Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 12:15 PM Apr 2014

Update: "Haas v Romney" Racketeering Lawsuit. Grim Reaper Coming

On October 18, 2013, yours truly filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles federal court (Central Division) against Willard Mitt Romney, Bain Capital, Goldman Sachs and cohort attorneys/executives. The case evidence chiefly arises from public docket records and federal archives that are beyond contestation. Be that as it may, it matters Not, how much proof one has, when you are an insignificant and they are some of THE most powerful persons and entities on the planet.

As was foretold by naysayers and supporters alike;
the powers that be would come to bare to shut down this case.

For those who care to look at the evidence, it is easy to gain their support for the cause and instill outrage. However, that's not easy to do; because they (Romney & gang) have done much wrong and yours truly is not an attorney at law who failed English )(and hence, can't tell the story as it must be told). So, here we are, more than 180 days into the heretofore civil war that has turned into a RICO case. Where the insignificant amoeba versus a horde of tyrannical Goliath's tries as he may, to seek justice. Unfortunately (said to say) the case has begun to fray.

As was documented by PoliticusUSA.com's Rmuse - Romney fled Bain Capital to avoid prosecution. You can see the details of the story concerning Rmuse's pic below, titled "Public Records Reveal Romney Profited from Fraud, Corruption and Racketeering at Bain".

Rmuse also has other articles about this subject, like;

"Tell the DoJ to Investigate Romney's Serial Frauds"

AND

"Post Election Romney & Bain Face Federal Corruption Perjury Probe"

Remaining a troubling matter is the fact that there's NEVER any investigation into Romney & Bain. If they did, those two would go down rather swiftly. Evidence abounds of Mitt Romney's bad faith and his desire to be "retroactively" retired from Bain Capital in August 2001 - back to February 11, 1999. Mitt lied on his federal election Campaign finance 278 OGE Form.

But it is okay to lie, if your Mitt RMoney guy!
[br]



[br]
[hr]

Right now, a hearing is scheduled for June 2, 2012, on - whether or not - the court will dismiss the case against Romney and gang. Meanwhile, yours truly has filed a Motion to Reconsider
; because the Judge (for now) has dismissed the case against Romney/Bain law firm and executives, MNAT, Greg Werkheiser and Barry Gold.

It's a simple fact that Romney & his gang can never permit this case to go to trial (nor can Goldman Sachs); because they've done everything I've alleged. There's even no question of culpability. MNAT law firm and Paul Traub's law firm, already confessed supplication of erroneous affidavits to the court.

There's only the question of accountability.

You can read more about the cases intertwined in this at Wall Street Journal 2005 (here), Rolling Stone Taibbi 2012 (here), New York Times 2013 (here), Rmuse's "Meet the Man Battling Romney Bain 12 years" (here). Addicting Info Nathan's (well researched) story "Romney Slapped with Racketeering".

Plus, Ann Werner of Liberals Unite stories;

"Mitt Romney Sued for Racketeering in Federal Court"

and Ann Werner's followup story (updates)

"Update Federal Racketeering Lawsuit Mitt Romney"

Ann Werner has the following quotes of my saga - that;

{Laser} Haas owns Collateral Logistics, Inc. (CLI) and was assigned to handle the liquidation of eToys and asserts that in that capacity he discovered evidence of perjury and multiple frauds. As an executive of eToys, Haas was required to report what he found to the estate managers and attorneys. Failure to do so would have been punishable by being fined and/or imprisoned for up to three years. In his affidavit, Haas states that not only were the misdeeds he reported ignored but “the bad faith parties were given the keys to the vaults they were fleecing and the promise by the police to be willfully blind.”


[br]
And Ann Werner points out my affidavit states to the court that;

[br]
His {Laser Haas's} affidavit goes on to say:


As wind down coordinator of the eToys liquidations, my company, Collateral Logistics, Inc., and I were the court appointed fiduciaries to keep everything kosher and “maximize returns with minimum expense” in eToys. When Bain Capital had announced they were buying the entire estate of eToys for $5.4 million, we halted the auction and forced them to pay tens of millions of dollars more.

That is when they offered me an $850,000 bribe and I told them no! This caused a panic in their ranks, because I reported the bribe to the Delaware Department of Justice. Who informed this layman that it was not really a bribe – until accepted.

[br][hr][br]

As yours truly keeps telling Romney's counsels - "you guys need everyone to be on bended knee to the lord"

"and Laser Haas only needs 1 honorable public servant willing - To Do Their Job"


Here's my Motion to Reconsider the Court's decision to give Romney, Bain, Goldman Sachs crony attorney's a walk.

