

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
20. The Rethugs just hate the attention this book is getting.
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 10:01 AM
Apr 2014

It counters their central core ideology regarding economics. This will be the perfect issue to focus on during the 2014 and 2016 elections. If we can convince the ignorant masses that trickle-down is bogus.. then the Republicans are finished.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
22. The problem with "Trickle down does/doesn't work" is defining "works".
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 10:13 AM
Apr 2014

The argument goes round in circles, because we don't define success. Republicans see supply side as being very successful because it concentrates wealth in the hands of their owners. It's been fabulously successful for them. They will never admit what their goal is, and as long as we let the discussion hover around "does/doesn't work", the middle class and poor suffer.

My opinion, agree that it works to increase income disparity. Agree that it works to destroy the middle class. Tie the lead weight of Supply Side economics around the Republicans neck and kick them overboard.

 

toby jo

(1,269 posts)
27. What's their dodge?
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 11:02 AM
Apr 2014

They've had one for 30 years.

What I hear from righties at work is: 'chico and bubba are stealing from us'. Doesn't compare to what 'the man' stole, but that never enters the equation.

Never.

So the dodge is ignorance.

If we make this a national campaign, have everybody repeat it, billboard it, commercialize it, we can break through their defenses. Book's a bomb ( good one ) Heave fucking ho.

geretogo

(1,281 posts)
32. Trickle down has always worked for the short term for a few up until the the start of wide spread
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 01:31 PM
Apr 2014

violence and up rising from the proletariat , then peace and prosperity for a while and then the cycle
starts over again . So goes history .

BlueEye

(449 posts)
36. I have both Warren's book and Piketty's
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 02:22 PM
Apr 2014

"Capital" on my summer reading list. I understand the latter is fairly dense, at 700 pages. Should be a good time.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
41. Obama has said it 500 times, at least
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 05:01 PM
Apr 2014

Over the years, at all the economic talks he's given around the country, he always has brought it up. Just for the record.

It always goes something like this:

"Top-down economics doesn't work," President Obama told an adoring crowd this September in Virginia Beach. "We don't need to double down on the same trickle-down policies that got us into this mess in the first place," he continued.


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/12/16/obama039s_trickle-down_economics_297984.html



Trickle down economics, the conservative theory embraced by Ronald Reagan and virtually every conservative since, “doesn’t work,” Obama declared. And even as conservatives have clung to the idea in the face of overwhelming evidence against it, “it has never worked,” Obama added:

Now, just as there was in Teddy Roosevelt’s time, there’s been a certain crowd in Washington for the last few decades who respond to this economic challenge with the same old tune. “The market will take care of everything,” they tell us. If only we cut more regulations and cut more taxes – especially for the wealthy – our economy will grow stronger. Sure, there will be winners and losers. But if the winners do really well, jobs and prosperity will eventually trickle down to everyone else. And even if prosperity doesn’t trickle down, they argue, that’s the price of liberty.

It’s a simple theory – one that speaks to our rugged individualism and healthy skepticism of too much government. And that theory fits well on a bumper sticker. Here’s the problem: It doesn’t work. It has never worked. It didn’t work when it was tried in the decade before the Great Depression. It’s not what led to the incredible post-war boom of the 50s and 60s. And it didn’t work when we tried it during the last decade.


http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/12/06/383348/trickle-down-economics-doesnt-work-obama-asserts-in-economic-speech/



The Wizard

(12,545 posts)
44. Trickle down
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 09:30 PM
Apr 2014

Golden parachutes for the wealthy elites who make the laws and golden showers for the working class. No thanks.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
45. You only find dispair if you are invested to the concept of never ending growth....
Sun Apr 27, 2014, 12:51 AM
Apr 2014

Instead of a sustainable balance that meets the needs of life on this rock.

Populist_Prole

(5,364 posts)
52. What a concise summation
Sun Apr 27, 2014, 02:22 PM
Apr 2014

That's why those so consumed with getting ever more and more are never happy, no matter how much they've got.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
53. Right, to them, there is no "excess"....
Sun Apr 27, 2014, 02:54 PM
Apr 2014

Case in point:



While you might be struggling to pay the electric bill, they are convinced their shit don't stink.

Populist_Prole

(5,364 posts)
55. Is that Rush Limpball's bathroom?
Sun Apr 27, 2014, 03:05 PM
Apr 2014



Seriously though, I am constantly chided by both my money obsessed right-wing father and his friends for my desire to work just enough to live reasonably well rather than constantly hustle for more money or more status. My attitude is incomprehensible to them.

A little missive I've read that describes my feeling perfectly:

Once a fisherman was sitting near seashore, under the shadow of a tree smoking his beedi. Suddenly a rich businessman passing by approached him and enquired as to why he was sitting under a tree smoking and not working. To this the poor fisherman replied that he had caught enough fishes for the day.

Hearing this the rich man got angry and said: Why don’t you catch more fishes instead of sitting in shadow wasting your time?

Fisherman asked: What would I do by catching more fishes?

Businessman: You could catch more fishes, sell them and earn more money, and buy a bigger boat.

Fisherman: What would I do then?

Businessman: You could go fishing in deep waters and catch even more fishes and earn even more money.

Fisherman: What would I do then?

Businessman: You could buy many boats and employ many people to work for you and earn even more money.

Fisherman: What would I do then?

Businessman: You could become a rich businessman like me.

Fisherman: What would I do then?

Businessman: You could then enjoy your life peacefully.

Fisherman: What do you think I’m doing right now?
 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
57. Mine is, "Those who rail the loudest about the work ethic,...
Sun Apr 27, 2014, 03:40 PM
Apr 2014

....dream of becoming rich so they'll never have to work again."

Response to applegrove (Original post)

BelgianMadCow

(5,379 posts)
56. That, and the up-trickled moneyed elite is largely hereditary
Sun Apr 27, 2014, 03:21 PM
Apr 2014

or so I have read in a review, because it's major league sold out here - and at Amazon. I'm ordering a copy.

 

Nanjing to Seoul

(2,088 posts)
63. What a godless, un-American commie! Doesn't this Liberal harpie know that giving money
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 08:09 AM
Apr 2014

to the top in huge amounts always trickles down? It's like a loaf of bread with 25 slices. The upper 1% can eat 24 of them, loan the rest to the bottom 99% and tell them to be happy with the crumbs.

Seriously. . .if we started saying Republican ideas don't work, the entire American system of government would collapse.

BTW, massive sarcasm here

 

HenryWallace

(332 posts)
64. Changing naritive
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 09:43 AM
Apr 2014

The statement “doesn’t work” isn’t strong enough.

The direct implication of the book is that unrestrained capitalism naturally leads to a less free and just society.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
71. Just 4 words
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 05:52 AM
Apr 2014

GET OUT THE VOTE

Start telling people now to vote their local GOP sock puppet out. Tell them to read Picketty, tell them to imagine the USA without the new healthcare ...

... and most of all start working now!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Elizabeth Warren Si...