General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Day Free Speech Died : F.C.C., in a Shift, Backs Fast Lanes for Web Traffic
WASHINGTON The principle that all Internet content should be treated equally as it flows through cables and pipes to consumers looks all but dead.
The Federal Communications Commission said on Wednesday that it would propose new rules that allow companies like Disney, Google or Netflix to pay Internet service providers like Comcast and Verizon for special, faster lanes to send video and other content to their customers.
The proposed changes would affect what is known as net neutrality the idea that no providers of legal Internet content should face discrimination in providing offerings to consumers, and that users should have equal access to see any legal content they choose.
The proposal comes three months after a federal appeals court struck down, for the second time, agency rules intended to guarantee a free and open Internet.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/24/technology/fcc-new-net-neutrality-rules.html?_r=0
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)They cannot have the proles actually learning anything.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)business....
I can't say here what I will do.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)LONDON- European lawmakers approved new rules on Thursday aimed at guaranteeing equal access to the internet and cutting cellphone charges across the 28- member European Union.
The lawmakers also made it mandatory for mobile phone companies to comply with rules to phase out roaming costs when consumers use cellphones in other European Union countries by the end of next year.
'This vote is the EU delivering for citizens ", Neelie Kroes, the European commissioner responsible for telecommunications said in a statement on Thursday. "This is what the EU is all about - getting rid of barriers to make life easier and less expensive."
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/04/business/international/eu-lawmakers-approve-tough-net-neutrality-rules.html
Response to octoberlib (Reply #4)
dixiegrrrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
moondust
(19,991 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)This is an area of the law which I have little experience so if I am wrong correct away.'
However a few months ago the dc circuit ruled isps are not common carriers. They are to be regulated in accordance with that ruling and existing law, so the FCC has made the regulations in accordance with the law.
The solution is to change the law.
Not likely to happen, but this is the rule of law at work, no?
politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)pa28
(6,145 posts)On Wednesday, the chairman laid out a plan for preserving the Open Internet after a federal appeals court struck down the rules last month.
As part of this new strategy, Wheeler said the FCC will not ask the federal appeals court to re-examine its decision in which the rules were thrown out. Instead, the agency will write brand-new rules using a different legal basis that was affirmed by the court's decision.
http://www.cnet.com/news/fcc-to-rewrite-net-neutrality-rules/
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)pa28
(6,145 posts)Two months ago chairman Wheeler committed to re-writing the rules around a different legal basis to preserve net neutrality.
Now we see he did the opposite and produced a new policy that simply conforms to the ruling.
In other words the promises to protect neutrality were bullshit and the public is going to take yet another shearing from a lobbyist-run government agency.