It clearly was an error to dismiss the case against them;
based upon the 1881 case of Barton v Barbour

http://petters-fraud.com/clocked_april21_di_77_motion_to_reconsider_mnat_gold_dismissal.pdf


Please Stay Tuned.
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Update: "Haas v Romney" Racketeering Lawsuit. Grim Reaper Coming (Original Post) laserhaas Apr 2014 OP
I'm too poor to be able to "POLL"; but - Please VOTE. Is Mitt Romney above the law - Yes or No? laserhaas Apr 2014 #1
dismiss on what grounds? leftyohiolib Apr 2014 #2
Judge granted dismissal against MNAT and Barry Gold on the "Barton" doctrine case of 1881 laserhaas Apr 2014 #3
thankyou leftyohiolib Apr 2014 #4
Your welcome. - It really is this simple. Romney/Bain STOLE our eToys company laserhaas Apr 2014 #6
good luck to you leftyohiolib Apr 2014 #8
Thanks laserhaas Apr 2014 #10
Well there's that, and.... jberryhill Apr 2014 #9
Judge can simply find some other reason - if he wants to REALLY get rid of case. laserhaas Apr 2014 #5
K & R !!! WillyT Apr 2014 #7
appreciate that "WillyT" laserhaas Apr 2014 #11
You Are Quite Welcome !!! WillyT Apr 2014 #18
Mitt Romney's a Haas-Been Blue Owl Apr 2014 #12
If only pscot Apr 2014 #13
Concur 'pscot' laserhaas Apr 2014 #15
I wouldn't bet on that - laserhaas Apr 2014 #14
Keep fighting the good fight neffernin Apr 2014 #16
Thanks 'neffernin'. laserhaas Apr 2014 #17
Good luck laserhaas! I hope you nail the bastard! Scuba Apr 2014 #19
As a matter of law, ive got them laserhaas Apr 2014 #20
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
1. I'm too poor to be able to "POLL"; but - Please VOTE. Is Mitt Romney above the law - Yes or No?
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 12:20 PM
Apr 2014

He has been -

thus far!
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
3. Judge granted dismissal against MNAT and Barry Gold on the "Barton" doctrine case of 1881
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 12:44 PM
Apr 2014

It's a 130 year old case that is much argued about; but was settled by the National Bankruptcy Review Commission.

Barton case of 1881 simply states (like trying to sue judge for a bad decision) you Can't sue a trustee (doing court works). However, all the Circuits (including the 9th and 3rd Circuits) said that Barton does NOT apply to willful misconduct and gross negligence.

In this case we have massive willful misconduct;
and gross negligence unfathomable.

As you can see in my brief/rebuttal (Motion for Reconsideration),
it is easy to prove that the Standard is (whether or not) there was intent
(willful misconduct/gross negligence)

In our eToys case - they already confessed "INTENT".

http://petters-fraud.com/clocked_april21_di_77_motion_to_reconsider_mnat_gold_dismissal.pdf

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
6. Your welcome. - It really is this simple. Romney/Bain STOLE our eToys company
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 12:48 PM
Apr 2014

Because the attorneys working for eToys and the Creditors

(SECRETLY)


worked for Goldman Sachs and Bain Capital.
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
9. Well there's that, and....
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 12:58 PM
Apr 2014

....the Complaint reading like a Dr. Bronner's soap label doesn't help much either.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
5. Judge can simply find some other reason - if he wants to REALLY get rid of case.
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 12:46 PM
Apr 2014

HOWEVER;

I'm betting that this Court can be cajoled to see the light.

Yours truly just has to tell the story Better.

KISS

Separate it to one crimes issue at a time.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
15. Concur 'pscot'
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 01:39 PM
Apr 2014

Word is - Mitt ain't done yet.

He's networking around;
and making many more "friends".

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
14. I wouldn't bet on that -
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 01:38 PM
Apr 2014

There's more going on with his plans for 2016- than meets the eye.

If he and his get away with all these crimes;
do you think he's simply going to retire

and stop doing wrong?

neffernin

(275 posts)
16. Keep fighting the good fight
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 02:10 PM
Apr 2014

People like you are the reason there's been any progress in this country in the past 200 years. If people haven't been fighting for fairness, win or lose, our society would be closer to feudalism*.

(Closer than it already is)

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
17. Thanks 'neffernin'.
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 04:08 PM
Apr 2014

We haven't lost this civil war yet.

And - they have suffered some (civil) casualties.

The truth is a wonderful soldier.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
20. As a matter of law, ive got them
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 02:10 PM
Apr 2014

But tjis case is an issue of money, power, might makes. Right versus the Truth.

They have stolen much money and therefore have much power; but

I,ve gotMuch proof of wrong doings

Very Much

Including Confessions

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Update: "Haas v Romn...