General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI doubt most people have much of a notion of science one way or another
Last edited Tue Apr 22, 2014, 04:19 PM - Edit history (2)
We always see polling on whether people think the world was created 6,000 years ago or came into being 13,600,000,000 years ago.
To most folks those are both just really long spans of time that can be summed up as "forever ago."
The belief that the world is only a few thousand years old is not actually deeply stupid until you contextualize it somehow. Think through, scientifically, what that would mean if true. Absent context, it is merely a wrong answer.
So much of the national "denial" of science is probably better described as indifference to science. To deny something one would have to know something about it to even get to the level of denial.
But folks who cling to scientific absurdity despite knowing the objections (scientific creationism, for example) are just nuts.
It is fine to think that Noah put all the species of animals on the Ark as long as you don't have a good sense of how many species of animal there are. (And thus always were! No evolution.)
It is only when you know how many species there are and then try to rationalize ways for the Ark to hold them all that it becomes lunacy. (Versus indifference and ignorance.)
Silent3
(15,246 posts)RainDog
(28,784 posts)This impacts the level of science education in this nation, if you compare science literacy in the US to other western nations.
The reason so many Americans don't believe the earth is 4.5 billion years old is b/c of the influence of religious stupidity throughout American culture.
It has to do with competing narratives.
Religion doesn't require facts in order to propagandize people - and the negative effects of this propaganda are woven throughout American culture - our politics included.
The worst thing for any American, in terms of education, is exposure to religious fundamentalism as an approved view of life.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)It's catharsis. He absorbs their dread with his narrative. Because of this, he's effective in proportion to the amount of certainty he can project. Certain linguistic anthropologists think that religion is a language virus that rewrites pathways in the brain. Dulls critical thinking."
- Rustin Cohle, True Detective
RainDog
(28,784 posts)Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)since this seems inspired by my "where is the line between woo and bad science? Is Pradaxa woo?" thread.
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)FarCenter
(19,429 posts)cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)fixed.
pnwmom
(108,987 posts)everything in school, or retains everything they were taught.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)But using an ancient mythical story to prove modern science?
Seems pretty lame.